Go lesbians!!
Edit: One of my best friends I have known since I was 4 years old is a lesbian and she & her girlfriend are perfect for each other.
One Million Moms Upset About Two Women Kissing in Urban Outfitters Catalog: Totally Fine or 'Inappropriate'?
SodaHead Living
2012/04/18 17:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
594 votes
|
|
67% | |||
|
290 votes
|
|
33% | |||
A photo of two young women kissing in the new Urban Outfitters catalog has upset One Million Moms. Well, not exactly one million moms, but the outspoken group that is "fed up with the filth many segments of our society, especially the entertainment media, are throwing at our children."
The group issued the following warning, according to The Advocate: "On page two of this catalog is a picture of two women kissing in a face holding embrace!" They're also urging their members to cancel their catalogs and threaten to shop elsewhere. "The ad and catalog are clearly geared toward teenagers," the group says. "The content is offensive and inappropriate for a teen who is the company's target customer."
True, Urban Outfitters is targeted at teens, but so are shows like "Glee," which have done so much for gay rights. One Million Moms previously failed to get Ellen DeGeneres fired as spokeswoman for JCPenney (because she is a lesbian). Do you think the group is right about this ad being "inappropriate"? Or do you think it's totally fine?
Top Opinion
-
Totally fine
+31Some girls like other girls, not a big deal. Time to get over it. I'm a teenage girl, and this is nothing I haven't seen or done myself. I have friends that are lesbians & bisexual. It happens.
Go lesbians!!
Edit: One of my best friends I have known since I was 4 years old is a lesbian and she & her girlfriend are perfect for each other.
Club Shepherd, yyyy
THEE Shepherd Act, 2010
THEE Shepherd Card Cruise
JESUS CHRIST/GOD/THEE HOLY GHOST, ARE REAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!... I PRAISE THEM, EVERY DAY, I MAY BE HANDICAPPED, NOW, BUT SOON, VERY SOON I WILL BE IN HEAVEN WORSHIPPING AND PRAISING MY FATHER, AND YOUR DADDY, GOD, VERY SOON!
BRIAN EDWARD SHEPHERD
Sadly enough, even the innocent male to male kiss pic I uploaded will offend people because of their double standards...If it's two women, everyone says fine, but oh the wrath of Kahn comes alive when two men kiss. And it's largely an American double standard. When I was in Europe I had many male to male kisses, and there was nothing sexual about it.
And it did the job; they got our attention. Suckers.
I don't condone sexism, agism or racism or looksism
Finally, your sexual organs are heterosexual. That is you have female organs which serve in both form and function to work elegantly as counterparts to the male sexual organs. There is no homosexual sexual organs. So all human beings, unless there is a woeful physical deformity, are innately heterosexual.
My organs, yes, my feelings, no. I love women. I don't like men, at all. Physical features are of equal relevance as emotion, and I am not attracted to men. I don't care if penis fits in my vagina, I have no interest in it, and that's absolutely my right and no one should be able to take that away from me, or any other homosexual, whether it's through ignorance or complaining about a damn advert.
The state as a matter of fact has no interest in protecting your emotions, and most certainly the state has no interest in protecting your emotions in regards to marriage.
We have the same heart, blood, hands, fingers, toes, legs, feet, and the only difference is genitals and sexual preference. Why on earth does it matter to you, or anyone else, so much? Give us our rights, and we'll stop complaining, it's as simple as that. In thirty years people will look back at this and wonder why it was an issue to begin with. What if the world were run by homosexuals, and we restricted your rights? You'd be on my side of this argument.
It appears the state has no interest in anything that doesn't conform to their idea of the perfect society and what it should look like.
And once again protecting your sexual preference isn't in the interest of the state. You don't have a right to choose any one you want to marry any more than I do. I'm not allowed to marry a near kin. I'm not allowed to marry a horse or a child for that matter. No one has a right to mattey anyone or any thing they choose. The fact of the matter is that the only marriage that the state has an interest in protecting is heterosexual marriages because it protects women and children.
Heterosexist cultures have done nothing but create murder and mayhem. And pederasty was always par for the course.
I don't want them to protect it, I can do that myself. What I want, and what many of us want, is for them to pull their fingers out and acknowledge that we are just as human as they are, and want nothing more from them but the same rights heterosexual couples have. My own uncle was told he couldn't be at the side of his own partner of 32 years when they turned off the life support, because he was gay and not classified "next of kin" or family. It's disgusting, and discriminatory. We're not going anywhere.
And when I say every single time, that homosexuality has been endorsed and practiced in a culture, I mean every single time. Every single time homosexuality became dominant in a culture, the status of women were flushed into the toilet, and children were discarded at the will and discretion of the homosexist patriarchy. That happened in Phoenicia and ancient Greece and ancient Rome, to say nothing of the butch homosexuals such as Ernst Rohm and Rudolf Hess in the Nazi party of Germany.
The homosexuals in the Nazi party have been kept under wraps long enough, but ugly truth tends to rear it's head sooner or later.
Sure the homosexuals in the Nazi party sent feminine homosexuals into concentration camps. It served two purposes. It made the Nazi's appear to be in compliance with the moral standards of Germany and butch homosexuals hated feminine homosexual. It is still that way today, as this youtube clip demonstrates adequately,
Konrad Heiden, author of A History of National Socialism,
" homosexuality was widespread in the secret murderers'
army and its devotees denied that it was a perversion.
They were proud, regarding themselves as `different from
the others,' meaning better. They boasted about their
superiority. Roehm exclaimed that the misfortune of the
age was domination by women; he praised the epochs that
had been dominated by figures like Alexander the Great,
Caesar, Charles Xll Sweden, Prince Eugen...
The homosexuals in the Nazi party have been kept under wraps long enough, but ugly truth tends to rear it's head sooner or later.
Sure the homosexuals in the Nazi party sent feminine homosexuals into concentration camps. It served two purposes. It made the Nazi's appear to be in compliance with the moral standards of Germany and butch homosexuals hated feminine homosexual. It is still that way today, as this youtube clip demonstrates adequately,
Konrad Heiden, author of A History of National Socialism,
" homosexuality was widespread in the secret murderers'
army and its devotees denied that it was a perversion.
They were proud, regarding themselves as `different from
the others,' meaning better. They boasted about their
superiority. Roehm exclaimed that the misfortune of the
age was domination by women; he praised the epochs that
had been dominated by figures like Alexander the Great,
Caesar, Charles Xll Sweden, Prince Eugene of Savoy and
Frederick the Great, five great warriors and five
homosexuals."
Hitler's Children: Hitler Youth and the SS by Gerhard Rempel
"Homosexuality, meanwhile continued on into the war years when Hitler Jugend boys frequently became victims of molestations at the hands of their SS tutors; Himmler consistently took a hard line against it publicly, but was willing to mitigate his penalties privately and keep every incident as secret as possible."
By the same note, infants became disposable in every single one of these cultures as well. And lo and behold, as America becomes more "tolerant" of homosexuality,the ugly side of infanticide again rears it's ugly head. This time under the "scientific" status of the term "after-birth-abortions."
Anyone who doesn't learn the lessons of history is going to be doomed to repeat them. All I can say is women in the US that tolerate this special and unique form of all inclusive form of homosexist misogyny ane going to learn a lesson that will send them reeling and staggering across the nation.
And domestic abuse, even among Lesbians is much higher in homosexual partnerships.
" Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana.