Kardashian Sisters Reveal New Lingerie Line for Sears: Sexy or Trashy?

by SodaHead Living Posted 2012/03/14 17:02:43

Related Topics: Fashion, Kardashian Kollection intimates, Kardashians, Kim Kardashian, Khloe Kardashian, Kourtney Kardashian, Kardashian Sisters, Kardashian lingerie, Lingerie, Underwear, Pregnant, bra, Sisters, Sleep, Sexy, Shorts, Nude, Photo

Read More

738 votes
Read all 269 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Sexy	369 votes	50%
	Trashy	369 votes	50%

Feel like you've seen enough of the Kardashian sisters? Well, you haven't seen anything yet. Because Kim, Khloe and Kourtney are all posing in their skivvies to promote their Kardashian Kollection Intimates line.

kardashian lingerie

Kim and Kourtney pose in lacy nude and black bra-and-panties sets (the shot was reportedly taken before Kourtney got pregnant), while Khloe wears a one-piece with push-up cups. All the ladies are wearing thigh-high stockings and heels, and Khloe is wearing garters. "My sisters are I are excited to reveal our new ad for our Kardashian Kollection Intimates!" Kim announced. "The intimates line is so gorgeous, comfortable and feminine and we are very proud of the line!"

Want to see even more of Kim? She also tweeted a photo of herself wearing an itty bitty pair of silky pink shorts -- and nothing else, along with the caption: "Can't sleep tonight ..." Do you find the line sexy -- or kind of trashy? We just wonder what Jon Hamm has to say about it ...

kim underwear

+30

Add a comment above

rosalie.harman 2012/03/14 17:09:57

Trashy

+10
Greedy is the best definition.
>> See Replies

More polls by SodaHead Living

joma5004 2012/03/15 14:28:56

Trashy

+3
The Kardachians are the epitome of skank! Anyone who buys their line is trashy.

reply
vinone 2012/03/15 14:18:57

Sexy

+2
They look pretty sexy, but if it's legitimate lingerie it will often be defined as somewhat trashy. And it's got Kardashian in the name, so at least 50 percent of the people will bash it just for that.

reply
wow-really 2012/03/15 13:59:20

Sexy

+6
Isn't lingerie supposed to be a little trashy?
I thought men loved a lady in public, but a freak in the bed???
One person's sexy can be another person's trashy when it comes to lingerie, so it all depends on how freaky you like it.
Compared to some of the stuff out there, I think their line is tame, and actually quite pretty.

reply
♫ Mz BillieJoe ♫ 2012/03/15 13:49:51

Trashy

+4
They just can't stop making themselves look trashier..-_-"

reply
L K 2012/03/15 13:24:49 (edited)

Sexy

+2
Actually, it is both. Sexy AND trashy. They are trying to make money obviously, BUT at least, they are showing the world that women don't have to be like the 6 ft tall, bony Victoria Secret models. It actually gives young women a better self image to see girls with fuller figures. The girls Victoria Secrets uses, show pretty, but painfully thin women with fake breasts and give today's young women a warped view of how they should look. So, at least the K girls are helping with young women's self esteem and have reality based figures that are attainable. For that reason only, I am for their new enterprise. Obviously they aren't classy girls, but hey, they are Kardashians!!

reply
Nat™ 2012/03/15 12:46:11

Sexy

+2
It's lingerie.

reply
SJG 2012/03/15 12:45:49

Sexy

+2
Yummy

reply
laRonde 2012/03/15 12:33:30

Trashy

+3
Neither, just plain ugly

reply
Artisan Rose ☽✪☾☥ 2012/03/15 11:54:35
Kigan 2012/03/15 09:40:11

Trashy

+3
I already see their regular collection - it doesn't tend to leave the racks. I imagine many women would be ashamed to wear that stuff - and that is before putting the logo on it.

Women actually buy lingerie at Sears? I don't even by my underwear at Sears, and I'm not all that picky about it.

reply
David Cowie 2012/03/15 08:36:52

Trashy

+5
I HATE THESE FAKE FLAKES!!!

reply
Jo 2012/03/15 08:18:08

Sexy

+2
their faults be damned, they ARE beautiful girls, and their faces and names will sell that lingerie.

reply
sash 2012/03/15 07:25:05

Trashy

+2
Who under the age of 65 would buy lingerie or anything else for that matter at Sears? I am positive the Kardashians have never even been in a Sears.

reply
Corsair 2012/03/15 07:05:00

Sexy

+3
That's so hot. I don't care what people say. They're attractive, and for them to put out a lingerie line is also very forward since it will help with their clothing business. It's a good idea. They're also not exclusive as seen in the ad, they're target is a department store.

reply
kimlyn 2012/03/15 06:57:49

Sexy

+2
but uhhhmmm did anyone say photoshop?!?

reply
Nessa 2012/03/15 06:14:53

Trashy

+2
I'm surprised, none of it even looks nice. regardless, i wouldnt spend money on something they made. they have enough money as it is. and i couldnt bear the shame of wearing the kardashian tag! harhar.

reply
Farnsworth 2012/03/15 06:08:18

Trashy

+3
Trash in trash bags

reply
Grandma for Obama 2012/03/15 06:05:43

Trashy

+2
Well actually it's neither sexy or trashy ... it's kind of funny! My daughter and her friends say they won't shop in Sears because it caters to old timers like me and old timers like me don't want anything perceived to be sexy by the Kardashians. Sears was just trying to buy a younger market. Perhaps it will work but the Kardashians don't care if it will work or not because they will be making money from the transaction.

reply
brittneylalaa 2012/03/15 06:04:00

Trashy

+3
Go the f*** AWAY.

reply
Stef and the City 2012/03/15 05:52:54

Sexy

+2
Weirdly enough, Kourtney and Khloe look better in their lingerie than Kim in the first picture. Don't cyber-hit me or anything but I actually like these...

reply
Molko-Addict 2012/03/15 05:44:38

Trashy

+3
i hate that ulgy ass kim, i thought it couldn't get worse, what's next? push-ass-up panties?

reply
Stef an... to Molko-A... 2012/03/15 05:51:52

You are the second person to make me literally laugh out loud on this forum.

reply
Axe Grinder 2012/03/15 05:31:36

Sexy

+3
I was really ready to hate this, because all things Kardashian is just getting on my nerves, but actually, they look great, so I gotta' keep it real, very nice.
*I'm still sick of this damned family though* :)

reply
Mrs. Kathy Arch 2012/03/15 05:23:55

Trashy

+4
Sorry, but I won't be giving my money to anyone named Kardashian. Unless it makes them go away-permanently-then I might

reply
topgundy7 2012/03/15 05:14:29

Trashy

+2
I'm not buying it!

reply
barby karring 2012/03/15 05:06:19

Sexy

+2
Who is it geared towards what age categories?

reply
sash to barby k... 2012/03/15 07:27:36

Anyone who like polyester?

reply
cents-less 2012/03/15 04:16:18

Sexy

+3
the picture that is shown is nice but I bet the best description would be Highly Overpriced.

reply
wesley 2012/03/15 03:20:48

Sexy

+2
Kim and khole are

reply
Chokmah 2012/03/15 02:55:09 (edited)

Trashy

+2
I think their new line of undies would go over better at WalMart or The Dollar Store... I can hear it now, "Attention Wal-Mart Shoppers"

reply
wamcalif 2012/03/15 02:53:50

Sexy

+2
My, my, my...

reply
ALynn73 2012/03/15 02:44:57

Trashy

+2
those are yucky they are to colorless and where's the satin looks like they made no lace either.

reply
Detective_Alibi_Lawliet 2012/03/15 02:32:49

Trashy

+2
It has the name Kardashian on it....

reply
Firekitty ∞ijm♥G☮F♀U∞ 2012/03/15 02:03:52

Sexy

+2
I really don't think they look trashy. I am not a fan of the Kardashians but I do like Khloe...

reply
Medulla Oblongata 2012/03/15 01:52:10

Sexy

+2
Khloe looks like a drag queen, though. Definitely a butter face.

reply
Catita 2012/03/15 01:51:23

Trashy

+2
absolutely whorish......LOL

reply
kelly 2012/03/15 01:50:26

Trashy

+3
Oh my god please, PLEASE just leave us ALONE!

reply
Jay Calderone 2012/03/15 01:48:36

Sexy

+3

reply
SoLongFairLady 2012/03/15 01:47:52

Sexy

+2
Sexytrashians

reply
jaymz 2012/03/15 01:41:13

Sexy

+2
dont be jellious people , not everyone can look that good and be filtlthy rich !

reply