I recently came across this info and it led me to ask the question was jesus black
In a recent conversation, a friend casually said to me, “Well, you know Jesus was black, don’t you?” Needless to say, this led to a long conversation.
I researched this over 15 years ago, and did find that there is sufficient Biblical evidence to say that Jesus was indeed of mixed ancestry, including African. But whether or not that makes him “black” depends on whose definition you use.
Many have heard of the “black Madonna” and believe that to be a carryover from when everyone believed Jesus had African ancestors in his lineage. But that’s not “proof,” anymore than we can say it’s “proof” that Santa Claus is black because we saw a black Santa Claus last Christmas in Harlem.
Where is the proof? I have actually seen Old Testament quotes used to “prove” that Jesus was black. But you can’t use Old Testament quotes for proof, since those quotes were written before Jesus was born!
And you really can’t rely on the book of Daniel or the book of Revelation for proof of Jesus’ African ancestry either since those books are highly symbolic and prophetic and subject to diverse interpretations.
Many of the Old Testament quotes that are used to “prove” that Jesus is black are King James translations, and if you read from another Bible translation – such as the Lamsa Bible translated out of the Aramaic – there would be no “evidence” whatsoever there to suggest anything about Jesus being black.
The key to Jesus’ ancestry is to look at the genealogies listed in the Bible, specifically Luke 3: 23-31, and Matthew 1:1-17. Note carefully that most such lineages list only the male line, but there in these lineages (both a bit different, by the way), we are told of at least four of the women in Jesus’ genealogical line. These are Rehab, Ruth, Tamar, and Bathsheba. Rehab (also spelled Rahab) was a Canaanite. Tamar was probably a Canaanite. Bethsheba, often referred to as a Hittite, was more likely Japhethic, that is, not a descendant of Ham. (However, this is not clear). Ruth was in the line of Ham.
Now, who was Ham? Who were the Canaanites and Hittites?
According to Genesis 9:19, all mankind descended from Noah’s three sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth as they spread throughout the world. Ham’s descendants became the black people who settled in Africa, and parts of the Arabian peninsula. His sons were Cush, whose descendants settled in Ethiopia, Mizraim, whose descendants settled in Egypt, Put, whose descendants settled in Libya, and Canaan, whose descendants settled in Palestine. The descendants of Cush were the main populace of the Cushite Empire, which extended from western Libya to Ethiopia and Nubia, all of present day Egypt, and the Arabian peninsula into the mountains of Turkey. They spoke several languages and had skin pigmentation ranging from dark black to medium brown.
It takes a bit of study to ascertain who these people were – and there were other possible African women in Jesus’ lineage as well – but, in general, when we are speaking of Cushites, Canaanites, descendants of Ham, etc., we are speaking of Africans. It is entirely possible that this wasn’t a big deal when the scriptures were written since Jesus’ racial background would have been regarded as common knowledge.
Still, nowhere in the Scriptures can one find definitive descriptions of Jesus’ ethnicity or physical appearance. It just isn’t there. But the clues are there. He was obviously a Jewish rabbi, trained in the Jewish ways, whose background included people from all parts of the known world at that time.
Was Jesus black? It all depends upon how you define “black.” He was clearly a cosmopolitan man.
If you can I recmmend taking a look at this book Yahushua The Black Messiah, ISBN# 978-0-9825080-9-1. In this book you see pics of John Pope II looking at a picture of a "black" baby Yahshua (not jeZEUSE) and his mother, yet they place these pics of blond hair blue eyed anglo saxon..there's more information I could've shared, but I am at work supposedly doing overtime.
Anyone thinking that Jesus was white is a holdover from some racist, backwater town.
Remember, in America, if it's not white-- it's black.
So, we both agree he was nowhere near white. Remember the "one drop rule" that decides who's black and who isn't in America? Yeah... Jesus would be black by that rule.
Why would you deny that?
I could not care less about the color of Jesus.
Well................Black Irish.
Really? Who really cares, does it make any difference whatsoever?
It is pointless really to argue about what color he was. Jesus was not divine, or some other ridiculous notion, he was a human being. He was a philosopher and a good one and I think he would be appalled at the very state of religion today. In his time he saw the problems withing the Jewish religion and advocated something different, something that got twisted just the same.
The tribes of Israel where just a bunch of superstitious desert folk whose leaders decided to create a false history and deity to justify horrifying acts of genocide and wanton cruelty, that unfortunately wasn't crushed into the grave of the thousands of other dead gods.
Want to own that one?
I know what he didn't look like. When I was a child I was given an illustrated children's Bible for 1st communion. There was a picture of Jesus rising from the water after being baptized. He was blonde haired, blue eyed, tanned, and very buff. He was like the Nazi version of Jesus. We still tease my mother about that Bible. LOL...