In what way would it effect you personally? Just curious. Because if you don't like it for religious reasons then, the gay married couple would never make it to heaven with you. So why do you mind if no one is getting hurt?
I'm not hateful enough to deny people equal treatment just because I don't approve of how they act or what they do (not that I feel like that towards homosexuality) it's not like like I go around trying to ban Christians from going into my neighborhood every week trying to convert people therefore stopping them from doing something other religions are allowed to do even though I see that as a grave insult
I don't think that I should have a say in how they live their life. If they want to be married to someone, I don't think I have the right to tell them they can or cannot do it. Discrimination is something that I've never been a supporter of.
I don't think this should even be an issue. I'm not American-- I'm from a country where gay marriage is legal. You know what? The country hasn't fallen into anarchy yet. The sanctity of marriage remains. Can you guess what the consequences for gay marriage are? Gays will marry. Nothing else will change. Gay marriage being legal literally does not affect the people who protest it in any way.
>>>Gay marriage being legal literally does not affect the people who protest it in any way.>>>
Yes, it does. There have been cases where practicing Christians who are florists, photographers, and innkeepers have been compelled under law to service "gay weddings."
This is in spite of the fact that freedom of religion is guaranteed by literal word in the U.S. Constitution, a document which never once mentions the word "marriage."
"It doesn't affect anyone else" isn't just a tired, old, broken-record, repeated argument. It's also an utterly false one.
"Yes, it does. There have been cases where practicing Christians who are florists, photographers, and innkeepers have been compelled under law to service "gay weddings.""
Because florists, photographers, and innkeepers who have been affected make up ALL protesters. Furthermore, whether or not they have the right to refuse service (which I'm pretty sure they probably do, but I'm not American, so I can't quote American law at you), if they voice their beliefs on it, in a respectful way, the couple would probably go look for another florist, photographer, or location anyways-- though maybe that's just my common sense kicking in here.
Can you think of any stronger ways that people are affected? Because if not, the argument is perfectly valid, and will be repeated until it's not true any longer.
That if someone opposes "gay marriage," they're saying that gay people aren't human beings?
Is this the sort of "logic" that the "gay marriage" crowd bases its arguments on? Good grief.
Bigamists, polygamists, and people who are attracted to their siblings are also human beings. That doesn't mean we should legalize those types of "marriages," though.
Gay marriage is between two consenting adults (Americans). It's pretty disgusting of you to compare gay marriage with pedophilia. Would you do the same with interracial marriage?
Show me where she compared it to pedophilia. You can't. Although, behind the scenes some want that legalized too. Interracial marriage? Apples and oranges. This is based on sexual preference, not race.
In what area?
Nature? Lots of homosexuality present in nature
"There is no reason why the state should "honor" it by letting two people of the same sex get married."
Yes there is.
Because the states appeals to the rights of ALL citizens, and [is supposed to] provide freedom and equality under the law to everybody.
That's why.
Yes, it does. There have been cases where practicing Christians who are florists, photographers, and innkeepers have been compelled under law to service "gay weddings."
This is in spite of the fact that freedom of religion is guaranteed by literal word in the U.S. Constitution, a document which never once mentions the word "marriage."
"It doesn't affect anyone else" isn't just a tired, old, broken-record, repeated argument. It's also an utterly false one.
...the horror!!
Can you think of any stronger ways that people are affected? Because if not, the argument is perfectly valid, and will be repeated until it's not true any longer.
That if someone opposes "gay marriage," they're saying that gay people aren't human beings?
Is this the sort of "logic" that the "gay marriage" crowd bases its arguments on? Good grief.
Bigamists, polygamists, and people who are attracted to their siblings are also human beings. That doesn't mean we should legalize those types of "marriages," though.