Is Abortion Ok.?
Stef
2012/06/24 19:33:48
|
|
|||||
|
43 votes
|
|
45% | |||
|
41 votes
|
|
43% | |||
|
12 votes
|
|
13% | |||
I Dont Think Its Ok. I Dont Think It Should Even Be Legal In The U.S. I Read In An Article That If A Female Walks Into A Doctors Office And Says, " Im Having A Boy And I Wanted A Girl." That Its Legal To Abort The Baby For The Sex It Has. It's So Sad :( Wtf Is This World Coming To.?!!!
Top Opinion
-
Cellar Door 2012/06/24 22:58:59It's Ok (Agree)+12I'm pro-choice. Saying that abortion shouldn't be legal isn't going to stop people from having abortions, it just means that more women will go for unsafe abortions instead. For the well-being of women, abortion needs to be legal. I support a woman’s right to terminate a pregnancy for any reason, whether it is because she feels that she is not mature enough to be a mother, has current responsibilities or future plans that would be interfered with by a pregnancy, because she cannot afford to have a child, etc. Embryos and fetuses should not have more rights than a woman, because a woman deserves the rights to her body that she was born with and I do not believe it is fair to force a woman to go through with something that can greatly affect her health and future when she does not want to go through with it.



















By the way, hittler killed less than 6.000.000 jews. The bodycount from the WWII is more than 50.000.000 people, and probably more than 60.000.000. And sure, Vietnam and Camboya where "peace in the making", just as first gulf war.
I agree that terminating based strictly on the gender is a bit uncaring/selfish, but if it's within the first trimester, then it's still her right. You said that you don't think it should even be legal. Are you saying that your beliefs are more important than hers? Are you saying that your rights should extend so far that you can control what she can and cannot do?
Seriously, learn to accept that others should be allowed to make choices for themselves just as you are allowed to make choices for yourself. If you would never get an abortion regardless of circumstances, then that's your CHOICE. You should be happy and gra...
I agree that terminating based strictly on the gender is a bit uncaring/selfish, but if it's within the first trimester, then it's still her right. You said that you don't think it should even be legal. Are you saying that your beliefs are more important than hers? Are you saying that your rights should extend so far that you can control what she can and cannot do?
Seriously, learn to accept that others should be allowed to make choices for themselves just as you are allowed to make choices for yourself. If you would never get an abortion regardless of circumstances, then that's your CHOICE. You should be happy and grateful that you are able to make that choice for yourself. Don't go making it for other people too, because I doubt you'd like it if others started telling you what you can or can't do for things you feel should be your decision.
Oh and is there any reason that you capitalize the first letter of every word you type? It's a horrible habit to have and any good teacher will actually deduct points off of reports for doing that sort of thing. Not to mention employers would tell you to cut it out too.
If you want people to respect your opinions, you need to respect others opinions. For example, a woman who has the opinion that she should be allowed to have an abortion. But if you're all out with "AbOrTiOn ShOuLd Be IlLeGaL" then that's not respecting her opinion, that's you wanting to exert control over her life and her rights.
Your arrogance in calling me arrogance is rather amusing. Life doesn't begin at conception, it's the process that leads to life that starts at conception. It's like making a cake. You have the ingredients and mix them together. The process has started but it's no where near being a cake yet. If you dump it out, then yeah that should be a crime (because cakes are yummy) but it's not a cake yet so you didn't kill the cake. Put it in the oven and at a certain point, it's developing into a cake and to yank it out and end the process would be killing it. It's a matter of figuring out when it crossing that threshold of just being mixed ingredients to being a cake that's just not thoroughly cooked yet.
George Carlin made a couple of very valid points on the issue. One, you don't need to give every ejaculation a name (slight over exaggeration of how overboard pro-lifers are). The other is that a pro-life...
Your arrogance in calling me arrogance is rather amusing. Life doesn't begin at conception, it's the process that leads to life that starts at conception. It's like making a cake. You have the ingredients and mix them together. The process has started but it's no where near being a cake yet. If you dump it out, then yeah that should be a crime (because cakes are yummy) but it's not a cake yet so you didn't kill the cake. Put it in the oven and at a certain point, it's developing into a cake and to yank it out and end the process would be killing it. It's a matter of figuring out when it crossing that threshold of just being mixed ingredients to being a cake that's just not thoroughly cooked yet.
George Carlin made a couple of very valid points on the issue. One, you don't need to give every ejaculation a name (slight over exaggeration of how overboard pro-lifers are). The other is that a pro-lifer will fight and kill for the right of the fetus to be born and, as he said it, "but once you're born, you're on your own." He's right too. There have been numerous instances over the years where a pro-life activist has KILLED someone. How's THAT for a hypocrite? "ALL life is precious, and I'll kill you to prove it!"
Or to put it simply. Um, no.