New York Times Publishes Hit Piece Against US Constitution As FBI Demonizes Everyday Americans As Possible Terrorists?
~ The Rebel ~
2012/02/08 21:30:22
In a move that has shocked many Americans, the New York Times has published a hit piece against the US Constitution and its “outdated” ways.
The hit piece comes on the heels of a sitting justice of the Supreme Court recommending multiple other constitutions and human rights charters to Egypt over the very constitution she is tasked to protect.
In the hit piece, the author actually claims that the US Constitution guarantees “relatively few rights.
There are lots of possible reasons. The United States Constitution is terse and old, and it guarantees relatively few rights.
The commitment of some members of the Supreme Court to interpreting the Constitution according to its original meaning in the 18th century may send the signal that it is of little current use to, say, a new African nation.
And the Constitution’s waning influence may be part of a general decline in American power and prestige.
Relatively few rights? Interpreting the Constitution in its original form a bad thing? America losing its prestige because we follow our Constitution?
Read More: http://theintelhub.com/2012/02/07/new-york-times-p...
Top Opinion
-
The Dude 2012/02/08 21:43:03
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.”
“It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” -David Rockefeller -
http://theintelhub.com/2012/0...