‘If We Did Not Have Global Warming, We Wouldn't See This'
ProudProgressive
2012/06/30 17:46:17
NBC Meteorologist On Record Heat Wave: ‘If We Did Not Have Global Warming, We Wouldn't See This'
By Joe Romm
Jun 30, 2012
Tweet of the heat wave, from the National Weather Service:

It is friggin' hot!
How hot is it? It's so hot that all-time records are being set in June: "Nashville has reached its hottest temperature on record…109 degrees at 314 pm. The previous all time record was 107 from July 27th and 28th of 1952."
Here is a great graphic via Capital Climate:

The U.S. surface temperature map from Unisys at 4 pm, June 29,2012, shows 100° temperatures stretching almost continuously from California eastward to the Carolinas.
NBC Meteorologist Bill Karins said on Friday , "We've never really seen a heat wave like this in the month of June." Sadly, in a few decades this will just be considered a normal June (see below).
How hot is it? It is so hot that NBC Washington's Chief Meteorologist, Doug Kammerer, explained on air "If we did not have global warming, we wouldn't see this."
Like a baseball player on steroids, our climate system is breaking records at an unnatural pace (see "March Came In Like A Lamb, Went Out Like A Globally Warmed Lion On Steroids Who Smashed 15,000 Heat Records"). As Climate Central explains in its post, "Scorching June Heat Wave Puts 50 Million in U.S. on Alert":
During the June 22-to-28 period, there were 2,132 warm temperature records set or tied in the U.S., compared to 486 cold temperature records. This includes 267 monthly warm temperature records, and 54 all-time warm temperature records.
For the year-to-date, warm temperature records have been outpacing cold temperature records by about 7-to-1.
In a long-term trend that demonstrates the effects of a warming climate, daily record-high temperatures have recently been outpacing daily record-lows by an average of 2-to-1, and this imbalance is expected to grow as the climate continues to warm. According to a 2009 study, if the climate were not warming, this ratio would be expected to be even. Other studies have shown that climate change increases the odds of extreme heat events and may make them warmer and longer lasting.
All-time records set Thursday included several in Kansas, where Norton Dam recorded a high of 118°F, beating the old record of 113°F set just a few days earlier. Dodge City, Kan., set a daily high temperature record with a mark of 108°F. That came one day after that town recorded its all-time highest temperature of 112°F, breaking the old record of 110°F, which had been recorded just two days earlier, on June 26.
Since the science of attributing extreme events to global warming is still emerging, scientists still disagree to what extent a specific event like this heat wave is driven by global warming. But two of the leading experts explain at RealClimate why even small shifts in average temperature mean "the probability for ‘outlandish' heat records increases greatly due to global warming." Furthermore, "the more outlandish a record is, the more would we suspect that non-linear feedbacks are at play – which could increase their likelihood even more."
Here's a Stanford release for Climatic Change study (PDF here) I wrote about last year:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/l2371617777412kp/fulltext...
Stanford climate scientists forecast permanently hotter summers
The tropics and much of the Northern Hemisphere are likely to experience an irreversible rise in summer temperatures within the next 20 to 60 years if atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations continue to increase….
"According to our projections, large areas of the globe are likely to warm up so quickly that, by the middle of this century, even the coolest summers will be hotter than the hottest summers of the past 50 years," said the study's lead author, Noah Diffenbaugh, The study, based on observations and models, finds that most major countries, including the United States, are "likely to face unprecedented climate stresses even with the relatively moderate warming expected over the next half-century."
I interviewed Diffenbaugh for my book, Hell and High Water, and in 2008 wrote about his earlier work in a post titled, "When can we expect very high surface temperatures?"
Bottom line: By century's end, extreme temperatures of up to 122°F would threaten most of the central, southern, and western U.S. Even worse, Houston and Washington, DC could experience temperatures exceeding 98°F for some 60 days a year. And that's not even the worst case, since it's "only" based on the A2 scenario, 850 ppm.
The peak temperature analysis comes from a Geophysical Research Letters paper that focused on the annual-maximum "once-in-a-century" temperature. The key scientific point is that "the extremes rise faster than the means in a warming climate."
The definitive NOAA-led U.S. climate impact report from 2010 warns of scorching 9 to 11°F warming over most of inland U.S. by 2090 with Kansas above 90°F some 120 days a year with 850 ppm. By 2090, it'll be above 90°F some 120 days a year in Kansas — more than the entire summer. Much of Florida and Texas will exceed 90°F half the days of the year. These won't be called heat waves anymore. It'll just be the "normal" climate.
And remember, high heat means dry areas become drier and humid areas become intolerable.
On our current emissions path, we may well exceed the A2 scenario and hit A1FI, 1000 ppm (see here). In a terrific March 2010 presentation, Climate scientist Katherine Hayhoe has a figure of what the A1FI would mean:

Mother Nature is just warming up.
The time to act is yesterday.
Related Post:
Science stunner — On our current emissions path, CO2 levels in 2100 will hit levels last seen when the Earth was 29°F (16°C) hotter: Paleoclimate data suggests CO2 "may have at least twice the effect on global temperatures than currently projected by computer models"
http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2011/06/02/234291/romm/2011/01/...
By Joe Romm
Jun 30, 2012
Tweet of the heat wave, from the National Weather Service:

It is friggin' hot!
How hot is it? It's so hot that all-time records are being set in June: "Nashville has reached its hottest temperature on record…109 degrees at 314 pm. The previous all time record was 107 from July 27th and 28th of 1952."
Here is a great graphic via Capital Climate:

The U.S. surface temperature map from Unisys at 4 pm, June 29,2012, shows 100° temperatures stretching almost continuously from California eastward to the Carolinas.
NBC Meteorologist Bill Karins said on Friday , "We've never really seen a heat wave like this in the month of June." Sadly, in a few decades this will just be considered a normal June (see below).
How hot is it? It is so hot that NBC Washington's Chief Meteorologist, Doug Kammerer, explained on air "If we did not have global warming, we wouldn't see this."
Like a baseball player on steroids, our climate system is breaking records at an unnatural pace (see "March Came In Like A Lamb, Went Out Like A Globally Warmed Lion On Steroids Who Smashed 15,000 Heat Records"). As Climate Central explains in its post, "Scorching June Heat Wave Puts 50 Million in U.S. on Alert":
During the June 22-to-28 period, there were 2,132 warm temperature records set or tied in the U.S., compared to 486 cold temperature records. This includes 267 monthly warm temperature records, and 54 all-time warm temperature records.
For the year-to-date, warm temperature records have been outpacing cold temperature records by about 7-to-1.
In a long-term trend that demonstrates the effects of a warming climate, daily record-high temperatures have recently been outpacing daily record-lows by an average of 2-to-1, and this imbalance is expected to grow as the climate continues to warm. According to a 2009 study, if the climate were not warming, this ratio would be expected to be even. Other studies have shown that climate change increases the odds of extreme heat events and may make them warmer and longer lasting.
All-time records set Thursday included several in Kansas, where Norton Dam recorded a high of 118°F, beating the old record of 113°F set just a few days earlier. Dodge City, Kan., set a daily high temperature record with a mark of 108°F. That came one day after that town recorded its all-time highest temperature of 112°F, breaking the old record of 110°F, which had been recorded just two days earlier, on June 26.
Since the science of attributing extreme events to global warming is still emerging, scientists still disagree to what extent a specific event like this heat wave is driven by global warming. But two of the leading experts explain at RealClimate why even small shifts in average temperature mean "the probability for ‘outlandish' heat records increases greatly due to global warming." Furthermore, "the more outlandish a record is, the more would we suspect that non-linear feedbacks are at play – which could increase their likelihood even more."
Here's a Stanford release for Climatic Change study (PDF here) I wrote about last year:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/l2371617777412kp/fulltext...
Stanford climate scientists forecast permanently hotter summers
The tropics and much of the Northern Hemisphere are likely to experience an irreversible rise in summer temperatures within the next 20 to 60 years if atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations continue to increase….
"According to our projections, large areas of the globe are likely to warm up so quickly that, by the middle of this century, even the coolest summers will be hotter than the hottest summers of the past 50 years," said the study's lead author, Noah Diffenbaugh, The study, based on observations and models, finds that most major countries, including the United States, are "likely to face unprecedented climate stresses even with the relatively moderate warming expected over the next half-century."
I interviewed Diffenbaugh for my book, Hell and High Water, and in 2008 wrote about his earlier work in a post titled, "When can we expect very high surface temperatures?"
Bottom line: By century's end, extreme temperatures of up to 122°F would threaten most of the central, southern, and western U.S. Even worse, Houston and Washington, DC could experience temperatures exceeding 98°F for some 60 days a year. And that's not even the worst case, since it's "only" based on the A2 scenario, 850 ppm.
The peak temperature analysis comes from a Geophysical Research Letters paper that focused on the annual-maximum "once-in-a-century" temperature. The key scientific point is that "the extremes rise faster than the means in a warming climate."
The definitive NOAA-led U.S. climate impact report from 2010 warns of scorching 9 to 11°F warming over most of inland U.S. by 2090 with Kansas above 90°F some 120 days a year with 850 ppm. By 2090, it'll be above 90°F some 120 days a year in Kansas — more than the entire summer. Much of Florida and Texas will exceed 90°F half the days of the year. These won't be called heat waves anymore. It'll just be the "normal" climate.
And remember, high heat means dry areas become drier and humid areas become intolerable.
On our current emissions path, we may well exceed the A2 scenario and hit A1FI, 1000 ppm (see here). In a terrific March 2010 presentation, Climate scientist Katherine Hayhoe has a figure of what the A1FI would mean:

Mother Nature is just warming up.
The time to act is yesterday.
Related Post:
Science stunner — On our current emissions path, CO2 levels in 2100 will hit levels last seen when the Earth was 29°F (16°C) hotter: Paleoclimate data suggests CO2 "may have at least twice the effect on global temperatures than currently projected by computer models"
http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2011/06/02/234291/romm/2011/01/...
Read More: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/06/30/509246...
Top Opinion
-
Midnite12 2012/06/30 17:55:37






















Now, any place on earth can have a heat wave. But when Arctic ice melts away, that reflects average temperatures going up over a year or several years, and nobody can claim the thermometer data are biased:
Ice doesn't lie:
I've found this 3 part series a good guide to what's going on with the climate and the so-called debate that goes with it:
Global warming isn't the biggest threat to life on Earth ..... ignorant, selfish people are! And to the future generations, I apologize for their ignorance, greed and lack of foresight.
First of all, they didn't show a comparison to nitrogen or oxygen, they just showed co2. Then it occurred to me that co2 cools as it expands, and for that reason it's likely that the gas in the tube was cold, having just come out of a 'rather large cylinder'. Wouldn't any cold gas tend to absorb heat energy?
That demonstration had more in common with a magic trick than it did with real science, and that's the kind of pseudo-scientific manipulation that makes me doubt the assertions of the climate change people.
Further reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://www.newscientist.com/a...
"Water vapour is by far the most important contributor to the greenhouse effect."
http://www.newscientist.com/a...
These are from the same pages that you cherry picked from, it shows you didn't read them properly and it has exposed your tactics.
Stanley Meyer's claims about his "Water Fuel Cell" and the car that it powered were found to be fraudulent by an Ohio court in 1996.
The makers of the Lutec 100 (video 2) have never proved it and they're still looking for investors, if it worked then they'd be super-rich and would get a Nobel prize! http://www.lutec.com.au/
http://web.archive.org/web/20...
A Youtube video doesn't make them real or what they say they are.
Do some research.
I assume you think that global warming is a scam but you believe these videos?
These are not perpetual motion machines any more than a water wheel is perpetual motion. It's about harvesting energy that is ambiently existing all around us.
The laws of thermodynamics are only true to a point, there are exceptions to them. Take Meyer's invention for instance, fuel cells do not change electricity into hydrogen, they use electricity to stimulate the separation of water into it's constituent elements. Meyer just found a more efficient way to do it. The fact that burning the hydrogen releases more energy than it took to separate it is irrelevant. And Meyer's technology does work, there are quite a number of water powered vehicles running around out there. The fact that nobody is getting rich off it yet is a result of manipulation - patents and financing are two areas that the controllers use to keep these technologies down and without those two things it's pretty hard to do much. But the information is out there and every day there are people modifying their vehicles to run for free. Heck, you can buy the parts on Ebay.
Follow the money.
What a joke the Heartland Institute is.