Tatooing babies from birth? (for identification? good idea or bad?

by stevegtexas@aol.com Posted 2012/06/18 16:38:57

Related Topics: Baby, Bad, Birth, babies

Read all 50 opinions

For some reason, my first photo was "deleted" those "picture police!" i guess the pic of the child with the tatoo was too much for mature viewers?

Mark 2012/06/18 16:51:22

+3
How about a microchip in the palm of the hand that changes colour? When you hit 30 you can either be re-newed or try Logan's Run.
>> See Replies

More polls by stevegtexas@aol.com

greenday4life 2012/10/09 23:38:16

This is so wrong! Cant people see who's there own kids now?

reply
Erin V. 2012/07/31 15:03:13

thats a horrible idea

reply
Jorge Enriquez 2012/07/18 16:20:38

Just bad.......if u want tatoo, why not a little one?

reply
Heat Her 2012/06/22 13:48:38

Whatever happened to fingerprinting?

reply
Swan Eshdeh 2012/06/20 13:11:57

very bad idea!

reply
Sunset moon 2012/06/20 00:08:08

I think it is a horrible idea!!

reply
Miss Bela Rae 2012/06/19 18:04:19

I think the legal age for tattoos should be fifteen. People shouldn't be allowed to tattoo their babies, because
1. It's extremely painful,
2. The kid might hate it when they get older,
3. They'll be judged their whole life for it,
4. It'll stretch out and look weird and distorted as they grow older, and
5. There are other ways to identify a baby. You could get a DNA test, which as far as I know is just a shot, which babies get shots for vaccination anyway.

reply
overseanancy 2012/06/19 02:14:29

+1
NO!!!!! PLEASE NO!!!!

reply
Kay 2012/06/19 01:35:10

bad

reply
princess 2012/06/19 00:14:17

+1
It's outrageous and disgusting!!

reply
Relay 2012/06/18 22:58:49

lol maybe if you had identical twins...

reply
Nikki 2012/06/18 22:04:37

terrible....

reply
Mark 2012/06/18 21:09:36

Of course NOT !

Lev.19:28 .

reply
The Potato Princess 2012/06/18 20:26:47

Bad idea.

A tattoo is a very personal thing, IMO and you can't just choose that for someone.

reply
Quietman ~PWCM~JLA 2012/06/18 20:16:21

BAD!!

reply
susan BN-0 2012/06/18 20:15:27

Bad Idea.

reply
««Gingey, the Master Debate... 2012/06/18 20:13:05

+1
Barbaric

reply
Anca 2012/06/18 19:40:13

NO! We are not products,we don't need barcode.

reply
Mrs. Kathy Arch 2012/06/18 19:18:04

WTH?

reply
Keith 2012/06/18 19:02:00

Bad idea.

reply
Ken 2012/06/18 18:38:25

Bad idea.

reply
Doreen 2012/06/18 18:17:28

+1
NO!

reply
Vision of Verve 2012/06/18 18:16:17
Professor Wizard 2012/06/18 18:08:07

I think the Nazi's would be fine with that idea.

reply
Lili13 2012/06/18 18:04:51

Bad and thats is just sad

reply
selena costa 2012/06/18 17:46:10

+1
stupid

reply
Just me ∞ijm♥G☮F♀U∞ 2012/06/18 17:46:04

+1
BAD, VERY BAD!! We've managed for thousands of years without that, I don't see the need for it now. I do believe it is illegal for anyone under the age of 18? to get a tattoo and it doesnt matter if they have parental permission or not.

reply
Jeff Vader 2012/06/18 17:25:38

+1
Stupid, why not just use a branding iron while their at it.

reply
Shawna 2012/06/18 17:09:52

+1
Not good. Not fair. Should not be allowed.

reply
wtxwoman 2012/06/18 17:09:22

+1
Bad idea, but a tracer chip would be good. They could be made to turn off at age 18.

reply
MlssCue =Go Blue= 2012/06/18 17:06:37

+1
Nah, bad.

reply
Happy 2012/06/18 16:52:19

+1
horrible idea, very stupid

reply
Mark 2012/06/18 16:51:22

+3
How about a microchip in the palm of the hand that changes colour? When you hit 30 you can either be re-newed or try Logan's Run.

reply
stevegt... to Mark 2012/06/18 17:01:51
Kat Thirt33n 2012/06/18 16:49:56

kinda creepy

reply
Kat 2012/06/18 16:49:17

Bad idea, children do not belong to the government, all the furor the little libby are having over "It's my body I can do whatever I want with it" but they'd probably support this just because their party of idiots want it. Might as well be the dark ages or mark of the beast. Apparently they want everyone to get an RFID chip, I'm not for that either.

reply
wtxwoman to Kat 2012/06/18 17:08:21

+1
From looking at the picture, I think it's a fair bet that the government didn't tatoo that baby. Some crazy person did.

reply
Kat to wtxwoman 2012/06/18 17:33:25 (edited)

No, It's probably photoshopped on the baby, I believe it's illegal to tattoo someone under either 16 or 18. I think they'll want to tattoo a number on everyone, I definitely don't support it

reply
wtxwoman to Kat 2012/06/18 17:42:43

Well, that's good to hear. I don't know anything about tatoos, other than I don't like them. A small pretty one isn't so bad, but all over your body,no. I keep telling my daughter that that dragonfly on her shoulder will look like a dragon when she is my age. lol

reply
Kat to wtxwoman 2012/06/18 17:48:08

No I don't care for them. My brother had some done when he was about 20. got an infection, had to keep them out of the sun for quite a while, I don't know anybody that got them that didn't regret it. Bad thing about tattoos for ID, if you know what it looks like it can be duplicated very easily. I've seen kids do them with pens that looked legit.
On a shoulder might be ok, anything that droops with age would be weird later.

reply