The US Has More Tax Preparers Than Cops and Firemen Combined: Is It Time to Simplify the Tax Code?
Heisenberg
2012/08/15 20:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
424 votes
|
|
93% | |||
|
32 votes
|
|
7% | |||
Face The Facts USA:

Watch the video here.
Up to 1.2 million tax preparers make a living navigating the labyrinth US tax code for taxpayers. We have more professional tax preparers in the United States than law enforcement officers (765,000) and professional firefighters (310,400) combined.

Watch the video here.
Read More: http://www.facethefactsusa.org/facts/when-tax-comp...
Top Opinion
-
Birthpangs 2012/08/15 21:07:52Yes






















Revising the code to be simpler, would cause those politicians to have to pull back their hands.
Unless they just simplify it so that only those who make $30K to $300K pay taxes - and everyone else is exempt - including those who make income via investments. Increasing those amounts for inflation every year. THAT Congress would buy off on.
Who creates all the Tax Shelters/Loopholes, who writes the Code .... Lobbies/Corporations or Bribed Politicians ?
A Flat Tax is always touted as ' Giving the rich a even lower tax rate ' and anyone with a brain knows that statement is B S.
A Flat Tax would likely raise Warren Buffets rate ..... it would also mean that the Freeloaders who currently pay nothing would have to start paying ... ahem .... " Their Share "
............ whoops, we damn sure don't want that to happen, the Freeloaders will revolt !
So if you're at the helm and you'd like to continue the bribes, continue the strife and ensure no unity what do you do .... ' They aren't paying their Fair Share '
.......... easy as that.
Be real funny if Romney took that Harry Reid tax BS and blew it back in the faces of folks like Maddow or Sawyer and said .... ' What's your salary and just how much have you paid in Income Tax ' ..... fwiw, Sawyer makes $ 12 mill per year and Maddow about 2 mill per year.
IRS Agents could be utilized to police the Black Market .... of course that's figuring that we actually wanted to address the problem.
I would simply apply some sort of attrition into the equation in some areas, although we are kidding ourselves if we don't actually gut some Programs + Agencies .... we simply cannot afford them.
Obama believes doctors make too much and lawyers don't
Obamaism in action.
NOBAMA2012
NOBAMA 2012
I'd also eliminate the death tax on, perhaps, the first $3 million of an estate, so no working person has the government take away from their spouse or children that for which they've worked their entire lives.
The more money we allow working people to keep, the less we'll have redistribution after the fact, and the nanny state that accompanies it.
so you are saying, when a farm owner passes. his farm should be broken up and sold? To pay these taxes?
And that to avoid paying taxes noone should seek to make more the 250K? great incentive.
So you are saying Gates, Jobs, etc are evil?
would that also make Obama, Clinton, the kennedys, the buffetts of the world are evil?
Should those not paying taxes decide were the tax money goes?
I believe there are already contries like that and they are in serious financial problems
Your program really sucks
BUT IT ISTHE OBAMA VISION so
NOBAMA 2012
I mentioned nothing at all about redistribution, except for a way to uproot as much of it as possible and to shrink government in the process. Yours is the kind of Orwellian doublespeak for which the Republicans have unfortunately become famous.
Nor did I call anybody 'evil' – what in the world are you talking about here? I understand Obama and Buffet at least have come out in support of higher taxes on the wealthy, themselves included, but I don't care what either of them think. I'm rendering my own appraisal, and I'm not even suggesting higher taxes on the rich. I'm suggesting eliminating those for which the working class is presently liable, so that those who do pay taxes can perhaps even pay less in taxes, as the working class gains the means to provide for themselves in the first instance.
I'm sorry that allowing people to provide for themselves and eliminating the need for nursing from the federal teat seems radical to you, my friend.
scroll up to your last comment, last paragraph
If Obama and buffett wanted to pay higher taxes they could have. but being the weak people they are they demand they be forced to do what they claim is thier fair share, why is that . (US tax form has a place where those that wish to pay down the debt can do so by simply checking the box, and writing the check, maybe to hard for them? I ask you, why would a man declare that he will not do what he says is the right thing to do unless forced to? and is that leadership to you? maybe excuses and blame are also leadership to you? Listen to Obamas rants, Is that him or the side effects of meth use that he admits to , wrote of. ?
Obamas incemtive for government dependency is pretty attractive
look at what LBJs, , the liberal great society provides through welfare, housing, food, cars, cell phones, and a taxpayer funded debit card good at casinos, strip clubs, and liquor stores. To many that is an acceptable lifestyle. and no drug testing. cannot beat that.
I am for a productive America, not a dependent America.
there are plenty of countries with the agenda you like, most of Europe. cuba, the list is long. you should show your true colors and move there.
NOBAMA 2012
Also, you're right about me coming at this primarily from a libertarian viewpoint – I lean left, mostly because I think strongly supporting labor is the only thing that can get us out of this fine, big-government mess we're in (to me pro-labor laws and/or reigning in corporations are far preferable to a monstrous government apparatus), but am a libertarian at my core.
You're right though, it is tax on top of tax, and that just adds another point of government contact/extraction. I'll be happy to reconsider that point.