Why is it that a short haired woman is more socially acceptable than a man wearing high heels?
bodaishinboy
2012/07/02 01:16:56
I have seen countless pictures of women with short hair who are hailed for their beauty or fashion forwardness. While men who would dare to deviate from the mold risk being ostracized. It is generally accepted that women don't have buzz cuts and men don't wear high heels. So why is it that when women stray from the norm no one really bats an eye. Point and case, no one would accuse the woman pictured of being a lesbian (I don't think), but for the guy many might question his sexual preference. Any takers on why?
I personally love the guy's style minus the hand bag, but that aside I'd
rock that look all day, and as for the woman, I think she beautiful and
were I single, I would jump at the opportunity to date her.
To me, they both have an equal degree of deviation from what is typically socially acceptable for appearance.


I personally love the guy's style minus the hand bag, but that aside I'd
rock that look all day, and as for the woman, I think she beautiful and
were I single, I would jump at the opportunity to date her.
To me, they both have an equal degree of deviation from what is typically socially acceptable for appearance.


















Women have had short hair as an option at various places and times throughout history, several of which predates the abolition of slavery in the United States alone.
Case and point.
High heels on the other hand are traditionally women's wear. I could see men in some kind of platform type shoe. I mean really, if a guy wants to wear high heels who am I to try to stop him. He should do what he wants.
sorry dude
The point being made here is that the inverse could be said as well. And finally thanks for elaborating on your opinion.
while a man just looks camp and silly in women's clothing.