First I just wanna say that I love you for listening to Depeche Mode. Second, I'd have to say that my own personal jesus would probably be my family, mainly because no matter what, they are there for me and love me like no other.
How could the dude be from Nazareth when it didnt exist untill around the 2nd century??? That was a fill in to make the fairy tale more plauseable... Lying for God is acceptable... LMAO
The bible is not good to use to validate it,,, Excuse your ignorance.. Just because the bible says so, doesnt make it true... Go do some freaking research outside the bible m maybe you weill cease being so stupid, as to believe what you read in the fairy tale book..
If you actually read the bible, you'll find a large number of contradictions ( a list here) but in addition to this, the bible is actually wrong. To be clear, I mean not factual, invented, incorrect, not true, a fiction - however you want to say it. Now there may be parts that are right. For example, there are some examples of good ethical thinking such as the exhortation to "give unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's and unto God the things that are God's". There are even some accurate historical facts - the Romans did occupy Israel in the time of Jesus and Jerusalem did exist at that time. But there are some major errors - including the fact that Nazareth does not exist. That's right, the birth place of Jesus could not have been Nazareth. "Jesus of Nazareth" is a fiction.
The Myth of Nazareth meticulously reviews the archaeology of the Nazareth basin from the Stone Age to the present, and shows that the settlement of Nazareth came into existence in the early second century C.E., well after the time of Chris...
The bible is not good to use to validate it,,, Excuse your ignorance.. Just because the bible says so, doesnt make it true... Go do some freaking research outside the bible m maybe you weill cease being so stupid, as to believe what you read in the fairy tale book..
If you actually read the bible, you'll find a large number of contradictions ( a list here) but in addition to this, the bible is actually wrong. To be clear, I mean not factual, invented, incorrect, not true, a fiction - however you want to say it. Now there may be parts that are right. For example, there are some examples of good ethical thinking such as the exhortation to "give unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's and unto God the things that are God's". There are even some accurate historical facts - the Romans did occupy Israel in the time of Jesus and Jerusalem did exist at that time. But there are some major errors - including the fact that Nazareth does not exist. That's right, the birth place of Jesus could not have been Nazareth. "Jesus of Nazareth" is a fiction.
The Myth of Nazareth meticulously reviews the archaeology of the Nazareth basin from the Stone Age to the present, and shows that the settlement of Nazareth came into existence in the early second century C.E., well after the time of Christ. In this study René Salm reviews all the structural and movable evidence from the first excavations in the late 19th century to the most recent reports. This review also encompasses the extensive secondary literature, found in books and reference articles in dictionaries and encyclopedias. Salm shows that traditional conclusions found in all these works regarding the settlement of Nazareth are radically inconsistent with the itemized evidence in the ground.
Damn the bible said this jesus died before he was 50, or somewhere there abouts, most people interpret it was more around the age of 34 or 35, the crap in the book is so obscure no one can peice the fairy tail together accurately..
If this Jesus was from Nazareth he had to have lived at least 200 years.. LMAO
Again get your nose out of the bible and read some history.. or you will stay ignorant all your life....
If you actually read the bible, you'll find a large number of contradictions ( a list here) but in addition to this, the bible is actually wrong. To be clear, I mean not factual, invented, incorrect, not true, a fiction - however you want to say it. Now there may be parts that are right. For example, there are some examples of good ethical thinking such as the exhortation to "give unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's and unto God the things that are God's". There are even some accurate historical facts - the Romans did occupy Israel in the time of Jesus and Jerusalem did exist at that time. But there are some major errors - including the fact that Nazareth does not exist. That's right, the birth place of Jesus could not have been Nazareth. "Jesus of Nazareth" is a fiction.
The Myth of Nazareth meticulously reviews the archaeology of the Nazareth basin from the Stone Age to the present, and shows that the settlement of Nazareth came into existence in the early second century C.E., well after the time of Chris...
If you actually read the bible, you'll find a large number of contradictions ( a list here) but in addition to this, the bible is actually wrong. To be clear, I mean not factual, invented, incorrect, not true, a fiction - however you want to say it. Now there may be parts that are right. For example, there are some examples of good ethical thinking such as the exhortation to "give unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's and unto God the things that are God's". There are even some accurate historical facts - the Romans did occupy Israel in the time of Jesus and Jerusalem did exist at that time. But there are some major errors - including the fact that Nazareth does not exist. That's right, the birth place of Jesus could not have been Nazareth. "Jesus of Nazareth" is a fiction.
The Myth of Nazareth meticulously reviews the archaeology of the Nazareth basin from the Stone Age to the present, and shows that the settlement of Nazareth came into existence in the early second century C.E., well after the time of Christ. In this study René Salm reviews all the structural and movable evidence from the first excavations in the late 19th century to the most recent reports. This review also encompasses the extensive secondary literature, found in books and reference articles in dictionaries and encyclopedias. Salm shows that traditional conclusions found in all these works regarding the settlement of Nazareth are radically inconsistent with the itemized evidence in the ground.
Damn the bible said this jesus died before he was 50, or somewhere there abouts, most people interpret it was more around the age of 34 or 35, the crap in the book is so obscure no one can peice the fairy tail together accurately..
If this Jesus was from Nazareth he had to have lived at least 200 years.. LMAO
Again get your nose out of the bible and read some history.. or you will stay ignorant all your life....