The US Has More Tax Preparers Than Cops and Firemen Combined: Is It Time to Simplify the Tax Code?
Heisenberg
2012/08/15 20:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
424 votes
|
|
93% | |||
|
32 votes
|
|
7% | |||
Face The Facts USA:

Watch the video here.
Up to 1.2 million tax preparers make a living navigating the labyrinth US tax code for taxpayers. We have more professional tax preparers in the United States than law enforcement officers (765,000) and professional firefighters (310,400) combined.

Watch the video here.
Read More: http://www.facethefactsusa.org/facts/when-tax-comp...
Top Opinion
-
Birthpangs 2012/08/15 21:07:52Yes






















I would really appreciate all of the support that anyone gives my Campaign for the American People so that we can win for YOU. My Campaign has ALWAYS Represented the best interests of ALL of the people and can be supported at the above address and found at:
http://www.myspace.com/dwight...
Please contribute to our Campaign for the American People at the address below. You support is greatly appreciated.
http://fundly.com/s/campaign-...
We can see that the 6% who voted here are tax preparers firmly disagree. There is no need to make the average tax return so complicated that and stressing that three IRS agents or CPAs can do the same return and come up with different numbers. Certainly, those defrauded out of their returns by identity theft can't possibly be pleased with the process either.
With would all be better off with a simpler system that has a greater portion of the population paying a smaller amount in taxes. Of course, we need jobs for that to happen. If you need to elect someone based on creation of jobs, Romney's work saved many, created some and lost some, but with a positive number overall. Obama just has ACORN who play a significant role in this drawn out fiscal calamity.
But I also support a flat tax based on your income, and that should be income irrespective of tax shelters, deductions, exemptions, etc. Perhaps unearned income should be taxed at a greater rate, but earned income should be subjected to the same percentage across the board.
The ones having to pay usually want to know why they have to pay, and even after you explain it to them, they don't seem to understand.
Then you have the people that think that if they lost money on a stock, they get to take it off their taxes. No, if you have a net capital loss, then you can take some of it off your AGI, but it doesn't come off your taxes. Your AGI is lower, and the taxes assessed on it are lower, but it doesn't come off your taxes. And that's only if you have a net capital loss--you could lose money on a stock and still wind up with a capital gain if you have other stocks that did well. The max that comes off the AGI in a year is 3,000. Anything over that is carried over to following years. So if you had a 30,000 loss, you have ten years of carryover. Assuming no other gains.
AND I SPEND WAY TOO MUCH TIME DOING THEM AND SEARCHING FOR WAYS TO REDUCE THEM.
The current tax code should be tossed in the trash where it belongs and replaced with a fairer tax. And take no offense but you and your kind should be out of work. You add NOTHING to the GDP, just a drag on it.
But only those that paid into the system.
I'd be fine with ''doing away entirely with SS'', but I want every penny I've paid into the system and the match my employer paid for the last 40 Years I've been in the workforce by forcibly having SS removed from my salary. And a modest return on my money would be nice too.
I know, I know......fat chance. There is Nothing in the SS trust.
IRS: What are your assets Mr. Rockefeller?
Mr. Rockefeller: Uh, around $10,000.
Don't believe that? Take a few minutes out of your pathetic little lives and watch this video. Do it now before it's taken down, again. Every time it pops up, it magically disappears????
You will see why if you watch it.
http://video.google.com/video...