
Should Pets Be Required to Wear a Seat Belt?
SodaHead Living
2012/06/11 19:39:13
|
|
|||||
|
278 votes
|
|
37% | |||
|
468 votes
|
|
63% | |||
Hmm ... we've never really thought about this one before. Should owners have to buckle up their pets in the car, or face a hefty fine? In New Jersey, penalties for driving with an unrestrained pet range from $250 to $1,000 and as much as six months in jail, NorthJersey.com reports.


"That’s for each offense," Col. Frank Rizzo, police superintendent for the New Jersey Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, told reporters. "So, if you have more than one animal loose in your car, just do the math…"
The New Jersey statute defines unrestrained pets in cars as animal cruelty. Some pet owners use small cages, but most buy seats and harnesses that attach directly to existing seat belts, NorthJersey.com reports. However, a 2010 survey conducted by the American Automobile Association showed that 20 percent of those polled allow their dogs to sit on their laps while they drive. And nearly one-third of the respondents admitted that unrestrained pets are distracting.
“Some people tell us they like to let their pets hang their heads out the window to take in the fresh air," Rizzo said, "but dogs and cats become projectiles in a crash." Do you think people should be forced to buckle up their pets?
“Some people tell us they like to let their pets hang their heads out the window to take in the fresh air," Rizzo said, "but dogs and cats become projectiles in a crash." Do you think people should be forced to buckle up their pets?
Top Opinion
-
Yes+19I tie my dog up in the passenger seat or the back seat cause she'll try and jump in my lap (this is no purse dog, this is a 65-70lbs adult black lab, who still thinks she's a puppy) She could obstruct my view! Very dangerous. And for the safety of the dog too, if in a car accident I'd hate to think of my poor girl to fly out the window and getting hurt worst!























We need to buy three of them! (and they're not cheap!)
BUT, the key here is the fact that the animal DOES NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON. Yeah, it can understand "Oh, car ride", but it doesn't understand the dangers and it cannot be taught the dangers. I think that making pets "wear a seat belt" should be at the discretion of the owner. Try tying a Rottie or Sheppard into a seat belt if you own a small car without a suitable trunk to keep their cage in. Some small cats and dogs can fit in carriers, but don't like them. It could be just as much a distraction for the driver if their dear pet is crying like it's being knifed in the backseat. And some just like to be able to move and readjust themselves-- try taking a ten-hour drive with a restrained animal. That's much more of a "cruelty to animals" than "protecting" them. They don't understand that it's dangerous or that you're 'denying them a safety' or anything, all they understand is that they haven't broken any rules and are suddenly in a cage/tied in a carseat/in a pet-carrier in the back of a car.
God, this sounds like PETA crap. I can't believe so many people said "yes" or that it's an actual law anywhere.