Quantcast

Is Abortion Ok.?

Stef 2012/06/24 19:33:48
You!
Add Photos & Videos
I Dont Think Its Ok. I Dont Think It Should Even Be Legal In The U.S. I Read In An Article That If A Female Walks Into A Doctors Office And Says, " Im Having A Boy And I Wanted A Girl." That Its Legal To Abort The Baby For The Sex It Has. It's So Sad :( Wtf Is This World Coming To.?!!!
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Cellar Door 2012/06/24 22:58:59
    It's Ok (Agree)
    Cellar Door
    +12
    I'm pro-choice. Saying that abortion shouldn't be legal isn't going to stop people from having abortions, it just means that more women will go for unsafe abortions instead. For the well-being of women, abortion needs to be legal. I support a woman’s right to terminate a pregnancy for any reason, whether it is because she feels that she is not mature enough to be a mother, has current responsibilities or future plans that would be interfered with by a pregnancy, because she cannot afford to have a child, etc. Embryos and fetuses should not have more rights than a woman, because a woman deserves the rights to her body that she was born with and I do not believe it is fair to force a woman to go through with something that can greatly affect her health and future when she does not want to go through with it.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Psicolabis NEVER F... 2012/06/24 23:58:07
    Psicolabis
    +1
    same as i said above, children are killed everyday in wars. and most of anti abortionists are ok with that
  • NEVER F... Psicolabis 2012/06/25 00:37:18
  • Psicolabis NEVER F... 2012/06/25 00:47:25
    Psicolabis
    People like obama and bush leaded wars that killed many children. Are you OK with excecuting both of them?
  • NEVER F... Psicolabis 2012/06/25 01:44:06
  • Psicolabis NEVER F... 2012/06/25 02:25:48
    Psicolabis
    +1
    really? you compare an accident with a war? You are so cinnical i can't keep arguying with you.
  • NEVER F... Psicolabis 2012/06/25 02:48:23
  • Psicolabis NEVER F... 2012/06/25 03:17:02
    Psicolabis
    +1
    Actually i can, i choose not to. Manufacturers have several rules to make swimming pools safe, if they don't follow them they can go to jail. Drivers have rules to drive and if they don't follow them, the can go to jail. The farmers thing is just idiotic. Children can have mistakes that lead to their death, like eating fast, swimming without care, and many others, but "living on a city that was bombed because of a war" is not their mistake, is the choice of the one who oredered the bombing.
  • NEVER F... Psicolabis 2012/06/25 03:30:43 (edited)
  • Psicolabis NEVER F... 2012/06/25 04:08:56
    Psicolabis
    I could say there are many objections to make to your argument. The pool is not the body of water, but the structure that contans it (that is what manufacturers make), that farmers make food to feed people, and if people die by accident while eating is no one fault, the same with drivers. The problem isn't that, the problem is that you believe that abortion is killing children intentionally, and i say, in war the same happends. I mean, when mayor cities are bombed everyone knows that there are children. And, for you to know, tha baby is not alive. Untill the 13th week, if the mother dies, for any reason and by any cause THE KID DIES JUST AS ANOTHER PART OF HER BODY, so untill the 13th week the kid is another part of her body.
    By the way, hittler killed less than 6.000.000 jews. The bodycount from the WWII is more than 50.000.000 people, and probably more than 60.000.000. And sure, Vietnam and Camboya where "peace in the making", just as first gulf war.
  • luke NEVER F... 2012/06/25 07:56:01
    luke
    A clump of cells in the uterus ≠ a child.
  • Scream 2012/06/24 22:41:04
    It's Ok (Agree)
    Scream
    +2
    Making abortion illegal won't stop it happening either. It should definitely be legal.
  • Don Leuty 2012/06/24 22:38:44
    Not Ok (Disagree)
    Don Leuty
    +2
    Life is special.
  • Stef Don Leuty 2012/06/24 22:39:16
    Stef
    +1
    I Agree.
  • Psicolabis Don Leuty 2012/06/25 00:00:21
    Psicolabis
    +2
    you are totally right, in life you can suffer from hunger, deseases, you can be recruited for an army... life is beautyfull specially when you are poor.
  • Scott (o)(o) 2012/06/24 22:38:08
    It's Ok (Agree)
    Scott (o)(o)
    +2
    in some situations I think it's the only real choice !!! sad but true !!
  • Anonymouse BN-0 ~bibbityboo~ 2012/06/24 22:37:24
    It's Ok (Agree)
    Anonymouse BN-0 ~bibbityboo~
    +4
    My view is, until its heart starts beating, it is just a part of your body, it's not alive, and it's more of a parasite than a person. You can get rid of it if you want to. After the heart beat and before it is distinguishable as a human, it is an animal, and should be treated with respect, and not he abused or caused unnecessary pain, but if you have quite a good reason for it, you can get rid of it. After that, it is a human, and should only be aborted to protect the mother, if it would have severe learning difficulties or something to vastly reduce its quality of life, etc.
  • It's Ok (Agree)
    Pixie·ŸŸMzAwesome♠ƤĦĂĔŢ♠
    +6
    I am pro choice for ANY reason!
  • The_Infidel_Atheist 2012/06/24 22:34:25 (edited)
    Not Ok (Disagree)
    The_Infidel_Atheist
    +1
    I personally don't find abortion "okay" in some cases, but I would never want the woman's right to choose to be taken away.
  • TheTruth1313 2012/06/24 22:33:59
    It's Ok (Agree)
    TheTruth1313
    +1
    Not sure if "OK" is the correct term here. I am merely pro-choice. However, I also think that it is a decision that should not ever be taken lightly.
  • DFA 2012/06/24 22:33:21
    It's Ok (Agree)
    DFA
    First trimester or rape only IMHO.
  • Doesn't Matter To Me.
    Jersey Roze ♥Jwon's Cyar'ika ♥
    +2
    I don't advocate for or protest against abortion. Personally, I don't think abortion is the ok, but I would never take away a womans right to have one. She knows what's best for her in her situation, and if she thinks abortion is it, then that's her choice...
  • Chloey Hamer 2012/06/24 22:19:01 (edited)
    It's Ok (Agree)
    Chloey Hamer
    +4
    sorry. I'm 100% pro choice.
  • Scott (... Chloey ... 2012/06/24 22:40:27
    Scott (o)(o)
    +3
    Agree !!
  • Lady Whitewolf 2012/06/24 21:12:36
    It's Ok (Agree)
    Lady Whitewolf
    +1
    Pro-CHOICE!
  • N-RagedOwner 2012/06/24 20:26:26
    It's Ok (Agree)
    N-RagedOwner
    +3
    Overall and within reason, I believe a woman has the right to choose. What if she was at a party, passed out and didn't realize that she had gotten 'seduced' (okay, raped) by half a dozen guys and then ends up pregnant? She might not be ready for it, scared, whatever, and decide to terminate the pregnancy. Now, I said within reason. To me, within reason is the first trimester. I don't mean that down to the day. As in, if it's one or two days over, then oh well. But 4 to 5 months in (or even later), then that's unreasonable. At that point, unless her health will be endangered, she should just carry to full term and figure out what to do from there.

    I agree that terminating based strictly on the gender is a bit uncaring/selfish, but if it's within the first trimester, then it's still her right. You said that you don't think it should even be legal. Are you saying that your beliefs are more important than hers? Are you saying that your rights should extend so far that you can control what she can and cannot do?

    Seriously, learn to accept that others should be allowed to make choices for themselves just as you are allowed to make choices for yourself. If you would never get an abortion regardless of circumstances, then that's your CHOICE. You should be happy and gra...

    Overall and within reason, I believe a woman has the right to choose. What if she was at a party, passed out and didn't realize that she had gotten 'seduced' (okay, raped) by half a dozen guys and then ends up pregnant? She might not be ready for it, scared, whatever, and decide to terminate the pregnancy. Now, I said within reason. To me, within reason is the first trimester. I don't mean that down to the day. As in, if it's one or two days over, then oh well. But 4 to 5 months in (or even later), then that's unreasonable. At that point, unless her health will be endangered, she should just carry to full term and figure out what to do from there.

    I agree that terminating based strictly on the gender is a bit uncaring/selfish, but if it's within the first trimester, then it's still her right. You said that you don't think it should even be legal. Are you saying that your beliefs are more important than hers? Are you saying that your rights should extend so far that you can control what she can and cannot do?

    Seriously, learn to accept that others should be allowed to make choices for themselves just as you are allowed to make choices for yourself. If you would never get an abortion regardless of circumstances, then that's your CHOICE. You should be happy and grateful that you are able to make that choice for yourself. Don't go making it for other people too, because I doubt you'd like it if others started telling you what you can or can't do for things you feel should be your decision.

    Oh and is there any reason that you capitalize the first letter of every word you type? It's a horrible habit to have and any good teacher will actually deduct points off of reports for doing that sort of thing. Not to mention employers would tell you to cut it out too.
    (more)
  • Stef N-Raged... 2012/06/24 22:31:41
    Stef
    I Agree With What You Said At The Begginging, I Mean I Would Do The Same. Don't Tell Me How I Should And Shouldnt Write Ok.? Ok. They've Made Choices For Me, Why Cant I Make Them A Choice.?! They Say This Country Is Free And They Say This Country Is Equal, But It Is Not If That Is Only Sometimes. That's My Opinion Not Yours.
  • N-Raged... Stef 2012/06/24 23:01:28
    N-RagedOwner
    +1
    How you write is annoying and also gives the impression that your lacking in intelligence.

    If you want people to respect your opinions, you need to respect others opinions. For example, a woman who has the opinion that she should be allowed to have an abortion. But if you're all out with "AbOrTiOn ShOuLd Be IlLeGaL" then that's not respecting her opinion, that's you wanting to exert control over her life and her rights.
  • Anonymo... N-Raged... 2012/06/24 22:40:30
    Anonymouse BN-0 ~bibbityboo~
    That's a rather arrogant thing to say. Most pro-lifers don't want to take a woman's choice away, they want to prevent a person from being killed in their eyes.
  • Stef Anonymo... 2012/06/24 22:42:37
    Stef
    In Some Cases I Wouldnt Want To Take It Away But In Others, I Would.
  • N-Raged... Anonymo... 2012/06/24 22:57:44
    N-RagedOwner
    +2
    No, all prolifers want to take the choice away. You can't prevent what they consider to be a 'killing' (as you put it) without taking that choice away, it just can't be done. So the one with arrogance wouldn't be me, it would be you.
  • Anonymo... N-Raged... 2012/06/24 23:04:34 (edited)
    Anonymouse BN-0 ~bibbityboo~
    Their main objective is to protect the baby though. They place the life of the baby above the freedom of the mother to abort it, in the same way that most people place the life of a person above the freedom of a person to kill them. You're still being arrogant in saying that they want to take away the mother's freedom, because that's just the consequence of preventing the death of the baby.
  • N-Raged... Anonymo... 2012/06/24 23:27:36
    N-RagedOwner
    +1
    No, it's not a consequence of 'preventing a death', it's the reality of what it is. I have yet to hear one pro-life activist making headlines for saying, "If a woman can get an abortion without killing the unborn child, then I'm okay with that!" No, it's about making abortion illegal, which is taking away the choice of the individual for the sake of something that isn't true.

    Your arrogance in calling me arrogance is rather amusing. Life doesn't begin at conception, it's the process that leads to life that starts at conception. It's like making a cake. You have the ingredients and mix them together. The process has started but it's no where near being a cake yet. If you dump it out, then yeah that should be a crime (because cakes are yummy) but it's not a cake yet so you didn't kill the cake. Put it in the oven and at a certain point, it's developing into a cake and to yank it out and end the process would be killing it. It's a matter of figuring out when it crossing that threshold of just being mixed ingredients to being a cake that's just not thoroughly cooked yet.

    George Carlin made a couple of very valid points on the issue. One, you don't need to give every ejaculation a name (slight over exaggeration of how overboard pro-lifers are). The other is that a pro-life...
    No, it's not a consequence of 'preventing a death', it's the reality of what it is. I have yet to hear one pro-life activist making headlines for saying, "If a woman can get an abortion without killing the unborn child, then I'm okay with that!" No, it's about making abortion illegal, which is taking away the choice of the individual for the sake of something that isn't true.

    Your arrogance in calling me arrogance is rather amusing. Life doesn't begin at conception, it's the process that leads to life that starts at conception. It's like making a cake. You have the ingredients and mix them together. The process has started but it's no where near being a cake yet. If you dump it out, then yeah that should be a crime (because cakes are yummy) but it's not a cake yet so you didn't kill the cake. Put it in the oven and at a certain point, it's developing into a cake and to yank it out and end the process would be killing it. It's a matter of figuring out when it crossing that threshold of just being mixed ingredients to being a cake that's just not thoroughly cooked yet.

    George Carlin made a couple of very valid points on the issue. One, you don't need to give every ejaculation a name (slight over exaggeration of how overboard pro-lifers are). The other is that a pro-lifer will fight and kill for the right of the fetus to be born and, as he said it, "but once you're born, you're on your own." He's right too. There have been numerous instances over the years where a pro-life activist has KILLED someone. How's THAT for a hypocrite? "ALL life is precious, and I'll kill you to prove it!"
    (more)
  • Anonymo... N-Raged... 2012/06/25 15:08:10
    Anonymouse BN-0 ~bibbityboo~
    They consider the foetus to be alive, so consider abortion as murder, so want to prevent murder. If we legalised murder because it infringed on people's rights, that would be ridiculous, this is how they see abortion. I am pro-choice myself, but your allegations are very ignorant - just because people think differently doesn't mean they're wrong.
  • N-Raged... Anonymo... 2012/06/27 16:09:24
    N-RagedOwner
    +1
    My 'allegations' as you call them are not ignorant. Your lack of understanding is. Pro-life people insist that life begins at conception, but that's only the beginning of a process. I also find it hypocritical to fight for something that doesn't yet have life, but then be willing to turn around and kill someone else because they don't hold the same inaccurate beliefs. Your analogy of legalizing murder is way off base, by the way.
  • Anonymo... N-Raged... 2012/06/27 16:31:01
    Anonymouse BN-0 ~bibbityboo~
    I don't believe that either, but it is a matter of opinion, not fact. General opinion is that something is alive when its heart is beating, and that's just by consensus. Life could start from anywhere between fertilisation and the onset of puberty.
  • N-Raged... Anonymo... 2012/06/27 20:19:52
    N-RagedOwner
    +1
    Plants are considered to have life yet no heartbeat. I say, if they are going to argue that life begins at conception and that it's murder to ever have an abortion, then they should honor all life, including plants. Which means if they eat any meat, vegetables or fruits, then they are support murder. Either be consistent or stfu with the misinformed b.s. (Not directed at you, just my thought on it.)
  • Anonymo... N-Raged... 2012/06/28 13:51:44
    Anonymouse BN-0 ~bibbityboo~
    They consider it to be an alive human at conception, meaning it has the same rights as another person.
  • N-Raged... Anonymo... 2012/06/28 15:06:32
    N-RagedOwner
    +1
    Then they need to prove it. They need to provide undeniable proof that there is indeed a soul/life within that human shell. Not just that the shell is alive, but that there is life within that shell.
  • Anonymo... N-Raged... 2012/06/28 15:42:35 (edited)
    Anonymouse BN-0 ~bibbityboo~
    With the death penalty, it is widely considered better to let a guilty man go than to kill an innocent. Why not the same here? If you are not sure if something's alive or not, surely it's better to assume it is alive and not kill it, just in case.
  • N-Raged... Anonymo... 2012/06/28 20:07:11
    N-RagedOwner
    +1
    In that case, let's just do away with condoms and other forms of birth control, because that one time that they work could be the time they are preventing a life, in essence killing it before it has a chance to exist.

    Or to put it simply. Um, no.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/05/18 18:32:41

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals