Chemicals, artificial sweeteners, artificial flavors, artificial colors, artificial food, might be good for artificial people... but real people should eat real foods, eating closer to the earth, least processed, least adulterated... I'm not talking vegan or such, just the kinds of foods my grandparents and parents ate. Whole milk, maybe even (gasp) raw milk, heavy cream, butter, lard, real meat, pork... yeah give me real food anytime!
Wretha
Real Fat, Real Sugar, Real Good: Do Cooking Substitutes Cut It?
Fef
2012/07/10 05:42:02
|
|
|||||
|
6 votes
|
|
8% | |||
|
73 votes
|
|
92% | |||
Food substitutes claim to offer healthier alternatives to "the real thing," but food critics complain that the substitutes don't taste as good.
FOXNEWS.COM reports:

FOXNEWS.COM reports:
Substitutes generally disappoint in head-to-head food comparisons: sugar vs. stevia (sweetener derived from South American perennial shrubs); steak vs. tempeh (a slightly-fermented soybean and grain patty); Parmesan cheese vs. “nutritional yeast.”

Read More: http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2012/07/09/real-fat...
Top Opinion
-
Wretha S 2012/07/10 18:49:55Real Ingredients






















Margerine was supposed to be healthier than butter, but then it came out that trans fats are actually way worse for you than butter.
Aspartame was supposed to be healthier than sugar, but now it is known to be responsible for a laundry list of negative side effects and sugar is healthy by comparison.
Soy was supposed to be healthier than meat, but now it's been linked to allergies, digestive tract problems and sterility.
Give me good old ingredients, I don't want to be a guinea pig for food companies.
far healthier overall (than fakes or genetically modifieds)
and the ability to consistently use across the cook/bake spectrum makes REAL far superior indeed ..