Should welfare recipients be banned from spending their benefits on alcohol, cigarettes, and strip clubs?
TheFix
2012/06/20 16:42:02
|
|
|||||
|
105 votes
|
|
82% | |||
|
23 votes
|
|
18% | |||



















Oh, one I forgot, tattoos, how can these poor people who can't afford to buy school lunches for their kids afford all these tattoos? What's up with that?
There are always those who will need help, temporarily, but there are also a lot who simply ride the gravy train.
sounds more like urban myths to me.
How do they do these things on welfare, could it be because the taxpayers pick up almost all of their other costs, like feeding their children, food stamps, medicare, subsidized housing? I know some on welfare collecting quite a bit more than my mother on social security, and she doesn't get free lunches, it's not all chicken feed as you suggest, especially when we include all the other things thrown in.
I'm not against welfare, when I worked for the census I saw more than I cared to living in shipping containers, tents and campers along the river, or living in overturned dumpsters, under bridges, in foreclosed houses with no electricity or water. There are people who really need help, but I also so way too many who were seriously abusing the system, depriving those who really need the assistance. This is where we get to the point of this post, welfare needs to be cleaned up, and it's use strictly controlled. There are limited resources and as the average middle class incomes continue to decline the resources will shrink even more. Why should someone go hungry when another can use their welfare to smoke, drink or get tattoos? Yep, it's happening all around you.
The system while theoretically possible just wouldn't work in practice.
Not to mention you still need cash for some things. (e.g. just about any public transport, or Taxi service.)
A nice dream, but sadly that's all it is.