Homophobia Is Just a Homosexual Propaganda Term// a term they made up
As we have known all along, homophobia is just a propaganda term used by the homosexual activist community to harass those of use who value marriage and traditional family values, and as Matt Barber of Liberty Counsel describes:
is designed to label negatively anyone who holds traditional values about human sexuality and marriage. He believes parents should be in an uproar. ”We have here public education once again trying to co-opt the proper role of parents, trying to impose their ideology on children whether or not that happens to be the ideology that parents share,” he points out.
Sarah Arnold, a Wisconson public high school teacher is apparently so concerned with this made up term, that she created a program for her students entitled, “Exposing Hidden Homophobia. ” She heard an “anti-gay undertone” in her students conversations and took it upon herself to educate her English students on the issue. Arnold claims that although the student body is mostly white, there are “unacknowledged” demographics at her school. So she decided to address these hidden demographics, i.e. the GLBT students (gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered) and pass it off as an English lesson.
The program Arnold developed included “in-depth exploration of depictions” of homosexuality in mass media; several homosexual-themed films, documentaries, books and novels; internet research on “the nature of homophobia”; and a “homophobia questionnaire” coupled with a “heterosexual questionnaire” designed to take questions “commonly asked of homosexuals and ask them of heterosexuals” – e.g., “When did you decide to become heterosexual?’”
Who asks a child that? And yes, for those of you who might not realize it, high school students are still children. The source material that this teacher has exposed these children to is and outrage. When students were reluctant and parents “balked,” (as well they should), especially Christian parents, Arnold defended her homophobia program by arguing,
that the project supported “higher-order thinking skills” because students were asked to perform such tasks as assembling and presenting portfolios of their research into homosexual culture and media.
I don’t know if this lady just got out of college or what, but I think that that her homosexual promo program is not the only way, or even an acceptable or necessary way, to teach “higher-order thinking skills” to students. Arnold has since attracted outside interest in her “homophobia” program, and she has thus made her resources and lesson plans available for other public school teachers to use so they can indoctrinate their own students with hyped homophobia propaganda. She also includes with her lesson plans, shortened versions of her “Hidden Homophobia Unit,” which you can read here.
Laurie Higgins of the Illinois Family Institute (IFI) said she was “speechless” when she learned of the curriculum.
Matt Barber says the program is really intended to indoctrinate children into thinking that homosexual behavior is okay. “The term ‘homophobia’ is a made-up term, made up by homosexual activists, that has no scientific value, no clinical value whatsoever,” he contends. “It’s merely a propaganda term.”
“Wisconsin public schools are permitting radical ideologues to use public money to promote their subversive, unproven moral conclusions and political goals about homosexuality,” said Higgins in an IFI article. “These propagandists, who should be teaching history or literature or writing, are instead pursuing their illegitimate goals of transforming the views of other people’s children on the contentious issue of homosexuality.”
“Arnold, like countless other English teachers, bases her text selections on whether the ideas conform to and advance her socio-political goals and her particular moral convictions,” said Higgins. “And she’s doing this with public money.”
Wow… with all of the recent financial shortages in public schools, I am quite sure that schools can find better and more productive ways to spend the little moeny they do have. Sarah Arnold likely isn’t the only public school teacher taking leeway with her lesson plans to indoctrinate your children with their personal ideologies. Have you discussed curriculum with your child’s teachers? Do you know what your children are reading, watching and being exposed to by these radical liberals?
Read More: http://thejournalistachronicle.wordpress.com/2009/...




















I'm not an Ophidiophobia, but I'd freak out if I saw one loose esp in my house.
If I was with someone who knows how to handle them I'd be ok.
This would be me if there was a snake too close to me
LOL!!!
You're right, her behavior is wierd.
Maybe it was a flake snake or the $$$ was too good to pass by.
Meaning of Phobia:
Noun a persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation that leads to a compelling desire to avoid it.
There are NO homosexuals anywhere that cause me any FEAR!
I do Not agree with this unnatural lifestyle and I will Not accept it as a Natural Occurrence!
No Phobia Here...
Not For YOU; DAH!!!
What the Hell is this Crazy "teacher" thinking or better yet teaching?
I'd be P O if my children went to this school.
I'd be waiting for her in the parking lot with local news cameras around so she could explain what the HELL she's teaching on Public School Funds!
I agree with you bro, "this is extra dumb"...
Jesus Christ left us an additional Commandment, which is to love one another as he had done so.
My Children are taught that very same thing, but they’re also taught Not to give into Man's Sinful ways.
So if you’re asking me if my children are taught to go against God's Laws, then my answer is HECK No; I'll have to answer to God for that.
Animals torture other animals too.
Saying homosexuality is "normal" isn't a fact, any more than these other aberrant behaviors are.
I'm willing to concede that the jury is still out on whether homosexuality is an inborn trait or a behavioral dysfunction. But it was treated as a psychological compulsive disorder until the American Psychological association took it off the list of disorders in 1973. And scientific research to prove it might be a disorder is very difficult because even psychological professionals are harassed and intimidated if they try to do a study that even potentially goes against the politically correct gay/liberal point of view.
Even so, there are psychologists who conduct therapy and research on the subject.
And people streated who say they have been cured of homosexuality and live normal heterosexual lives, and have married.
Do you also think it was irrational to teach equality during the civil rights era?
And then, yeah, it became a propaganda weapon much like the word 'racist.' Because it was so widely misused, that word almost has no meaning anymore.
* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
Others are very heterosexual and could be nothing else.
Some have leanings and are one or the other, but occasionally exxperiment, or could be persuaded to.
Some are bisexual and go equally both ways.
But there is no proof that someone unquestionably is naturally gay. Or whether it is instead an impulse, a compulsive behavior. So you can't "realize" something that might just be a behavioral compulsion.
If a man or woman has a compulsion to have sex with underage partners (male or female) is it morally right for them to do that? With teenagers? With children?
If one has a compulsion to gamble, or drink alcohol, or use drugs, is that an inborn natural behavior they have a right to pursue? No. We treat those as compulsive disorders.
If someone likes to torture other people, or torture animals, do they have a right to their "lifestyle choice"? To murder people? No. Those are crimes that are punished.
The rest of your opinion, I seem to differ with, however. There's a difference between compulsive behavior and natural attraction. Being gay doesn't mean that you have compulsive behavior, it's simply attraction just like a straight person would experience.
Basically all of those compulsions are harmful, though, that's the difference with the "lifestyle choices". Those crimes are punished because they are harmful! Who does being gay harm? No one. Not a single fly.