Quantcast

‘Seventeen’ Magazine Signs ‘Body Peace Treaty’: Is It Enough?

SodaHead Living 2012/07/08 17:58:11
You!
Add Photos & Videos
After a 14-year-old girl led a crusade against altered photographs in Seventeen, the magazine’s staff vowed not to change girls’ body or face shapes. But is their new Photoshop policy really all that different from their old one?

According to Ann Shoket, the magazine’s editor-in-chief, Seventeen “never has, never will” alter the way girls look. Apparently, their retouching just involves “removing wrinkles in fabric, stray hairs, a few zits, random bra straps,” etc. Hmm…interesting. Essentially, because they admit no wrongdoing, there is nothing for Seventeen to change.

Jezebel's Jenna Sauers puts it this way: “So, a quick list of what Seventeen is not doing under the terms of this ‘treaty’: it is not going to stop Photoshopping its models and celebrity subjects. It is not going to acknowledge that its reliance on Photoshop has ever been in any way problematic. It is not going to commit to publishing any unretouched photo spreads. Lame.”

Seventeen’s new “Body Peace Treaty” has the support of the National Eating Disorders Association, but even their president, Lynn Grefe, admits that this is just a first step in working to promote positive body image and more attainable standards of beauty in magazines.

"I'm not saying it's a total victory," said Grefe. "Seventeen, Teen Vogue, Vogue, Cosmo, every magazine still has ads for diet products and other things that we find problematic, but in terms of the Photoshopping stuff, I believe that Ann is sincere and wants to really educate the consumer and work with the girls and show them what has been Photoshopped and how to recognize that."

So SodaHeads, what do you think about Seventeen’s “Body Peace Treaty”? Is it enough?

Read More: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Skye 2012/07/08 18:22:51
    Yes
    Skye
    +17
    I am highly annoyed with insecure girls. If the girls in magazines make you feel self conscious... STOP READING THEM. I'm 13 and it doesn't make me feel insecure in ANY way.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Sister Jean 2012/07/08 18:41:05
    Yes
    Sister Jean
  • Cal 2012/07/08 18:34:51
    Yes
    Cal
    +1
    Who cares? You are paying them for their publication. They can do whatever they want however they want. Don't like it? Stop paying for it....
  • Skye 2012/07/08 18:22:51
    Yes
    Skye
    +17
    I am highly annoyed with insecure girls. If the girls in magazines make you feel self conscious... STOP READING THEM. I'm 13 and it doesn't make me feel insecure in ANY way.
  • RoseyRhod Skye 2012/07/08 23:04:09
    RoseyRhod
    +1
    It's good to see a young lady with strong self esteem. I sure wish I'd had your confidence while growing up. I'm nearly 50, and I'm still trying to learn to like myself.
    I hope you keep your strong self worth. You deserve it.
  • Alexis Skye 2012/07/08 23:09:31
    Alexis
    +1
    I don't think magazines are making girls insecure, it's other girls verbally smashing their sel esteeme straight into the ground.
  • Skye Alexis 2012/07/09 22:05:59
    Skye
    I know, but if magazines DO make you feel bad about yourself, DON'T READ THEM.
  • Arianne Skye 2012/07/09 07:56:59
    Arianne
    +1
    Agreed. I have never in any way tried to compare myself to girls in the magazines. For one its their JOB to look pretty and its probably photoshopped.

    Really if I were to feel self conscious it isn't because of magazines, its because people around me would say "you're getting fatter!" or "time to hit the gym!." And even then it hardly lasts.
  • Jo 2012/07/08 18:06:41 (edited)
    Yes
    Jo
    +8
    I'm sorry, but I was once a 14 year old, and I dont recall ever feeling this way looking at magazines. The models that grace the pages of seventeen are NOT responsible for the self esteem of these girls---thats up to them. The models dont "promote eating disorders" because its obvious that they're healthy, and if the models needed airbrushing, they wouldnt be models. Their size, features, and skin are what allow them to be models. If airbrushing and photshopping were as commonplace as people think, no magazine would ever need models and would never have to pay the extraordinary amounts of money to these models that they do---they'd just pull some totally average woman off the streets, pay her $20, photograph her, and then alter the photos, and thats not happening, now is it?

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/05/18 14:57:11

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals