Quantcast

PUBLIC OPINION > $1,000 a Week Can't Replace a Career

SodaHead Living 2012/06/15 20:59:02
An 18-year-old student from New York won the lottery this week, and it will earn him around $1,000 a week for the rest of his life. That's about $48,000 a year for absolutely nothing. It isn't exactly a high roller salary, and if he wants to move up the ladder he'll have to supplement his income, but technically he'll never need to work a day in his life. Good Morning America asked if that was enough to keep people from working.

1000 dollars

A grand a week would be amazing, but there are a couple of reasons most people would still prefer to work. First of all, it's not an enormous amount of money. It's definitely enough to live on, but it would leave most people lacking. A Princeton study found that $75,000 a year is the "happiest income," which means you'd need another $27,000 to really live it up. Not only that, but careers are fulfilling. Without work, life can get pretty boring. And a $1,000-a-week cushion will cut down on the stress, too.

Young People Need Work

Naturally, there had to be an age limit. Work is important, but eventually people retire. Based on our results, that cut-off age is about 55 years old. After that, the desire to keep working unnecessarily dropped an average of 28%. However, more than half of people over the age of 55 still said they'd keep working. Maybe retirement's not that great after all.

Unemployed Are So Over It

We also anticipated some correlation based on employment status, and again, the results were somewhat predictable. Full-time workers seem to love work, while the unemployed were less than enthusiastic about continuing to job search after landing a grand a year. But students were actually the most eager to work. They're still figuring out what they want to do, and they're going to pursue it, whatever it is.

Drinkers Need Jobs

Let's move away from the obvious for a minute, and take a look at one statistic that surprised us. Would you believe drinkers were 11% more likely than nondrinkers to want to continue working? It could be that workaholics enjoy their drink -- see "Mad Men" -- or it could be that drinkers need a little more to fuel their fire. Either way, it seems that drinks and jobs go hand-in-hand.

If you'd like to vote on this question, dig deeper into the demographics, or engage in existing discussion about the topic, visit our poll about working unnecessarily. We'd love to hear from you!
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • Lord Emperor of Dune 2012/06/15 21:13:58
    Lord Emperor of Dune
    +11
    That would get me the hell out of my job in about 3.6 seconds. It's not enough to live high on the hog, but it's enough to live modestly and fairly well.

    Now, I wouldn't quit working... I would train as a lion tamer, profession shooting competitor, fly fisherman, car painter, sculptor... I would work, but I wouldn't feel bad if a job didn't pan out. I would just move on to the next experience... Damn, I wish I could win that money...

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • ambra 2013/01/17 05:46:38
    ambra
    +7
    Wish I could win 1,000 a week I could start my dream now. And move into the house I want to and its even for rent again. Lol I was sopost to get money when my grate grandpa passed away but nope that all got taken wish he was still a live he would help be..
  • Ben 2012/07/09 11:56:52
    Ben
    Yes, but part time only and since money wouldn't be an issue, I could choose a job that I enjoyed more rather than which pays the bills better.
  • Call me Mark willya? 2012/06/18 22:08:21
    Call me Mark willya?
    Sorry, but, SHOW ME THE MONEY!!! With a thousand dollars a week I could make repairs to my home, buy supplies to work on my art projects, get my car fixed and STILL pay all my bills... Right now I live on $420.00 a month (30% VA disability).
  • Kirby 2012/06/18 21:54:40
    Kirby
    I'd quit so fast I'd leave black marks going to the door! Would have more than enough money for my side business that I do now .
  • Margaret Jacobson 2012/06/18 21:32:55
    Margaret Jacobson
    me I would rather work AND keep getting my $1000.00 weekly !! PLEASE
  • tblackb 2012/06/18 20:59:36
    tblackb
    Yes, $52,000 a year before taxes isn't a lot of money...
  • JuliaLoren 2012/06/18 20:49:19
    JuliaLoren
    i would do a lot more volunteering with my time, but i dont really need much to live on, im not materialistic... the more i have, the more i give :)
  • Torchy 2012/06/18 20:14:33 (edited)
    Torchy
    I'd keep working. $1000 a week is more than I make right now, but I would just consider it a bonus and some security should I finally say "Screw this job!" as opposed to a salary. I'd probably start looking to do something I really enjoy, though.
  • KeithL 2012/06/18 18:38:11
  • bman~AVA 2012/06/18 16:54:04
    bman~AVA
    I don't know. I could live pretty good on a thousand a week. I like working but for me I think it would make me somewhat lazy in that department
  • Rod 2012/06/18 15:37:21
    Rod
    +1
    I am so stupid. I have thought all my life that there were 52 weeks in a year and that 1,000 dollars a week would give me 52,000 dollars a year. What a dunce I was.
  • ..::loc... Rod 2012/06/18 19:07:27
    ..::localeye::..
    There was probably some tax factored into that number.
  • Rod ..::loc... 2012/06/18 20:56:08
    Rod
    +1
    I suppose that's possible. However for a single young person making 52,000 dollars a year the income tax would be much much more than 9%. It would be closer to 20% plus FICA which would be another 6 plus percent. So, with at least 25% being paid in taxes the take home pay would only be around 39,000, give or take.
  • _-T3x4S_M4D3-_ 2012/06/18 15:36:46
    _-T3x4S_M4D3-_
    bs... ill take it
  • Professor Wizard 2012/06/18 15:28:06
    Professor Wizard
    +1
    I would keep working... but it would change my attitude for dealing with inept people.
  • HendricksMathew 2012/06/18 12:57:05
  • Beat Magnum True Hero 2012/06/18 10:09:10
    Beat Magnum True Hero
    +4
    $1,000 a week? Yeah, I'd quit my job. No more boss, no more meeting, no more coworkers. I'd still work, but on my own terms.
  • Pele Emerging 2012/06/18 06:50:31
    Pele Emerging
    I'm nearer the end of my working career than I'd like to think. Right now, a grand a week would be an amazing supplement to retirement and might mean I'd retire earlier, rather than later.
  • Johann 2012/06/18 06:39:54
    Johann
    As a student, that would sound nice to win that money. I still would like to work seeing that unemployment gets boring if you zone in. Activities and College keep me busy. $1,000 a week for Welding? I can only imagine.
  • uninformedluddite 2012/06/18 06:15:38 (edited)
    uninformedluddite
    There's a "happy income"? If you cannot process that that thought is sick then you may never be truly happy.
  • Fariborz-Zak 2012/06/18 05:27:51
    Fariborz-Zak
    agree
  • ..::localeye::.. 2012/06/18 02:49:33
    ..::localeye::..
    I would still have my business and use that money just to travel with.
  • Adam 2012/06/18 02:14:06
    Adam
    It wouldn't replace a career, but it sure as hell would replace my current job! I live on a third of that. With that kind of money, Id buy a small parcel of land and a Yurt, grow a few vegetables, save most of my earnings and dedicate all my time to running, and creative, and philanthropic pursuits. Hell, once I pay off my student loans, I could feel like i'm living extravagantly and donate $3,000 a month to charity.
  • Pedalpusher 2012/06/18 00:54:53
    Pedalpusher
    He'll actually get less than that a week! It was eight hundred and something after taxes. That's not a good income! I would hope he would continue his education and get a good job, and that money would allow him to be a little more comfortable in life.
  • Mel Mar... Pedalpu... 2012/06/18 08:52:43
    Mel Martens
    You guys still have to pay taxes after you win a certain amount of money? What the hell?? Why aren't the taxes taken out prior to the win like every other sane country with lotto?
  • Pedalpu... Mel Mar... 2012/06/18 23:32:15
    Pedalpusher
    It's never done as far as I know. All these games shows the person doesn't get what the win! Uncle Sam gets his cut.....it's income.
  • Mel Mar... Pedalpu... 2012/06/19 01:08:01
    Mel Martens
    Sure it's income, but it really is disgusting to offer someone a full cake, then take half while the person being offered had already seen the full amount. Taking the taxes out PRIOR to the win would be just that tiny little bit nicer.

    Of course, in Australia the Lottery commission is basically a rotating charity (thus is untaxable) that puts investments into the community for returns in advertising, the local arts and tourism. One can get a grant from the commission to fund a media project, for example, that Oz Lotto sees as a viable investment to encourage the youth to grow their own businesses in the media and thus bring international attention to the country in some for or another.

    With lottery winnings and such themselves, it's only deemed taxable income if you invest it in anything, at which point a certain percentage can be taken over time from the investment actually earned. You also get the entire lump sum in one go and buying your own house or your own car is not deemed taxable as you are merely owning that house, not earning from it. But if you buy multiple houses and rent them out, only the earnings from those houses directly add up for a taxable income.

    Your winnings themselves are completely your OWN!
  • Pedalpu... Mel Mar... 2012/06/20 05:15:53
    Pedalpusher
    For any Arizona Lottery prize valued over $5,000, the Arizona Lottery is required by law to withhold 25% for federal taxes and 5% for Arizona state income taxes for U.S. citizens or resident aliens. For non-resident aliens, the withholding tax is 30% federal and 6% state. Winners may be liable for more or less taxes when they report winnings to the IRS. You may wish to consult with a tax advisor regarding tax obligations. State part of the winnings are used to fund special Projects.
  • Willski 2012/06/18 00:25:50
    Willski
    enough to live on. £635.961 a week, (i'm english) i could do that easily.
    £33183.53646 a year, my family of 5 lives on something close to that.
  • Kim Possible 2012/06/18 00:02:56
    Kim Possible
    I would work but won't OD. More money is coming in. With 1K every week I could easily afford some type of college and earn my degree in a field I enjoy.
  • Jaiheena Star 2012/06/17 23:31:53
    Jaiheena Star
    He the student moves to Ohio the money would last longer. I'll take a week for life.
  • Bulanova (Team Hargitay) 2012/06/17 23:22:22
    Bulanova (Team Hargitay)
    Good grief, $1K a week? Sign me UP! I usually make about $350 a month and last month, only $160.
  • Michelle 2012/06/17 22:42:53
    Michelle
    +1
    One thousand a week would be a very nice income, but I would still work to keep myself busy. Definitely something I'd enjoy, rather than any job to keep food on the table.
  • Shadow13 2012/06/17 22:40:04
    Shadow13
    I say to live very modestly and properly invest excess earnings. By investing early you can shore up a sizable sub to provide fuel for future investments and allocate resources for large purchases when necessary. As far as working, I suppose you could find something to fill your time and maybe earn a little extra, there is always volunteer work as well.
  • Miko Mikomiko 2012/06/17 21:34:17
    Miko Mikomiko
    +1
    No, having a job is still important. You never know when the money will run out so it's important to save.
  • Zach 2012/06/17 20:50:35
    Zach
    +1
    That's a pretty decent salary. But keep in mind inflation. In about 10 years, $4000 a month is going to be a lot less than it is now. Use that to put in your saving's account or your child's college savings, but keep your job.
  • babygir... Zach 2012/06/17 21:18:46
    babygirl1234
    +2
    Thank you so much zach finally someone understands wat i am saying and send me a friend request
  • John Freeman 2012/06/17 19:53:05
    John Freeman
    +1
    Its disturbing how much ppl depend on money. I'll just leave this here, the short/sweet version of the whole money system. -
  • Mel Mar... John Fr... 2012/06/18 10:47:52
    Mel Martens
    +1
    I will have to crossreference a lot of things in that video...but damned if even the surface facts aren't freaken scary as hell
  • John Fr... Mel Mar... 2012/06/19 04:54:50 (edited)
    John Freeman
    Good, its always wise to get information from more than one source and decide for yourself whether something is true or not.

    And I agree, even the surface facts are quite disturbing....

    Edit- Oh yeah, I also recommend checking out "The Money Masters", its basically the incredibly long/detailed version of this one, but its worth watching. =)

Living

2013/06/19 19:20:32

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals