Quantcast

Why Is H&M Designing Skirts for Men?

I mean no offense to skirt-wearing men. If you enjoy wearing skirts, lots of power to you. You're also probably from Scotland. But if not, that's cool, totally cool. I'm not saying men in skirts aren't awesome; I'm just saying you're going to have a tough time finding a man who wants to put a skirt on. In public, anyway.

But H & M must be confident men want to wear skirts, and not just in private. They're including a men's skirt in their Spring/Summer 2010 collection. For the USA. My question is, how the heck can H & M expect to sell skirts to men in America? It's H & M. Yes, everyone loves Marc Jacobs in a skirt (well, some people do); but do you know any men who would actually pick up on this style cue?

H & M is for the common man here in America. You can be fashionable in H & M, but most people who shop there are not totally into super high-style and aren't looking to break any style barriers. H & M is about fashion with an edge, but it generally doesn't go overboard. H & M is not Marc Jacobs and it doesn't have the same customers.

Skirts are the scariest of H & M's 2010 men's fashions, but there are other scary pieces as well. Pieces that include lots of fringe, over-sized tie-dye scarves, too-small faded denim vests, Moroccan-inspired tunics, and more.

Perhaps the worst part of the whole skirt fiasco is what the model is wearing along with the skirt: a pair of tights. Find me a man who will wear a skirt and a pair of tights, and, well, I'm pretty sure you can't. H & M is totally setting themselves up for failure with the upcoming season's line for men. I have a feeling men are going to be running as far from H & M as they can get.

Read more: http://hypebeast.com/2009/11/hm-2010-spring-collec...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • Richard January 30, 2010 13:36:26
    Richard
    +3
    It's about the money – puting men in skirts in your collection has two effects it gets your name in the press for being cutting edge and it makes the image of a man in a skirt more recognisably mainstream.

    The current costs of selling skirts for men are minimal because the initial take up will be small and the costs will be well covered from the advertising budget given the media exposure – look at your article - H&M; get free exposure.

    There are close to five hundred million men in Europe and America who only wear pants.

    Skirts and trousers are not completely interchangeable women tend to wear pants when doing practical things. Thus when a man buys a skirt he will still buy nearly as many pants. That means skirts for men is an almost completely untapped market. A 0.1% take-up, or one in a thousand, men wearing skirts represents half a million sales or at $50 each or $25 million. At a 5% take-up or, one in twenty, men that's $1.25 billion dollars of new market.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Charles September 06, 2010 15:46:43
    Charles
    Greeks wear tights under a pleated skirt. Bicycles are another case of the cult of invented sex differences knowing no bounds. There "have to be sex differences" in many things! Few girls wear skirts, fewer still wear them on a bike--they don't need the extra space on bike. Boys bikes are made so as to do maximum damage to them with the high crossbar in case of accident. Traditionalists are so oppressively stupid! The dip down style is best for both sexes, and the campaign to differentiate so many things by sex goes far beyond what's necessary for distinguishing gender. Voice--build--distribution of body hair--is ALL that's needed! See pdf at non-commercial site dfwseekwoman.net for history of how men always historically wore skirts, and the persecution of women in pants beginning in 1853 and lasting to the present. That's me in the skirt! history historically wore skirts persecution women pants 1853 lasting skirt
  • martinus February 22, 2010 00:55:23
    martinus
    Mike224; the mainstream is already here, but skirts for men not for the crowd, and that make the difference.
    If everybody would turn into skirted we would have the same like today: Uniformed men.
  • mara February 10, 2010 01:53:28
    mara
    Susie, Detroit Metro Area. And I know I daily skirt wearer very well, it's a teacher. And he has no problems at all.
  • Susie A... mara February 10, 2010 02:14:26
    Susie Anderson
    Great! I think that's awesome.... I wish more guys would try it out.
  • mara Susie A... February 14, 2010 17:45:18
    mara
    Thanks, Susie. Yes, I agree, I also would see more guys skirted. The world would be much more colorful.
  • Charles Susie A... September 06, 2010 23:06:22
    Charles
    Women are wearing every type of trouser but men are often told they "have to wear a kilt" if they want a skirt. I immediately rejected that as short sighted but chose the second best known ethnic "male skirt" the fustanella seen in previous post. Viva variety. Being freed from tradition only to be limited by another tradition is senseless. fustanella previous post viva variety freed tradition limited tradition senseless
  • martinus February 06, 2010 01:35:52
    martinus
    Susie, I don't where you live but it is going to happen because in our area already some men wearing skirts daily. Even teachers and physicians. And everybody likes this guys.
  • Susie A... martinus February 06, 2010 04:28:40
    Susie Anderson
    Oooh where do you live??
  • Richard January 30, 2010 13:36:26
    Richard
    +3
    It's about the money – puting men in skirts in your collection has two effects it gets your name in the press for being cutting edge and it makes the image of a man in a skirt more recognisably mainstream.

    The current costs of selling skirts for men are minimal because the initial take up will be small and the costs will be well covered from the advertising budget given the media exposure – look at your article - H&M; get free exposure.

    There are close to five hundred million men in Europe and America who only wear pants.

    Skirts and trousers are not completely interchangeable women tend to wear pants when doing practical things. Thus when a man buys a skirt he will still buy nearly as many pants. That means skirts for men is an almost completely untapped market. A 0.1% take-up, or one in a thousand, men wearing skirts represents half a million sales or at $50 each or $25 million. At a 5% take-up or, one in twenty, men that's $1.25 billion dollars of new market.
  • ThinkAboutIt! January 24, 2010 04:58:25
    ThinkAboutIt!
    I have to agree with Susie. Although I would not have a problem wearing a skirt, is an undergarment required?
  • Charles ThinkAb... September 16, 2010 04:46:32
    Charles
    Only if you need support while running (what do track athletes know that some Scots seem to not know?) Going without underwear is called "regimental," it's unnecessary risk of soiling a garment. It only takes one time, and some kilts do cost hundreds of $$$. Why not protect it?
  • mara January 23, 2010 21:45:53
    mara
    +1
    Interesting but not a new idea that men wearing skirts. I see more and more and I have to admit they are looking very good. Looks like that this guys I saw were really proud about wearing something different.
    I don't think that H&M; will sell men's skirts in all their stores because I heard that they decided to sell them only in "trend-stores".
    In case of common man in America: I think men have to change and have to get out their "common-view-cage"; we have to learn that men should be treated like a stereotyped 'somebody' but more an individual. I believe that men deserve the same access to finery as women. "They are no less beautiful creatures and they are no less deserving of a wide range of clothing in which to express their style. We've come to accept that men's sense of style comes down to their shirt, cuff links and tie, and it is an utterly ridiculous concept at the best of times." And fortunately, skirts can look just as good on men as they do on women. So, let's just go with open mind to a new area of understanding and accepting.
  • martinus January 23, 2010 00:55:55
    martinus
    +1
    Probably we are further than you think. I am a daily skirt (and kilts are skirts) wearer because of a medical issue so I have to wear support-hose. The reactions from women and men are really refreshing, very nice and positive. Never had a bad comment, everybody loves this change. Just 2 hours ago a middle-aged man asked me where he can get such nice skirts [it was a kilt-styled pleated skirt, 1/2 inch above knee) after he commented: "I love your outfit".
    Any questions?
  • Funguy January 22, 2010 23:19:39
    Funguy
    +1
    It sounds brilliant to me at last the chance to wear a skirt designed for me (I'm not Scottish!)
  • Conveyician January 22, 2010 02:53:40
    Conveyician
    I am not even going to get started on this. The storm is coming.
  • Charles Conveyi... September 16, 2010 17:30:28
    Charles
    Review commentary in the New York Times archives, 1853-1881 especially, then the bicycle craze of the1890's that also failed to overcome social resistance to women in pants, and up to just before WWI when only one woman in NY state was wearing pants in public--Mary Walker, a Civil War medico who was reduced to tears by lecture from male general berating her for wearing pants. All objections to men in skirts have absolutely exact parellels to objections against women in pants in times gone by. Both styles are sex neutral due to NO anatomical difference. Terms like "crossdressing" are constructed to contravene personal automony, without which personal freedom is seriously abridged.
  • mike224 January 20, 2010 04:32:37
    mike224
    It looks like an experiment.
    If you could get over the hump, plenty of men would be wearing skirts.
    It looks like there isn't enough pressure to get over the hump. They would need more companies and more than one or two skirts. Pity. It would have been a paradigm shift in apparel that I would have been around to see.
  • Susie A... mike224 January 20, 2010 04:42:42
    Susie Anderson
    Gosh, I would love to see that. But I just don't think it will happen. At least not in my lifetime (and I'm pretty young).
  • mike224 Susie A... January 20, 2010 05:35:40
    mike224
    Yeah, it would have to start with some serious mainstream attention, and people would have to really try to pull it off. I doubt we'll see it.

    Besides, they'd have to start manufacturing mens' bikes with women's frames. :-P
  • martinus mike224 March 29, 2010 01:48:06
    martinus
    What's the difference between men's and women's bikes? The frame, means the "body". Nobody cares in reality who is riding the bike because they are only constructed for best using.
    The same with men and women's bodies, they are different. But the clothes can be the same - see example bike.
    I would love to see more men in skirts.

About Me

Susie Anderson

Susie Anderson

United States

December 22, 2009 00:41:05

View complete profile

The Latest From SodaHead

Living

Food