Is "bad sex" better than "no sex"?
♒ßεllεchεvεllε®♒
2012/06/08 13:24:45
|
|
|||||
|
71 votes
|
|
30% | |||
|
113 votes
|
|
47% | |||
|
54 votes
|
|
23% | |||
Top Opinion
-
Melizmatic 2012/06/08 15:50:36Nope.






















I don't think it's like "eating what food you had because you had nothing better" - at least you are not still hungry, but some seem to think it doesn't matter as long as their own needs have been met.
And what will she get?
Sex can be more than just standard piv sex to many.
The assumption about lying is laughable though, on two counts; one that anyone cares enough to lie to people that they don't know, (and if they do, WOW).
Two, that its ever advisable to believe what strangers on the internet say, anyway.
That being said, the bottom line is that some people are easily satisfied with the 'bare minimum', while others are just not.
Kick rocks, Biddy; you wont be missed.
And besides that, rape isn't sex.
yes some lovemaking sessions are better than others; yes a mutually active partner is preferable to one who just lies there (but i'm sure i can't be the only guy whose partner has "given" him a quickie when Deadly Sperm Build-Up has caused his eyes to go crossed, and his brain to stop functioning until he achieved release) ... but the "happy ending" is always happy, no???
Just take our word for it; there is sex that exists which is so bad, that you end up mad that you even wasted the time shaving your legs.
If you've never had a bad experience; then you should count yourself lucky.
For most women, its more than a need for than mere pressure release inside a wet hole.
Some people have no stroke at all, unfortunately.
*lolz
mine is strong and hits the target