PUBLIC OPINION > Most People Think That Cigarettes Are Worse For You Than Pot
SodaHead Living
2012/06/12 18:00:00
Teenagers are faced with a lot of temptations, both in and out of school, and for many, it's hard to keep those danger levels straight. That can be troubling for parents. For instance, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently reported that fewer teens are smoking cigarettes, but more teens are smoking pot. Is that better or worse that the status quo? We asked the public for some input.


Fortunately for parents, it looks like the trend toward pot is a positive sign. Not much is known about the long-term physical effects of marijuana, so it's very difficult to cite plausible information on its dangers, but the fact that it's so difficult to connect to major concerns like lung cancer and brain development gives it a good leg up. Tobacco is a confirmed killer; pot is a confirmed couch-magnet.
Teens Against Tobacco


Anyone who's been affected by tobacco, either directly or through the loss of a loved one, should be thrilled to see that teens are well aware of the dangers of cigarettes. Of course, this isn't the same as asking if tobacco is dangerous, but if teens are thinking critically enough to place it above pot on the danger scale, it's still a great sign.
Conservatives Consult the Law


Health isn't the only issue at hand here. There are also legal issues to consider. While it is illegal for teens to buy tobacco products, getting caught with weed will get you in way more trouble, regardless of age. Conservatives were one of the few demographics to say weed is a greater danger, and many respondents cited the substance's legality as a reason.
Women Warn Against Cigs


We really weren't sure what to expect when it came to gender, but sure enough, a correlation did emerge. Men were actually much more likely than women to cite pot as a dangerous substance for teens. Typically, gender-related smoking statistics aren't that pronounced, and the smoking demographic showed no difference anyway. Maybe it's just the smell.
If you'd like to vote on this question, dig deeper into the demographics, or engage in existing discussion about the topic, visit our poll about cigarettes and pot. We'd love to hear from you!
Top Opinion
-
Skeptikat 2012/06/12 20:33:21





















RESPIRATORY ILLNESSES
The main respiratory consequences of smoking marijuana regularly (one joint a day) are pulmonary infections and respiratory cancer, whose connection to marijuana use has been strongly suggested but not conclusively proven. The effects also include chronic bronchitis, impairment in the function of the smaller air passages, inflammation of the lung, the development of potentially pre-cancerous abnormalities in the bronchial lining and lungs, and, as discussed, a reduction in the capabilities of many defensive mechanisms within the lungs.
Marijuana smoke and cigarette smoke contain many of the same toxins, including one which has been identified as a key factor in the promotion of lung cancer. This toxin is found in the tar phase of both, and it should be noted that one joint has four times more tar than a cigarette, which means that the lungs are exposed four-fold to this toxin and others in the tar. It has been concretely established that smoking cigarettes promotes lung cancer (which causes more than 125,000 deaths in the US every year), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic bronchitis and emphysema) and increased incidence of respiratory tract infections. This implies, but does not establish, that smoking marijuana may le...
RESPIRATORY ILLNESSES
The main respiratory consequences of smoking marijuana regularly (one joint a day) are pulmonary infections and respiratory cancer, whose connection to marijuana use has been strongly suggested but not conclusively proven. The effects also include chronic bronchitis, impairment in the function of the smaller air passages, inflammation of the lung, the development of potentially pre-cancerous abnormalities in the bronchial lining and lungs, and, as discussed, a reduction in the capabilities of many defensive mechanisms within the lungs.
Marijuana smoke and cigarette smoke contain many of the same toxins, including one which has been identified as a key factor in the promotion of lung cancer. This toxin is found in the tar phase of both, and it should be noted that one joint has four times more tar than a cigarette, which means that the lungs are exposed four-fold to this toxin and others in the tar. It has been concretely established that smoking cigarettes promotes lung cancer (which causes more than 125,000 deaths in the US every year), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic bronchitis and emphysema) and increased incidence of respiratory tract infections. This implies, but does not establish, that smoking marijuana may lead to some of the same results as smoking cigarettes. It is notable that several reports indicate an unexpectedly large proportion ofmarijuana users among cases of lung cancer and cancers of the oral cavity,pharynx, and larynx. Thus, it appears that the use of marijuana as a medicine has the potential to further harm an already ill patient in the same way that taking up regular cigarette smoking would, particularly in light of the fact that those patients for whom marijuana is recommended are already poorly equipped to fight off these infections and diseases
If you have any more questions, feel free to ask. Otherwise please stop spreading your propaganda as if it were factual.
Try this for a fun exercise; Call around to your local Medical Examiners, Undertakers, hell even PHYSICIANS, ask them if they've ever seen ANYBODY die from ANY disease that was directly attributed to smoking too much Marijuana. The answer is NO. 15,000 mcg in a 15 minute time frame would be a lethal dose of marijuana. It is also IMPOSSIBLE to ingest that much, even if eating it. You would be so high and incapacitated long before you got to that level, that it would never kill you.
Your "facts" appear to be nothing but the typical government sponsored propaganda to fuel their overly expensive "war on drugs"
I'll take a LITTLE BIT of tar from my weed, and forego the FORMALDEHYDE, ARSENIC AND METHANE among other highly toxic and lethal chemicals IN ADDITION TO TAR that are found in cigarettes.
Serious penalties and fines on their shoulders When they sell cigarettes to those who are under age.
Marijuana is for the most part a NATURAL HERB, and I have yet to see any negative health effects from it.
I'll give you the first three (when under the influence). The maintaining employment bit is perceptual. I know many daily pot smokers who maintain employment just fine, including myself as a business owner. Problem is, the ones who can do it and still maintain employment are the ones who don't advertise the fact that they do it...
I've been married for 15 years, run my own business in a mentally challenging career (IT) and have 3 well-adjusted and successful children. I'm not alone.
I'll give you the 'stinks' - smells are subjective though and there are many different scents depending on the strain (from sweet to pungent) but inhilation is not the only way to use Cannabis I'm sure you already know so I won't get into that, but the rest of it is highly overblown sensationalism at work (propaganda). Somebody has been putting a lot of stock into the 'Reefer Madness'.
Look, if you're going to smoke all day every day, then sure - these statements are then true. But someone who knows their limit, and only takes a couple of hits in the afternoons and evenings then puts it away, the effects are more minimal than slamming down a couple of drinks down your gullet in under an hour after a hard day's work (for those with weak tolerances anyway, you drink more you need more - you smoke more, you need more and on and on that goes, but it doesn't mean anything because that is how our bodies Chemistry is programmed, and it only becomes a problem physically if you can't go without a substance and thankfully, Cannabis is absolutely not physically addictive unlike every other 'drug' - a...
I'll give you the 'stinks' - smells are subjective though and there are many different scents depending on the strain (from sweet to pungent) but inhilation is not the only way to use Cannabis I'm sure you already know so I won't get into that, but the rest of it is highly overblown sensationalism at work (propaganda). Somebody has been putting a lot of stock into the 'Reefer Madness'.
Look, if you're going to smoke all day every day, then sure - these statements are then true. But someone who knows their limit, and only takes a couple of hits in the afternoons and evenings then puts it away, the effects are more minimal than slamming down a couple of drinks down your gullet in under an hour after a hard day's work (for those with weak tolerances anyway, you drink more you need more - you smoke more, you need more and on and on that goes, but it doesn't mean anything because that is how our bodies Chemistry is programmed, and it only becomes a problem physically if you can't go without a substance and thankfully, Cannabis is absolutely not physically addictive unlike every other 'drug' - and that includes prescription chemistry experiments too). I speak from personal experience here, from both substances. Moderation is the key. A couple hits are comparable to a couple of drinks, and of course there will always be both Cannabis smokers and alcohol drinkers who are going to abuse both or one or the other substances when they want to "party" rather than when they just want to "take the edge off". That is never going to change.
For me personally, Cannabis is nowhere near as cognitively debilitating as drinking is. I'd rather never have to drink again, and given the choice between being able to kick back with a six pack or a bowl of Cannabis, I'd chose the Cannabis every time - and my liver would thank me for that decision. Unfortunately, I'm just not willing to risk being charged as a Felon - so I drink instead, for now.
http://www.foxnews.com/health...
http://www.foxnews.com/health...
http://www.foxnews.com/health...