Quantcast

When DID ignorance become a point of view?

Wilde~MoonChild ™ 2011/04/03 05:14:31
Related Topics: College, Education, Style
Ignorance has always been a point of view
After Bush part II
When Reagan cut civics from Education
Comment
Undecided
You!
Add Photos & Videos
From Palin to Bachmann and Snookie speaking at a COLLEGE, of all places.

When exactly did ignorance become a point of view... I mean REALLY?
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Brian ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮ 2012/07/23 15:33:33
    Ignorance has always been a point of view
    Brian ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮
    +1
    The very first time ANYONE used it to abscond with essential liberty.
  • Tim 2012/07/23 15:32:26
    Comment
    Tim
    +1
    Anytime Liberal Demonazi's are in charge. Ignorance is a point of view and Stupidity runs rampant !
  • BlondeA... Tim 2012/07/23 17:02:49
    BlondeAphrodite
    from your side
  • john Kills 2012/07/23 15:27:23
    Comment
    john Kills
    When dumbarses became the large majority.
  • frank 2012/07/23 15:26:00
    Undecided
    frank
    +3
    Ignorance and political correctness go hand in hand.
  • Wilde~M... frank 2012/07/23 16:12:20
    Wilde~MoonChild ™
    Hows that?
  • WankerBait 2012/07/23 15:25:14
    Ignorance has always been a point of view
    WankerBait
    for the uninformed, and keeping the masses uninformed has always been a tool used by religion and government to maintain control ...

    A current example is the Texas GOP's official party platform against teaching critical thinking skills in education:

    "We oppose the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (values clarification), critical thinking skills and similar programs that are simply a relabeling of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) (mastery learning) which focus on behavior modification and have the purpose of challenging the student's fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority."

    Welcome to Duhmerika ...
  • sherdon2 2012/07/23 15:21:16
    Comment
    sherdon2
    +1
    How is it a persons fault that they don't know everything? Our son is a Robotics Engineer and I'm certainly ignorant on that subject. We can all keep open minds and learn from each other and we can learn something new every day.Just because we don't agree with an others view doesn't make them ignorant and why do we always have to label others? OK...jumping off the soap box now.
  • JimTheGeek 2012/07/23 15:21:08
    Ignorance has always been a point of view
    JimTheGeek
    It is only recently, with the internet and sensationalism media that they've gotten any widespread attention. And now the ignorant have their own political party! The GAWP
  • bobdid 2012/07/23 15:14:56
    When Reagan cut civics from Education
    bobdid
    +1
    When our nation elected a President who confused movie scripts with reality the course was set. It was more important to be affable and avuncular than factually accurate, intelligent, or thoughtful. Action without thought was prized of thought before action and consideration. The national attention span first approached that of a fruit-fly. Intellect became a dirty word. This mindset set the stage for Quayle and "W". Guys you'd rather have a beer with than have them manage the repair of your dish washer.
  • raine 2012/07/23 15:14:24
    Comment
    raine
    +1
    Who knows. It isn't a point of view . An ignorant person can have his own point of view which may be ignorant to someone with better knowledge on the subject
  • Edwin 2012/07/23 15:03:42
    Ignorance has always been a point of view
    Edwin
    +1
    Remember the "Know Nothing" Party? It was an American political party in the mid-1800's. Interestingly, it has parallels to modern political extremism.

    The primary motivation of the Know Nothing Party was anti-immigration. Immigration (of German, Chinese, and Irish Catholic immigrants) was seen by some as damaging to the values of America. Steps were taken to try and limit immigration (which was MUCH less restrictive than it is now), but they did not meet with much success.

    A secondary motivation for the Know Nothings was a perception that politicians seemed unresponsive to the needs of 'real' Americans.

    They scored surprise victories in many states, and the mayor of Chicago even blocked immigrants from city jobs. Unfortunately for the Know Nothings in Illinois, Lincoln's political star was rising at that time and he kept them from gaining much real power.

    Ultimately, the issue of slavery split the Know Nothings (with the anti-slavery faction leaving the party).
  • Independent Thinker 2012/07/23 15:02:31
    Comment
    Independent Thinker
    +2
    Mmm....not everyone can know about everything. There is always a learning curve - ignorant question.

    One of my favorite quotes says it best. "Everyone is ignorant only on different topics" (Will Rogers).
  • sherdon2 Indepen... 2012/07/23 15:12:24
    sherdon2
    Agree..Have a Blessed Day!
  • engineer 2012/07/23 15:02:19
    Comment
    engineer
    Reagan and Bush mentioned above. Also since the media has given mostly one side through FOX, Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity, etc. The allowing of Clear Channel to legally purchase 1200 stations. All these people who listen have no idea of the truth, nor do they want to learn
  • bob h. 2012/07/23 15:00:10
    When Reagan cut civics from Education
    bob h.
    Dimmies need love too.
  • wale63 2012/07/23 14:50:39
    Comment
    wale63
    when YOU became a poster.
  • Wilde~M... wale63 2012/07/23 16:17:11
    Wilde~MoonChild ™
    ...... no need to be insulting.. If you are unable to give your opinion because its above your understanding, being rude really isn't a better option. It shows you have nothing to say
  • wale63 Wilde~M... 2012/07/25 02:29:17
    wale63
    Yes there is a need to be insulting as the person i was responding to was insulting in HIS statement as he has nothing of substance to say.
    Andy
  • Beverly 2012/07/23 14:46:26
    Ignorance has always been a point of view
    Beverly
    +1
    Actually it started when the Democrats let the Marxist take over their party. Then there are the Bobs out there that let us know ignorance is alive and roaring.
  • Wilde~M... Beverly 2012/07/23 16:17:59
    Wilde~MoonChild ™
    Define Marxist and then give an example....
  • Beverly Wilde~M... 2012/07/23 20:07:03
    Beverly
    Do your own homework. The definition is in Websters dictionary and once you read that you will see that Obama's policies fit with the definition to a t.
  • HenriLewkowiczhenri 2012/07/23 14:42:06
    After Bush part II
    HenriLewkowiczhenri
    +3
    it is a American illness ..as long as RELIGIONS will dominate American soil . the country will be producing massively Ignorant IDIOTS
  • mich52 2012/07/23 14:33:40
    When Reagan cut civics from Education
    mich52
    +3
    Most Cons. on this site live by ignorance and their lies...
  • Wilde~M... mich52 2012/07/23 16:18:55
    Wilde~MoonChild ™
    I asked this question last year... how in the world did it get back into the rotation?
  • mich52 Wilde~M... 2012/07/23 19:45:58
    mich52
    No idea, I don't know much about how this site works other then most Cons. hate opposing opinions...
  • Jim 2012/07/23 14:30:08 (edited)
    Ignorance has always been a point of view
    Jim
    +1
    It's been a point of view as long as there has been ignorant people. Blaming it totally on any one person or any one group of people is an example of ignorance.
  • Friday - Just the Facts 2012/07/23 14:29:26
    When Reagan cut civics from Education
    Friday - Just the Facts
    +6
    Ronald Regan the high saint of the Republican Party was actually a terrible president. Why he is held in such high regard by conservatives is laughable. Besides eliminating civics classes in schools across the country he was responsible for many other Bad & Ugly policy changes.
    Copied from an article: The Bad and the Ugly
    By Fabian on Tue Jun 08 2004 10:07 am

    It is amazing to me how people get a selective memory when speaking about those that have passed away. Case in point, President Reagan. He passed away this week, and from news reports, you would think that the man was Mother Teresa. I’ll concede the fact that he’s responsible for scaring the bejesus out of Gorbachev and ending the cold war, and he was a good public speaker, but he wasn’t a saint! Since it seems that the media outlets and the Republican spin machine will continue talking about the “good” of Reagan, let’s talk a little about the bad and the ugly, shall we?

    The Bad: Reaganomics. This so-called economic concept of Ronald Reagan was that if you cut taxes you would increase Federal Revenues since economic activity would increase. The increase in economic activity would bring with it increased Federal tax revenues. In other words the tax cut would be self liquidating and self paying since any lost revenues fo...




















    Ronald Regan the high saint of the Republican Party was actually a terrible president. Why he is held in such high regard by conservatives is laughable. Besides eliminating civics classes in schools across the country he was responsible for many other Bad & Ugly policy changes.
    Copied from an article: The Bad and the Ugly
    By Fabian on Tue Jun 08 2004 10:07 am

    It is amazing to me how people get a selective memory when speaking about those that have passed away. Case in point, President Reagan. He passed away this week, and from news reports, you would think that the man was Mother Teresa. I’ll concede the fact that he’s responsible for scaring the bejesus out of Gorbachev and ending the cold war, and he was a good public speaker, but he wasn’t a saint! Since it seems that the media outlets and the Republican spin machine will continue talking about the “good” of Reagan, let’s talk a little about the bad and the ugly, shall we?

    The Bad: Reaganomics. This so-called economic concept of Ronald Reagan was that if you cut taxes you would increase Federal Revenues since economic activity would increase. The increase in economic activity would bring with it increased Federal tax revenues. In other words the tax cut would be self liquidating and self paying since any lost revenues for the moment would almost immediately be made up by increased revenues in the future. It didn’t cost anything, therefore, to lower taxes and the economy would be stimulated to new heights.

    In truth, Reaganomics was a smoke screen for a hidden agenda. Taxes were cut, only in the first year of his presidency, to keep the American public happy while a plan to increase the national debt by $2.5 trillion was being concocted. What for? The United States systematically overspent on national defense to crush the Soviet Union since it was obvious they couldn’t keep up. It took Reaganomics only 8 years to increase the national debt from $1 trillion to about $3.5 trillion!

    Reaganomics Key Points:

    ■The national debt when Ronald Reagan took office was about $1 trillion. That included in it all the debt run up for the Revolutionary war, the Spanish-American war, the Civil war, World War I, World War II, the Korean war, the Vietnam war and all the Social wars of the 1930′s and subsequent years. In other words it took the United States from 1776 until 1980 or more than 200 years to accumulate a national debt of $1 trillion.

    ■Ronald Reagan left us a national debt of about $3.5 trillion or $3,500 billion.

    ■Given the spending habits established by the legacy of Ronald Reagan the national debt is now a little over $7 trillion!

    ■The interest cost on the national debt now runs about $318 billion a year! When Ronald Reagan took office they were about $53 billion a year.
    So, feel free to give Reagan props for ending the Cold War, but don’t perpetuate the myth of fabulous Reaganomics. The end of the Cold War came with a $2.5 trillion price tag attached to it, don’t try and tell us that it was free!

    The Ugly: the closing of mental health hospitals in California and across the United States. Is it any wonder that California seems to have all of the crazy homeless people? State mental hospitals were taken away by Governor Reagan in the seventies, and federal mental health programs were later taken away by President Reagan in the eighties.

    When Ronald Reagan was governor of California he systematically began closing down mental hospitals, later as president he would cut aid for federally-funded community mental health programs. It is not a coincidence that the homeless populations in the state of California grew in the seventies and eighties. The people were put out on the street when mental hospitals started to close all over the state.

    Seeing an increase in crime, and brutal murders by Herb Mullin, a mental hospital patient, the state legislature passed a law that would stop Reagan from closing even more state-funded mental health hospitals. But Reagan would not be outdone. In 1980, congress proposed new legislation (PL 96-398) called the community mental health systems act (crafted by Ted Kennedy), but the program was killed by newly-elected President Ronald Reagan. This action ended the federal community mental health centers (see timeline on this link) program and its funding.

    In closing, the next time you pass by a homeless person in downtown San Francisco screaming to themselves at the top of their lungs, remember Reagan. And if your kids need to go out and get jobs at age 9 to pay down the national debt, be sure to tell them that they can thank Ronald Reagan, and now President Bush, for their misfortune.
    (more)
  • mich52 Friday ... 2012/07/23 14:36:28
    mich52
    +3
    nailed it

    Excellant article..
  • Wilde~M... Friday ... 2012/07/23 16:20:45
    Wilde~MoonChild ™
    RR was one of the worst! I was young but my parents struggled the MOST under RR.
  • William Major 2012/07/23 14:28:39
  • bob h. William... 2012/07/23 15:08:04
    bob h.
    Very eloquent. But try for a sentence.
  • gynger.fyer 2012/07/23 14:27:23
    Ignorance has always been a point of view
    gynger.fyer
    +2
    But usually there was a smaller audience. Now that we have more forums and more people can afford access to those forums, we really are becoming aware of how ignorant people are. I think there is a direct correlation between those with poor impulse control and ignorant opinions being spouted. Thats my theory anyway. Think about it, most people spout off ignorance in a bid to be heard first. They have not fully taken the time to look at all angles of an argument. It's all emotion. So, 9 times out of 10 their opinions are a bunch of useless nonsense with only a modicum of truth mixed in.
  • Reichstolz 2012/07/23 14:21:08
    Ignorance has always been a point of view
    Reichstolz
    +1
    Without ignorance there would be no democratic party.
  • Alexander 2012/07/23 14:20:32
    Ignorance has always been a point of view
    Alexander
    +2
    Ignorant people express themselves whenever and wherever they can.
  • Reichstolz Alexander 2012/07/23 14:22:03
    Reichstolz
    Just like those who post these types of questions?
  • princessDGAF 2012/07/23 14:16:11
    Ignorance has always been a point of view
    princessDGAF
    +1
    Its a nasty side effect of this whole "freedom of speech" thing we have going on in this country. (and think about it....every opinion is ignorant to someone)
  • SW 2012/07/23 14:10:50
    When Reagan cut civics from Education
    SW
    +1
    When you're separating the good guys from the bad guys, the ones who cut civics from public education are which ones...
  • tdterry1999 2012/07/23 14:10:34
    Comment
    tdterry1999
    When they started letting you post.I'm pretty sure that's when it started.
  • sabre2th1 2012/07/23 14:08:11
    Comment
    sabre2th1
    July 4, 1776

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/05/22 18:57:03

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals