Quantcast

If you could change any law in your country what would it be and why?

MYSTIC MYSTIQUE 2012/06/06 21:10:40
Related Topics: Law, Country
I'd change....
I wouldn't change any.....
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • stevegtexas@aol.com 2012/06/06 21:15:39 (edited)
    I'd change....
    stevegtexas@aol.com
    +3
    Divorce........... shouldnt get married without first going to counselling, the same with divorce........cant get divorced without first going to counselling... but still, free to stay free to leave otherwise....but always "optional" counselling! sanctity of marriage

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • ⚜3rd Street Boss⚜ 2012/06/08 22:53:06
    I'd change....
    ⚜3rd Street Boss⚜
    So much...
  • ehrhornp 2012/06/08 17:18:05
    I'd change....
    ehrhornp
    End the war on drugs.
  • Idc anymore 2012/06/08 04:04:00
    I wouldn't change any.....
    Idc anymore
    i really dont know
  • Shane 2012/06/08 00:16:19
    I'd change....
    Shane
    tax laws for sure.
  • ♒ßεllεchεvεllε®♒ 2012/06/07 19:10:09
    I'd change....
    ♒ßεllεchεvεllε®♒
    laws concerning term limits, pensions, lobbying, and our ability to fire people when they aren't performing as promised.
  • layla 2012/06/07 19:02:12
    I'd change....
    layla
    Drinking age back to 18. If we are aloud to vote, smoke and go to jail, then why not drink? God know that we do it anyway even if it's against the law.
  • Jackal 2012/06/07 19:00:56
    I'd change....
    Jackal
    The "No Child Left Behind" law that was implemented by G.W. Bush...
  • Scooter 2012/06/07 18:59:10
    I'd change....
    Scooter
    +1
    Helmet Law...you should be able to choose.
  • _-T3x4S_M4D3-_ 2012/06/07 18:57:38
    I'd change....
    _-T3x4S_M4D3-_
    legalize pot for all purposes!
  • mandyinabox 2012/06/07 18:30:57
    I'd change....
    mandyinabox
    the Louisiana Vaginal Ultrasound Bill; the Georgia law that states ANY sexual intercourse between non-18's is classified as "rape" and that the older, even if they only just turned the next year old, is punished to the point of being forced to relocate to an area secluded and away from children; and laws that prohibit discussion of any other sexuality than heterosexuality in school Health Classes; plus also the story of the 17-year-old Tran who was put behind bars because she missed one too many days of school, despite the fact that she was working a full-time & a weekend job to support her family and was struggling with her Honor Roll work load, and had not insofar as I read harmed anyone in any way. stupid law
  • ♌βļąƈʞƦơșƐ3033♌ 2012/06/07 16:58:07
    I'd change....
    ♌βļąƈʞƦơșƐ3033♌
    +1
    I'd change the law saying that marriage is between a man and woman... which just isn't true anymore.
  • DesTay896 2012/06/07 14:07:54
    I'd change....
    DesTay896
    +1
    states being able to decide what is or isnt a marriage.
  • Muskoka 2012/06/07 12:26:09
    I'd change....
    Muskoka
    Take all tax exemptions away from churches.
  • Marcus Clark 2012/06/07 07:39:20
    I'd change....
    Marcus Clark
    I would pass a bill that is currently in Congress. This bill has been reintroduced into every session of Congress for the last decade plus, but it just sits there and never makes it to the floor for a vote. This bill would completely overhaul our federal tax system.
    (Follow the link for more information.)
  • sockpuppet 2012/06/06 21:33:15
    I'd change....
    sockpuppet
    +2
    No more "hate crime" classifications. They have no business punishing people for their thoughts.
  • Joey sockpuppet 2012/06/07 00:17:19
    Joey
    It is always funny how republicans get so upset with Hate Crimes laws. When in the court of law many times the mind set of a person highlighted .
  • sockpuppet Joey 2012/06/07 02:56:48
    sockpuppet
    +1
    We're just concerned with fairness in the eyes of the law, which democrats overlook to keep minority votes.
  • Joey sockpuppet 2012/06/07 04:14:40 (edited)
    Joey
    If Cons really cared about fairness you would complain about stop and frisk going after innocent black people , and other forms of racial profiling. but this is something that is supported by people on the right . Also what is not fair about hate crimes laws ?
  • sockpuppet Joey 2012/06/07 04:34:21
    sockpuppet
    Profiling is the way to get the criminals off the streets. It's not 100% accurate, but it sure beats wasting police time on honest citizens. Somebody has to pay for that, you know.

    Hate crime means they're punishing you for your thoughts in addition to the actual criminal acts you've committed. When they started locking people up for "wrong thinking" and "hate" the whole country should have demanded that those lawmakers be ejected from office immediately.

    It's "thought crime" whether it's policed fairly or not. Nobody in a free society should be punished for their thoughts. North Korea, maybe. The USA... never.
  • Joey sockpuppet 2012/06/07 05:04:28 (edited)
    Joey
    I really the the republican set.. complain about fairness than in the same conversation support innocent people being harassed due to their color . I don't miss being a republican at all.

    Next they are not looking people up for " wrong thinking" they are locking people up from crimes that they did . You can hate whom ever you want.No one is going to come in your house and tell you not to be racist . However when you hurt someone that is when it is in issue . So all this complaining about a thought crime is moot.

    Edit: It is funny you talk about North Korea yet you are ok with people being profiling .
  • sockpuppet Joey 2012/06/07 05:31:00
    sockpuppet
    If you want to catch criminals and stop crime, you need to go where the crimes are and talk to the criminals. You think skin color should make a person "off limits" to the cops? When "innocent people" start acting like they're innocent, they won't be harassed anymore. That means it's time to join Society and drop the 'thug culture' crap. Those are the people being hassled by the cops, and 9 times out of 10, they're only "innocent" because they ran-- and ditched their contraband before they got tackled.

    I like you, and I know you're a smart man. While I don't always sound like it, I learn from you. The thing we always butt heads on, though, is that you seem to think white people get everything handed to them on a silver platter, and I think black people do. The truth must be somewhere closer to the middle.

    And they are indeed locking people up for wrong thinking. That's what "hate" crimes are. Murder might get you 10 years, but if they suspect you "hate" the victim because of race, gender, sexual preference, etc. they tack on a longer sentence. They punish you for your motivations. Read about it-- you'll see.
  • Joey sockpuppet 2012/06/07 14:28:44
    Joey
    It seems that you are going off a false narrative about the people who are stopped and harassed. It is everyday people... also I do not care if someone is dressed like a thug. These people should not get stopped as well. This is America we should have the right to wear what we want without being subject to harassment. I mean look at all the assumptions that you made in your opening statement . 9 out of 10 times if someone does not have anything on them .. that means they throw away what they were holding ? How do you come to such a conclusion? The real fact is normal everyday people are treated like thugs for just being black. There was a joke that went something to this effect .. What do you call a black Doctor in the South .. and the answer is a racial slur. And that mindset seems to still be alive. Not saying that you are going around calling black people racist names . But it seems that you are so ready to believe to worse. In New York with their stop and Frisk that target mostly black people there are only 6% of the time do they find something illegal . 6% that would be 94 % of the time black people had to make stuff vanished . Hate to break it to you most many black people are not training by Chris Angel .

    You are right there motives are taken into account but that...
    It seems that you are going off a false narrative about the people who are stopped and harassed. It is everyday people... also I do not care if someone is dressed like a thug. These people should not get stopped as well. This is America we should have the right to wear what we want without being subject to harassment. I mean look at all the assumptions that you made in your opening statement . 9 out of 10 times if someone does not have anything on them .. that means they throw away what they were holding ? How do you come to such a conclusion? The real fact is normal everyday people are treated like thugs for just being black. There was a joke that went something to this effect .. What do you call a black Doctor in the South .. and the answer is a racial slur. And that mindset seems to still be alive. Not saying that you are going around calling black people racist names . But it seems that you are so ready to believe to worse. In New York with their stop and Frisk that target mostly black people there are only 6% of the time do they find something illegal . 6% that would be 94 % of the time black people had to make stuff vanished . Hate to break it to you most many black people are not training by Chris Angel .

    You are right there motives are taken into account but that is not wrong thinking .. that is wrong thinking followed by a wrong action. However this is something that happens in every murder case . If you plan it out ... you get a longer time than if it was just something random . While not a technical terms people use the term a crime of passion in order to try to get less time . I don't understand why hate crimes are where we draw the line .
    (more)
  • sockpuppet Joey 2012/06/07 22:00:51
    sockpuppet
    OK... so what needs to be done, regarding profiling? People in the inner city appeal to the police to put a stop to all the crime. What, then, would you have them do?

    1. Accost EVERYONE, rather than the likely suspects?

    2. Drive through the neighborhoods, but not stop the car?

    3. Place officers on every street corner to prevent crime?

    Bear in mind that somebody has to pay for all this, and that none of it would be necessary if the people in this part of town would obey the law in the first place. Whose responsibility is this? Are these young black men incapable of behaving themselves without a babysitter of some kind? You will never convince me that there is any actual difference between people of different colors. We are all equally capable of being honest, law-abiding citizens.

    So... what should we do, if not to mix it up with the ones who are actually committing the crimes?

    As for premeditation as a special circumstance, a person's intent is entirely different from his/her motivations. When you start punishing people for something intangible like a thought-- by adding 20 years for "hate", you've entered a realm of conjecture. Nobody knows what's on someone else's mind.

    You can make a good case for premeditation if the killer goes home and returns w...









    OK... so what needs to be done, regarding profiling? People in the inner city appeal to the police to put a stop to all the crime. What, then, would you have them do?

    1. Accost EVERYONE, rather than the likely suspects?

    2. Drive through the neighborhoods, but not stop the car?

    3. Place officers on every street corner to prevent crime?

    Bear in mind that somebody has to pay for all this, and that none of it would be necessary if the people in this part of town would obey the law in the first place. Whose responsibility is this? Are these young black men incapable of behaving themselves without a babysitter of some kind? You will never convince me that there is any actual difference between people of different colors. We are all equally capable of being honest, law-abiding citizens.

    So... what should we do, if not to mix it up with the ones who are actually committing the crimes?

    As for premeditation as a special circumstance, a person's intent is entirely different from his/her motivations. When you start punishing people for something intangible like a thought-- by adding 20 years for "hate", you've entered a realm of conjecture. Nobody knows what's on someone else's mind.

    You can make a good case for premeditation if the killer goes home and returns with a .45 auto, but to say that he pulled the trigger because his victim was gay or black or disabled or whatever is guesswork. And even if you KNOW how he felt about the other person, why should this earn him more years in prison?

    It's a political gesture-- created in congress to appease people who perceive themselves to be 'special' in some way. Everyone but whites and straights is what it boils down to.

    I'm probably not as bitter as I sound, and definitely not as racist as I sound-- what I am is alarmed by the acceptance of the double standard. It's not even acceptance, anymore. It's expected to such a degree that half the country refuses to acknowledge it.

    Women demand equal pay for equal work, but can't hold up their end of the bargain. Minorities want a level playing field, but want it tipped in their favor. We're not supposed to see any difference in a man's worth based on skin color, but blacks still call each other "brother" to the exclusion of everyone else in the room.

    For years, you've insisted that we're all the same, and now that this is common knowledge, you want to be treated differently. It's a 2-way street, you know-- we ALL have to be willing to integrate. This means that we have to give little to become part of something larger than ourselves.

    This is exactly the "conversation on race" that I've been wanting to have since Obama suggested this in a speech a few years back. A very good speech, I might add. I'm not trying to wear you down-- I'm trying to find some reasonable common ground with you. How can someone so obviously intelligent as yourself fail to recognize a double standard when you see one?
    (more)
  • Vennie 2012/06/06 21:21:51
    I'd change....
    Vennie
    +1
    That's a tough question, asking me to pick just one. If it could only be one I guess it would be repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act. That is such an unnecessary and bigoted piece of legislation it should never have seen the light of say.
  • stevegtexas@aol.com 2012/06/06 21:15:39 (edited)
    I'd change....
    stevegtexas@aol.com
    +3
    Divorce........... shouldnt get married without first going to counselling, the same with divorce........cant get divorced without first going to counselling... but still, free to stay free to leave otherwise....but always "optional" counselling! sanctity of marriage
  • james.g.mcdonald.5 2012/06/06 21:14:00
    I'd change....
    james.g.mcdonald.5
    +3
    Tax laws. Tax the rich not the poor.
  • sockpuppet james.g... 2012/06/06 21:35:22
    sockpuppet
    In other words, punish those who have more than you do.
  • mandyin... sockpuppet 2012/06/07 18:37:16
    mandyinabox
    though not in terms of meritocracy (where this is applicable), is my opinion
  • sockpuppet mandyin... 2012/06/07 19:26:39
    sockpuppet
    Some professions require a much larger investment than others. Some require special insurance coverage (medical malpractice comes to mind). Some are hazardous. Some, as in Hollywood, are simply highly paid for unknown reasons.

    It's not up to us to judge what someone is worth. It's certainly nothing to punish someone for.

    If the government can't afford to pay its bills, it can cut back its consumption, like the rest of us have to.
  • MYSTIC ... sockpuppet 2012/06/08 16:12:38
    MYSTIC MYSTIQUE
    +1
    Understandable but the government is in charge of all monies.They are the rich...and the rich being taxed isn't that bad if job doesn't require a purpose.Have you ever had a job that made you 2 million in two months? Theres a few entertainers that have.Government workers are the higher payed and their payed highy for a purpose which would mean they can not be taxed.If you really think about it alot of jobs suit no purpose its just something to do to get what you want.Taxing and filing taxes is a way for government to make sure your managing and claiming every money you have.Taxes may vary, you could get monies back or be in debt to your ass end but if you realize money management is a purpose and if you manage monies well then not being taxed would be nice for some people too.Debt is when you should be punished in taxes.To me its a punishment for you not using those higher power faces on paper wisely ;) does that make sense or should I stay out of government talk....seriously is that a good point?
  • sockpuppet MYSTIC ... 2012/06/08 22:22:26
    sockpuppet
    If that's the way you feel about taxation, that's certainly a good point. You have as much business discussing these matters as anyone else does. :O) Personally, I couldn't stand to be in debt-- people who spend money they don't have should be punished somehow, rather than rewarded. Here in the states, they punish you for saving though. It's not right!

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/05/20 14:03:17

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals