Quantcast

The Big White (Military) Wedding: Civilian Brides Just Don't Understand!

I can't claim to be an expert on the economy. I don't know which industries are holding firm and which are about to cave in on themselves. What I am an expert on, however, is television. And if television is any indicator, the wedding industry is booming.

With shows like Bridezillas, Say Yes to the Dress, Platinum Weddings and more taking up entire evenings of cable channel programming, it's no surprise that the mental image of the pretty, pretty princess day is alive and well in the minds of many young women these days. However, at the end of the long, expensive day, it all comes down to the fact that you're married, right?

Right?

More and more these days, a trend is emerging among young couples in general, but is especially prevalent among military couples. A quick Justice of the Peace ceremony is done to get the legalities taken care of, and then the "real" wedding is planned for a later date. In some cases, the couple does not even tell friends and family that they're already married.

This phenomenon is commonly discussed on both wedding forums and military forums around the Internet, usually with the disclaimer that "civilian brides just don't understand." Young women are encouraged to go ahead and just get the paperwork out of the way for the convenience of being married to a member of the military and plan their "real" wedding for a later date, because everyone deserves their wedding day.

Never mind the fact that not every civilian bride has gotten a big white wedding. Never mind the fact that plenty of military brides have planned a lovely wedding on short notice, or been happy with their courthouse ceremony. Never mind the people who have chosen courthouse ceremonies - not "real" weddings according to this school of thought.

Never mind all of that - what it comes down to is this: it would be convenient to be legally married right now, but I want my bridal shower, big white dress and fancy party later. As a military bride, I am entitled to both.

While it's a common theme in the wedding industry that every little girl grows up dreaming of her wedding day, it's hard to ignore the effects that "weddings as entertainment" are having on the mindset of young couples today. Marriage in general, and especially to a member of the military, requires sacrifices of all sorts. One of the first sacrifices that may have to be made is the wedding itself. Yet this seems like an impossible proposition to so many - as if they are being cheated out of their due. So I need to ask - is it about marriage, or is it about a wedding?

Do you think the recent burst in popularity of wedding-related television programming has had any effect on this phenomenon of prioritizing the dream wedding over the marriage itself? What do you think of the "two wedding" phenomenon? Are military brides exempt from the traditional rules here?
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • ~Pro-Fetus Anti-Liberal Ant... January 07, 2010 17:47:27
    ~Pro-Fetus Anti-Liberal Anti-Atheist~
    +6
    I'm a military wife. I don't watch any of the silly shows on TV because I think they're all wasting their money anyway. I bet most of the ones on TV wedding shows, will end up divorced within 5 years, lol. I got married, a couple people knew and that was that. We were both married before, so we didn't need to go any further than that. People that do all that fancy sh*t, generally just do it for show. With my first marriage to a civilian, I also did the quiet, courthouse thing. I'm glad I didn't waste my money on that one either. :)

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • shalena July 24, 2011 18:32:07
    shalena
    +3
    I'm about to become a military wife myself. My fiance' wants us to be married before he leaves for basics, and that isn't leaving much time in the way of planning the wedding I've always envisioned. We also don't have the money. We're both agreeing to a courthouse wedding and then an actual ceremony later on down the road. It's no secret, it won't be a reenactment either. It's him loving me enough to let me have that special day. To walk down the aisle and see him waiting for me. Sure, it's materialistic, but it's not tacky. It's love. Pure and simple.
  • Zoel January 19, 2010 00:12:34
    Zoel
    My husband and I have been married for 16 years. We were married by my uncle (who is Mayor) in a civil ceremony, and we have never been happier. I think in many cases, both military and civilian, girls are focused on a "dream wedding" and never realize that they are making a forever commitment. My recomendation is to take all that money you want to spend on a "dream wedding" and spend it on a dream hunniemoon. Just you and your hunnie getting to know each other and building the foundation of your marriage with wonderful memories of each other. Those memories get you through the hard times, the broke times, and the lonely deployment times. I believe civil ceremonies keep the focus where it belongs, on the couple getting married. Huge weddings seem like a production aimed at selling everyone around that couple on thier happiness.



  • Jo January 12, 2010 15:12:41
    Jo
    Isn't this the nature of our culture about everything -- to focus on the extraneous and unimportant and miss what's most important? We do that with Christmas, Easter, Thanksgiving, etc. There's something to be said for simplicity.
  • TruBluTopaz January 12, 2010 04:47:05
    TruBluTopaz
    +1
    The wedding industry sells these dumb little girls and their mothers on the idea that they MUST spend tens of thousands of dollars on one party. It's ludicrous. It is perfecting possible to have a simply wedding and do much of the work yourself. I was in the church choir so the director helped me find a guitarist and flute player and as a gift arranged the music. I picked up and arranged the flowers myself. I did my own hair. I found a dress that someone else ordered and then backed out on. We used a coupon to get the groom's tux for free. It simply doesn't have to be a big blow out. My daughter worked for a bridal show company and the stuff people sell these girls is just silly. I think part of our problem as a nation is that we have bought into the Oprah idea that everyone "deservers" the best=even if they can't afford it. company people sell girls silly nation oprah deservers besteven afford
  • Dwight Mann January 12, 2010 02:48:53
    Dwight Mann
    It is that fantasy thing that TV promotes. people live vicariously through the tube. . .

    fantasy tv promotes people live vicariously tube
  • Zozo January 12, 2010 02:39:38
  • Kelly Lang Zozo January 12, 2010 02:51:42
    Kelly Lang
    I have to disagree. No one is "entitled" to a big fancy wedding day.

    Also, if a young military couple feels THAT STRONGLY about having the big fancy wedding day, then they need to put off getting married until they can afford or have the time for the big fancy wedding. Getting married in secret and then throwing what amounts to a "fake" wedding later for the attention and gifts is just flat out tacky.
  • Zozo Kelly Lang January 12, 2010 02:55:54
  • Kelly Lang Zozo January 12, 2010 03:39:57
    Kelly Lang
    Why in the world WOULD someone be entitled to a wedding? It's certainly not a standard human right in this country. A lot of problems with young people these days stem from the idea that they "deserve" or are "entitled to" certain things. There's very little in this world that you're just entitled to, and a wedding certainly isn't one of them.
  • Zozo Kelly Lang January 12, 2010 03:52:41
  • Kelly Lang Zozo January 12, 2010 04:02:15
    Kelly Lang
    My beef here is that people believe they're entitled to a big white wedding day and will throw themselves a second wedding and even go so far as to lie to their families about their marital status. I think it's materialistic and wrong. You get one wedding day. You can have your big white wedding, or you can have it in a courthouse. But you only get one.

    I'm currently engaged and planning a wedding, to a man in the military, in fact. It would be very convenient for us to get married at a courthouse right now, but we're not going to. Instead, we're planning a standard wedding. If circumstances forced us to get married at the courthouse instead, then that would be our wedding. We would not be "entitled" to follow it up with a big white wedding day on top of our already legal marriage.

    The sense of entitlement is my problem. The right to a big white dress and fancy party is certainly not in the Bible.
  • Zozo Kelly Lang January 12, 2010 19:05:06
  • Kelly Lang Zozo January 12, 2010 19:12:37
    Kelly Lang
    I believe you're missing the point. I'm not saying any woman SHOULD be denied her wedding day if that's what she wants - though I will not agree that anyone is entitled to anything, because the pervading sense of entitlement among young people in this country is pretty unpleasant.

    What I AM saying is this - you can have your big fairytale wedding if that is what you want - but if you have ALREADY HAD a justice of the peace wedding because you refused to wait until you could afford you fairytale wedding, or refused to wait until you had the right time for a fairytale wedding, you should NOT get a "do over" wedding.

    A bride can plan her perfect dream day all she wants, I don't care. It IS a problem when a couple runs to a justice of the peace or courthouse because it's convenient and still expects everyone they know to shower them with gifts and attention when they decide to throw a fake wedding later.

    You get ONE wedding.
  • Zozo Kelly Lang January 12, 2010 19:24:17
  • Kelly Lang Zozo January 12, 2010 19:45:13
    Kelly Lang
    I'm not sure if you truly believe that all women are entitled to such frivolity or you're confusing the notions of "wedding" and "marriage." Either way, we're going to have to agree to disagree. A big white dress is simply not among the things I am "entitled" to as a woman or person at all. I am entitled to marry who I choose to and spend my life with him. Anything on top of that is an add on either EARNED - through my own money - or generously gifted to me by family, friends and anyone else who shares our day with us, of their own free will.

    Clint Eastwood was obviously talking about weddings when he said, "Deserve's got nothing to do with it."
  • Zozo Kelly Lang January 12, 2010 22:28:36
  • Jen Kelly Lang January 20, 2010 03:47:35
    Jen
    +1
    sometimes its not about not having the money or refusing to wait until the right time for a fairytale wedding, if u r engaged to a military man, u of all ppl should understand that sometimes the need arises to get married quickly and have a "wedding" later. I am getting married by a justice of the peace and having my wedding later due to the fact that our deployment was moved up by 6 months, so yes there are very legit reason as to why ppl have 2 "weddings". its not because we cant afford it or cant wait. it is because there is a very real possibility that he may not make it back home and its peace of mind for us both to know that me and our 3 kids will be taken care of if the day arises when he wont be here to do so
  • Kelly Lang Jen January 20, 2010 03:58:19
    Kelly Lang
    Sorry, I still disagree. You're getting married by a JOP. That's a wedding, a real wedding. I don't see the need for the second wedding. I don't think there is any legit reason to do that. Even though I'm engaged to a military man. There's no need for a second wedding after a JOP wedding except for a desire for the fairytale wedding.
  • Jen Kelly Lang January 21, 2010 03:09:14
    Jen
    +1
    there is a difference. JOP is a ceremony. a wedding is a ceremony, reception and enjoying the experience w friends and family. but everyone is entitled to their own opinion just doesnt mean that everyone elses is wrong.
  • Zozo Kelly Lang January 31, 2010 23:24:49

About Me

Kelly Lang

Kelly Lang

AZ, US

December 30, 2009 23:01:44

Poking the buttons and upping the thumbs.

View complete profile

The Latest From SodaHead

Living

Food