I've read about 3 different VERSIONS of the Christian Bible, The Book of Mormon, the Quran, and a series of the older jewish/rabinical sources as well. Then their's the other types of "Bibles" out there, too, but I'm guessing this questions considers only "CHRISTIAN" books, bibles, as we're rather narrow minded that way . .. .
I'm not sure if I've read all of it or not, but I used to go to a religious academy as a child and attended a bible study for the past year and a half.
Many, many times. All of it, I don't just skim like some Christians do to find what they like and follow it. The bible is a horrible, horrible book.. Bad plot, too fantasy like, and so on..
Most bible scholars I've read don't recommend reading it as if it were a single book cover to cover. It is a very diverse collection of 72 books. Each with it's own character, purpose, audience of the age, and they encompass a wide range of literary forms. There are a few history books. There are biographies. Law books. Poetry. Books of wise sayings and quotations. There is one long form song. There are prophetic books, and letters to various diocese of the early Church by the Apostles of Christ. Some of the New Testament was written for a primarily Jewish audience, and some for a primarily Gentile audience. But one thing that all the books have in common, is that they were found to be divinely inspired. So, anyway....I have read all of the New Testament, to be sure, actually more than once, but cover to cover only once. I have read each of the Gospels a number of times, and probably the Gospel's of John and Matthew the most often. In the Old Testament I've read Genesis and Exodus fully, as well as Job, Ruth, the Psalms, Esther, Ruth, the Song of Solomon, Judith, Isaiah, Haggai, Tobit, and Malachi. Over the course of the past three years, I may have read all but a few passage of the bible by going along and expanding on the daily lectionary readings of the Church....
Most bible scholars I've read don't recommend reading it as if it were a single book cover to cover. It is a very diverse collection of 72 books. Each with it's own character, purpose, audience of the age, and they encompass a wide range of literary forms. There are a few history books. There are biographies. Law books. Poetry. Books of wise sayings and quotations. There is one long form song. There are prophetic books, and letters to various diocese of the early Church by the Apostles of Christ. Some of the New Testament was written for a primarily Jewish audience, and some for a primarily Gentile audience. But one thing that all the books have in common, is that they were found to be divinely inspired. So, anyway....I have read all of the New Testament, to be sure, actually more than once, but cover to cover only once. I have read each of the Gospels a number of times, and probably the Gospel's of John and Matthew the most often. In the Old Testament I've read Genesis and Exodus fully, as well as Job, Ruth, the Psalms, Esther, Ruth, the Song of Solomon, Judith, Isaiah, Haggai, Tobit, and Malachi. Over the course of the past three years, I may have read all but a few passage of the bible by going along and expanding on the daily lectionary readings of the Church. This has at minimum given me a good portion of all the books, and at least the highlights. We do a Psalm every day, as well as an Old Testament reading, and New Testament reading from the letters, The Acts, or the Apocalypse, and a Gospel reading. Then, what my wife and I will do is read the full chapter that the daily readings come from. We then look at study sources, discuss what the reading is saying, and break it down a little bit. This way, we're getting the proper meaning, learning something, and even finding out how it applies to our current lives. Everyone is different of course, but for us, we're finding this to be far more meaningful experience than just sitting down and reading the bible as if it were a Stephen King novel. I wouldn't be able to draw the richness, and meaning out of it that I get this way. Most people who start out with good intentions of reading the bible cover to cover, who I've spoken to, or on the occasions where I tried it myself, get bogged down in the begats, or alternately bored and disturbed by Levitical law, and that's that. It gets set on a shelf to collect dust.
Another way that's helpful, and I pick up a lot of Old Testament this way as well.....
At the bottom of each bible page, pretty much, is a list of cross references in the footnotes. So, for instance if you're reading one of the Gospels, (which I heartily encourage we all do daily to some extent), say The Gospel of St. John 4:16 - 26 for the day, then you can look at the footnotes, and it will direct you to the OT, in this case 2 Kings 17:24 - 41; Hosea 2:7; Deutoronomy 11:29; Joshua 8:33; Malachi 1:11 and Isaiah 2:3, (as well as some NT cross-reference). By going to the OT references, you are not only reading, and learning something from the OT, but connecting it with Jesus Christ. It will be scripture that He is quoting, or fulfilling, or both. It gives a historical continuity, richness and depth to the study, and links the covenants between God and man over the ages.
“Then the higher criticism of the Bible, displaying that marvelous library as the imperfect work of fallible men.” From The Lessons of History by the Durants.
Yeah. The first part seems to be a series of stories told around the evening fire meant to scare the kids and keep them in line. It also seems to be the reflections of an obscure desert tribe claiming a glorious history for themselves.
The second or "new" part contains many good suggestions for living a "good" life as well as associating politics, God and threats. Could make one helluva movie.
There are some exciting parts, and I wouldn't let children read much of it (too much violence, rape, murder, etc...)
Some parts, however, will put you to sleep. Agreed. (atheist here as well). There are other ancient religious texts that keep up the action a littler better. IMO.
I have never read it cover to cover, but I always read from the bible when debating people about the bible. It'd be silly not to at that point.
Although, it typically does me no good as absolutely everything I quote is completely out of context and no one believes me when I tell them I've read parts of the bible. =\
Another way that's helpful, and I pick up a lot of Old Testament this way as well.....
At the bottom of each bible page, pretty much, is a list of cross references in the footnotes. So, for instance if you're reading one of the Gospels, (which I heartily encourage we all do daily to some extent), say The Gospel of St. John 4:16 - 26 for the day, then you can look at the footnotes, and it will direct you to the OT, in this case 2 Kings 17:24 - 41; Hosea 2:7; Deutoronomy 11:29; Joshua 8:33; Malachi 1:11 and Isaiah 2:3, (as well as some NT cross-reference). By going to the OT references, you are not only reading, and learning something from the OT, but connecting it with Jesus Christ. It will be scripture that He is quoting, or fulfilling, or both. It gives a historical continuity, richness and depth to the study, and links the covenants between God and man over the ages.
Blessings,
Steven
No longer believe it though...
The second or "new" part contains many good suggestions for living a "good" life as well as associating politics, God and threats. Could make one helluva movie.
Some parts, however, will put you to sleep. Agreed. (atheist here as well). There are other ancient religious texts that keep up the action a littler better. IMO.
Although, it typically does me no good as absolutely everything I quote is completely out of context and no one believes me when I tell them I've read parts of the bible. =\