Same-sex marriage akin to the tyrannies of Nero
|
|
|||||
|
3 votes
|
|
20% | |||
|
1 vote
|
|
7% | |||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | |||
|
1 vote
|
|
7% | |||
|
10 votes
|
|
67% | |||
Same-sex marriage akin to the tyrannies of Nero
30 May, 2012 04:00 AM
THE push for same sex marriage cuts to the heart of natural law, religious freedom and the rights of children to have proper parents.
Radical humanist groups, like the gay, lesbian, transsexual, bisexual and inter-sexual G.L.B.T.I. want to challenge natural law tradition with their own ideas for a better world.
They want to use same-sex marriage, anti-discrimination and "human rights" legislation to bring traditionalists and churches into conflict with the state man-made laws of a dominant secular group and force them to accept the new agenda, to preach and teach it as of equal rights in our kindergartens, primary and secondary schools or lose state funding for services like education, health care, aged care, adoption etc.
So much for human rights and religious freedom of conscience, the basis of Western society; morality is not made by a majority.
It is one thing for society to tolerate private disordered sex contrary to natural law, but not the public acceptance and promotion of such behaviour as of equal choice and rights.
We hate the sin but love the sinner.
Many can’t believe that the denial of basic human rights by a tyranny can happen here, but history shows us otherwise.
The tyrannies of Rome under Nero, in England under Elizabeth I, of France under Robespierre, In Germany under Bismarck and Hitler, in Mexico and Spain in the 1920s and 30s, in Russia, Eastern Europe and China under Communism and now threatened by Obama in the US, through Healthcare are examples.
Totalitarian tyranny happens again when a dominant group believe they can control human society on their own terms for a "better" world like the farmer controlling an animal farm. God help us all to preserve the best of our Judeo Christian heritage.
Fr Bernard McGrath,
Bendigo
Top Opinion
-
BattleBattlerBenji (PHAET) 2012/06/02 11:55:36Undecided
+11Is this the same "natural law" in which 1500 species of animals have been observed to have homosexual behaivour?
It amazes me how often some people want to take what is presented under a sacried rite and lay claim free for all acts upon it.
what next women will start leaving the toilet seat up?
or do you seriously think natural order is wrong?
But if you serve one master you are bond to play within his rules and not demand some rules and stay with the other master, this is the whole point here
marriage is a rule alloated to Christians only these were written long before the pages of the bible compiled the scriptures into one easy to hand around book for all humans to read.
Satans way which is the other master does not have marriage instead be offers living together and multiable sex partners.
it's like having five dollars going to the candy store spending the five dollars and then expecting to still have five dollars when you leave.
can you see that same connection here from that simple illustration?
the only difference is human masters have no way of giving you eternal life, as they have tried to find the foutain of youth without any success so far.
now everyone is entitled to live life as they wish in a free society and this type of enslavery by one group over another for their own selfish plearuse is not a valid reason to have a righteous man who has faith in God, to be told he can not long live under God's laws just to make a mockery out of his faith now.
how would that be holding up the consitutional rights of the God fearing man?
The questions is will they or will they give up their gift of ever lasting life?
1 Corinthians 6:9What! Do YOU not know that unrighteous persons will not inherit God’s kingdom? Do not be misled. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men kept for unnatural purposes, nor men who lie with men,
well it seem Jesus did make it clear homosexuality is very forbiden. the acts of sex is soley to reproduce new humans now explain how poking the wrong hole is going to make a man fall pregant?
now if it is out of context as you claim then offer some reasoning as to why you say the statement within the bible is unture in reply to your statement of untruth
please share with us your wisdom upon this matter?
Paul was a man of legatistic writting and when one reads what is Pauls writtings one can easily see by the sentence structuring alone whom the sayings belonged.
1 Corinthians 6:9 which you are pointing to hear is NOT of paul's works it matches other statements made by Jesus just look at John 13:13 to 16 and you can clearly see it is just how Jesus persented his words and thoughts to the people.
but you are right Paul was Sual a man who once murdered Christains before the holy spirit of God touched him and cleaned him of his sin.
It's not unnatural behavior for any homosexual/bisexual people, nor for the many animal species who do have homosexual behavior.
Gay parents are proven to be just as good parents as any straight couple! But where are the "proper" parents for the children of divorced, sex offenders, drug addicts, orphans, foster kids, etc. Gay people at least raise wanted children, rather than "accidents" that many straight couples produce.
No one is focing people to accept the gay community, but children should be taught tolerance, not hate. If you believe otherwise, you have a problem.
same sex marriage is classed as devil worshiping and not a Godly act even the scriptures state
let no man come between this that God has YOKED together. that is the marriage of a one man to one woman and nothing else. it is very simple sory to burst your bubble but the Truth is also hard to hear and often hated
When the state legally acknowledges your marriage and you get benefits from it, then it's obviously a bit more than a religious celebration. It's a legal contract as well, and a social event.
Ignorance >.<
Marriage is done by someone who is of a religous notartory to start with which means it is done under a religious act. Mind you are right in saying it does belong to those of a the chirstian faith alone as that is where marriage was heritagted from.
now the material world where legal enties come into play is another entirely different standing. Yes the world of men give way to marriage and provide material gains for those in this arragement, I do not argue your point on that.
But the legal side you speak of is also accepted under de-facto laws a man made system to honor couple who are not Christian, personally this I believe could suit those who wish to be seen in a union of legal standing as a couple. while still respecting God and not abusing the religious rights of Christians with shame marriages which have no complance's to God's laws.
it would be so easy for Humans to set up the system and say partnered or marraiged within the legal confines wheras partnered means union under man's laws and married union under God's laws. it would also work just the same in the eyes of the legal systems for material gains as you spoke about above.
the only difference is the social event could be done under a legal contrac...
Marriage is done by someone who is of a religous notartory to start with which means it is done under a religious act. Mind you are right in saying it does belong to those of a the chirstian faith alone as that is where marriage was heritagted from.
now the material world where legal enties come into play is another entirely different standing. Yes the world of men give way to marriage and provide material gains for those in this arragement, I do not argue your point on that.
But the legal side you speak of is also accepted under de-facto laws a man made system to honor couple who are not Christian, personally this I believe could suit those who wish to be seen in a union of legal standing as a couple. while still respecting God and not abusing the religious rights of Christians with shame marriages which have no complance's to God's laws.
it would be so easy for Humans to set up the system and say partnered or marraiged within the legal confines wheras partnered means union under man's laws and married union under God's laws. it would also work just the same in the eyes of the legal systems for material gains as you spoke about above.
the only difference is the social event could be done under a legal contract ceriomony by judge in some community hall or centre instead of a church where non- christians have no place to be.
I believe this would be a suitable compromise for those who are not of God's people and have no intent on wanting the gift of everlasting life which is resevered soley for God's people and none other.
Yes I know non-God people are going to cry fowl but how can they afterall they choose to walk away from God and his laws for their own pleasure. or should I say no point in crying over spilt milk when it happens.
marraige is a coverant between a man and a woman in the presence of God. which means a person is making a committment to God under a religous rite.
anyone who makes this commenttment has accepted God as their master and denied any other from of belief.
now in order for what you are asking to be a rite under law of man, one would have to be known as coupled and not married. hence the term men gave de-facto. naturally it can be done in some cerimony within a courthouse or a community hall type building. and there-after considered under the laws within man's world as a form of marriage but not committed to God.
anyone who is currently married has made and taken an oath to God and is accountable to God in death no matter how much the person wants to scream and shout I do not believe in God. Married is a rite before God and acceptence of God as Master, Ruler, Judge and Jury upon their life whilst living and at time of death.
Atheists do NOT take an oath to God when they get married. They don't accept him as their master, they don't make a commitment to God, etc. They choose to not make it a religious rite by doing so. But it is still legally and socially considered marriage. Why can gay marriages not be the same as atheistic marriages (a social/legal commitment instead of religious) then?
a Christian rite is a contract made with God one you are personally responible to honour and be held accountable for.
one man murders a woman and is punished with a period in jail
should we now allow this man to be free?
or
should we keep the ceremony of jailing true?