Quantcast

Should the Church still be carrying out Exorcisms?

Wayne TH G 333 2012/05/02 01:13:50
Related Topics: Church
Yes the Church should still be conducting exorcisms
No the Church should not be conducting exorcisms
I am not sure
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • B Lawrence byz 2012/05/04 04:11:23
    B Lawrence
    +3
    Obamas not a demon, just a tool.
  • MorbidC... byz 2012/05/04 04:12:07 (edited)
    MorbidCynic
    +2
    Obama is likely influenced by a demon, a demon of lies and deceit.
  • Chokmah byz 2012/05/04 04:36:48
    Chokmah
    +1
    Obama may be the Anti-Christ!

    obama anti christ
  • ehrhornp Chokmah 2012/05/04 04:45:51
    ehrhornp
    +1
    No Ronald Reagan was the Anti Christ. 666 Ronald Wilson Reagan count the letters and you get 666. He broke the 20 year curse which is something the devil could do.
  • Chokmah ehrhornp 2012/05/04 05:10:31
    Chokmah
    Satan cannot cast out Satan. Ronald Reagan was a believer... Obama is not, and Obama is trying to force the Christians to conduct abortions in their hospitals and hand out contraceptive to their children and workers. Obama wants to be a dictator and institute the morality police, like the Bolsheviks did.
  • acacia86 Chokmah 2012/05/04 06:14:22
    acacia86
    Obama wants things modernized. We cannot evolve as a society, as a species if we keep with the old rules. It's funny how you call him a dictator, and accusing him of instuting the morality police, considering that i've witnessed countless "Christians" judging and dictating to their brothers and sisters on a day to day basis and acting as morality police. True dictators don't like having their dictatorship censored.

    All of that said I think it's up to an individual if they wish to get an abortion, if they use contraceptives, but the knowledge of these services should be made readily available to them and not censored out in a dictator fashion simply because a handful of people (or possibly more) have an issue with it. Don't judge what you don't know. Maybe a teenager is on contraception for medical reasons, or to clear up her skin. Maybe they're getting condoms because they want to know what it is and how they work for later in life. As far as a woman is put on this earth to breed, I'm a chronic asthmatic. The medications I have to take on a day to day basis would be fatal to a developing fetus, are you going to deny me my right to birth control, force me to go off my meds and be an incubator? I should have say over what happens to my body. I'm not going to live as a nun, but i...



    Obama wants things modernized. We cannot evolve as a society, as a species if we keep with the old rules. It's funny how you call him a dictator, and accusing him of instuting the morality police, considering that i've witnessed countless "Christians" judging and dictating to their brothers and sisters on a day to day basis and acting as morality police. True dictators don't like having their dictatorship censored.

    All of that said I think it's up to an individual if they wish to get an abortion, if they use contraceptives, but the knowledge of these services should be made readily available to them and not censored out in a dictator fashion simply because a handful of people (or possibly more) have an issue with it. Don't judge what you don't know. Maybe a teenager is on contraception for medical reasons, or to clear up her skin. Maybe they're getting condoms because they want to know what it is and how they work for later in life. As far as a woman is put on this earth to breed, I'm a chronic asthmatic. The medications I have to take on a day to day basis would be fatal to a developing fetus, are you going to deny me my right to birth control, force me to go off my meds and be an incubator? I should have say over what happens to my body. I'm not going to live as a nun, but if an unplanned pregnancy happens I should have the right to chose if I want to take the risk in having the child or not.

    Not that it's really any of your business but for additonal FYI, the safer medication combinations out there to control my asthma (which is mostly brought on by dust and pollen exposure even in small amounts, I'm deathly allergic) don't work. So it's literally risk my life or risk the baby's life. Are you going to sit there and be the morality police telling me that it's my duty as a woman to risk forfeiting my life for an unborn child when I have a sick relative whose dependent on me?

    Laws, like the ones in Utah, which criminalize women for simply falling down the stairs while pregnant need to be abolished. While I understand protecting the rights of the unborn, when do the rights of the unborn over ride the rights of the adult carrying the unborn? For a developing body that may or may not survive to full term despite the best effort put forth by the mother? I was pregnant once, miscarried, despite trying my best to keep the child. In Utah now a days, from all I've heard, i'd be locked up and charged with murder for not discontinuing the medicatioin that I have to take so I can breathe. and you call Obama a dictator? I'm glad I'm not in Utah, that's all I can say about that.
    (more)
  • Chokmah acacia86 2012/05/04 15:01:05 (edited)
    Chokmah
    Christian religious membership is voluntary, government diktat is not. Obama and his Czars (Caesars) are nothing but authoritarian enforcers. America was founded on free choice, limited government, religious freedom, etc.. Government should not require ANY hospital or organization to do something it doesn't want to do, as long as it is not discriminating.

    The Nazis and Bolsheviks tried to destroy religion, kill priests and nuns. All under the guise that they were getting rid of old and superstitious organizations. The Nazis introduced euthansia, infanticide, and abortion to get rid of 'inferior' and politically incorrect people. The Bolsheviks were cruder and just starved and tortured tens of millions of Orthodox and Catholic Christians. This is dangerous and is a slippery slope to a culture of death. There is nothing modern about human sacrifice.

    Go to Europe where the culture and people are dying, they have a negative growth rate among the people and a growing immigrant population of Muslims, Animists, and Atheists. They hate Christians in Europe too and are ashamed of their once great Christian cultures. The same cultures that today the entire world mimics and copies.

    'Nuff said..
  • acacia86 Chokmah 2012/05/04 18:30:40 (edited)
    acacia86
    It is discriminating though. Refusing to perform abortions and hand out information on birth control discriminates against women, labelling them as incubators, willingly or not. This is road to wire clothes hanger abortions performed in a bathroom which may or may not lead to a sucessful abortion of the fetus, but also poses risk to the woman in terms of hemorraghe and infection.

    Far safer to force hospitals to adhere to their hippocratic oath to do no harm. If your personal religious beliefs interfer with the quality of care you give to a patient you should chose a different career path. Spoken as someone who is both spiritual and in health care herself.

    I couldn't have an abortion myself, but I have disepsensed medication to patients knowing that they were going to use that medication to abort. I took an oath to do no harm and provide quality of care. I don't know why that patient is aborting, maybe it's because of a related health issue which would make it too dangerous, maybe it's because they can't financially afford it, maybe they just got news that they have a terminal illness and would rather put in energy trying to stay around for an older child rather than try to give that child a sibling. I don't know, and it isn't my job to judge. it's my job to serve the public and...







    It is discriminating though. Refusing to perform abortions and hand out information on birth control discriminates against women, labelling them as incubators, willingly or not. This is road to wire clothes hanger abortions performed in a bathroom which may or may not lead to a sucessful abortion of the fetus, but also poses risk to the woman in terms of hemorraghe and infection.

    Far safer to force hospitals to adhere to their hippocratic oath to do no harm. If your personal religious beliefs interfer with the quality of care you give to a patient you should chose a different career path. Spoken as someone who is both spiritual and in health care herself.

    I couldn't have an abortion myself, but I have disepsensed medication to patients knowing that they were going to use that medication to abort. I took an oath to do no harm and provide quality of care. I don't know why that patient is aborting, maybe it's because of a related health issue which would make it too dangerous, maybe it's because they can't financially afford it, maybe they just got news that they have a terminal illness and would rather put in energy trying to stay around for an older child rather than try to give that child a sibling. I don't know, and it isn't my job to judge. it's my job to serve the public and provide quality service without discrimination, without judgement, without guilt trips. That's what it means to be in health care.

    Also, being respectful of other cultures does not mean that you are ashamed of your own.

    The fact that you would compare Obama to a group which killed groups of people displays your view grows fully out of a biased view. You're upset because he's saying, "enough. You will respect women's rights. There will be a defined separation of Church and State."

    I'm glad that a president finally had the courage to say that point blank, as said before, what really needs to be done is that new law in Utah which criminalises women for falling down the stairs while pregnant (accidentally included from the last article on the subject that I read) needs to be overturned. If I actually saw the rest of the US teaming against Utah for making such a law, then I could certainly see your view. However I was disgusted to see that a few states were considering following Utah's path. Stuff like that has to be prevented. That is full out discrimination against women, and it's currently allowed. The religious dictatorship in the US needs to be curved. This is coming from a Christian, btw. Baptised, gone to church since I was in diapers. doesn't matter. There needs to be a separation of church and government, and human rights need to be above religious rights. Religion, as you said, is voluntary, or it should be. More and more it seems they're attempting to remove the option of not following Christianity and force it onto other groups and non believers. It's their right to chose their own path.

    Also, when Obama executes a priest or a nun, I'll be 100% behind shutting him down, but I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for that to happen.
    (more)
  • Chokmah acacia86 2012/05/04 19:38:42 (edited)
    Chokmah
    The discrimination is against the unborn. A doctor considers the lives of both his patients. Your political beliefs are clouding your spiritual beliefs, And I suggest you go back a read the Hippocratic Oath, especially this part:

    "I will not give a lethal drug to anyone if I am asked, nor will I advise such a plan; and similarly I will not give a woman a pessary to cause an abortion.

    In purity and according to divine law will I carry out my life and my art."


    Perhaps you should find another line of work.
  • acacia86 Chokmah 2012/05/04 19:54:48 (edited)
    acacia86
    +1
    And you just proved that there is no defined separation of Church and State.

    Also, I'm not American. Our hippocratic oaths differ as well as the meaning.

    From the University of Ottawa's website:
    "Hippocrates, often referred to as the “Father of Medicine,” was an ancient Greek physician who is said to have lived according to outstanding moral values and ethical medical practice. Perhaps the greatest contribution made by Hippocrates to medicine is the Hippocratic Oath (7). For centuries, physicians recited this oath (either the original version or modifications) at convocation ceremonies and upon entering medical practice. Although the oath has been subject to much debate over the centuries, both in terms of its content and its author, it remains one of the most quoted documents in the history of medicine.

    The Hippocratic Oath was an oath taken by physicians to protect all life, to hold in highest regard one’s teachers, to recognize one’s limitations, and to renounce self-interest in the treatment of patients. Certain values inherent in the Hippocratic Oath are echoed in modern views of professionalism. Such attributes continue to define modern expectations of physicians and medical students alike, Other views found in the Hippocratic Oath, such as those on abortion and surgical p...











    And you just proved that there is no defined separation of Church and State.

    Also, I'm not American. Our hippocratic oaths differ as well as the meaning.

    From the University of Ottawa's website:
    "Hippocrates, often referred to as the “Father of Medicine,” was an ancient Greek physician who is said to have lived according to outstanding moral values and ethical medical practice. Perhaps the greatest contribution made by Hippocrates to medicine is the Hippocratic Oath (7). For centuries, physicians recited this oath (either the original version or modifications) at convocation ceremonies and upon entering medical practice. Although the oath has been subject to much debate over the centuries, both in terms of its content and its author, it remains one of the most quoted documents in the history of medicine.

    The Hippocratic Oath was an oath taken by physicians to protect all life, to hold in highest regard one’s teachers, to recognize one’s limitations, and to renounce self-interest in the treatment of patients. Certain values inherent in the Hippocratic Oath are echoed in modern views of professionalism. Such attributes continue to define modern expectations of physicians and medical students alike, Other views found in the Hippocratic Oath, such as those on abortion and surgical practice are not consistent with contemporary beliefs in modern Western secular societies. Given the complexity of medicine in the 21st century, an ancient oath cannot possibly encompass current values. Therefore, the significance of the Hippocratic Oath does not reside in its specific guidelines, but rather, in its symbolism of an ideal: the selfless dedication to the preservation of human life."

    SELFLESS which means personal beliefs should not interfer with the care provided.

    The basic jist of the oath used in my line of work in the health care field is simply this: I swear to do no harm. I swear to provide care to enhance longivity and quality of life.

    The primary patient is the mother, the baby is secondary. That is universal in either Canada or the US. In Canada, legaly as it stands (and this part i don't agree with) a baby is not a baby until it draws its first breath. I believe the baby is not a viable human being until the 24th week of pregnancy. Before this time there is no medical intervention that could preserve the average fetus' life outside of the womb as the lungs are too severely underdeveloped to permit appropriate gas exchange, there for respiration is not possible. Ventolators would have no effect in countering this.

    There for, from this view, American laws do discriminate against women.

    So ya know, I'm not a doctor or a nurse. I grew up with true separation of Church and Government, and it's reflected in the care that I provide.

    So now that's settled, let's get back to the original topic: Exorcism.
    (more)
  • Chokmah acacia86 2012/05/04 20:57:46
    Chokmah
    Flavius Josephus, a well-known Jewish historian who described the destruction of Jerusalem, wrote: "The law, moreover enjoins us to bring up all our offspring, and forbids women to cause abortion of what is begotten, or to destroy it afterward; and if any woman appears to have so done, she will be a murderer of her child, by destroying a living creature, and diminishing humankind."

    (Josephus, Flavius, The works of Flavius Josephus translated by William Whiston ; with an introductory essay by H. Stebbing, Philadelphia, 1966, pg. 374-375)
  • acacia86 Chokmah 2012/05/04 21:53:45 (edited)
    acacia86
    Let's consider the scenario I originally replied with. Mother requires medications which are high risk to a developing child in order for her (the mother) to live, alternative lesser risk treatments don't work. Whose right to live is greater? Mother or child?

    Also that translated quote is from a historian from the 1st Century. Again, as with the Hippocratic oath, doesn't apply to the 21st century's more modern living standard. Back in those days women were guaranteed to be cared for either by family or by their husband, there were forced weddings if a young man got a young girl pregnant.

    These days it isn't uncommon to hear of a girl getting disowned and thrown into the streets for being pregnant. When laws are put in place to protect young girls from such treatment then we'll be in a better position to deny them the right to abortion.

    Ontop of that, what sort of laws are in place in the US to prevent the father of the child from walking out and skipping out on child support? Will the court during custody battles, freeze the father's account if he refuses to pay child support? Will they automatically withdraw the support payments from each paycheck? The young mothers I know of around here don't have to worry about these things, my cousins in the states do.
  • Chokmah acacia86 2012/05/05 04:05:15
    Chokmah
    Okay, now we can get back to the culture and its values. And that, I can agree with you, a culture needs traditions. Religion helps to solidify honorable traditions and imprint honorable principles. The West needs to return to its roots, but needs to temper its fervor with what we have learned from experience over the last 500 years.
  • Null_Shock Chokmah 2012/05/05 04:00:25
    Null_Shock
    You are an idiot....I don't even know where to start....frak it I'll let some one else point out all your inaccurate information which begins in the first 2 lines.
  • Chokmah Null_Shock 2012/05/05 04:34:26 (edited)
    Chokmah
    Start by studying the teachings of our Founding Fathers, and why they fought a revolution to free us from the tyrannical stranglehold of totalitarian governments.
  • ehrhornp Chokmah 2012/05/04 06:37:13
    ehrhornp
    +1
    lol, but Ronald Wilson Reagan equals 666. A coincidence, I think not. Ronald Reagan only said he believed. I think he lied. If you are going to work in a public hospital, then you should be expected to perform medical procedures. If you don't want to perform those procedures, then leave. We don't need phony doctors. Fire their butts.
  • Chokmah ehrhornp 2012/05/05 03:54:52
    Chokmah
    Hebrew numerology does not count the number of Roman letters in a person's name. A coincidence? I think not. Nice try Zohar.

    In Hebrew, each letter possesses a numerical value. Gematria is the calculation of the numerical equivalence of letters, words, or phrases, and, on that basis, gaining, insight into interrelation of different concepts and exploring the interrelationship between words and ideas.

    The assumption behind this technique is that numerical equivalence is not coincidental. Since the world was created through God's "speech," each letter represents a different creative force. Thus, the numerical equivalence of two words reveals an internal connection between the creative potentials of each one. (Tanya, Sha'ar HaYichud VeHaEmunah)

    There are four basic ways to calculate the numerical equivalent for each individual letter: Absolute Value,Ordinal Value,Reduced Value,Integral Reduced value

    The Tikunei Zohar explains that the concept of reduced value is related to the spiritual world of Yetzirah. On that basis, a relationship can be established between these four forms of calculation, the four spiritual realms, and the four letters of God's name.
  • acacia86 2012/05/04 03:55:20 (edited)
    No the Church should not be conducting exorcisms
    acacia86
    +2
    historically those who were supposivedly possessed infact suffered a medical condition, epilepsy being a common one. "The exoricsm of Emily Rose" was loosely baesd on the story of Anneliese Michel, an epileptic and schizophrenic who died due to people allowing her in her unstable state to decide to discontinue her anti psycotic and anti convulsant therapy which had treated her since she was a child. Yes it's true those medications are not fool proof but all of the 'signs of possession' that Anneliese Michel displayed are also commonly displayed by schizophrenics. Now a days, they would've done an MRI to confirm diagnosis rather than allow her illness to kill her through exorcism.
  • Chokmah acacia86 2012/05/05 04:00:37
    Chokmah
    Exorcism did not cause her schizophrenia and epilepsy. This was unfortunate but they didn't know what they didn't know. Just as not too many years ago doctors were prescribing thalidomide to expectant mothers and creating severely deformed children. A lifetime sentence actually caused by Big Pharma and modern medicine.

    This was done in modern Europe and Great Britain in the 1960's. A horrible tragedy based on ignorance and modern medicine.
  • acacia86 Chokmah 2012/05/08 10:24:35
    acacia86
    +1
    Never said it *caused* schizophrenia and epilepsy, I said it fed into her schizophrenia and allowed her illness to lead her away from life saving treatment in favour of exoricsm and religioius delusion. Are all religious people delusional? No. But Michel certainly was. She had auditory hallucinations, ate insects, she supposively spoke in tongues, however she did learn to speak hebrew in Sunday school. Not to mention the six demons she was supposively possessed by were all infamous criminals or mentioned in biblical scripture. People that she would've known about through school teachings which isnt uncommon in schizophrenic hallucination.

    They should've denied her request as soon as she stopped medicating and forced her to continue with medications that would have saved her life. So yes the church was responsible for her death.

    you're using medications that were misguidedly used to treat severe morning sickness and comparing it to anticonvulsants proven to treat the conditons they're prescribed for. One has nothing to do with the other. Morning sickness anti emetics are in a category all of their own because you're dealing with one patient you can fully see and one you can only see through technnology assistance. Whole different ball game.
  • Chokmah acacia86 2012/05/08 13:00:39
    Chokmah
    Yes, everything you discuss is in a 'whole different ball game'. You seem to make up your own rules.
  • acacia86 Chokmah 2012/05/08 22:45:47
    acacia86
    No i compare apples to apples, not apples to oranges.
  • B Lawrence 2012/05/04 03:51:55
    Yes the Church should still be conducting exorcisms
    B Lawrence
    +2
    If it's voluntary, sure. People should be able to do what they want. If it doesn't hurt anyone. I'd rather go on a bike ride...but hey.
  • Figment 2012/05/04 03:51:51
    I am not sure
    Figment
    +3
    Often mental illness has been confused with demonic possession in the past. Of course it's hard to prove whether it's true or not. It's amazing how much psychology/psychiatry is speculative.

    My answer, probably not... but it will continue of course. Maybe behind closed doors.
  • acacia86 Figment 2012/05/04 04:12:46 (edited)
    acacia86
    +1
    actually through MRI it is possible to identify schizo-affective disorder. Epilepsy wasn't recognized as an actual illness until Dr. Penfield began performing high risk brain surgeries on people suffering 'episodes'. Recently (as in the past decade) researchers have been able to identify several key points on an MRI that differ between a healthy brain and a schizophrenic brain. The bipolar brain is similar in several ways. So psychology/psychiatry is becoming less speculative and more factual.
  • Chokmah acacia86 2012/05/04 04:24:10
    Chokmah
    +2
    That is correct, and I have even seen studies linking viral infections in childhood and infancy to autism and schizophrenia. I am beginning to think that a lot of autoimmune disorders have a viral antagonist.
  • Figment acacia86 2012/05/04 04:25:44 (edited)
    Figment
    You are correct, and yet one can easily qualify as psychotic and get meds based on a few stories told to a shrink. Pretend to be depressed or to have ADHD and you can get pills as easy as pie. Practice is not keeping up with science?
  • Chokmah Figment 2012/05/04 04:26:38
    Chokmah
    But for thousands of years people did not understand the diseases and conditions of the human brain. Exorcisms at least let some of the patients and their families have some hope.

    Let's look at these exorcisms as palliatives and appreciate their psychological value to the victims and their families.
  • Figment Chokmah 2012/05/04 04:36:45
    Figment
    +1
    Sure, as long as it's not torture disguised as medicine. Also doesn't the person have to consent to being exorcised in order to make it legal?
  • sara Figment 2012/05/04 06:04:53
    sara
    The devil uses people with weaknesses of all kinds including sick minds
  • donald 2012/05/04 03:36:45 (edited)
    Yes the Church should still be conducting exorcisms
    donald
    +1
    Jesus drove tormenting spirits out of people.There are many Christians groups doing that. It takes faith. I don't know about the ritualistic churches.
  • Chokmah donald 2012/05/04 04:12:42
    Chokmah
    +1
    The traditional Christian Churches that have rituals have a great, deep, and abiding faith. After all, these Apostolic Churches brought the Bible to us moderns at great expense. It took years to hand copy the Bible during most of recorded history. I don't know about the American folk bible churches and their showy exorcisms, power point presentations, and rock bands on stage.
  • donald Chokmah 2012/05/04 04:43:12
    donald
    When I said I don't know about the ritual churches,its because I don't know about them.So I don't speak about something I don't know about.I don't go to those kind of churches.
  • Singerar Chokmah 2012/05/04 04:43:39
    Singerar
    +1
    It's quite frightening. I've calculated to have gone to over 3000 services before I was 25. Lots of tent revivals, typical 4 services a week, couple of Snake Handling freakshows. I was lucky to have been born with half a brain to survive all the voo doo.

    Since I was a singer and fascinated with Science and Psychology...I would have to put myself in a "happy place" to survive all the trauma and guilt. I ended up studying theology and Cult Religions for fun, just to fight fire with fire. The psychology of religios faith is fascinating!!! Kinda like a Heroin high.

    My main problem with basic Christianity was the vast number of people who have been murdered or imprisoned in the name of God.

    I am Spiritual ... But this organized new stuff?...is for the birds. And as I said earlier, quite frightening.
  • Singerar 2012/05/04 03:31:14
    I am not sure
    Singerar
    +1
    I thought electric shock worked well for that!
  • Chokmah Singerar 2012/05/04 04:18:01
    Chokmah
    +1
    Funny, I had an older friend whose wife had electric shock therapy and he told me that everyone at the asylum back then were walking around with Bibles, and that most of the asylum inmates thought they were prophets, and some thought they were Jesus. My older friend told me that he always connected religious zealotry with mental illness after that.

    Today we have psychotropic drugs, lithium, anti-convulsives, and anti-depressants. To think that Jesus exorcised an epileptic in the Bible when today we would control these siezures with phenobarbital or some such other common drug.
  • Singerar Chokmah 2012/05/04 04:29:20
    Singerar
    Right???? Oh so true...

    Now we've got Evangelical preachers saying they will Exorcise your child if you THINK they have a "demon" in them. (probably just ADHD)
  • Chokmah Singerar 2012/05/04 04:33:03
    Chokmah
    +1
    Now you're giving me the chills!!!
  • Singerar Chokmah 2012/05/04 04:56:33
    Singerar
    My parents ex pastor gave a whole sermon on it while I was in town about 5 years ago. He was a Dr. In Theology. As soon as he said what he did, I stood up and walked out, followed by my Father.

    I waited after the service for the "hand shaking" line and asked him if he was scared of child abuse for trying to exorcize a "demon" out of a child. He looked at me, smiled, and said "God Bless you child".

    He was fired 3 weeks later for not taking his meds...see, he was Bi-polar. His final Sunday....he stood at the podium, didn't say anything for about 10 min. Rubbed his head, then said..."Are you ready for the Rapture?". Then walked off the floor. (oopsie). THAT'S the time they noticed there was a problem...not all the others.

    He had been counseling children.
    Boogie men do exist....sometime under the guise of God.
  • KANKY 2012/05/04 03:22:18
    Yes the Church should still be conducting exorcisms
    KANKY
    +1
    it might help all these sick crazy people out their if it was up to me i would kill them all especially the child rapiest and kidnappers!

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/05/26 06:08:51

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals