The Public Is Growing Weary of Popular Technology

your ignorance on this subject astounds me, here is a link to the national cancer institute and how they feel about cell phones causing tumors

http://www.cancer.gov/cancert...

in case you are too lazy to read it, since apparently you are also too lazy to actually look stuff up, I will go ahead and quote some things for you

"Studies thus far have not shown a consistent link between cell phone use and cancers of the brain, nerves, or other tissues of the head or neck..."

"...although many studies have examined the potential health effects of non-ionizing radiation from radar, microwave ovens, and other sources, there is currently no consistent evidence that non-ionizing radiation increases cancer risk"

"The only known biological effect of radiofrequency energy is heating. The ability of microwave ovens to heat food is one example of this effect of radiofrequency energy. Radiofrequency exposure from cell phone use does cause heating; however, it is not sufficient to measurably increase body temperature."

"Although there have been some concerns that radiofrequency energy from cell phones held closely to the head may affect the brain and other tissues, to date there is no evidence from studies of cells, animals, or humans that radiofrequency energy can cause cancer."

"It is generally accepted that damage to DNA is necessary for cancer to develop. However, radiofrequency energy, unlike ionizing radiation, does not cause DNA damage in cells, and it has not been found to cause cancer in animals or to enhance the cancer-causing effects of known chemical carcinogens in animals"

"Brain cancer incidence and mortality (death) rates have changed little in the past decade."

Please also read chapter 6 of that article where it lists all the major reputable organizations for cancer, communications and even the FDA and all of them state that the evidence is inconclusive at best.

Hopefully that will enlighten you on the subject, but more than likely you will just dismiss it all and cling on to some non-sensible argument as to why you have to be right, even though real evidence says otherwise. If you don't do that and actually see it the way it really is then I would be amazed as almost no human has that ability.

That page found in about 5 secs on google

Do you know what it means when they use the qualifier "consistent?" It means some studies show a relationship and some don't. Now who pays for some of those studies, namely the ones that don't show a relationship? Oh my it's the cell phone industry.

Secondly the notion that DNA damage is a requirement for creating cancer is widely held by 99% of the research community - the same community that is clueless about what cancer is or how to treat it! Part of their cluelessness is the damaged DNA theory. So that throws out that premise.

IOW, although they call themselves experts, they are anything but experts because they don't know what a true cancer cell is. Their focus on DNA is so far off base, they are in another ballpark.

All it takes to produce cancer is to affect the physical structure on one hydrogen atom on a fatty acid. That is not DNA damage, so they are looking in the wrong place. The change in structure blocks oxygen transfer which allows cancer cells to turn themselves on. Cancer cells are normal cells. But they stay dormant unless they are provided an ideal environment.

The overall incidence brain cancer is up despite the short period of time cell phones have been in use. Where it is up mostly is in young adults which makes sense since they had thinner skulls as teens.

Ten years is a short period of time, we are only at the beginning. In recent years the phones have become much more powerful and more teens have them. So we can expect an even higher incidence ten years from now, especially among young adults because those teens will have become adults by then.