No, it is intended to be a marketing name, not a scientific fact. That's as stupid as saying El Pollo Loco ("the crazy chicken") is committing fraud by not selling chickens with schizophrenia.
And exactly where is the Burger King's kingdom? This is much ado about nothing, just like the L.A. Slimes is a big nothing.
Is an 11-inch "footlong" Subway sandwich a fraud?
L.A. Times
2013/01/18 17:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
2,384 votes
|
|
71% | |||
|
980 votes
|
|
29% | |||
Subway is facing an outcry over a single inch. The giant sandwich chain is still dealing with peeved consumers after an Australian customer alleged, with photographic evidence, that the company’s popular Footlong sub doesn’t live up to its name.
Instead, Matt Corby’s sandwich was 11 inches long, according to a photo he posted on Subway’s Facebook page positioning his mass of tomatoes, onions, olives and bread next to a tape measure along with the message “subway pls respond.” The takeaway? Size matters to a lot of Subway customers.

Instead, Matt Corby’s sandwich was 11 inches long, according to a photo he posted on Subway’s Facebook page positioning his mass of tomatoes, onions, olives and bread next to a tape measure along with the message “subway pls respond.” The takeaway? Size matters to a lot of Subway customers.

Read More: http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-sub...
Top Opinion
-
thefatguy 2013/01/18 20:14:08



















Real sandwich has MEAT!
That's what I'm talking about.
*Note the sarcasm*
*sarcasm mode*
That said, people who stand in line to buy Subway subs can see the sub being made in front of them, so they're well-aware of how large it is in visual terms before they pay for it. Especially considering it's intended for immediate consumption (it isn't, say, 1100 bushels of corn sold as 1200), it's hard for people to make a strong case that they were deceived about what they were buying.
Still, Subway should definitely rectify this problem: Either change the name, or make actual foot longs (at least on average, and indicate variability) and sell them for whatever price they can afford. They are not entitled to advertise a "five dollar foot-long" without actually delivering a five dollar foot-long just because customers "should know better."
they are trying to make as much money as they can while still makeing the public think that paying only five dollers for a sub that is not even a foot long as they claim.
So i really think that we are being scamed ... but really whos is going to take there time and measure thare sub, the go back and demand another inch of sub?
it would just be to much work for another inch add to your sub.
and in the end i know it is the moral of the whole thing but do you really think that McDonalds uses all white meat for there Mcnuggets? and even if they did how was the liveing conditions for the chicken before it was slaughterd? what was the foods given to the chicken to give it the nutrition it needed before it became what we feed our self? and how do they keep it fresh along the way? by harsh chimicals?
So if you go into a fast food place expecting them to tell you the truth more then they have to about there food and if you are really getting what you payed for then you will get very shocked to know how much they really are lieing to you.
thats why i say no because it apart of everyday life, for the big comps. to try and get as much money as they can out of you for as little as they can get away with.
And...if they are going to base their gazillion dollar marketing scheme on "$5 FOOTLONG"...then it should measure in at 12"!! Of course, they're also dealing with loaves of bread, and I would imagine that they bake differently, so one might be slightly shorter than 12". It's possible that this unlucky Aussie got the one loaf that came in under the required 12" that day, who knows?
It will probably end up being like the 1/4 Pounder uproar where someone weighed the cooked patty and found that it wasn't a full 1/4 pound of "beef"...so then they had to start advertising it as "1/4 pound, pre-cooked weight" Maybe Subway will have to start advertising their footlong with an asterisk that states "due to circumstances beyond our control in the baking process, some sandwich loaves may be slightly less or more than 12", but will average one foot"!! Sheesh!!
Shaving off 1 inch from every foot-long roll does save a lot of bread. If a Subway serves 8 sandwiches per hour on average for 13 hours per day, how many inches of bread do they save by chopping them at 11 inches? Bonus: How many inches does that shop save from Monday through Friday?
Answer:
104 inches. Bonus: 520 inches – that’s over 43 feet!
From the Bedtime Math site.
...hahahaha XD
Its rather frustrating for them to be allowed to advertise one thing sell us another.
Cause technically speaking I could say 500lb burger before butchered and cooked. We need to more definitely define the lines that seem to be getting crossed more and more everyday. When I bought a 40gig harddrive back in the day it was exactly 40 gigs same with internet i bought internet of a certain speed and more often then not thats what I got. If something was unlimited it was not unlimited up to a certain point.
Prices have gone up services down and wages have stayed the same or moved marginally for middle lower class. I remember buying brand new video games for 20 dollars and would always have a certain amount but now they cost 60 and sometimes I get a game that last me maybe 3 hours. internet was 15 bucks for speeds that were actually advertised and sometimes faster now I have to pay 120 just to have true unlimited but at a relatively slow speed. My 40 gig harddrive cost 30 dollars was top of line still in my internet only computer with no issues. My new harddrives last maybe a year two tops and cost 80 bucks.
As for the HDD size, blame the Americans. A kilobyte is 1,024 bytes, not 1,000!
Back to topic: it's not fraud. If you are fooled that's your problem. Why is an 11" sandwich not enough for you? I could understand if it was 6 rather than 12, but really
I don't understand this case.