Study Suggests Jocks Really Are Dumber: Believable or Baloney?
SodaHead Living
2012/05/21 18:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
306 votes
|
|
71% | |||
|
126 votes
|
|
29% | |||
You've heard all the stereotypes ... the dumb jocks, the ditzy cheerleaders, the band nerds. Often, these cliches are more insulting than anything else. But new research suggests there might be some truth to at least one of them. Jocks in contact sports perform worse on tests than non-jocks, according to a Dartmouth College study.


But before you get all riled up, consider this: The study mainly detected inferior test-taking performance among athletes who participate in contact sports (e.g. football and hockey.) So have no fear, tennis players!
Twenty-two percent of students who participated in contact sports scored significantly lower in memory and learning skills than expected, as opposed to only 4 percent of non-contact sport athletes (those who participate in track, crew and Nordic skiing), LiveScience reports. And it may have something to do with those blows to the head.
Twenty-two percent of students who participated in contact sports scored significantly lower in memory and learning skills than expected, as opposed to only 4 percent of non-contact sport athletes (those who participate in track, crew and Nordic skiing), LiveScience reports. And it may have something to do with those blows to the head.
"These results were found shortly after the season and we do not know how long the effect [of the head impacts] lasts," study researcher Thomas McAllister said in a statement. "While it may be bad for the 22 percent, the good news is that overall there were few differences in the test results between the athletes in contact sports and the athletes in non-contact sports." Do you think this study explains the whole "dumb jock" thing once and for all?






















This jock who sits behinds me in Chemistry class gets on my nerves and he barely gets good grades. H
P.S., I ALSO HAVE DISCOVERED THERE ARE A GREAT NUMBER OF DUMB NON-JOCKS OUT THERE. PERHAPS THERE SHOULD BE A STUDY TO DETERMINE WHAT THEIR PERCENTAGE IS IN THE WORLD'S TOTAL POPULATION?
Uh ^Sigh
"...the study did not find differences in test results between the two groups of athletes at the beginning of the season, suggesting that the cumulative head impacts that contact athletes had incurred over many previous seasons did not result in reduced thinking and memory skills in the overall group."
Anyone who has ever played ball knows that you get some slight headaches during camp, then the membranes between your brain and your skull (meninges) swell a tiny bit and stay that way over the entire season...keeping your brain from rattling around so much.
It doesn't surprise me that their scores would be lower after the season. It would have been more informative if they had continued to test the contact-sport jocks to see how long it took for their scores to get back to normal after the season ended.