Quantcast

PUBLIC OPINION > $1,000 a Week Can't Replace a Career

SodaHead Living 2012/06/15 20:59:02
An 18-year-old student from New York won the lottery this week, and it will earn him around $1,000 a week for the rest of his life. That's about $48,000 a year for absolutely nothing. It isn't exactly a high roller salary, and if he wants to move up the ladder he'll have to supplement his income, but technically he'll never need to work a day in his life. Good Morning America asked if that was enough to keep people from working.

1000 dollars

A grand a week would be amazing, but there are a couple of reasons most people would still prefer to work. First of all, it's not an enormous amount of money. It's definitely enough to live on, but it would leave most people lacking. A Princeton study found that $75,000 a year is the "happiest income," which means you'd need another $27,000 to really live it up. Not only that, but careers are fulfilling. Without work, life can get pretty boring. And a $1,000-a-week cushion will cut down on the stress, too.

Young People Need Work

Naturally, there had to be an age limit. Work is important, but eventually people retire. Based on our results, that cut-off age is about 55 years old. After that, the desire to keep working unnecessarily dropped an average of 28%. However, more than half of people over the age of 55 still said they'd keep working. Maybe retirement's not that great after all.

Unemployed Are So Over It

We also anticipated some correlation based on employment status, and again, the results were somewhat predictable. Full-time workers seem to love work, while the unemployed were less than enthusiastic about continuing to job search after landing a grand a year. But students were actually the most eager to work. They're still figuring out what they want to do, and they're going to pursue it, whatever it is.

Drinkers Need Jobs

Let's move away from the obvious for a minute, and take a look at one statistic that surprised us. Would you believe drinkers were 11% more likely than nondrinkers to want to continue working? It could be that workaholics enjoy their drink -- see "Mad Men" -- or it could be that drinkers need a little more to fuel their fire. Either way, it seems that drinks and jobs go hand-in-hand.

If you'd like to vote on this question, dig deeper into the demographics, or engage in existing discussion about the topic, visit our poll about working unnecessarily. We'd love to hear from you!
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • Lord Emperor of Dune 2012/06/15 21:13:58
    Lord Emperor of Dune
    +11
    That would get me the hell out of my job in about 3.6 seconds. It's not enough to live high on the hog, but it's enough to live modestly and fairly well.

    Now, I wouldn't quit working... I would train as a lion tamer, profession shooting competitor, fly fisherman, car painter, sculptor... I would work, but I wouldn't feel bad if a job didn't pan out. I would just move on to the next experience... Damn, I wish I could win that money...

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • janet 2012/06/17 19:06:15
    janet
    +1
    It will allow the winner a chance to work in a job that they truly enjoy or open their own business : )
  • moonchild 2012/06/17 18:39:17
    moonchild
    +2
    It is not chump change and can be lived off of- however I'd probably still seek out a job but it would be in something I really love and not just for the pay.
  • TimothyBrianFoley 2012/06/17 18:28:44
    TimothyBrianFoley
    whatever you have focus on that not on the money unless that's how much you get paid a week for your career then this shouldn't be an issue $52,000.00 annually is not a nomral salary
  • Apache 2012/06/17 18:21:41
    Apache
    You see, that's the Liberal's take on this situation. Never work another day in your life and get paid for it. Be a lazy maggot bum.

    My Conservative view is, keep working and use the $1000 a week to fall back on if need be or invest it into something worthwhile such as a business venture or something similar. Stay busy and you'll enjoy life to it's fullest.
  • KaylaE 2012/06/17 17:42:05
    KaylaE
    I think I would still get some part time job so that I can buy a nice house and not Ever worry about bills or anything that might come up (water damage, tornado's, really bad storms, ect.) and I could take vacations. I could also have extra money to put back for my son when he gets older.
  • Nonpartisan 2012/06/17 17:41:35
    Nonpartisan
    That is a lot more than I get paid from my retirement annuity after working for over 30 years for the Government. My pension would pay for the cheapest rent that is available here and basic expenses and not much else. A dollar certainly is not worth what it was 30 years ago. In order to be able to afford to do anything at all, I had to give up the apartment and move into a Motorhome, from which I run my Campaign.

    Even so, if I had a windfall of that amount, or any amount, I would still invest 100% of it in my Non-Partisan Campaign for the American People, the American People need it more than I do. http://www.myspace.com/dwight...
  • rascal 2012/06/17 17:03:57
    rascal
    +1
    $1000 a week for life....not a hard choice I would not work ever again. I would enjoy life.
  • TheExphinitee42 2012/06/17 17:01:07
    TheExphinitee42
    If that happen to me right now, I would be quitting my part-time job instantly and live my life into the affluent paradise. Hell yeah baby!
  • uninfor... TheExph... 2012/06/18 06:18:26
    uninformedluddite
    effluent paradise - FTFY
  • TheExph... uninfor... 2012/06/18 06:20:58
    TheExphinitee42
    Sorry, Idk what that means, but if its something you have against my answer on here, then what's the problem?
  • uninfor... TheExph... 2012/06/18 06:24:19
    uninformedluddite
    +1
    effluent means sewerage or discharge of a similar sort. I haven't got a problem with you at all - far from it. Paradise isn't money or possessions (and no I am definitely not a god-botherer).
  • TheExph... uninfor... 2012/06/18 06:27:31
    TheExphinitee42
    Okay, it just seemed like you were. Looks like I didn't know what 'paradise' meant and I guess I actually meant was "Affluent world"
  • jacob crim 2012/06/17 15:48:44
    jacob crim
    I make 705 after taxes every two weeks, i would gladly quit my job for 1,000 a week.
  • miranda monet 2012/06/17 14:43:14
    miranda monet
    +1
    MY HOUSEHOLD makes that a month so yes u could live off it & start a school to train service / companion cats . So States would recognize them as such . It would help a lot of Disabled that can't work & need help .
  • TKramar 2012/06/17 13:43:45
    TKramar
    I want to keep working the rest of my life, even if I had money coming in from some other source.

    By the way, $1000 a week is more than I make now.
  • HendricksMathew 2012/06/17 13:06:00
  • LEFT IS NOT RIGHT 2012/06/17 12:17:32 (edited)
    LEFT IS NOT RIGHT
    +1
    I'd work part-time ;-)
    Mcdonalds worker
  • Roxxi 2012/06/17 08:05:33
    Roxxi
    +1
    No, but I would quit my job and start training for a job I'd like to do and use that moeny to support me before I get there.
  • boltfox20 2012/06/17 06:39:16
    boltfox20
    +2
    $1,000 a week? That's more money than we get through this house in a month. I'll take it!
  • miranda... boltfox20 2012/06/17 14:38:04
    miranda monet
    +1
    ME TOO .
  • GLaDOS 2012/06/17 06:00:21
    GLaDOS
    +3
    I wouldn't continue working at a job I took just for the money. I would try doing things I actually wanted to do, instead.
  • Jake Blanton 2012/06/17 05:08:44 (edited)
    Jake Blanton
    Could I survive on it if necessary? Yeah...

    Could I continue to live in my current lifestyle without tapping into my savings? Probably not...

    My S.O. and I have made around $150-200K per year for the last few years. $50K would be a significant pay cut... I'm pretty sure that she would not like to cut back that far...
  • Sarah TH Marshall Switcher 2012/06/17 04:43:46
    Sarah TH Marshall Switcher
    The total income for our household is 3000 a month, so that would be an extra 1000.
  • Jdogg 2012/06/17 04:13:36
    Jdogg
    +1
    I could live on that,
  • spencerc143 2012/06/17 03:15:20
    spencerc143
    +1
    Yes it can. Thats probably more than most people make.
  • TKramar spencer... 2012/06/17 13:45:49
    TKramar
    More than I make anyhow.
  • AngelaDuke 2012/06/17 02:39:10
    AngelaDuke
    Funny I'm living on about half that right now and sometimes I even have money to do things. So, i can't quit my job until my service is over, but once it was I probably wouldnt get a job. My hubby could just continue working :P
  • Darkitec 2012/06/17 02:22:01
    Darkitec
    It's a bit more than double what I'm earning working full time right now. and It took almost 3 years to get this job. I'm sure I could find a lot of things that I could do in my free time that wouldn't cost a lot of money and could also perhaps earn me a few bucks more on top of the lottery winnings.
  • Dagon 2012/06/17 01:49:31
  • tesmith47 Dagon 2012/06/18 05:43:08
    tesmith47
    +1
    it depends on where you live, south dakota or los angles, big difference i cost of living
  • Dagon tesmith47 2012/06/22 21:13:11
  • The One 2012/06/17 00:49:24
    The One
    Gay!
  • BILL 2012/06/16 23:47:02
    BILL
    yes it can
  • RoseyRhod 2012/06/16 23:26:59
    RoseyRhod
    Hell, I'd take it! I'd still have to work though, but maybe I could cut back to a 32 hour week instead of a 40 hour week. I could pay off my mortgage, maybe find a better place to live, and get a newer car. (Mine has nearly 200,000 miles on it.) I could help put my son through college.
  • Teresa 2012/06/16 22:40:02
    Teresa
    I'll keep working, love my job, can´t help it!
    But being able not to worry about monthly bills...
  • knoodelhed 2012/06/16 21:48:58
    knoodelhed
    There are jobs I could do that I could make a reasonably comfortable living at when you add the $52k/yr. Even so, I'd end up investing a decent chunk of it.
  • MR. 2012/06/16 21:39:38
    MR.
    STUDY TO BE WHAT YOUR "HEARTS DESIRE" IS,... (AND THEN BE THE BEST!)
  • Christopher Kirchen 2012/06/16 20:12:34
    Christopher Kirchen
    Yes it can; if I won $1,000 a week for life I would find something else to do.
  • JimTheGeek 2012/06/16 20:10:50
    JimTheGeek
    +1
    Let's see...$48,000 a year is about twice what I'm making now and have made for most of my life. Work gives me some place to go where I don't spend any money. So, I'd probably keep working just so I don't have the excess time that would cost money.
  • joan.sloane 2012/06/16 19:47:14
    joan.sloane
    +1
    That is not enough to live on long term but what freedom it would offer. The options are almost endless. Save it all and retire young; take a job you love even if it doesn't pay much; afford the house you always dreamed of, on and on and on.

    I haven't played the lottery in years. Maybe I should buy a ticket.

Living

2013/05/18 11:44:30

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals