Quantcast

PUBLIC OPINION > Having More Than Two Parents Is Controversial

SodaHead Living 2012/07/05 21:00:00
California lawmakers are pushing a new bill that would allow children to legally have more than two parents in order to address complicated parenting situations. However, opponents have pointed out that the bill would bring equally complicated legal issues into the mix -- tax deductions, citizenship, and assistance, to name a few. We asked the public if it was OK for a child to have more than two parents.

sodahead parents

After more than 800 votes, the public still couldn't come to a consensus. It was split right down the middle. This is a pretty complex issue. On the plus side, additional parents are a reality that many kids are dealing with, especially in non-traditional homes. On the other hand, additional parents can potentially cause more disagreements and confusion within the non-nuclear family and among society at large. Needless to say, there are a lot of elements at work.

Parents Limit Parents

Though parenthood didn't have the strongest effect on how voters responded, it's the most immediate demographic. They are the ones who are going to make that decision (or at least fall into that position), after all. What's interesting is that people who don't want kids were most likely to OK additional parents. It's fine by them, as long as they aren't the ones doing it.

Modern Families

As you might expect, age had an enormous correlation. Voters under the age of 45 were about 35% more likely to give their blessing, while very few voters over 45 were OK with additional parents. We assume the primary reason for this is that younger voters are more likely to have either grown up with multiple parents, or known people who grew up with multiple parents. Or maybe they're just more open-minded.

The Man of the House

The gender correlation was interesting. Based on the results, women are about 23% more likely to be OK with additional parents than men. This could be the result of two elements. First, previous polls have suggested women are more comfortable with the thought of homosexual relationships. Second, men are sometimes expected to be the "head of the household." If a father has to share that responsibility with a step-parent, it could create difficulty.

If you'd like to vote on this question, dig deeper into the demographics, or engage in existing discussion about the topic, visit our poll about having more than two parents. We'd love to hear from you!
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • darlenedoskas1969 2012/07/06 14:24:35
    darlenedoskas1969
    +21
    if my stepfather had had parental rights, I wouldn't have been left with my mother to be sold (sorry, I meant rented) to the highest bidder on a regular basis... my brother wouldn't have been murdered after one of her drug deals went bad... my sister wouldn't be a PTSD addled nutcase who is unable to care for her own child, or even herself... we could, instead have been raised by someone who actually gave a damn about us... but he didn't have rights... only our bio-dads had rights, and they were like mom, and didn't give a damn...

    having more than 2 parents shouldn't be controversial, if indeed it is... what should be controversial is abusing your kids... hurting your kids... letting other people hurt your kids... how about we worry more about helping kids, and making their lives better than about what sex their parents are or are not having?

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Red Branch ticlo7 2012/07/09 21:36:08
    Red Branch
    +1
    Where will this 3d parent come from? Do both biological parents have to agree on this person? Or, does the child make the choice with no input from the biological parents? At what age does the child make this monumental decision? Is this 3d person their for life or just at the whim of the minor? If there is a 3-way disagreement between the 3 parents, whose decision is the one implemented?
  • ticlo7 Red Branch 2012/07/10 15:41:08
    ticlo7
    The 3rd person could come from anywhere. I'm not going to state a the exact way it should happen, nor the exact age they'll come into the child's life or how long they'll stay. That's a personal decision, just like in any relationship.

    And yes, both biological parents should agree. If it's a 3-way parenting, all 3 members must be OK with the situation. The same as a 2-way parenting, both members must be OK with the situation.

    If there's a 3-way disagreement, it's no different than a 2-way disagreement. If it's a 2-way disagreement, whose decision is the one implemented? It just has to be sorted out like reasonable adults, although unfortunately that almost never happens.
  • Red Branch ticlo7 2012/07/10 15:50:05
    Red Branch
    +1
    Okay, I wish you all the luck in the world when it comes time for you to have kids and raise them when you use that concept.
  • ticlo7 Red Branch 2012/07/10 20:08:36
    ticlo7
    +1
    And I wish you and your grandchildren all the luck for the future.
  • Red Branch ticlo7 2012/07/11 03:45:41
    Red Branch
    +1
    Thank you
  • Live Fr... Red Branch 2012/07/13 16:00:09
    Live Free Or Die
    +1
    I foresee problems with all being in agreement from a legal standpoint. The minute there is a problem, the mother or father who took such an action may regret it.
  • Red Branch Live Fr... 2012/07/13 17:25:39 (edited)
    Red Branch
    +1
    I can see lots of problems and more regrets.

    Edited for spelling, Yes.
  • Live Fr... Red Branch 2012/07/13 17:46:18
    Live Free Or Die
    +1
    Most definitely.
  • Mellow ladyjane 2012/07/11 17:25:13
    Mellow
    Sure biologically, but it takes a hell of a lot more to be a parent then to screw and make a baby. A parent is someone who loves, provides, and protects. They Nurture and they teach. I will say it again, I have had three Moms. My biological mom, my grandmother and my foster mom. Out of those 3 two where actual parents and it wasn't the woman who brought me in to this world I will tell you that.
    I had three mothers, Like it or not.
  • Red Branch Mellow 2012/07/08 15:30:56
    Red Branch
    +1
    The Mormons did it for years because of the way our various levels of government are set up in the US. Utah had to wait about 50 years to become a state because of the men with multiple wives because we were not going to tolerate it.

    It probably does happen more than we realize, but that does not make a case for legalizing plural spouses. Murder happens too, but no one wants it legalized. Those other religions can keep that practice wherever they are found, just do not expect it to be here.
  • Live Fr... Red Branch 2012/07/08 16:38:24
    Live Free Or Die
    +1
    The youth may demand it all in the name of equal rights but it will be disastrous. Can you see all those step-parents taking away children in tandem with the other bio parent? Talk about a mess.
  • Red Branch Live Fr... 2012/07/08 18:22:36
    Red Branch
    +1
    Exactly, if they think things are bad now, they have not seen anything yet.
  • Live Fr... Red Branch 2012/07/08 19:53:41
    Live Free Or Die
    +1
    No kidding. Be careful of what you wish for, you just might get it. Unfortunately, imposing on those who know better seems to be the way of things these days.
  • Red Branch Live Fr... 2012/07/08 21:44:59
    Red Branch
    +1
    As the first lady of Arkansas, Hillary favored laws reducing the the legal controls parents have over their children.
    "It Takes A Village", originally an African proverb, now the title of one of her books is an argument for more govt interference in the life of the American family.
  • Live Fr... Red Branch 2012/07/08 22:28:56
    Live Free Or Die
    +1
    I never read her book about it or even knew anything about it. But I heard she was for mandatory government funded preschools. I am totally against that. A child needs undivided attention if the parent can give it to them. I somehow wouldn't doubt that she would be for reducing legal parental rights. After all, she never, ever had to worry about it happening to her.
  • Red Branch Live Fr... 2012/07/09 02:11:08
    Red Branch
    +1
    If I were to look for it, I could find some of her specific objectives in lessening parental control.
    As a hard-core lib, that stuff is for the masses, not the elite like her and Bill.
  • Live Fr... Red Branch 2012/07/09 02:25:22
    Live Free Or Die
    +1
    Of course. You know she would never have to deal with it. I know the name of the book though, "It Takes A Village To Raise A Child".
  • Mellow Red Branch 2012/07/11 17:30:58
    Mellow
    I did not say it should be legal, I was just saying it is not only a Muslim thing as ladyjane had insinuated.
  • Red Branch Mellow 2012/07/11 18:33:32
    Red Branch
    A previous comment I explained the Mormons and their polygamy and how it was handled. We did not allow it. I am not sure how much emphasis I placed on Islam, but it should not be allowed their either.
  • Mellow Red Branch 2012/07/11 19:06:08 (edited)
    Mellow
    +1
    Hey laws are laws. I get that, but this thread is not about polygamy, it's about having more then two parents. I was just wondering why Muslims where specifically singled out by ladyjane.
  • Red Branch Mellow 2012/07/13 17:27:55
    Red Branch
    As to why, I suppose because they are the ones who openly have multiple wives.
    For more specifics, ask ladyjane.
  • Live Fr... ladyjane 2012/07/08 19:59:21
    Live Free Or Die
    +1
    AGREED!
  • bleep 2012/07/07 05:51:45
    bleep
    +4
    I think that the birth parents can only be called parents. And if you want to raise another kid it should be called something else like it really is.
  • JessyBear bleep 2012/07/07 14:41:01
    JessyBear
    Hey bleep we agree on somthing
  • bleep JessyBear 2012/07/08 07:25:04
    bleep
    +1
    it happens.
  • Fariborz-Zak 2012/07/07 05:19:39
    Fariborz-Zak
    yes
  • Derbyhat 2012/07/07 05:17:53
    Derbyhat
    +2
    If it is okay to have more than two parents, then it is okay to include neighbors that we called "uncle" or aunt". How are we going to find their birth records and family attachment to make this work? While I can trace my family tree back well in excess of 6 generations (26), how are you going to 3-D chart genealogy when so many are so careless about the relationship they stride into? In fact lets confuse the hell out of our grandchildren, so they'll need a scorecard to know Mom number four or Dad six. Then lets add grandparents. How much more unrealistic can people be?
  • Tim Upham 2012/07/07 03:56:41
    Tim Upham
    +1
    Do not get married and have kids. It now represents the institution of the devil, called divorced and dysfunctional.
  • JessyBear Tim Upham 2012/07/07 14:42:43
    JessyBear
    +3
    Sadly there is some truth to that - but that is not how it should be - what we need to do is give families a motivation to stay strong and be a strong unit - the Government does not want strong families - just like they don't want God in the picture - it removes some of their power.
  • Mellow JessyBear 2012/07/07 16:41:28
    Mellow
    +1
    See I as someone who is not a Christian, I feel the opposite. I do not want a christian god in my life because I worship a goddess, but I feel a lot of people in government keeps pushing their god in my face. This country is filled with many diverse religious views, and religion should be personal. It is up to each person to keep their god in their own lives. I do not shove my goddess in everyone's face, Buddhist does not shove Buddha in anyone face, nor does Taoists, or Hindus. It feels like Christians must always have their way and their way is the only one that is right. It is not right for me, or anyone else who has a different spiritual path.
  • Red Branch Mellow 2012/07/08 15:39:53
    Red Branch
    +1
    There are enough Hindus doing just that. We are not talking about a spiritual path, we are talking about the building block of Western Civilization. Anyone can believe whatever they want to believe and there are no restrictions. The problem comes when one attempts to act on those beliefs.
  • Mellow Red Branch 2012/07/11 17:44:48
    Mellow
    I have never had a Hindu shove their religion in my face. Only the Christian folk. They come to my house all the time thinking I need to be saved, and I tell them I do not want to be saved. Either way Building block for Western civilization is one thing, having God in the picture is another. I do not want or need God in my life, because I have something else. In the long run though if you pull away all the details, the myths and everything else, if you remove the chaff from the wheat, you will find the same universal truth. We should be focused on that truth more then anything else. Not the petty details that divide us.
  • Red Branch Mellow 2012/07/11 18:29:55
    Red Branch
    Odds are you won't have contact with a HIndu unless you are in India where the Hindus are attacking Christians.
    When Christianity falls, so does Western Civilization, which means Democracy goes with it. Like it or not that is the way it is. Democracy did not develop in Africa or Asia.

    Be careful what you wish for, you just may get it.

    As far as people on the doorstep, there are Mormons and Jehovah Witnesses, neither of which really qualify as Christians. Neither believe in Jesus which is a must to be Christian.
    I don't really care what they believe, but when they are on my doorstep either I do not answer the door or I tell them go bother someone else.

    "Seven Tipping Points" is a book that explains how 7 major events created Western Civilization to be what it is today. That is not the whole title and I forget the authors, but if you are interested reply and I will see if I can find the missing info Or you can just enter those words into a search engine and see what comes up.
  • Mellow Red Branch 2012/07/11 19:32:17
    Mellow
    +1
    I know a lot of Hindus in America, and it was those Hindus I was speaking of, because it is in America that we are referring to. I do not feel anyone's religion should fall, all I am saying is I do not want God in my personal life, because I do not believe in that personification of the higher being that exists.

    Mormons do believe in Jesus and consider themselves Christians. They in fact, believe that Jesus came to America after he resurrected and taught a tribe of Native Americans. It's written in the book of Mormon - 3 Nephi 11:18; 3 Nephi 12:1-2. I do not believe it, but it was a very nice story. We have some Mormons across the street. They are nice people, they got a little pushy for a minute, but when I told them it would never happen they stopped. I really enjoyed learning their beliefs though and read their book. I read the Bible too. As I did the Qur'an. I like knowing about diverse thinking.

    I have had people come to my door who where baptists, they told me I was a child of Satan because I was born out of wedlock. I said that's fine and dandy, but I do not believe in Satan and slammed the door in their face.

    I would love to read this book you are talking of. It is nice to get different ideas and perspectives. Thanks!
  • Red Branch Mellow 2012/07/13 17:40:35
    Red Branch
    I was speaking of Hindus, in India, in the news for attacking Christians and burning churches.

    Mormons do not believe that Jesus was the Son of God. They view Jesus as a Prophet and only a Prophet, nothing more. At least that is the line given to me by 2 Mormons on my doorstep. When I told them Jesus was the Son of God, both of them near choked and had nothing to say.

    While I have never read the Book of Mormons, I have read the Koran.
    I don't believe that I have ever had Baptists or anyones else at my door, but then I don't always answer it. With an intro like that, I do not see those Baptists and increasing the size of their flock.

    "The Miracle of Freedom: Seven Tipping Points That Saved The World".
    - Chris Stewart and Ted Stewart.
  • Mellow Red Branch 2012/07/29 06:32:14
    Mellow
    +1
    They believe Jesus is the son of god AND a prophet, your Mormons at your doorstep where Morons, (haha). They believe Joseph Smith was a prophet as well... but not the son of god... I do not believe in any of that stuff, but I do find it interesting...

    I will check this book out. thanks!
  • Red Branch Mellow 2012/07/30 01:36:46
    Red Branch
    Thanks, I hope you enjoy the book.
  • Red Branch Mellow 2012/07/13 17:47:10 (edited)
    Red Branch
    "Before The Pyramids: Cracking Archeology's Greatest Mystery" -Christopher Knight and Alan Butler.

    Edited for complete title and author's names.

    I forget their first names and I think this is their last names. But this book turns ancient history inside out, but it is ignored. It is ignored because the authors are engineers or geologists and not historians or archeologists.

    They claim the main architect of the Great Pyramid jouneyed to northern England to obtain the information necessary for the placement of the Great Pyramid and 2 other pyramids. He journeyed to England to study the Thornburgh Henge, which was about 4000 years older than the Great Pyramid. The Henge and the 3 Pyramids are place exactly like the stars in the Belt of Orion.

    They also pulled info from unusual sources about the pyramids and ancient astronomy and astrology (which used to be a respected science).
  • Mellow Red Branch 2012/07/29 06:34:15
    Mellow
    +1
    Right on, I will take a look, will be an interesting perspective.
  • Red Branch Mellow 2012/07/30 01:38:30
    Red Branch
    I would like to know what you think about both books, when you complete them.

Living

2013/05/21 07:08:07

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals