Should people be licensed to procreate? If not, why not?!

Question Living

Should people be licensed to procreate? If not, why not?!

by IsraeliteRian84 Posted April 25, 2008 01:02:23

I say license to drive...license to procreate!

Children are a blessing from "God", but if you are required to have a license to drive, why would you not be required to have a license to have children?. Sex is easy, most anyone can do it, but what about the consequences????.

This post has nothing to do with the NWO, or the population control agenda of any group.

It is just a personal thought...

Answers
Results
Recommend This

	Yes 53% 36 votes
	No 47% 32 votes

Sort By

Most Raves
Least Raves
Oldest
Newest

text size

Comments

#1 fan of SYTYCD August 07, 2009 06:38:37

Answered: No
thats stupid! People are still gonne have kids anyway. If a person was PG without this "license" then they'd have to have an abortion...with i am 110% against.
Andy August 06, 2009 16:07:10

Answered: No
theres nothing like a bit of right wing oprestion, & thats not a dig at people, just a general observation
Yume Supernova *~Never Forg... August 06, 2009 15:10:01

Answered: Yes
There are lots of people in this world who just should NOT be having kids.
Death Knight95 August 05, 2009 20:52:06

Answered: Yes
it'll make lots of people from having so many children and it'll make sure that those who ever have children will stay as a family
FoxFairy August 05, 2009 19:11:41

Answered: No
It might sound like a good idea consider all the people who have kids that shouldn't but, consider for a moment what kinds of discrimination could take place if licensing was required. What's to keep the people charge from deciding couples with certain genetic backgrounds couldn't have children, or even saying only rich people could? And exactly how would those not premitted to get licenses deal with the fact they can't have kids? Most likely they would have them anyhow, considering you can't demand people get fixed, unless you want treat them as through they are less than human.

Or are you suggesting we go the way of China? Who premits only one child per family, so that when a family is expecting a girl (but wants a boy) the child is aborted.
Brosia August 05, 2009 18:55:04

Answered: Yes
I have seen some seriously damaged people have even more damaged kids. I have witnessed a crack addict mother of 4 leave her kids at home to score. I have seen a 6 year old on a school day, miles away from his home and school, wandering the streets alone. These people do not deserve kids at all. Study, pass a test, prove that you can handle kids.
Thomas August 04, 2009 07:32:36

Answered: No
Instead, no license to drive or procreate. Fuck the government issuance of permissions for things we can do either way. Nothing wrong with procreation, for god's sake it's been happening for quite some time and it's what keeps the species going. So what if we don't "need" as many as are being born, who has the right to dictate when is enough? No one but me, for my own procreative tendencies, and my firearm agrees with me.
boomer August 02, 2009 16:02:55

Answered: No
procreation is a natural born right... what you're suggesting, Hitler, is called selective breeding, and it's sick.
Ihr Hase ~ Radix Libertas August 02, 2009 15:45:44

Answered: No
Slaves need permission to mate....

I am not a slave...

Side note**
Licensing is not any part of the Constitution, the government is forbidden from it...
Astoria Malfoy Bass ~*In Ha... August 02, 2009 06:28:46

Answered: Yes
(User did not leave a comment)
The Bantam Seditioner - Bla... August 02, 2009 06:26:04

Answered: No
(User did not leave a comment)
Daggett August 02, 2009 06:07:16

Answered: Yes
The human population is exceeding its resources. There needs to be some control
Dagon May 29, 2009 17:30:10

Answered: No
nature, not the courts mandates the driving force of reproduction. A vehicle is a device, sex is an instinct.
Diane May 29, 2009 16:59:33

Answered: Yes
I like to think that the end result would be fewer children abused, born drug addicted or left on garbage heaps.
dick May 29, 2009 16:52:46

Answered: Yes
Just the fact that Obie is in the white house is proof enough that some people are just to dumb to pass on their genes! We are fast becoming a third world country mainly because of the Liberals and their policy of allowing anything that can breathe and breed to cross our borders if they would make it a law that you had to be born to American parents on American soil it might help but then the American soil thing didn't help with Obie all he had to do was prove what a dishonest piece of crap he was to the Democrats and that made him a shoe in.
Charles May 29, 2009 16:07:23

Answered: No
Who has a right to say who can have children.Would only the rich have such a right.I think it is the best the way it is right now.
Hayley May 29, 2009 06:42:09

Answered: No
Because the government couldn't possible do this. I cannot totally agree with this. But I have seen instances where that thought came to mind...shame on me.
Lynn May 29, 2009 02:21:17

Answered: Yes
You have no idea how glad I am to hear that someone else shares this pov....

Few things a person can do will have more of an impact on the world around them than having children. And yet, any irresponsible, uneducated, ill-prepared moron can have one.... or 8...
Floe May 29, 2009 01:54:28

Answered: No
I'm sorry a license will not prevent unwanted pregnancies.
justonemom May 29, 2009 00:47:36

Answered: No
That's one slippery slope I don't want to slide down.