Man sues hospital for genital mutilation. Should he get paid?
Foxhound BN0
2012/06/30 17:36:46
A man in South Dakota is suing the hospital where he was circumcised as a newborn, saying he only recently became aware that he'd undergone the procedure and that it robbed him of his sexual prowess.
28-year-old Dean Cochrun is asking for $1,000 dollars in punitive damages from Sanford Hospital in Sioux Falls. He claims an unknown doctor at the hospital, then named the Sioux Valley Hospital, led his mother to believe the procedure was medically necessary.
He argues the circumcision was not necessary, unethical and without medical benefit.
Should he get paid?
See full story at http://www.wday.com/event/article/id/62301/
Should he get paid?
See full story at http://www.wday.com/event/article/id/62301/
Top Opinion
-
He should get paid.























A new national survey in Denmark, where about 5% of men are circumcised, examined associations of circumcision with a range of sexual measures in both sexes. Circumcised men were more likely to report frequent orgasm difficulties, and women with circumcised spouses more often reported incomplete sexual needs fulfillment and frequent sexual function difficulties overall, notably orgasm difficulties, and painful sexual intercourse. Thorough examination of these matters in areas where male circumcision is more common is warranted.
Frisch, M., Lindholm, M., and Grønbæk, M., "Male Circumcision and Sexual Function in Men and Women: A Survey-based, Cross-sectional Study i...
A new national survey in Denmark, where about 5% of men are circumcised, examined associations of circumcision with a range of sexual measures in both sexes. Circumcised men were more likely to report frequent orgasm difficulties, and women with circumcised spouses more often reported incomplete sexual needs fulfillment and frequent sexual function difficulties overall, notably orgasm difficulties, and painful sexual intercourse. Thorough examination of these matters in areas where male circumcision is more common is warranted.
Frisch, M., Lindholm, M., and Grønbæk, M., "Male Circumcision and Sexual Function in Men and Women: A Survey-based, Cross-sectional Study in Denmark," International Journal of Epidemiology (2011);1–15.
Circumcision is Associated with Premature Ejaculation
Premature ejaculation (PE) is common. However, it has been underreported and undertreated. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of PE and to investigate possible associated factors of PE. This cross-sectional study was conducted at a primary care clinic over a 3-month period in 2008. Men aged 18-70 years attending the clinic were recruited, and they completed self-administered questionnaires. A total of 207 men were recruited with a response rate of 93.2%. Their mean age was 46.0 years. The prevalence of PE was 40.6%. No significant association was found between age and PE. Multivariate analysis showed that erectile dysfunction, circumcision, and sexual intercourse =5 times in 4 weeks were predictors of PE. These associations need further confirmation.
Tang, W. and Khoo, E. "Prevalence and Correlates of Premature Ejaculation in a Primary Care Setting: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study," Journal of Sexual Medicine (2011) Apr 14.Researchers Demonstrate Traumatic Effects of Circumcision
A team of Canadian researchers produced new evidence that circumcision has long-lasting traumatic effects. An article published in the international medical journal The Lancet reported the effect of infant circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination. The researchers tested 87 infants at 4 months or 6 months of age. The boys who had been circumcised were more sensitive to pain than the uncircumcised boys. Differences between groups were significant regarding facial action, crying time, and assessments of pain.
The authors believe that "neonatal circumcision may induce long-lasting changes in infant pain behavior because of alterations in the infant’s central neural processing of painful stimuli." They also write that "the long-term consequences of surgery done without anaesthesia are likely to include post-traumatic stress as well as pain. It is therefore possible that the greater vaccination response in the infants circumcised without anaesthesia may represent an infant analogue of a post-traumatic stress disorder triggered by a traumatic and painful event and re-experienced under similar circumstances of pain during vaccination."
Taddio, A. et al., "Effect of Neonatal Circumcision on Pain Response during Subsequent Routine Vaccination," The Lancet 349 (1997): 599–603.
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances.
What you are sugesting is that the state should be complisit in asaulting a child on the grounds of its parents religion.(The amendment prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion) I sugest we are speaking about freedom from religion here. PERHAPS YOU DONT UNDERSTAND THE IMPLICATION.
Now keeping in mind that Atheism is an official religion now - you tell me what is happening.
TO THE TOPIC: I have never heard of a child under the age of 14 that had constitutional rights that his/her legal guardians (notice that the legal word of Guardian goes both ways, to guard the child, and to guard society) didn't voluntarily extend to them. That's a fact, Jack.
If it turns out that he was damaged by sloppy cutting (or something), that would be different. But the article doesn't say that.
If he isn't successful against the hospital, maybe he could sue his mother.
And his name is Cochrun, how damn ironic!
Maybe he should see a therapist or a circulatory specialist before rushing to sue.
Parents have the LEGAL RIGHT AND RESPONSIBILITY to authorize medical procedures for their children.
How could he know if his prowess was affected since he was circumcised before he had any? If he'd had an adult sex life, then had a procedure that resulted in reduced "prowess," I'd say "Go get 'em, Bucko!" If he THINKS (hopes?) he'd have been more "proficient" without circumcision, I don't think that's grounds for a lawsuit -- certainly not for a financial award. Is he hoping to buy improved prowess if he's successful?
Enough of this. If he has a legit medical issue, I'm all for his getting relief (in any way appropriate). Based on info available, his lawsuit is a crock. Have a nice day.