Lucy, you've got some 'splainin' to do!
Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
2012/08/27 22:22:10
No, not that Lucy, as in I Love. This Lucy, in the picture. Mary Leakey's Lucy.
Evolution tries to be the Grand Unified Theory of Life. But: how did life arise from non-life? And how can you confidently link supposed "hominids" to modern man? Much of the supposed evidence consists of artists' concepts only. And without one scintilla of evidence. So why do people accept these "just so" stories?
Evolution tries to be the Grand Unified Theory of Life. But: how did life arise from non-life? And how can you confidently link supposed "hominids" to modern man? Much of the supposed evidence consists of artists' concepts only. And without one scintilla of evidence. So why do people accept these "just so" stories?
Read More: http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/08/27...
Top Opinion
-
Whatever Lucy was, mankind was created.+10Lucy at least isn't a fraud, like Piltdown and Peking Men. But it is still misinterpreted. And without a credible theory of the origin of life, evolution is sunk. That's why evolutionists yell so loudly that "evolution has nothing to do with life origin!" Oh, yes, it does. For without origin, there's nothing to evolve.






















Evolution does not describe the origin of life, it describes the diversity of life.
The "Artist Concept" was created so you can get an idea what they believed they looked like.
They can tell it is a early human thanks to science like Osteology, Forensics, and Archeology and there gathering of consistent evidence, and their predictable capabilities.
The many scientists studying "abiogenesis" ( the study of how biological life could arise from inorganic matter through natural processes) are no closer to explaining how the amount of "intelligence" (defined as ordered information) necessary for the simplest single-cell organism to replicate itself, could have arisen through "natural processes" from inorganic matter, than they were decades ago, even with the assistance of powerful computers.
Even Sir Francis Crick, Nobel laureate and one of the discoverers of the DNA double-helix and an atheist, proposed that life on earth originated elsewhere and was transported here! Richard Dawkins, when being interviewed by Ben Stein, also fell back on the other-earthly origins of life "theory." How quickly they abandon the actual scientific method when their scientific "theories" are shown to not hold water. Dawkins and Crick are okay with a "creator", just so it isn't God.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sc...
http://www.newscientist.com/a...
http://www.livescience.com/71...
etc etc etc