I had mixed emotions about joining this group but did so to make this point. I am an agnostic. Being an agnostic is not a choice. Either you believe in a supreme being or you don't. I did not choose not to believe, I just don't. I am fairly well versed in the Bible but I am not convienced. Atheist does not describe what I am because I do not deny the existance of a God, I just don't believe. I choose to be a fiscal conservative. I choose to be a libertarian. I do not choose to be an agnostic, I just am. I could see joining a group for fiscal conservatives or libertarians because that is my choice but to join a group just because that is what I am? Kind of like joining a group called "white people" or "old men" What do you think?
I have thought about this at great length, many times and I think it's highly probable that everyone is agnostic on some level, but some people favour ideas that bring them comfort, help them cope with their fears about mortality and they choose to think of those ideas as beliefs, as if that makes them more substantial and anti-religious people just like to be contrary to the aforementioned people and take an opposing stance, but that is equally ignorant of the fact that we don't really know much of anything.
Dang it. Didn't think it through ._. I meant to choose I just am an agnostic.
It wasn't really a choice... actually I've always been one. I was just confused growing up.
I always questioned things in the bible and religion in general as a child.
For me, identifying as an agnostic was a long journey. I was raised a Catholic and had the faith drilled into me in Catholic school. I tried very hard to be a good Catholic but my heart was never in it. Finally, in the middle of a life crisis I realized that I couldn't pray for help because I didn't really believe there was anyone listening on the other side. From that point forward the Catholic/Christian game was over.
I don't know if I will ever make the big leap to Atheism but I am open to experiencing whatever reality my study, intellect and inner truth take me.
I believe its a choice because when I was learning about god in church when I went there with my grandparents none of it made sense to me. I could have chosen to just accept that they were right because that's what they believe. I don't trust a book written by men years after the situations in there happened. How do we know that what was written in that book weren't just a dream or fiction? I believe the bible was written only as a way of governing the people by scaring them into believing they were going to hell if they committed a sin.
Hi. Beliefs are not a choice. You are correct that agnosticism is not a choice. Neither is atheism. Theese are
"Atheist does not describe what I am because I do not deny the existance of a God, I just don't believe"
Atheism isn't the "denial" of gods, it's the absence of belief in gods. If you don't believe in any gods, you're an atheist.
Just because religions have been indoctrinated people to think that "atheism = evil" doesn't mean you have to buy into that.
Atheist: a person who does not believe in a god or gods.
Theist: a person who believes in a god or gods.
Polytheist: a person who believes in multiple gods, often in a pantheon.
Monotheist: a person who believes in a single god.
Deist: a person who believes in a higher “power”, or equates the Universe or Nature with “God”.
Non-religious: studies show this is almost always (90%) means “closet atheist”.
Then there are two modifiers of belief which are commonly misunderstood and misused:
Gnostic: Having knowledge. Agnostic: Not having knowledge.
Gnostic theists “know” their god(s) exist.
Agnostic theists worship a god(s), but admit they have no evidence or “proof” that this god exists at all, or in the way they imagine it does. Theists with doubts are agnostic theists.
Agnostic atheists do not believe in any gods, bu...
Hi. Beliefs are not a choice. You are correct that agnosticism is not a choice. Neither is atheism. Theese are
"Atheist does not describe what I am because I do not deny the existance of a God, I just don't believe"
Atheism isn't the "denial" of gods, it's the absence of belief in gods. If you don't believe in any gods, you're an atheist.
Just because religions have been indoctrinated people to think that "atheism = evil" doesn't mean you have to buy into that.
Atheist: a person who does not believe in a god or gods.
Theist: a person who believes in a god or gods.
Polytheist: a person who believes in multiple gods, often in a pantheon.
Monotheist: a person who believes in a single god.
Deist: a person who believes in a higher “power”, or equates the Universe or Nature with “God”.
Non-religious: studies show this is almost always (90%) means “closet atheist”.
Then there are two modifiers of belief which are commonly misunderstood and misused:
Gnostic: Having knowledge. Agnostic: Not having knowledge.
Gnostic theists “know” their god(s) exist.
Agnostic theists worship a god(s), but admit they have no evidence or “proof” that this god exists at all, or in the way they imagine it does. Theists with doubts are agnostic theists.
Agnostic atheists do not believe in any gods, but are open to the possibility that a god may exist, particularly a deist version of a god.
Gnostic atheists “know” that certain gods, or all gods, do not exist.
Many people mistakenly think “agnostic” is some neutral position between theism and atheism. This is incorrect. People either believe in god(s), or they do not. Just like unicorns. Agnosticism and gnosticism modify both views. However, due to the stigma which often still applies to the label “atheist”, many atheists used the term “agnostic” instead. “Agnostic” has become used for people who are more properly defined as “agnostic atheists”. This is unfair to the many theists who are also agnostic.
If you definitely know that Thor does not exist, you are a gnostic atheist in regards to Thor. If you are pretty sure that Allah isn’t real, but conceed that he could exist, you are an agnostic atheist in regards to Allah. If you think the Jewish god exists but maybe not as depicted in the Bible, and you attend a Christian church, you are an agnostic theist in regards to Yahweh (“God”). And if you are certain that some higher power exists, and claim to be able to prove it, you are a gnostic deist. Note that the same person could be all four, just in relation to different god concepts.
I don't think any true religion is a choice. If you believe, really believe, then it is not a choice. It was meant to be. You can chose a specific church to worship in, but you cannot choose what message of the holy or divine, or lack there of, you feel in your soul.
Deism and Agnosticism are two different things. They don't "blend together" at the edges. You're an agnostic deist.
Atheist: a person who does not believe in a god or gods.
Theist: a person who believes in a god or gods.
Polytheist: a person who believes in multiple gods, often in a pantheon.
Monotheist: a person who believes in a single god.
Deist: a person who believes in a higher “power”, or equates the Universe or Nature with “God”.
Non-religious: studies show this is almost always (90%) means “closet atheist”.
Then there are two modifiers of belief which are commonly misunderstood and misused:
Gnostic: Having knowledge. Agnostic: Not having knowledge.
Gnostic theists “know” their god(s) exist.
Agnostic theists worship a god(s), but admit they have no evidence or “proof” that this god exists at all, or in the way they imagine it does. Theists with doubts are agnostic theists.
Agnostic atheists do not believe in any gods, but are open to the possibility that a god may exist, particularly a deist version of a god.
Gnostic atheists “know” that certain gods, or all gods, do not exist.
Many people mistakenly think “agnostic” is some neutral position between theism and atheism. This is incorrect. People either believe in god(s), or they do not. Just like unicorn...
Deism and Agnosticism are two different things. They don't "blend together" at the edges. You're an agnostic deist.
Atheist: a person who does not believe in a god or gods.
Theist: a person who believes in a god or gods.
Polytheist: a person who believes in multiple gods, often in a pantheon.
Monotheist: a person who believes in a single god.
Deist: a person who believes in a higher “power”, or equates the Universe or Nature with “God”.
Non-religious: studies show this is almost always (90%) means “closet atheist”.
Then there are two modifiers of belief which are commonly misunderstood and misused:
Gnostic: Having knowledge. Agnostic: Not having knowledge.
Gnostic theists “know” their god(s) exist.
Agnostic theists worship a god(s), but admit they have no evidence or “proof” that this god exists at all, or in the way they imagine it does. Theists with doubts are agnostic theists.
Agnostic atheists do not believe in any gods, but are open to the possibility that a god may exist, particularly a deist version of a god.
Gnostic atheists “know” that certain gods, or all gods, do not exist.
Many people mistakenly think “agnostic” is some neutral position between theism and atheism. This is incorrect. People either believe in god(s), or they do not. Just like unicorns. Agnosticism and gnosticism modify both views. However, due to the stigma which often still applies to the label “atheist”, many atheists used the term “agnostic” instead. “Agnostic” has become used for people who are more properly defined as “agnostic atheists”. This is unfair to the many theists who are also agnostic.
If you definitely know that Thor does not exist, you are a gnostic atheist in regards to Thor. If you are pretty sure that Allah isn’t real, but conceed that he could exist, you are an agnostic atheist in regards to Allah. If you think the Jewish god exists but maybe not as depicted in the Bible, and you attend a Christian church, you are an agnostic theist in regards to Yahweh (“God”). And if you are certain that some higher power exists, and claim to be able to prove it, you are a gnostic deist. Note that the same person could be all four, just in relation to different god concepts.
I am actually an atheist because I don't believe that any god(s) exist, but that was not one of the choices available to check off above. The agnostic label seems too "wimpy" of a choice to me. I could also just say that I don't know if any god(s) exist and therefore just call me an agnostic. But I'm a scientist and I have searched for proofs of a god's existence and have found none so far (but there have been lots of "evidences" proposed as "proofs", which were really circumstantial evidences when they were scrutinized closely).
I also maintain that everybody must be born agnostic, because they don't know what they believe until someone else starts putting such supernatural thoughts into their minds, so by that logic, everybody must make a choice to either forever remain an agnostic or choose not to be an agnostic.
If saying that I don't know is wimpy, then just call me wimpy. Being able to admit that you don't know is part of being human. Saying that there is no God is just your opinion. Many people have differing opinions.
Saying that there is no god is not just an opinion from a scientist's point of view, because a scientist requires proof before a theory can be elevated to the stature of a reality. Since there has been no proof of the existence of any god(s) so far, then the belief in such god(s) remains at the theory status for the time being. However, since scientists are always open-minded regarding theories while awaiting future discoveries to either confirm them (or disavow them), we are vigilant for the long-awaited proof. Until then, the fact remains that there is/are no god/gods until a scientific proof is produced.
Atheist: a person who does not believe in a god or gods.
Theist: a person who believes in a god or gods.
Polytheist: a person who believes in multiple gods, often in a pantheon.
Monotheist: a person who believes in a single god.
Deist: a person who believes in a higher “power”, or equates the Universe or Nature with “God”.
Non-religious: studies show this is almost always (90%) means “closet atheist”.
Then there are two modifiers of belief which are commonly misunderstood and misused:
Gnostic: Having knowledge. Agnostic: Not having knowledge.
Gnostic theists “know” their god(s) exist.
Agnostic theists worship a god(s), but admit they have no evidence or “proof” that this god exists at all, or in the way they imagine it does. Theists with doubts are agnostic theists.
Agnostic atheists do not believe in any gods, but are open to the possibility that a god may exist, particularly a deist version of a god.
Gnostic atheists “know” that certain gods, or all gods, do not exist.
Many people mistakenly think “agnostic” is some neutral position between theism and atheism. This is incorrect. People either believe in god(s), or they do not. Just like unicorns. Agnosticism and gnosticism modify both views. However, due to the stigma...
Agnostic isn't wimpy. It's just misused.
Atheist: a person who does not believe in a god or gods.
Theist: a person who believes in a god or gods.
Polytheist: a person who believes in multiple gods, often in a pantheon.
Monotheist: a person who believes in a single god.
Deist: a person who believes in a higher “power”, or equates the Universe or Nature with “God”.
Non-religious: studies show this is almost always (90%) means “closet atheist”.
Then there are two modifiers of belief which are commonly misunderstood and misused:
Gnostic: Having knowledge. Agnostic: Not having knowledge.
Gnostic theists “know” their god(s) exist.
Agnostic theists worship a god(s), but admit they have no evidence or “proof” that this god exists at all, or in the way they imagine it does. Theists with doubts are agnostic theists.
Agnostic atheists do not believe in any gods, but are open to the possibility that a god may exist, particularly a deist version of a god.
Gnostic atheists “know” that certain gods, or all gods, do not exist.
Many people mistakenly think “agnostic” is some neutral position between theism and atheism. This is incorrect. People either believe in god(s), or they do not. Just like unicorns. Agnosticism and gnosticism modify both views. However, due to the stigma which often still applies to the label “atheist”, many atheists used the term “agnostic” instead. “Agnostic” has become used for people who are more properly defined as “agnostic atheists”. This is unfair to the many theists who are also agnostic.
If you definitely know that Thor does not exist, you are a gnostic atheist in regards to Thor. If you are pretty sure that Allah isn’t real, but conceed that he could exist, you are an agnostic atheist in regards to Allah. If you think the Jewish god exists but maybe not as depicted in the Bible, and you attend a Christian church, you are an agnostic theist in regards to Yahweh (“God”). And if you are certain that some higher power exists, and claim to be able to prove it, you are a gnostic deist. Note that the same person could be all four, just in relation to different god concepts.
Thank you for the detailed definition lineup, Seathanaich. After examining that list, I would say that I am most like the definition of "agnostic atheist" I have even upon occasion referred to the order of the universe as simply "Nature" or the "Spirit of the Universe", but that latter one troubles me a little because it tends to imply some sort of undetectable being.
I know that I am limited. I know mankind is limited. I know there is exponentially more that we do not know than what we do know.
Understanding that because of the above, there are some things that are simply beyond me, and no way to guaranty any claim I make with 100% objective certainty makes my agnosticism not a choice, but the only reasonable result.
I am an atheist. I don't think being an atheist is a choice until you're old enough to make such a decision--atheists and agnostics are what we are born as. Before you start snapping at me for being arrogant, rember the nature vs. nurture argument in the scientific community. As a child, you are taught the religion of your parents. If your parents raise you to be Jewish, you have Jewish beliefs. If you are raised as a Christian, so that is your faith. But if you were not taught to believe in God, never told stories from your religions bible/history, would you really believe in God "by nature"? Probably not.
Being an atheist is never a choice. Your beliefs are not choices. If they were, you could "choose" to become a Hindu tomorrow. Or believe in Santa Claus.
So why is it that I was a Christian for fifteen years--I wholeheartedly believed in God--and I became an Atheist, without doubt that God and Jesus were fairytale figures, in a matter of months, with no warning and no reason?
Because you learned things, and thought about things, that caused you to no longer believe in the religion that you had been taught. It wasn't something that you set out to do, or wanted, or chose. It happened because you figured things out after you thought about them.
And congratulations on doing so - most people aren't capable of figuring out that religion is bunk. But your atheism, like mine, was not a choice; it was a logical conclusion that you came to.
We have lots of choices in life, but they're choices about our actions, and actions are very different than beliefs. We don't choose our beliefs, but that doesn't mean they can't change, if we learn new things, or think carefully about the beliefs we currently hold. I hope I have explained that clearly. I think it's interesting that people think they "choose" their beliefs, when they don't. Cheers.
Sorry, I meant to vote "I am not an agnostic but am here because..." I CHOOSE not to be an agnostic. I'm just NOT, but please don't hold that against me or do hold it against me because I CHOOSE not to care!
Because you were trained to think that powerful emotions are "the spirit". If you had not been taught to think that, you would consider powerful emotions to be "powerful emotions".
I've always seen it as a choice, as with any religious belief. But come to think of it, I could try and try to convince myself that the Bible is the word of a perfect, loving and merciful god (and I have before), but ultimately I could never fully and truly believe it. It'd be like trying to convince myself that two plus two equals five by blocking out logic and reason.
I am atheistic. I believe in nothing religious, and that was not a choice for me. I can't think of anything that would make me choose to have a religion. So I think you are right.
I don't say I can't believe in God, I just say that I don't. I actually envy people that do believe. I take my kids to church so that they can make up their own minds. I do not try to force my beliefs upon them. Maybe we, you, Nathaneal and I, The River Rat, will, one day, meet God on the road as the Bible says Saul did. I am just not so sure that, if there is a God, I would recognize him.
It wasn't really a choice... actually I've always been one. I was just confused growing up.
I always questioned things in the bible and religion in general as a child.
I don't know if I will ever make the big leap to Atheism but I am open to experiencing whatever reality my study, intellect and inner truth take me.
"Atheist does not describe what I am because I do not deny the existance of a God, I just don't believe"
Atheism isn't the "denial" of gods, it's the absence of belief in gods. If you don't believe in any gods, you're an atheist.
Just because religions have been indoctrinated people to think that "atheism = evil" doesn't mean you have to buy into that.
Atheist: a person who does not believe in a god or gods.
Theist: a person who believes in a god or gods.
Polytheist: a person who believes in multiple gods, often in a pantheon.
Monotheist: a person who believes in a single god.
Deist: a person who believes in a higher “power”, or equates the Universe or Nature with “God”.
Non-religious: studies show this is almost always (90%) means “closet atheist”.
Then there are two modifiers of belief which are commonly misunderstood and misused:
Gnostic: Having knowledge. Agnostic: Not having knowledge.
Gnostic theists “know” their god(s) exist.
Agnostic theists worship a god(s), but admit they have no evidence or “proof” that this god exists at all, or in the way they imagine it does. Theists with doubts are agnostic theists.
Agnostic atheists do not believe in any gods, bu...
"Atheist does not describe what I am because I do not deny the existance of a God, I just don't believe"
Atheism isn't the "denial" of gods, it's the absence of belief in gods. If you don't believe in any gods, you're an atheist.
Just because religions have been indoctrinated people to think that "atheism = evil" doesn't mean you have to buy into that.
Atheist: a person who does not believe in a god or gods.
Theist: a person who believes in a god or gods.
Polytheist: a person who believes in multiple gods, often in a pantheon.
Monotheist: a person who believes in a single god.
Deist: a person who believes in a higher “power”, or equates the Universe or Nature with “God”.
Non-religious: studies show this is almost always (90%) means “closet atheist”.
Then there are two modifiers of belief which are commonly misunderstood and misused:
Gnostic: Having knowledge. Agnostic: Not having knowledge.
Gnostic theists “know” their god(s) exist.
Agnostic theists worship a god(s), but admit they have no evidence or “proof” that this god exists at all, or in the way they imagine it does. Theists with doubts are agnostic theists.
Agnostic atheists do not believe in any gods, but are open to the possibility that a god may exist, particularly a deist version of a god.
Gnostic atheists “know” that certain gods, or all gods, do not exist.
Many people mistakenly think “agnostic” is some neutral position between theism and atheism. This is incorrect. People either believe in god(s), or they do not. Just like unicorns. Agnosticism and gnosticism modify both views. However, due to the stigma which often still applies to the label “atheist”, many atheists used the term “agnostic” instead. “Agnostic” has become used for people who are more properly defined as “agnostic atheists”. This is unfair to the many theists who are also agnostic.
If you definitely know that Thor does not exist, you are a gnostic atheist in regards to Thor. If you are pretty sure that Allah isn’t real, but conceed that he could exist, you are an agnostic atheist in regards to Allah. If you think the Jewish god exists but maybe not as depicted in the Bible, and you attend a Christian church, you are an agnostic theist in regards to Yahweh (“God”). And if you are certain that some higher power exists, and claim to be able to prove it, you are a gnostic deist. Note that the same person could be all four, just in relation to different god concepts.
Well, no. It was indoctrination you received from your parents. But you are correct in it not being a choice.
Atheist: a person who does not believe in a god or gods.
Theist: a person who believes in a god or gods.
Polytheist: a person who believes in multiple gods, often in a pantheon.
Monotheist: a person who believes in a single god.
Deist: a person who believes in a higher “power”, or equates the Universe or Nature with “God”.
Non-religious: studies show this is almost always (90%) means “closet atheist”.
Then there are two modifiers of belief which are commonly misunderstood and misused:
Gnostic: Having knowledge. Agnostic: Not having knowledge.
Gnostic theists “know” their god(s) exist.
Agnostic theists worship a god(s), but admit they have no evidence or “proof” that this god exists at all, or in the way they imagine it does. Theists with doubts are agnostic theists.
Agnostic atheists do not believe in any gods, but are open to the possibility that a god may exist, particularly a deist version of a god.
Gnostic atheists “know” that certain gods, or all gods, do not exist.
Many people mistakenly think “agnostic” is some neutral position between theism and atheism. This is incorrect. People either believe in god(s), or they do not. Just like unicorn...
Atheist: a person who does not believe in a god or gods.
Theist: a person who believes in a god or gods.
Polytheist: a person who believes in multiple gods, often in a pantheon.
Monotheist: a person who believes in a single god.
Deist: a person who believes in a higher “power”, or equates the Universe or Nature with “God”.
Non-religious: studies show this is almost always (90%) means “closet atheist”.
Then there are two modifiers of belief which are commonly misunderstood and misused:
Gnostic: Having knowledge. Agnostic: Not having knowledge.
Gnostic theists “know” their god(s) exist.
Agnostic theists worship a god(s), but admit they have no evidence or “proof” that this god exists at all, or in the way they imagine it does. Theists with doubts are agnostic theists.
Agnostic atheists do not believe in any gods, but are open to the possibility that a god may exist, particularly a deist version of a god.
Gnostic atheists “know” that certain gods, or all gods, do not exist.
Many people mistakenly think “agnostic” is some neutral position between theism and atheism. This is incorrect. People either believe in god(s), or they do not. Just like unicorns. Agnosticism and gnosticism modify both views. However, due to the stigma which often still applies to the label “atheist”, many atheists used the term “agnostic” instead. “Agnostic” has become used for people who are more properly defined as “agnostic atheists”. This is unfair to the many theists who are also agnostic.
If you definitely know that Thor does not exist, you are a gnostic atheist in regards to Thor. If you are pretty sure that Allah isn’t real, but conceed that he could exist, you are an agnostic atheist in regards to Allah. If you think the Jewish god exists but maybe not as depicted in the Bible, and you attend a Christian church, you are an agnostic theist in regards to Yahweh (“God”). And if you are certain that some higher power exists, and claim to be able to prove it, you are a gnostic deist. Note that the same person could be all four, just in relation to different god concepts.
I also maintain that everybody must be born agnostic, because they don't know what they believe until someone else starts putting such supernatural thoughts into their minds, so by that logic, everybody must make a choice to either forever remain an agnostic or choose not to be an agnostic.
Atheist: a person who does not believe in a god or gods.
Theist: a person who believes in a god or gods.
Polytheist: a person who believes in multiple gods, often in a pantheon.
Monotheist: a person who believes in a single god.
Deist: a person who believes in a higher “power”, or equates the Universe or Nature with “God”.
Non-religious: studies show this is almost always (90%) means “closet atheist”.
Then there are two modifiers of belief which are commonly misunderstood and misused:
Gnostic: Having knowledge. Agnostic: Not having knowledge.
Gnostic theists “know” their god(s) exist.
Agnostic theists worship a god(s), but admit they have no evidence or “proof” that this god exists at all, or in the way they imagine it does. Theists with doubts are agnostic theists.
Agnostic atheists do not believe in any gods, but are open to the possibility that a god may exist, particularly a deist version of a god.
Gnostic atheists “know” that certain gods, or all gods, do not exist.
Many people mistakenly think “agnostic” is some neutral position between theism and atheism. This is incorrect. People either believe in god(s), or they do not. Just like unicorns. Agnosticism and gnosticism modify both views. However, due to the stigma...
Atheist: a person who does not believe in a god or gods.
Theist: a person who believes in a god or gods.
Polytheist: a person who believes in multiple gods, often in a pantheon.
Monotheist: a person who believes in a single god.
Deist: a person who believes in a higher “power”, or equates the Universe or Nature with “God”.
Non-religious: studies show this is almost always (90%) means “closet atheist”.
Then there are two modifiers of belief which are commonly misunderstood and misused:
Gnostic: Having knowledge. Agnostic: Not having knowledge.
Gnostic theists “know” their god(s) exist.
Agnostic theists worship a god(s), but admit they have no evidence or “proof” that this god exists at all, or in the way they imagine it does. Theists with doubts are agnostic theists.
Agnostic atheists do not believe in any gods, but are open to the possibility that a god may exist, particularly a deist version of a god.
Gnostic atheists “know” that certain gods, or all gods, do not exist.
Many people mistakenly think “agnostic” is some neutral position between theism and atheism. This is incorrect. People either believe in god(s), or they do not. Just like unicorns. Agnosticism and gnosticism modify both views. However, due to the stigma which often still applies to the label “atheist”, many atheists used the term “agnostic” instead. “Agnostic” has become used for people who are more properly defined as “agnostic atheists”. This is unfair to the many theists who are also agnostic.
If you definitely know that Thor does not exist, you are a gnostic atheist in regards to Thor. If you are pretty sure that Allah isn’t real, but conceed that he could exist, you are an agnostic atheist in regards to Allah. If you think the Jewish god exists but maybe not as depicted in the Bible, and you attend a Christian church, you are an agnostic theist in regards to Yahweh (“God”). And if you are certain that some higher power exists, and claim to be able to prove it, you are a gnostic deist. Note that the same person could be all four, just in relation to different god concepts.
Do people choose NOT KNOWING?
Understanding that because of the above, there are some things that are simply beyond me, and no way to guaranty any claim I make with 100% objective certainty makes my agnosticism not a choice, but the only reasonable result.
Actions are choices. Beliefs are not.
And congratulations on doing so - most people aren't capable of figuring out that religion is bunk. But your atheism, like mine, was not a choice; it was a logical conclusion that you came to.
We have lots of choices in life, but they're choices about our actions, and actions are very different than beliefs. We don't choose our beliefs, but that doesn't mean they can't change, if we learn new things, or think carefully about the beliefs we currently hold. I hope I have explained that clearly. I think it's interesting that people think they "choose" their beliefs, when they don't. Cheers.
People confuse their choice of actions, with their lack of choice over beliefs.