Study Says Organic Food Is No Healthier Than Non-Organic: Do You Agree?
Heisenberg
2012/09/05 18:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
203 votes
|
|
54% | |||
|
171 votes
|
|
46% | |||
CA.NEWS.YAHOO.COM reports:
Organic produce and meat typically isn't any better for you than conventional varieties when it comes to vitamin and nutrient content, according to a new review of the evidence. But organic options may live up to their billing of lowering exposure to pesticide residue and antibiotic-resistant bacteria, researchers from Stanford University and the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System found.

Read More: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/organic-food-no-healthier...
Top Opinion
-
lucky 2012/09/04 14:41:19No, organic is healthier!+20The study only shows its the same in Vitamin and Nutrient content, it fails to mention the potential harm of certain chemicals and hormones contained in non-organic food, regardless, I prefer organic not because of possible health benefits but because of taste and composition and although it may cost more, I end up getting more for my money.























If you limit the scope of whether it's healthier "in these terms" then you're not really answering whether it's healthier.
Also, how did they choose from among the studies? Did they use a broad spectrum of well-researched, peer-reviewed sources, of did they cherry-pick the ones that would give them the results that they wanted?
Finally, exactly who funded this study-of-studies? The pesticide industry? The fertilizer industry? Who?
As always, take the results of these types of studies-of-studies with a significantly-sized grain of organic salt. Then follow the money.
our milk shoul dbe unpasturized as well, unpasteurized is HEALTHIER and thats why the government made it illegal to sell unpasteurized milk!
the government and corps that sell you food don't give a crap about yyour health, they only care about the money that goes into their greedy pockets!
its healthier when the consumer can afford to have it in their diet...