Quantcast

Restrictions On International Travel Without Due Process?

~ The Rebel ~ 2012/06/05 21:03:29

A few weeks ago the United States Senate passed a piece of legislation called the “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act”, it is essentially a transportation bill focused on roads and bridges. Title III of the act is a revenue provision concerning gas guzzling, cars leaking underground storage tanks, import duties and a number of other fees, taxes and other revenue enhancements.

Section 40304 is a rather bizarre provision that certainly doesn’t seem to fit in a transportation bill and is buried so deep that few senators have probably even read that far into the bill which is 1676 pages. Section 40304 is titled “Revocation or denial of passport in case at certain tax delinquencies”. The provision specifically amends the 1926 Passport Act to permit the IRS to simply ‘Certify” to the Secretary of State that an individual “has a seriously delinquent tax debt in an amount in excess of $50,000.00. The law does not require that any hearing be held or require administrative due process of any kind. In fact the IRS must only give what is called a “Notice of levy” to the tax payer. This is nothing more than the IRS’ own determination that the taxpayer owes $50,000.00 and while $50,000.00 sounds like a lot of money, it can easily be the case that much smaller amounts with penalties and interest can cross the $50,000.00 threshold.

While most folks would consider this a heavy handed tool that denies taxpayers due diligence, it brings up an even more basic question: Do you have the “right” to travel?

Read More: http://www.westernjournalism.com/restrictions-inte...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • ProudProgressive 2012/06/05 21:12:28
    ProudProgressive
    Once a notice of levy is served on a taxpayer, the taxpayer can appeal the determination. This is not at all uncommon. If you get served with a summons claiming you owe me a million dollars, you of course have the opportunity to (a) force me to prove my claim and/or (b) provide evidence to disprove it.
  • ~ The Rebel ~ 2012/06/05 21:04:41
    ~ The Rebel ~
    Most people would assume the answer to this question is “yes”, but actually no such right can be found in the Constitution. While the Founding Fathers may have deemed the right to travel so basic and fundamental that they didn’t feel the need to have a separate clause defining the right, The Government beginning with the Passport Act of 1926 considers travel a “privilege” not a right.

    If you want a real eye opener on this topic, pull out your own passport (authorized by the Passport Act of 1926) and turn to the fine print at the back. Remember you can’t travel outside the US without a passport nor can you legally enter the US without a passport.

    http://www.westernjournalism....
  • ProudPr... ~ The R... 2012/06/05 21:14:22
    ProudProgressive
    The government does not consider travel a privilege rather than a right. However, they do consider getting a United States passport to be a privilege rather than a right. If someone is in violation of United States laws, it's not that unreasonable for certain privileges to be denied.

Living

2013/06/19 11:06:00

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals