Quantcast

Man jailed for 30 Days for Catching Rain Water on Own Property | CNSNews.com: Is this justice?

Heisenberg 2012/08/09 14:46:30
You!
Add Photos & Videos


CNSNEWS.COM reports:

Gary Harrington, the Oregon man convicted of collecting rainwater and snow runoff on his rural property surrendered Wednesday morning to begin serving his 30-day, jail sentence in Medford, Ore.

premium balance spin seek news under-reported result media bias omission

Read More: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/man-sentenced-30-d...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • sglmom 2012/08/23 05:41:03
    Disagree
    sglmom
    +1
    And to think that in my area ..
    we are encouraged to purchase ..
    not only the supplies to effectively compost ..
    but also encouraged to obtain the rain barrels ..
    so that we can effectively use the Rain Water (from the Gutters) ..
    in our Gardening Needs ..
  • Paul V. Tupointeau 2012/08/15 04:38:33
    Disagree
    Paul V. Tupointeau
    +1
    "The State has no use for law-abiding citizens" ---unknown.
  • Andy Fletcher 2012/08/13 02:40:14
    Agree
    Andy Fletcher
    I'm fairly conservative, but sorry, on this I agree. In most places it it illegal to divert natural water runoff or impede it if it flows to a creek,stream, river or natural water shed. There are also numerous local, state, and federal regulations regarding construction of dams and retention basins,for public safety and other concerns. I wish they had pics of the property with the article. If he did nothing more than dig big basins in the middle of his property that would be one thing but according to the article he built dams across natural washes and closed the gates preventing the natural flow. That's a far cry from collecting rain water and snow runoff from his property. Check your deeds folks. Few people these days have either water or mineral rights on their own property, especially in an urban/semi urban community. If you are in a water district, most likely you can not have a well on your property. Be very careful when establishing a water district and the powers you give them.
    The Antelope Valley in California's high desert was for years the largest producer of alfalfa in the west. The cities of Palmdale and Lancaster established rural and municipal water districts on the vote of the people. As the cities annexed more area, the water districts expanded with the annexe...
    I'm fairly conservative, but sorry, on this I agree. In most places it it illegal to divert natural water runoff or impede it if it flows to a creek,stream, river or natural water shed. There are also numerous local, state, and federal regulations regarding construction of dams and retention basins,for public safety and other concerns. I wish they had pics of the property with the article. If he did nothing more than dig big basins in the middle of his property that would be one thing but according to the article he built dams across natural washes and closed the gates preventing the natural flow. That's a far cry from collecting rain water and snow runoff from his property. Check your deeds folks. Few people these days have either water or mineral rights on their own property, especially in an urban/semi urban community. If you are in a water district, most likely you can not have a well on your property. Be very careful when establishing a water district and the powers you give them.
    The Antelope Valley in California's high desert was for years the largest producer of alfalfa in the west. The cities of Palmdale and Lancaster established rural and municipal water districts on the vote of the people. As the cities annexed more area, the water districts expanded with the annexed territory. They put meters on the farmers wells and started charging them for the water they previously got for the cost of pumping it out of the ground. They went from 5 to 6 harvests per year down to 1 or 2 from natural rain, and eventually just ceased operations. A short twenty years later and hundreds of thousands of acres of once fertile farm land are blowing dust and tumble weeds. All perfectly legal.
    (more)
  • Nilam 2012/08/12 20:33:34
    Disagree
    Nilam
  • Dave In Cali 2012/08/12 11:54:26
    Disagree
    Dave In Cali
    +1
    I think it's high time we set a date for the American Bastille.
  • schjaz 2012/08/11 17:06:01
    Disagree
    schjaz
    +1
    I am disagreeing with the caption but the article offers no proof that he is not guilty of doing what the government states.....DIVERTING water instead of accessing runoff. i just don't know.
  • Cat 2012/08/10 21:22:54
    Disagree
    Cat
    +1
    as long as he didn't block a stream that waters nearby farms or supplies water to lakes and rivers,he did nothing wrong.
  • thefatguy 2012/08/10 18:11:39
    Disagree
    thefatguy
    +1
    I think everyone can agree that conservatives want to decrease the size of government and "liberals" want to increase it. But, at what point does the "liberal" side say, "Okay, that's going too far"? If this isn't it, I don't know what would be.
  • ERide54 2012/08/10 14:15:18
    Disagree
    ERide54
    +1
    Really to stupid for a comment:-)
  • Wake The Sheeple 2012/08/10 13:57:14
    Disagree
    Wake The Sheeple
    +1
    That western Oregon and Washington for you, they are eco fascists there. King County in WA requires you to keep a sizable percentage of your property "natural" or face fines and jail time. Imagine the County being your nosy overreaching HOA director.
  • lucky 2012/08/10 13:49:13
    Agree
    lucky
    +1
    Im guessing the majority of people who answered disagree know very little about owning land in the country and didnt look up the details of the case. Nearly every state have provisions to stop that type of behavior because the flow of water is important not just to one land owner but often several others. The natural flow of water can be the difference between having water for your cattle and crops and extreme drought conditions.
  • Odinsown 2012/08/10 13:12:09
    Disagree
    Odinsown
    +1
    Water should be free to gather from natural places, like rain or springs on ones property. If he had been stealing from a municipal or private source(city water pipes or a neighbors well) then sure but collecting rain and snow melt shouldn't be illegal.
  • freespire 2012/08/10 12:55:06
    Disagree
    freespire
    +1
    what next women wearing mini skirts will be locked up for indecent exspoure?
  • Wake Th... freespire 2012/08/10 13:59:50
    Wake The Sheeple
    +2
    No that state encourages feminists but at the same time time prohibits essential liberty from others.
  • freespire Wake Th... 2012/08/11 01:49:54
    freespire
    +2
    it is sad when the right's of God's gifts are taken away by men whom believe they own something they have no power to control where it will turn up.
  • Anonymouse BN-0 ~bibbityboo~ 2012/08/10 11:24:38
    Disagree
    Anonymouse BN-0 ~bibbityboo~
    +1
    What was the reason behind this? Does that mean that water butts are illegal?
  • S and S 2012/08/10 10:01:00
    Agree
    S and S
    +2
    he's stealing from the Gov't and could be a considered a Terrorist under NDAA.

    after all Obama owns the rain!
  • Terry McGinnis 2012/08/10 08:44:32 (edited)
  • Witch.Nikki.Jo 2012/08/10 07:58:29
  • xxx 2012/08/10 07:24:42
  • Terry M... xxx 2012/08/10 08:46:49
    Terry McGinnis
    +1
    Nope! They are the true retards of the world and need to be jailed for their stupidity! :)
  • Wake Th... xxx 2012/08/10 14:01:45
    Wake The Sheeple
    +1
    Have you been to Western Oregon? They are one of the largest breeding grounds of eco terrorists and eco fascists.
  • xxx Wake Th... 2012/08/13 00:03:22
    xxx
    +2
    i had no idea
  • Transquesta 2012/08/10 07:07:23
    Agree
    Transquesta
    +1
    I agree it's a call to action. A call which so-called 'patriots' will ignore.

    A bully comes up to you on the playground and slaps the snot out of you. He then repeats that ages old question: "what are you gonna do about it, punk?" If your answer is/amounts to "nothing, sir," EXPECT more of the same.

    After the second slap, though, don't blame the bully.
  • KeeganTheAwesome 2012/08/10 06:56:24 (edited)
    Disagree
    KeeganTheAwesome
    +3


    Am I being paranoid, or does anyone else have the same feeling this article is fake? The story seems fictional to me, because I doubt our govt. would waste their time arresting rainwater collectors. Not to mention the sheer number of political adverts and phrases on the website.
  • Transqu... KeeganT... 2012/08/10 07:09:11
    Transquesta
    +2
    It is NOT fictional (click the link), and this has happened many times before.
  • Gabsters<3 2012/08/10 04:29:57
  • Raphy 2012/08/10 03:08:50
    Disagree
    Raphy
    +2
    Damn. I guess he isn't paying for his water bill lol. That is stupid. They need to ROADHOUSE that whole damn town.. peter griffin roadhouse
  • handeman 2012/08/10 02:55:31
    Disagree
    handeman
    +2
    Ok rain is now regulated?
  • Transqu... handeman 2012/08/10 07:10:32
    Transquesta
    +1
    In some communities it very much is! This is your country on liberalism.
  • unicorn_lady1 2012/08/09 21:21:24
    Disagree
    unicorn_lady1
    +2
    This is not justice its facism.
  • Kronan_1 2012/08/09 19:40:56
    Disagree
    Kronan_1
    +4
    What punishment do you get for a swimming pool? pool
  • unicorn... Kronan_1 2012/08/09 21:21:51
    unicorn_lady1
    +2
    WELL SAID.
  • Transqu... Kronan_1 2012/08/10 07:11:22
    Transquesta
    +2
    As long as you call it a swimming pool and not a retention pond, probably nothing.
  • Kronan_1 Transqu... 2012/08/10 18:11:13
    Kronan_1
    +1
    Well, the Clampetts called theirs a cement pond cement pond
  • thefatguy Kronan_1 2012/08/10 18:09:07
    thefatguy
    +2
    Electric shock.
    crack whore
  • Michelle 2012/08/09 19:22:50
    Disagree
    Michelle
    +1
    That's a ridiculous law. It's just rain.
  • Jockey101 2012/08/09 19:18:44 (edited)
    Disagree
    Jockey101
    +2
    What? You cannot get jail time for that -____-
  • xcide13 2012/08/09 19:14:43
    Disagree
    xcide13
    +2
    I was looking at property in Colorado the other day and one ad i read was very adamant about how whoever owned this land would also own the water.

    I nearly pissed myself at the idiocy of the idea.

    Thank God we don't have to worry about that BS here in Texas!
  • Professor Wizard 2012/08/09 18:47:45
    Disagree
    Professor Wizard
    +2
    In Texas... if you can catch it.. It belongs to YOU!

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/05/25 14:24:19

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals