Quantcast

Should Pets Be Required to Wear a Seat Belt?

SodaHead Living 2012/06/11 19:39:13
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Hmm ... we've never really thought about this one before. Should owners have to buckle up their pets in the car, or face a hefty fine? In New Jersey, penalties for driving with an unrestrained pet range from $250 to $1,000 and as much as six months in jail, NorthJersey.com reports.

pets seat belt

"That’s for each offense," Col. Frank Rizzo, police superintendent for the New Jersey Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, told reporters. "So, if you have more than one animal loose in your car, just do the math…"

The New Jersey statute defines unrestrained pets in cars as animal cruelty. Some pet owners use small cages, but most buy seats and harnesses that attach directly to existing seat belts, NorthJersey.com reports. However, a 2010 survey conducted by the American Automobile Association showed that 20 percent of those polled allow their dogs to sit on their laps while they drive. And nearly one-third of the respondents admitted that unrestrained pets are distracting.

“Some people tell us they like to let their pets hang their heads out the window to take in the fresh air," Rizzo said, "but dogs and cats become projectiles in a crash." Do you think people should be forced to buckle up their pets?
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • glass_butterfly ~YSU~ 2012/06/11 21:28:33 (edited)
    Yes
    glass_butterfly ~YSU~
    +19
    I tie my dog up in the passenger seat or the back seat cause she'll try and jump in my lap (this is no purse dog, this is a 65-70lbs adult black lab, who still thinks she's a puppy) She could obstruct my view! Very dangerous. And for the safety of the dog too, if in a car accident I'd hate to think of my poor girl to fly out the window and getting hurt worst! Pet lover

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Inquisi... TKramar 2012/06/14 14:47:50
    Inquisitve Kat
    Okay... you can, if you're an idiot.
  • TKramar Inquisi... 2012/06/14 21:06:17
    TKramar
    SUV's have a "trunk" inside the cabin, other trunks are really no different.
  • Inquisi... TKramar 2012/06/14 23:54:16
    Inquisitve Kat
    Would you put a child in one?
  • TKramar Inquisi... 2012/06/15 11:04:31
    TKramar
    Sure. I'd ride back there too. I've seen some roomy trunks.
  • KrSpo 2012/06/12 14:47:52
    Yes
    KrSpo
    +1
    absolutely. And those idiot rednecks who allow their dogs to run and jump all over the bed of their trucks, we need to take the driver out of the vehicles and shoot them in the head.
  • Gwen KrSpo 2012/06/12 15:01:21
    Gwen
    ....so much for allowing "all living creatures an opportunity to survive an accident"
  • KrSpo Gwen 2012/06/12 15:02:27
    KrSpo
    +1
    nope not at all. Shooting an idiot isn't an accident.
  • democoach KrSpo 2012/06/12 17:53:57
    democoach
    a great example of an idiot liberal! who thinks they are right and everyone else deserves death! IDIOT!
  • KrSpo democoach 2012/06/12 18:38:19
    KrSpo
    +1
    So, I guess you are one of those idiot neo-Fascists that allows your dog to jump around the bed of your truck, risking their lives? thought so, troll
  • democoach KrSpo 2012/06/13 05:17:16
    democoach
    you people are idiots! since when is keeping the country as much law free facist? you are facist! facists think we need laws put for everything
  • darlenedoskas1969 2012/06/12 14:39:15
    Yes
    darlenedoskas1969
    +1
    dogs should not be distracting the driver... if keeping them in seat belts is the best way to accomplish this, then I am all for it!!
    I love my dogs, but they don't belong in the driver's lap, or ESPECIALLY under the driver's feet(they're little, and easily fit under the peddles if I let them go there)... most people don't know how else to control their dogs than to confine them in some way, so those people especially, should be expected to keep their dogs in the back seat
  • democoach darlene... 2012/06/12 17:57:40
    democoach
    our dog isn't distracting the driver! she sits in the back seat, actually she lays down. and stays there. laws wont make any difference!
  • Inquisi... democoach 2012/06/12 19:18:39
    Inquisitve Kat
    If you get in a car crash, she becomes a projectile.
  • democoach Inquisi... 2012/06/13 05:17:51
    democoach
    thing is we know how to drive, unlike you apperently
  • Inquisi... democoach 2012/06/13 06:31:40
    Inquisitve Kat
    Oh, I know how to drive, and I'm sure you do, but you can't speak for the other drivers on the road.
    ANYONE can get in an accident.
  • democoach Inquisi... 2012/06/13 13:52:03
    democoach
    +1
    true, but defensive driving.

    by all means though if you think you shoul dput a seatbelt on your dog, go ahead and do it, do you really need the government to make you do it before you do it?
  • Inquisi... democoach 2012/06/13 15:40:31
    Inquisitve Kat
    I don't need the government to make me do it, but some people do... I don't care about them, I care about their dogs.
  • democoach Inquisi... 2012/06/13 20:04:16
    democoach
    no you don't you just care about having the governments filthy nose in every aspect of our lives! if i don't want to wear one, i wouldn't in spite of the retarded law!
  • Inquisi... democoach 2012/06/13 21:11:13
    Inquisitve Kat
    You'd choose to not wear a safety belt just to spite the government? That sounds incredibly childish. Besides, they don't care... they'll just give you a ticket and go about their day.
    And no, I don't want the government involved in every aspect of our lives...I've been bitching about people who let their pets ride unrestrained long before there was any talk about making it against the law.
  • dev_dvj 2012/06/12 14:37:19
    Yes
    dev_dvj
    not a bad idea or be put in cages in the car. for their own safety
  • A.Oscar 2012/06/12 14:35:23
    Yes
    A.Oscar
    Sometimes a few dogs like to run around in the car, and if come to the drive lap could be accident.
  • Chief 2012/06/12 14:32:04
    No
    Chief
    +4
    once a Government becomes too big and enacts to many laws, it becomes impossible to live ones life without eventually breaking one of them.

    Pretty soon you won't be able to leave your house without being fined for something.
  • Myopini... Chief 2012/06/12 15:07:18
    Myopinionmatters
    I agree that the bigger government gets the more problems there are to live, but in all reality this is an addition to the seatbelt law, and really does have justice behind it.
  • democoach Myopini... 2012/06/12 18:00:56
    democoach
    no it doesn't! seatbelt laws should if anything be lifted! as its a law that only serves as tax to power hungry cops! seatbelts may or may not save lives! in some cases might actually take lives! besides its no tup to the government to tell me i can or cannot skydive if i want! its my life! seatbelts only hurt me if i choose to wear one or not! you will no tget hurt by me not wearing a seatbelt! that law is stupid!
  • Chief democoach 2012/06/12 20:02:52
    Chief
    You are right on that, seatbelts may or may not save lives, it depends on the type of accident, the car, there are so many factors. Also like you said, you are not hurting anyone by not wearing your seatbelt.
  • Jen 2012/06/12 14:31:10
    Yes
    Jen
    I'm not crazy about the idea of yet another law ... but I can see the rationale behind it.
  • democoach Jen 2012/06/12 18:03:03
    democoach
    only liberals can make any law no matter how stupid seem rational! i supose your "not crazy about the idea of another law" but you can see the rationale behind the NDAA< ACTA, ANti-protes bills, etc etc! roflol! thus wanting the government in our lives! i bet you see the rationale behind putting camera;s in change rooms! lol. laws hav already gone too far!
  • Jen democoach 2012/06/13 00:30:23
    Jen
    I wouldn't put a pet-seat-belt law on a par with something like the NDAA. That would be morally equating two things that are not morally equal. Let's leave that to the liberals; it's what they're good at.
  • democoach Jen 2012/06/13 05:20:43
    democoach
    you sounded like a liberal! every new law that restricts us, but doesn't keep us from hurting others is a law closer to facism! and and giant steps away from true democracy
  • RJeffreySavlov 2012/06/12 14:29:56
    Yes
    RJeffreySavlov
    +1
    Pets can be a greater distraction than small children, who are required by law to be belted in. What is the difference between our two legged and four legged children in this instance.
  • Ahrtal 2012/06/12 14:28:32
    Yes
    Ahrtal
    I think the fines are outrageous, though, and the approach should be a safety issue. Common sense tells one that an untethered animal in a car is a potential hazard to the driver, passengers, and the animal. The interior of an auto is a very confined space, not designed for fetching a ball or playing tricks. It meant to seat passengers and the driver optimally to get from one point to another. If an animal has a panic attack or becomes excited, mayhem may ensue. It can be distracting, and in an accident the furry friend can become a deadly missile. A better idea might be to fine them for the first offense, and the next offense is mandatory seizure of the animal. It might be cute to have Fido hangin' out the window with mom or dad, but does lead to driver inattention when his/her butt ends up blocking the driver's vision. I've got two dogs, and I put them in doggie belts. At one point I had seven (all over seventy lbs.), and picking them up from the boarding facility and getting them home (10 miles) was, to say the least, an adventure.

    Another "cute" trick is the doggie in the bed of a truck. They should be in a carrier or physically restrained (comfortably). Yeah, I did it once---Gino (a pitt/beagle mix---We called him our beagle on steroids.) jumped out of the b...

    I think the fines are outrageous, though, and the approach should be a safety issue. Common sense tells one that an untethered animal in a car is a potential hazard to the driver, passengers, and the animal. The interior of an auto is a very confined space, not designed for fetching a ball or playing tricks. It meant to seat passengers and the driver optimally to get from one point to another. If an animal has a panic attack or becomes excited, mayhem may ensue. It can be distracting, and in an accident the furry friend can become a deadly missile. A better idea might be to fine them for the first offense, and the next offense is mandatory seizure of the animal. It might be cute to have Fido hangin' out the window with mom or dad, but does lead to driver inattention when his/her butt ends up blocking the driver's vision. I've got two dogs, and I put them in doggie belts. At one point I had seven (all over seventy lbs.), and picking them up from the boarding facility and getting them home (10 miles) was, to say the least, an adventure.

    Another "cute" trick is the doggie in the bed of a truck. They should be in a carrier or physically restrained (comfortably). Yeah, I did it once---Gino (a pitt/beagle mix---We called him our beagle on steroids.) jumped out of the bed as I was pulling out of the driveway. Fortunately, he was not injured, and he never rode in the bed again. He wasn't at fault; I was. It looked cool to have yer dawg in th bed o' yer truck. It is simply irresponsible to subject a dog to that potentially fatal scenario. And if he does jump/fall out of the truck bed, he becomes a hazard for other drivers either as a projectile, or avoidance.

    Now with cats, I don't think one could belt one in. I've tried, and Muffins just don't meow that way. A carrier is a must for a cat. Ya get used to the constant, monotone meowing, but you don't get a cat on your head or worse.
    (more)
  • kurtanderson1 2012/06/12 14:27:18
    Yes
    kurtanderson1
    Otherwise your dog could become a flying missile and end up going through the back of your head.
  • democoach kurtand... 2012/06/12 18:03:35
    democoach
    so you drive without a back seat or head protector? your not a safe driver!
  • MorganRae 2012/06/12 14:17:05
    No
    MorganRae
    Just tying the leash to the seatbelt should be good enough, no?
  • luna 2012/06/12 14:11:21
    Yes
    luna
    yes for safety just like humans. and that dog looks so cute in the car seat lol
  • democoach luna 2012/06/12 18:03:54
    democoach
    should not be law!
  • Wayne TH G 333 2012/06/12 14:01:59
    No
    Wayne TH G 333
    Not a seatbelt!!!
  • Darkitec 2012/06/12 13:32:27
    No
    Darkitec
    +3
    I'm sick and tired of nanny state government at any level
  • Inquisi... Darkitec 2012/06/12 19:17:02
    Inquisitve Kat
    I'm sick and tired of irresponsible pet owners and motorists.
  • Resp 2012/06/12 13:31:15
    Yes
    Resp
    +1
    I think so. My dog runs around the car when I'm driving. A seat belt would hold him in place and prevent him from being thrown against the windshield.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/05/19 12:06:31

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals