I'm still furious about the lack of thought most people have on this issue.
While I don't disagree that the woman was foolish for not using protection, I also see that what the man did was with malice. He knowingly exposed her to an illness. Thats criminal.
It seems like most people really only care about branding the woman with any label - that of "slut" - for having sex after four dates. This without knowing what happened during those four dates and having no concept of what its like to be around the age of 50.
I see a lot of hateful and ignorant internet trolls out there who care more about attacking a woman than saying one thing about a man who would lie about an illness and infect someone with it.
The Public Rejects Compensation for 'Surprise STDs' [INFOGRAPHIC]
SodaHead Infographics
2012/06/19 18:13:05
A couple of weeks ago, a woman reportedly won $900,000 in court from a guy who gave her genital herpes. According to the report, the man failed to inform her of his disease and refused to use protection. But we wanted to know if the public feels that victims of "suprise STDs" should receive compensation, or if they should still be held personally accountable for neglecting to use protection. Check out this week's infographic for details on how people responded. Let's dive!


Top Opinion
-
Superman 2012/06/19 18:56:49
![The Public Rejects Compensation for 'Surprise STDs' [INFOGRAPHIC] The Public Rejects Compensation for 'Surprise STDs' [INFOGRAPHIC]](http://images.sodahead.com/polls/002739029/stds-80129585419_xlarge.png)

![Thanksgiving: The Reason for the Season [INFOGRAPHIC] Thanksgiving: The Reason for the Season [INFOGRAPHIC]](http://images.sodahead.com/polls/003329051/thanksgiving-93109325925_crop.png)

![A Fourth of the Population Has Stolen From the Grocery Store [INFOGRAPHIC] A Fourth of the Population Has Stolen From the Grocery Store [INFOGRAPHIC]](http://images.sodahead.com/polls/003194651/stealing-88440771717_crop.png)

















I'm sorry, but that's messed up and there should definitely be legal repercussions for it.
And I bet he's never going to make that stupid mistake again too.
don't worry I don't judge ;P :)
I'm guessing the tax payers pay for court cost for criminal trials and don't for the rest. From the sounds of it... the women sued the man and there for not a criminal trial, and the loser probably had to pay for the court cost and/or had to pay the women the court cost so she could pay off her part of the court cost (a round about way of making the loser pay)
Bottom line.....she or anyone should insist on protection or keep their pants on.
Also making the loser pay the court fee would make some less trigger happy with the law suits. :)
-most interesting web blogger in the world
But she wasn't the one being irresponsible, rather HE was irresponsible for taking advantage of her trust and knowingly and deliberately infecting her through rough sex. He's a predator and he's not the only one out there. There are a lot of screwed up people who are deliberately infecting other people. I consider it a form of assault, and in the case of a terminal disease like HIV, it's murder. The woman is a victim of the guy's deception and no reasonable action on her part could have protected her from him. She deserves his entire estate while he deserves to spend the rest of his life in prison.