Should pedophilia be tolerated? Liberal Psychiatrists say yes
FanOreilly
2011/08/25 08:35:37
|
|
|||||
|
61 votes
|
|
17% | ||
|
302 votes
|
|
83% | ||
For years I have stated that as aberrant sexual practices such as homosexuality are normalized, so will other aberrant sexual practices such as pedophilia.
This comment is met with HOWLS by leftists who make the false claim that I think homosexuals are pedophiles. Sadly, the government school system has many victims so I clarify my point to the simple:
-Not all homosexuals are pedophiles
-Not even most homosexuals are pedophiles
-Some homosexuals are pedophiles but this is not the point.
The point is:
Homosexuality is an aberrant sexual practice long-recognized as immoral just like pedophilia.
The difference is that adults are better able to make decisions regarding 'consent' than children and therefore we tolerate homosexuality and do not tolerate pedophilia. (For now)
That distinction being made (for those too dull to understand it), pedophilia and homosexuality have for most of western civilization been considered aberrant and immoral and therefore discouraged and even made illegal by society.
We are changing society.
Homosexuality is going from being tolerated to being 'normalized'.
Seeing how homosexuality was considered immoral on the same level as pedophilia, we can expect pedophilia to begin a path toward 'normalization' as well.
This article supports my point:
"It’s often said, but bears repeating, that the TV, magazine and advertising images we absorb train our minds as to what is considered attractive — and, yes, specifically sexually attractive — in our culture. So, what does a magazine feature like this say? That it’s OK, even encouraged, to look at a child in a sexual way. …
But it’s adamantly not OK to look at a child in a sexual way, as harsh laws against pedophilia and child pornography attest. Maybe it seems like a leap of logic to move from provocative pictures to pornography and pedophilia, but again, images train the mind’s eye. The more readers and viewers see children in adult poses and in adult clothes, the less jarring it will be to those readers and viewers to see children in adult roles. "
We see evidence of this trend in the sexualization of children.
Usually liberals bring up the child rape in the Catholic church ignoring the facts that the average government teacher has a higher chance of being a child molester than the average Catholic priest and that the child rapists in the Catholic church are almost always left-leaning activist priests.
Another thing that happens is leftists try the slimey tactic of trying to accuse me of supporting child rape. This is both dishonest and amusing as liberals have no counter argument so they choose instead to smear.
I oppose homosexuality and pedophilia.
I believe homosexuality should be taboo but fully legal among adults. I believe sex with people under 18 should be illegal even between people under 18.
30 years ago (and for centuries before that) homosexuality was considered as bad as sex with children. Why is it now, as we redefine morality that one is OK, even normal and not the other?
Should we 'tolerate' pedophilia?
This comment is met with HOWLS by leftists who make the false claim that I think homosexuals are pedophiles. Sadly, the government school system has many victims so I clarify my point to the simple:
-Not all homosexuals are pedophiles
-Not even most homosexuals are pedophiles
-Some homosexuals are pedophiles but this is not the point.
The point is:
Homosexuality is an aberrant sexual practice long-recognized as immoral just like pedophilia.
The difference is that adults are better able to make decisions regarding 'consent' than children and therefore we tolerate homosexuality and do not tolerate pedophilia. (For now)
That distinction being made (for those too dull to understand it), pedophilia and homosexuality have for most of western civilization been considered aberrant and immoral and therefore discouraged and even made illegal by society.
We are changing society.
Homosexuality is going from being tolerated to being 'normalized'.
Seeing how homosexuality was considered immoral on the same level as pedophilia, we can expect pedophilia to begin a path toward 'normalization' as well.
This article supports my point:
"It’s often said, but bears repeating, that the TV, magazine and advertising images we absorb train our minds as to what is considered attractive — and, yes, specifically sexually attractive — in our culture. So, what does a magazine feature like this say? That it’s OK, even encouraged, to look at a child in a sexual way. …
But it’s adamantly not OK to look at a child in a sexual way, as harsh laws against pedophilia and child pornography attest. Maybe it seems like a leap of logic to move from provocative pictures to pornography and pedophilia, but again, images train the mind’s eye. The more readers and viewers see children in adult poses and in adult clothes, the less jarring it will be to those readers and viewers to see children in adult roles. "
We see evidence of this trend in the sexualization of children.
Usually liberals bring up the child rape in the Catholic church ignoring the facts that the average government teacher has a higher chance of being a child molester than the average Catholic priest and that the child rapists in the Catholic church are almost always left-leaning activist priests.
Another thing that happens is leftists try the slimey tactic of trying to accuse me of supporting child rape. This is both dishonest and amusing as liberals have no counter argument so they choose instead to smear.
I oppose homosexuality and pedophilia.
I believe homosexuality should be taboo but fully legal among adults. I believe sex with people under 18 should be illegal even between people under 18.
30 years ago (and for centuries before that) homosexuality was considered as bad as sex with children. Why is it now, as we redefine morality that one is OK, even normal and not the other?
Should we 'tolerate' pedophilia?
Read More: http://hotair.com/archives/2011/08/24/group-of-psy...
I am for the acceptance of homosexuality because homosexuality isn't inherently harmful, while pedophilia is by it's very nature destructive and traumatizing. Pedophilia should be a capital offense as far as I'm concerned.
Edited for typos.
(now I might be really moderated over this one) BE AWARE THAT SHOULD SOME PERVETED SON OF A BIT*H TOUCH ANY CHILD OR MY OWN FOR THAT MATTER HE BETTER GIVE HIS HEART TO GOD, HIS SOUL TO THE DEVIL, BECAUSE HIS ASS IS MINE AND I WILL NOT STOP TILL THE S.O.B. LEARNS.
If I am wrong than I guess I am wrong...These kids cannot speak for themselves and at a young age they are told that if you tell anyone the pervert will get you.
I know what I am talking about because I was molested by a perverted son of a bitch for years and years. My next door neighbor started when I was about 6 and didnt stop till I was 13 when I finally told my parents...trust me my dad was beating the guy when the sheriffs department came...and to the best of my knowledge he is still in prison though he would be well over a hundred now.
Did it make me gay? Nope infact I am so against gays that it is an obsession. And if any gays respond to this I WILL BLOCK YOU UNLESS I KNOW YOU...and I do know many gays but only because they have had the same thing happen to them in the past....
As I said before should someone touch in kids in an inapproitate manner I will introduce them to my two best friends MR. SMITH AND MR WESSON, and trust me I know places that no one will ever find them.
When one reads "We need to pray to God, " one assumes that the party is being sarcastic....obviously my crystal ball needs to go into the repair shop for updates.
As for your quote in Genesis I absolutely agree 100%, how ever try and convince those that do NOT believe in a Supreme Being such as God.
I am so totally against such stuff that I actually get all cotton mouthed and want to vomit.
See you were touched as a child....I on the other hand was raped at the age of 11 by the babysitter...and it was continued by my step-father till I was about 16.
I am not ashamed to admit it even at my old age as it was over a half a century ago and back in "the day" one did not even think of mentioning it to anyone as it was taboo to do so.
That is why I watched my kids like a hawk and the last fight I got into because some perv touched my child was in 1982 and then I put him in the hospital and I will openly admit that I went to jail but you can believe the guy let my kids alone...where he is now I have not a clue.
Those who do other offenses need to be sentenced according to the seriousness of the offense.
But "tolerating" pedophiles? Are you kidding me?
Having said that, you're NOT going to do something so ghastly stupid as to tell me that boys and girls are the same, are you? Certainly you can understand how the rape of a 12 year old boy does more physical and emotional damage than that of a 12 year old girl? Just so there's no mistaking, I'm NOT minimizing the attack on the girl.
I'm not saying that boys and girls are the same, but the difference in the trauma from such an attack isn't much, and therefore that's why I asked.
I'm impressed!
Now if it is a kid younger than 16 that will be different let the kid stew in jail for life and let him be someone wife if you know what I mean.
First off homosexuals have existed throughout time and in many accient cultures was an encouraged practice. 90% of the Roman Army were homosexual it was highly encouraged (although by todays standards they would be considered Bi sexual as they did keep wives at home), So how aborant homosexuallity is is debatable.
Second accross many periods in world history sex with what we would consider children was the norm. Before the Holy Roman Church banned the practice girls were wed at birth and the day the female began to mense she could be used by her husband. Often this made the child between the age of 8 and 10 years of age.
After the church banned that and made it only legal to marry females after they had started their mense the age of children being given for sex rose slightly to about the age of 13 although a girl could be wed at 12 and used by her husband at age 12.
BTW Rape of a child was a death pentality offense
As the human race moved from suvival mode to a more life mode children became less desirable for sex as the point prior...
First off homosexuals have existed throughout time and in many accient cultures was an encouraged practice. 90% of the Roman Army were homosexual it was highly encouraged (although by todays standards they would be considered Bi sexual as they did keep wives at home), So how aborant homosexuallity is is debatable.
Second accross many periods in world history sex with what we would consider children was the norm. Before the Holy Roman Church banned the practice girls were wed at birth and the day the female began to mense she could be used by her husband. Often this made the child between the age of 8 and 10 years of age.
After the church banned that and made it only legal to marry females after they had started their mense the age of children being given for sex rose slightly to about the age of 13 although a girl could be wed at 12 and used by her husband at age 12.
BTW Rape of a child was a death pentality offense
As the human race moved from suvival mode to a more life mode children became less desirable for sex as the point prior was to breed and children died in childbirth almost 70% of the time. This is not to say that anyone really frowned on a man having sex with a girla s young as 12 or for a woman (still in her breeding year [20-24]) to have a male sex partner as young as 15.
For a long period then the average age of marriage was earily 20s and while this didn't mean children were not engaging they couldn't be forced (although we know even today that is not very true)
The age dropped back to the earily teens once exploration turned to settlement and at varrious points during famine/plague or disasters... Post British Emperializime sex with children became something considered as "devient" but not prosucuted becuase often children forced into prostution were the sole earners for the family or for self.
Today we consider children below the "legal age of concent" (most states have this as 15 or 16 years of age) to be 'sexually abused" however there are still cultures out there who think if a girl is not wed and breeding before the age of 16 she is an old maid (good example is a TLC program about "travlers").
basicly as societies shift back and forth between survival and progression the age of sexual concent and normalicy shifts.
Again in the USA we are not a 3rd world country our furture is our children and their safety and well being both physically and mentally. But we do send double messages. not only with advertising but with failure of parents to procusute males who have sex with underage girls because they were "dating" , failure to seek damages and monotary support if pregancy occures, the support and normalizing of teen pregancies even the glorification of such, the ease of access to abortions and the hero worship of young males who get with older females...
If we want to stop the problem of sex with children we must set standards that are applied equally and then set punishments which are enforced equally and consistantly.