Quantcast

Is it contradictory for an atheist to give to charity?

Mark 2012/06/05 15:01:42
Related Topics: Charity
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Mechelle rand 2012/06/05 17:44:17
    Mechelle
    +2
    I do.t think that's true. Yes Christians do give but most of it is tithes and that is to their church of choice. Athiest are brought up knowing right and wrong just like everyone else. Most give with their heart and because they want to help, whereby Christians mostly give because the church and bible say to. I'm Spiritual and I give because I want to.
  • rand Mechelle 2012/06/05 22:56:22
    rand
    +2
    From "The Mind of the Market": "Conservative donate 30 percent more money than liberalis (even when controlled for income), give more blood, and log more volunteer hours.) Maybe I confused this with those of "religion". I'd agree that charitability is genetically built into us. Religion is a mitigating factor less and less, but that's a long story.
  • Mechelle rand 2012/06/05 23:34:53
    Mechelle
    +1
    I guess I don't care either way, as long as we are helping others. Those that help others for selfish reasons and for recognition tend to pi-- me off. Understanding and love and caring for others should be the reason we do it. I (in my opinion) think churches are becoming more and more selfish and in house oriented. Maybe its to build their church membership, but I can't say, nor can I judge. I can only do what I'm able and hope I help.
  • rand Mechelle 2012/06/06 19:07:03
    rand
    Agreed...in spades. No one knows the bliss of life without experiencing and practicing compassion. IF there were a Unitarian/Universalist Church nearby, I'd attend faithfully. I'm a strong believer in spirituality.

    “There are two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle.” Albert Einstein
  • Mechelle rand 2012/06/06 21:05:56
    Mechelle
    +1
    You sound like you have a great Faith. I wish you all the best in your spiritual walk. Learning.g of the different religions and paying attention, I know we all have the same goal, we just go about it differently. God Bless you. Have a great day.
  • rand Mechelle 2012/06/07 13:54:23
    rand
    My faith is in reason. While I'd agree that "we all have the same goal", happiness, our philosophies determine whether we pursue it through pleasure (Epicurean) or the more enduring and sustainable bliss.(Spiritualist).
  • Jackal 2012/06/05 16:52:57
    No
    Jackal
    +4
    Just because you are atheist doesn't mean you don't believe in love and taking care of others. I am an Atheist, with Humanist ideology. I give to 6 different charities. Three of them are Christian Charities.
  • Veritas 2012/06/05 16:47:14
    No
    Veritas
    +5
    Of course not!
  • jitko 2012/06/05 16:39:22
    No
    jitko
    +4
    It would be contradictory for atheist to tithe. Why wouldn't an atheist be even more interested in philanthropic efforts? :-/
  • Vennie jitko 2012/06/05 21:24:09
    Vennie
    +1
    I don't think tithing would be incompatible with atheism. It's basically giving 10% of what you own to a good cause. Wouldn't have to be a church; however, I belong to a church that has (and welcomes) atheists as members, and obviously they are welcome to tithe to the church. I am a Unitarian Universalist, and proud of it.
  • Muskoka jitko 2012/06/06 02:34:07
    Muskoka
    +1
    Tithing is not charity from ym perspective. It is like bribery to a god. Charity goes to people in need not to the upkeep of religious building and wages.
  • jitko Muskoka 2012/06/13 15:19:12
    jitko
    "ym"?
  • Helmholtz 2012/06/05 16:39:18
    No
    Helmholtz
    +6
    I don't see the connection at all. This question makes about as much sense as asking, "Is it contradictory for a Muslim to eat a sandwich?"
  • Syl 2012/06/05 16:35:09
    No
    Syl
    +8
    That's so ridiculous, why do so many theists assume that atheists are bad and selfish people with no morals?
  • ThinkAb... Syl 2012/06/05 17:14:34
    ThinkAboutIt!
    You're assuming that that's what they're assuming.
  • Syl ThinkAb... 2012/06/05 17:48:01
    Syl
    +2
    Many actually say it like that, or would you rather have me assume they are lying?
  • Mechelle Syl 2012/06/05 17:48:16
    Mechelle
    Exactly, Athiest are people like everyone else. Most are kind and loving people. Just because they have different beliefs does not mean they can't and dont donate.
  • Muskoka Syl 2012/06/06 02:35:18
    Muskoka
    That is the basic assumption of many. Atheists are frequently though about just under pedophiles. I have been told that many times.
  • skroehr 2012/06/05 16:31:23 (edited)
    Yes
    skroehr
    +1
    I meant to answer "no" - not "yes", so please imagine that the little banner above is green, and has a no in it.

    Anyway, whether they like it or not, Atheists are creations of God, and made in the image and likeness of God. They possess God's natural state of discernment which is the conscience. The conscience informs all persons of what is right and wrong. Also, Atheists tend to be secular humanists, and believe that all power is invested in man. They simply take care of fellow human beings as humanists rather than Christians or Muslims or Jews, etc. The point is, it's reasonable for Atheists, even within their own deeply flawed theology (or what they'll try to say is a complete lack of theology), to be kind. It's probably not as universal as those who would self identify as acknowledging God, and some may even purposely repress the God instilled tendency towards charity. But I know of many atheists who are open to many charities and causes. And, as a Christian, I will say that I am not open to all charities and causes myself. I always take time to investigate their stewardship, moral or ethical intent, how much money goes to actual provision of service. That sort of thing. This is also discernment. You're more likely to see me give to Catholic Charities, Salvati...
    I meant to answer "no" - not "yes", so please imagine that the little banner above is green, and has a no in it.

    Anyway, whether they like it or not, Atheists are creations of God, and made in the image and likeness of God. They possess God's natural state of discernment which is the conscience. The conscience informs all persons of what is right and wrong. Also, Atheists tend to be secular humanists, and believe that all power is invested in man. They simply take care of fellow human beings as humanists rather than Christians or Muslims or Jews, etc. The point is, it's reasonable for Atheists, even within their own deeply flawed theology (or what they'll try to say is a complete lack of theology), to be kind. It's probably not as universal as those who would self identify as acknowledging God, and some may even purposely repress the God instilled tendency towards charity. But I know of many atheists who are open to many charities and causes. And, as a Christian, I will say that I am not open to all charities and causes myself. I always take time to investigate their stewardship, moral or ethical intent, how much money goes to actual provision of service. That sort of thing. This is also discernment. You're more likely to see me give to Catholic Charities, Salvation Army, or Red Cross than to the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, or the DNC for instance. Whereas, an Atheist's charities might be precisely the other way around (though not neccissarily, I want to stress). Never the less, still believing that they are doing good, which is an intangible unless it has a reference against the concept of bad. Then we have to get into the conversation of where do the concepts of good and bad come from? And......well you get the idea ;-) Anyway..............I am open to, and have witnessed good hearts in persons with and without God.
    (more)
  • Jackal skroehr 2012/06/05 16:53:59
    Jackal
    +3
    All religions and ideology is deeply flawed. That is what makes us human.
  • skroehr Jackal 2012/06/06 04:21:49
    skroehr
    +1
    I'd argue all but one of course ; - )
    But I'll take that. At least it's not mean spirited.
  • classic skroehr 2012/06/05 20:42:36
    classic
    +3
    If Atheists are made in the Image of God,, Then god is an Atheist... Cant be both.......
  • skroehr classic 2012/06/06 04:23:14
    skroehr
    +1
    Well, I haven't been able to find any good reason why it can't be both. Anyway....thank you for the comment, and may God bless.
  • classic skroehr 2012/06/06 13:18:40
    classic
    +1
    You would be an Atheist or Religious,, You cant be both of them...
  • skroehr classic 2012/06/06 14:51:09
    skroehr
    Ah. I think I see the confusion. You're speaking about carrying dual ideologies once we're adults. Yes, it would be a bit difficult to say one was both an atheist and religious. What I was saying is that we are all the creations of God, and made in His image and likeness. All of us. Everyone. Then....if a person chose to be an Atheist down the line, then of course yes.....he or she is both a professed Atheist, while also being a child of God, and made in the image and likeness of His creator. The only difference is, he is not acknowledging it. That's what I meant. Blessings
    =============================...
    If there were no God, there would be no atheists. --G.K. Chesterton

    A little philosophy inclineth man's mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion. --Francis Bacon

    Since God created man in His own image how often has man endeavored to render a similar service to God? --Voltaire

    A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell.-
    C. S. Lewis
  • classic skroehr 2012/06/06 15:06:37
    classic
    +1
    If there were no God, there would be no atheists. --G.K. Chesterton

    If there were No God, there would be no religions...

    Since Man created god in his image, it is reasonable to assume this god is Evil...
  • skroehr classic 2012/06/06 15:14:08
    skroehr
    But there ARE religions, so this logic leads to there being a God. Good point. Likewise, sir Chesterton's statement works, because there ARE also atheists.
    -----------------------------...
    There is no evidence of man creating God. And even if there was, it would be quite a large jump to God is evil. Are you going to say because evil exists? Yes it does. This is due to a combination of fallen nature, and free will.
  • classic skroehr 2012/06/06 15:32:34
    classic
    False Logic.. Because you see a tree doesnt mean there is a God.. Because religion sprang from superstition does not mean there is a god.. There is no Evidence of a God creating man, only some supertitious writing by some ancient Goat herders...

    Without man, there would be no God.........Man must invent something to try and explain his lack of Knowledge,,, and it has to be a Magic Man....
  • skroehr classic 2012/06/06 16:28:40 (edited)
    skroehr
    Someone, (I don't think it was you, so sorry), said I must not know much about Atheism. This is untrue, since I once held several of the Atheist tenents of belief. I don't want to be presumptuous, as the gentleman who made this claim about me was, so I want to try to word this carefully. I can tell you're somewhat educated, but would it be fair to say that the focus of your education has not been classical philosophy, or Christian history and theology? It sounds as if you may have a little Nietzche in your backgroud. In actual history, superstitions have developed as offshoots of the religions which were natural to the culture. Superstitions are generally counted heresy against the religion from which they sprung, and differ. And they are simply what they are. Superstitions. Superstition has no legitimate standing in most world religions, and certainly not in the revealed teachings and traditions of Judaism and Christianity. Christians and Jews who have branched out into some kind of superstitious interpretive practice are referred to as heretics.

    I'm guessing your book of Goat hearders is the Holy Bible? That's usually the one bandied about in these types of discussions. The Bible has an odd, but quite real patholgy and history.

    There are no better historical docu...





    Someone, (I don't think it was you, so sorry), said I must not know much about Atheism. This is untrue, since I once held several of the Atheist tenents of belief. I don't want to be presumptuous, as the gentleman who made this claim about me was, so I want to try to word this carefully. I can tell you're somewhat educated, but would it be fair to say that the focus of your education has not been classical philosophy, or Christian history and theology? It sounds as if you may have a little Nietzche in your backgroud. In actual history, superstitions have developed as offshoots of the religions which were natural to the culture. Superstitions are generally counted heresy against the religion from which they sprung, and differ. And they are simply what they are. Superstitions. Superstition has no legitimate standing in most world religions, and certainly not in the revealed teachings and traditions of Judaism and Christianity. Christians and Jews who have branched out into some kind of superstitious interpretive practice are referred to as heretics.

    I'm guessing your book of Goat hearders is the Holy Bible? That's usually the one bandied about in these types of discussions. The Bible has an odd, but quite real patholgy and history.

    There are no better historical documents for 1st century Judea then the New Testament of the Holy Bible. Jesus the Christ, (Yeshua bar Josef) certainly existed, and the Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles are the most fleshed out 1st century biographies we have for any figure living at that time. See how much history you can find which was written by eye witnesses, of any other figure at that time in human history. Jesus can not be ignored, or brushed off as superstition. People must make a stand on Jesus. Not whether he existed. He did. But was he who he said he was? The answer to this question in your self, actually defines who you are. If Jesus was just a wandering Jew telling stories, and causing trouble, and was not the incarnation of God entering human history, taking upon himself the sins of the world, dying, and then rising again, then Christianity, and all that led up to it, and all that has happened since is pure folly. You would be correct in your asessment of religion. But if it's true, it is the most significant thing that there is, and it changes a person completely and changes the world. Western civilization was built upon this little itinerant Jewish teacher of 3 years. We have a demarcation of human history itself which is based on the incarnation (B.C./AD). All great writing, theater, music, culture and any other expression of western man referenced the incarnation. The older writings gave prophesy of the incarnation. I can accept, and even have respect for an honestly derived, and profoundly felt Atheism. But what I don't go for, and what even Atheists should fight against, is the offhand dismissal of the greatest minds of the past 5,000 years as some kind of a Joke. To be dismissive of the practice and profession of Christianity or Judasism. To approach them as second class ideologies, and the consideration of Christians as uneducated or in someway lacking. Christianity is a quite valid conclusion to a great deal of evidence. It can be arrived at intellectually, just as Atheism can. We are not delusional, cave dwelling morons. We have many doctors, scientists, philosophers etc., and frankly up until modernism and post modernism, and it's attendant new philosophies of nihilism and moral relativism, it was the philosophy of the intellectual elite, and practice of the faithful. I'm starting to write a book here, and I'm sorry about that. But I just ask that you are respectful of Christian theology. I will at all times try to remain respectful of Atheism. My stint with it was born of a combination of peer group, a lot of Ayn Rand, some Nietzche and my lack of exposure to Aristotle, Aquinas, Augustine, Chesterton, C.S. Lewis, the Church Fathers, The Church Doctors, The saints. etc. In our little karass of intellectual peeps, it's kind of amazing looking back that we claimed such knowledge without ever having studied any of the above together in reading groups. If we did allow for anything religious, it was always "new age" religious. You know, Urantia Book, Ruth Montgomery, Jane Roberts, TM, Edgar Cayce, Carlos Castaneda etc. It's like our whole pursuit was to stay away from the possibility of Jesus Christ.

    Anyway, I hope your journey will lead you to other considerations, but if not, I hope you study them all richly, and are always open to truth. Wherever it may lead, and no matter how inconvenient to our nature.

    Peace,

    Steven
    (more)
  • classic skroehr 2012/06/06 17:38:11 (edited)
    classic
    It is impossible to validate the bible using the Bible... It was written by men and took over 1600 years top complete and revised over and over, Forgeries entered, important information omitted.. None of the biblical writers and interpreters knew this Jesus,, Jesus Never wrote anything,. All you get is some dudes saying "And Jesus Said this" 95 percent of the bible is stories so outlandish they are not to be believed...The writers picked and chose what they wanted people to believe... The is no absolute proof that any of it is true save maybe 5% accuracy in some locations......
  • Muskoka skroehr 2012/06/06 02:36:35
    Muskoka
    You simply do not know much at all about Atheism.
  • skroehr Muskoka 2012/06/06 04:25:30
    skroehr
    This is fairly unlikely. I can't guarantee this of course, but there was a two or three year chunk that I thought I might be one myself, and I do remember being me somewhat. Thank you for your comment.
  • Muskoka skroehr 2012/06/08 02:42:05
    Muskoka
    Yes, you are dead wrong. Atheists do not believer that all power is invested in man. That is a completely rediculous statement. I have no idea where you picked up that piece of crap.

    Cooperation and morality is a function of survival and evolution. It is present in all animals that live in communities. It veries from religion to religion, culture to culture, nation to nation, family to family, individual to individual and from species to species. It can be changed easily by disease and injury to the brain and through careful brain manipulation as well. If it is capable of being changed, it is not devinely given.
  • Kronan_1 2012/06/05 16:27:10
    No
    Kronan_1
    +6
    Love for your fellow man has nothing to do with religion. If you want to help some one less fortunate than you , that's human nature. Not religious.
  • Dagon 2012/06/05 16:23:44
  • MandaLynne 2012/06/05 16:21:56
    No
    MandaLynne
    +6
    Being an atheist does not preclude someone from being kind, generous and loving. It precludes them from getting into Heaven.
  • classic MandaLynne 2012/06/05 20:43:41
    classic
    +2
    Well according to the "Saved" ones,, "religious Zealots.. Atheists are mean and evil...
  • MandaLynne classic 2012/06/05 20:47:42
    MandaLynne
    +2
    I am a devout Christian and I have never said any such thing, nor has any Christian I know said such a thing.
  • classic MandaLynne 2012/06/05 21:02:11
    classic
    +1
    You havent been in here long have you??? Or you have earmuffs on and dont listen to what your preacher says.....
  • MandaLynne classic 2012/06/05 21:18:57
    MandaLynne
    +1
    Been in where long? I have been here on Soda over a year. I have been here on Earth for almost 50 years. And I stand by my statement: I have never said any such thing nor has any Christian I know said any such thing. Are there some misguided Christians who have made such a statement? Of course there are. But my statement was I have not nor has any I know.

    I listen to everything my Pastor says. One of the most important things he has said about non-believers is this:

    "2 Timothy 2:23-26 - "Again I say, don’t get involved in foolish, ignorant arguments that only start fights. 24 A servant of the Lord must not quarrel but must be kind to everyone, be able to teach, and be patient with difficult people. 25 Gently instruct those who oppose the truth. Perhaps God will change those people’s hearts, and they will learn the truth. 26 Then they will come to their senses and escape from the devil’s trap. For they have been held captive by him to do whatever he wants."

    As we're reminded from the Scripture above, we "must be kind to everyone, be able to teach, and be patient with difficult people."

    If you do this, those who oppose you will be more willing to hear what you have to say and perhaps turn from their error, misunderstanding, confusion, selfishness, etc.

    What you must do is ref...

    Been in where long? I have been here on Soda over a year. I have been here on Earth for almost 50 years. And I stand by my statement: I have never said any such thing nor has any Christian I know said any such thing. Are there some misguided Christians who have made such a statement? Of course there are. But my statement was I have not nor has any I know.

    I listen to everything my Pastor says. One of the most important things he has said about non-believers is this:

    "2 Timothy 2:23-26 - "Again I say, don’t get involved in foolish, ignorant arguments that only start fights. 24 A servant of the Lord must not quarrel but must be kind to everyone, be able to teach, and be patient with difficult people. 25 Gently instruct those who oppose the truth. Perhaps God will change those people’s hearts, and they will learn the truth. 26 Then they will come to their senses and escape from the devil’s trap. For they have been held captive by him to do whatever he wants."

    As we're reminded from the Scripture above, we "must be kind to everyone, be able to teach, and be patient with difficult people."

    If you do this, those who oppose you will be more willing to hear what you have to say and perhaps turn from their error, misunderstanding, confusion, selfishness, etc.

    What you must do is reflect a Christlike character at all times and check your motives to be sure they are of God and not of yourself. Remember to love as Christ has loved us."

    Granted, it is not easy following this direction, for most non-believers are extremely contentious and quarrelsome. Patience is not one of my virtues, but I strive for it.
    (more)

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/05/25 17:52:52

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals