What's Uglier: Extreme High-Wasited Pants, or a High-Fashion Face Mask?
SodaHead Living
2012/05/08 21:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
264 votes
|
|
39% | |||
|
409 votes
|
|
61% | |||
When you think of high-waisted pants, you probably think of mom jeans, specifically, an infamous Jessica Simpson fashion faux pas. But fashion bloggers are going berserk over a pair of Viktor & Rolf high-waisted pants. And when we say high-waisted, we mean really high-waisted.


Heavy Browsing points out that the off-white pants were originally $1,495 at shopbop.com but now they're a relatively reasonable 50 percent off at $747.50. Sorry, did we just call them pants? These slacks look more like a strapless gown. In fact, they are described by Victor & Rolf as a Top Belt Jumpsuit, and they even come with a bandeau lining.
But wait -- we have something even more hideous to show you. At Fashion Week in Australia, a model for designer Magdalena Veleveska wore a hand-threaded face mask over her neon yellow lipstick, Yahoo! Shine reports. Hannibal Lecter, anyone? Which recent fashion fail is the ugliest?


Top Opinion
-
toxic_phantom 2012/05/09 01:08:12Extreme high-waisted pants






















Which one is completely stupid? The mask.
The other chick fell asleep in her kids toy box.
Plus they look unattractive and uncomfortable. I feel they have no waist at all, more a trouser dress. WEIRD I'M CONFUSED.....=/
High-WAISTED? Uhm, that's not her waist.. or anywhere near it.
but the face mast, I can't ever imagine wearing that anywhere, except MAYBE on hallows eve.