Quantcast

Should Smoking Be Allowed Outdoors?

SodaHead Living 2011/02/24 16:00:00
You!
Add Photos & Videos
The great outdoors has become the last remaining option for many Americans in need of a cigarette break -- but even this might be going up in smoke.

Chicago and San Francisco already have initiatives to curb secondhand smoke in public places. Now, New York City will ban smoking in parks, beaches, boardwalks, pedestrian plazas and other public spaces beginning on May 23, Reuters reports.

"Frederick Law Olmsted hailed public parks as the 'lungs of the city' -- a haven where one could escape the overcrowded, noisy and polluted streets," Mayor Michael Bloomberg said in a statement after signing the legislation on Tuesday. "We need to ensure that our public spaces provide just that -- a healthy place in which to relax and enjoy the surroundings."

New Yorkers are not allowed to smoke in restaurants and bars. They are permitted to light up on sidewalks and streets as well as in parking lots and in their homes, although most landlords don't allow it.

Beginning on May 23, any New Yorker who's caught smoking in a "banned" public space will be given a warning, followed by a $50 fine.

Needless to say, the city's smokers are running out of places to puff -- and some are none to happy about it.

"This is tyranny, rationalized by a lie," Audrey Silk, director of New York Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker Harassment, told Reuters. "That secondhand smoke is harming anybody outside is an absolute lie."

Read More: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/23/us-nyc-s...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • mana kai 2011/02/24 19:03:13
    Yes
    mana kai
    +15
    Just because you can smell a cigarette doesn't mean you are breathing a lot of second hand smoke in. People living in most cities breath in the equivalent of two packs of cigarettes a day from pollution.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • indiejen 2011/02/26 17:33:52
    Yes
    indiejen
    +2
    I don't smoke, but if we keep allowing it, the government will keep coming after more and more of our rights. Smoker's rights today, your rights tomorrow. People need to be more understanding and tolerant of each others vices.
  • Soup Man indiejen 2011/02/26 18:21:52
    Soup Man
    +2
    You got that right! it's all about control! Wake the F-UP people
  • Jackie Soup Man 2011/02/26 19:43:23
    Jackie
    How could you confuse "control" with health concerns. Just because you aren't concerned about your health, doesn't give you the right to ruin mine, and make my clothes and hair stink!!!!!!!!!! YOU need to wake up before it is too late for your health and welfare.
  • Soup Man Jackie 2011/02/27 17:33:00
    Soup Man
    +1
    "Domer"

    One who would live in a dome put on the white jumpsuit and eat the behavioral pill each day as a good domer would do
  • paulc 2011/02/26 17:24:32
    Yes
    paulc
    +1
    Smokers reap their own rewards.
  • JanHopkins 2011/02/26 17:20:33
    Yes
    JanHopkins
    +2
    Idiots!
  • jabin moore 2011/02/26 16:57:43
    No
    jabin moore
    +2
    you shouldnt even smoke at all any way its polluting our earth
  • Soup Man jabin m... 2011/02/26 18:27:49 (edited)
    Soup Man
    +3
    "Domer"

    One who would live in a dome put on their white jumpsuit and eat the behavioral pill each day as a good domer would do.
  • KeithCa... jabin m... 2011/02/26 23:23:00
    KeithCameron
    +2
    just be quiet please...
  • jake jabin m... 2011/02/26 23:51:24
    jake
    Very true.
  • nefertari 2011/02/26 16:29:32
    Yes
    nefertari
    Smoke is unhealthy....you can still inhale it outside and get cancer from someone else's bad habit. If they want to kill themselves go do it in their own homes.
  • amazinggrace 2011/02/26 15:49:00
    Yes
    amazinggrace
    +3
    More Govt. intrusion. Where will it end?
  • hasher 2011/02/26 15:40:53
    Yes
    hasher
    +2
    its getting ridiculous now with all this govt. interference. come on, let the smokers have that right at least.
  • catgirl369 hasher 2011/02/26 16:52:40
    catgirl369
    to maybe kill themselves and others
  • Soup Man catgirl369 2011/02/26 18:29:05 (edited)
  • catgirl369 Soup Man 2011/02/26 18:33:16
    catgirl369
    domer?
  • Steve King 2011/02/26 15:37:35
    No
    Steve King
    As long as smoke isn't purposely blown into people' faces and there is respect by the smokers, I don't have an issue. I am sure the government will ban it sooner or later because it is bad for the environment.
  • Soup Man Steve King 2011/02/26 18:31:34
  • Steve King Soup Man 2011/02/26 18:33:46
    Steve King
    huh?
  • Brian Griffin 2011/02/26 15:29:12
    Yes
    Brian Griffin
    +1
    To be honest i don't really know if you smoke outdoors it affects the Global Warming if you smoke indoors people will breath it in so i'll go for smoking outdoors
  • fortuenti 2011/02/26 15:14:36
    Yes
    fortuenti
    Where people are gathered in concentration there should be smoking restrictions. Tobacco smoke is toxic and disgusting
  • garyt212 fortuenti 2011/02/27 05:32:09
    garyt212
    So is exhaust emissions in air polluted cities toxic and disgusting...
  • Steve Johnson 2011/02/26 15:10:15
    Yes
    Steve Johnson
    +1
    I'm not a smoker, and I detest the smell of tobacco smoke. Still, if smoking is made illegal both indoors and out, where are you going to do it? Underwater?

    People shouldn't smoke outdoors in your face, but surely some accommodation could be made. If they want to ban tobacco, they should just do it.
  • dublin9 2011/02/26 15:00:33 (edited)
    No
    dublin9
    +2
    I've lived my life in New York City or what I like to call, "Moscow on the Hudson." Its Mayor Bloomberg is an anti-smoking, anti-gun fanatic. I might add that the billionaire Mayor was caught several times in pish posh hotel parties where his investment banker friends were puffing away at his table. I suppose laws don't apply to the wealthy and connected. Typical liberal logic.

    Smokers have been marked as the new persecuted group in America because they transcend all races, ethnicities and religions. Nobody can accuse persecuting them as discriminatory under law. But things have really become absurd. Smoking on NYC beaches was banned on the grounds that the butts add to Ocean Pollution. Nuts.
  • garyt212 dublin9 2011/02/27 05:33:45
    garyt212
    +2
    Bloomberg has his head up his a$$ so far he hasn't seen daylight in decades!
  • whipnet 2011/02/26 14:50:46
    Yes
    whipnet
    +5
    I quit smoking 7 years ago so it doesn't matter to me, but some of these anti-smoking laws are getting ridiculous. More nanny state.

    *
  • dublin9 whipnet 2011/02/26 17:40:58
    dublin9
    It SHOULD matter to you. Nanny state tyranny never stops with one thing.
  • whipnet dublin9 2011/02/26 19:47:34
    whipnet
    +1
    People smoking in public does not matter to me or bother me. A Nanny state does.
  • dublin9 whipnet 2011/02/26 20:31:15
    dublin9
    As it does me, my friend.
  • Tuna 2011/02/26 14:34:23
    Yes
    Tuna
    We need the TRUTH; most people that smoke do NOT suffer related illnesses, a small percentage do. If people that smoke don't get related issues, how can you just by being in the same room? People that never smoked get those same illnesses, NOT from cigarettes. So what is the common denominator if not cigarettes?
  • garyt212 Tuna 2011/02/27 05:35:51
    garyt212
    Maybe living in filthy air, polluted cities where bus exhaust far exceeds a puff on a cigarette?
  • SpeedDemon BN-0 2011/02/26 14:27:46
    Yes
    SpeedDemon BN-0
    +2
    Yeah, then what will the gov. do next, tax our breathing air!!??
  • garyt212 SpeedDe... 2011/02/27 05:36:29
    garyt212
    +1
    Look out...fart tax coming next...LOL
  • lawlerskates 2011/02/26 14:14:25
    Yes
    lawlerskates
    +2
    That's the only place smokers have left.
  • Pinball Wizard 2011/02/26 14:10:17
    Yes
    Pinball Wizard
    They already banned us from public buildings & we will always be able to smoke in our vehicles.
  • outofthisworld 2011/02/26 14:03:39
    Yes
    outofthisworld
    As long as you are raping your own lungs and not mine, I'm ok with it.
  • Faoxy1245 2011/02/26 14:02:22
    No
    Faoxy1245
    Its not just about second hand smoke, but think of what the chemicals from cigarettes do to the enviroment. If that isnt enough a good amount of smokers litter too. Not everybody has the eecency to dipose of their cigarette properly. The way I see it stricter bans on smoking regulations could possibly stop people from smoking which everyone knows is horrible for your own health anyway.
  • frjm 2011/02/26 13:51:11
    Yes
    frjm
    +5
    I will add my personal opinion in response to this question; I believe any business owner should be allowed to determine if smoking should be allowed in their establishment. It is not for the government to determine, it is for the patrons of that establishment to determine. If they don't like to be in an establishment which allows smoking they do not have to go there. If the business loses enough patrons, they will conclude what they want to do.

    Oh by the way, I AM NOT A SMOKER!!!!

    frjm
  • TerroRi... frjm 2011/02/26 14:32:50
    TerroRising~PWCM~JLA
    +1
    Nailed it.! Personal property rights, the foundation of freedom as we have come to know it. The only option now would be to turn your establishment into a members only club.
  • frjm TerroRi... 2011/03/06 23:26:12
    frjm
    +1
    In Arizona we can't even do that. I checked into it and they only allow clubs like the ELKs and the VFW.

    frjm

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/05/26 03:39:01

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals