Forget the Budget: Paul Ryan Is Hot: Do You Agree?

by Heisenberg Posted 2012/08/13 20:00:00

Related Topics: 2012 Election, Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan

706 votes
Read all 1,165 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Yes	336 votes	48%
	No	370 votes	52%

POLITICO.COM reports:
Overlooked, understandably, in Saturday’s analysis and news that Rep. Paul Ryan will be Mitt Romney’s vice presidential nominee was one mostly — but not entirely — unimportant aspect: Paul Ryan is kind of hot. Upon hearing the news of Ryan’s nomination, TMZ was quick to declare Ryan “the hottest vice presidential candidate ever."

+46

Add a comment above

Libertys Martyr 2012/08/13 20:59:46

No

+30
His voting record is not so attractive.
>> See Replies

More polls by Heisenberg

Politic... to Kenny T. 2012/08/19 02:43:09

And the KKK members were all Democrats ... check out a history book and see how liberals got their start hanging blacks and Jews as well as burning crosses. Imagine that. How proud you must be of your ancestry since you brought them up and all.

reply
T J to Politic... 2012/08/19 07:39:08

As I was telling les_gvt earlier. The KKK used to be Democrats, but times have changed. Jesse Helms and Strom Thurmond, two bigots, used to be Democrats, or Dixiecrats, but thanks to the Southern Strategy, they became Republican. You are using an outdate argument.

reply
Politic... to T J 2012/08/19 13:33:01 (edited)

No, you choose to misread what I said. Are you ESOL? SA

And the KKK members were all Democrats...How proud you must be of your ancestry since you brought them up and all.

Any moron can see that I was speaking of the historical, but like all liberals, you don't let the FACTS get in your way.

reply
T J to Politic... 2012/08/20 01:42:30

Right, what the hell does that have to do with today? That is the point I'm making. You people seem to have a real problem with logic and reason. So let me break it down, I KNOW THE KKK USED TO BE DIXIECRATS!!! But it still has no bearing on what's going on today. That is why I said you are using an outdated argument. Also, the whole liberals were hanging blacks argument, hold no water. Because the Dixiecrats then, are Republicans now, that is what you don't seem to understand. It's just like you teabagging cons, you use one small fact and completely distort it until it's a lie. You are pathetic.
P.S. Liberals were the ones fighting against slavery, and labor rights, and women's rights, and civil rights. You confusing party and ideologies shows how ignorant and uninformed you are.

reply
Politic... to T J 2012/08/20 01:59:13

You are pathetically dimwitted, How many times do I have to tell you want I was doing? Oh, I get it, you're mentally challenged, or perhaps you just don't like what I'm saying. Well, that's tough. I was giving you your heritage. NO, the KKK used to be Democrats. The Dixiecrats were Strom Thurmond's party. Do you sniff glue, smoke pot? You're sick, of course your icon sort of hints at that. What you don't seem to understand is that all the parties moved left, but you're too stupid to figure that out as well. Oh, there you go again, assuming something. Liberals fighting against slavery? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL The Republicans freed the slaves, You do know Abraham Lincoln don't you? geez, you are a piece of work. What the hell country do you live in? It sure isn't America. You wouldn't know an ideology definition if it bit your butt. Now I see the problem. You don't know your history and you don't know the poltical dynamics of your own country. LOLOLOLOL Buzz off nose picker.

reply
BigFig#9 to Politic... 2012/08/20 19:05:47

Just an interesting historical point - Tracing the evolution of parties over the years leads to lots of ironic former positions.... Republican anti WAR and introducing income tax, DEMs suppressing African American votes, etc....

reply
T J to Politic... 2012/08/21 05:21:39

Cute, here's the thing jackass, because you are too stupid to realize this, THE REPUBLICANS OF THE PAST ARE NOT THE REPUBLICANS OF TODAY!!! Barry Goldwater is not the same as Abraham Lincoln. The ideology of Theodore Roosevelt is not the same as Ronald Reagan, and Eisenhower is not the same as Bush. You are merely projecting your own stupidity onto me. That's your problem, not mine. What you fail to understand is this, (because I'm sure you scanned this and started thinking of more idiotic insults) is just because Lincoln and Bush were both Republican doesn't mean they are the same, just as Obama isn't the same Democrat Stephen Douglas was. Here's a fun tidbit, black people used to vote overwhelmingly Republican, until the Republicans changed. I know my history, it's you doesn't know anything. Try again loser.

reply
Politic... to T J 2012/08/21 09:48:25

Oh, did big boy get burned because he didn't know his history?

Are you too dumb to realize that my conversation all along has been about history?

Are you a foul-mouth bore?

Well, we all know that yes is the answer to those questions.

You can't climb out of your toilet of errors now, you have totally slam dunked yourself. LOLOLOL

I didn't have to do anything for you to make an idiot of yourself on this thread. Congratulations. And now you're arguing something that has no connection to what I was discussing, again.. You are a hoot. No, Bubba, you don't know your history, You must be on drugs because I don't think anyone would willingly prove to the world that they are so ignorant. It looks as though I knew enough history to call you on your mistake because you managed to not bring THAT up again. We can all see who the loser is on this one, and that loser is you.

reply
T J to Politic... 2012/08/22 03:29:03

What we have here is a failure to communicate. What you fail to understand is that I know we are talking history but you got it wrong when you said this: "check out a history book and see how liberals got their start hanging blacks and Jews as well as burning crosses." Which is so ridiculous it's not even funny. So what I did was bring the history discussion and compare it with the present. Your twisted take on history is your own problem, not mine. In fact, your sad arguments, which is based on you insulting me shows how pathetic you are. But enough about your insecurities. Here's the deal, if you knew what liberalism really was, you wouldn't post nonsense like liberals hung black people, if you really knew history, you would understand that the Democrats of the past are not the Democrats of the present, and neither are the Republicans the same as they used to be. Either you are missing what I am saying because you're a blithering idiot or you don't care and just want to pretend you know better than me. Whatever, give me your worst. You're still is a loser. P.S. The Dixiecrats were a branch of the Democratic Party, many of those KKK Democrats, would become Dixiecrats and later Republicans. So I am right again, and you still suck at life. Loser.

reply
Politic... to T J 2012/08/22 04:25:18 (edited)

Just a little snippet for you to mull over:

First KKKThe first Klan was founded in 1865 in Pulaski, Tennessee, by six veterans of the Confederate Army.[15] The name is probably from the Greek word kuklos (κύκλος) which means circle, suggesting a circle or band of brothers.[16]

Although there was no organizational structure above the local level, similar groups arose across the South, adopting the name and methods.[17] Klan groups spread throughout the South as an insurgent movement during the Reconstruction era in the United States. As a secret vigilante group, the Klan targeted freedmen and their allies; it sought to restore white supremacy by threats and violence, including murder, against black and white Republicans. In 1870 and 1871, the federal government passed the Force Acts, which were used to prosecute Klan crimes.[18] Prosecution of Klan crimes and enforcement of the Force Acts suppressed Klan activity. In 1874 and later, however, newly organized and openly active paramilitary organizations, such as the White League and the Red Shirts, started a fresh round of violence aimed at suppressing blacks' voting and running Republicans out of office. These contributed to segregationist white Democrats regaining political power in all the Southern states by 1877.

I think you're ...

Just a little snippet for you to mull over:

First KKKThe first Klan was founded in 1865 in Pulaski, Tennessee, by six veterans of the Confederate Army.[15] The name is probably from the Greek word kuklos (κύκλος) which means circle, suggesting a circle or band of brothers.[16]

Although there was no organizational structure above the local level, similar groups arose across the South, adopting the name and methods.[17] Klan groups spread throughout the South as an insurgent movement during the Reconstruction era in the United States. As a secret vigilante group, the Klan targeted freedmen and their allies; it sought to restore white supremacy by threats and violence, including murder, against black and white Republicans. In 1870 and 1871, the federal government passed the Force Acts, which were used to prosecute Klan crimes.[18] Prosecution of Klan crimes and enforcement of the Force Acts suppressed Klan activity. In 1874 and later, however, newly organized and openly active paramilitary organizations, such as the White League and the Red Shirts, started a fresh round of violence aimed at suppressing blacks' voting and running Republicans out of office. These contributed to segregationist white Democrats regaining political power in all the Southern states by 1877.

I think you're ridiculous for denying the truth, but that's your problem, not mine. You obviously have a major comprehension problem. Of course, I could show you pictures of the hangings, but you'd probably still deny everything. You really can be bright about some things, but you aren't as astute in the historical perspectives as you think you are. Insulting you just comes naturally. I often do that to people who are so brainwashed that they don't listen, don't research, and don't come off as too bright. You are a total loser to think liberals didn't hang folks, but then, as I've said, you are in severe denial. Don't keep coming up with the same old crap. The funny thing is to watch you deny something and then several entries below say the exact same thing I said to you. Good boy. Keep learning and the next person you argue with won't make you look so dumb. I do know better than you and in the grammar realm as well. LOLOL You must have looked Dixiecrats up to see the mistake you made early in the conversation. You are a failure. You pull crap out of the air or you're reading History for Dummies written by Dummies. I couldn't sleep and popped on line, found your boring diatribe and you've been the perfect sleeping pill. Good night, sleep tight yourself and don't let your historical confusion and rabid desire to be on top of the dung heap wear you out.
(more)

reply
T J to Politic... 2012/08/23 22:25:45

blahblahblahblahblahblah. You still don't get it. You put together this long post and it still says nothing. You still don't know what a liberal is, you still don't understand that the Democrats of the past are not the democrats of today. You still give this outdated, irrelevant argument which states the obvious but ignores the reality. I don't know know if I can get it through your thick skull, but there is again. Times change, democrats are different, republicans are different, liberal ideology is about freedom, not free swinging black people. Do you understand, or are you going to give another tired argument about what Democrats used to be over 100 years ago?

reply
Politic... to T J 2012/08/24 01:22:54 (edited)

You don't get IT. I know a liberal is someone with a mental disorder. You are the poster child after all. You don't know your history. You can't read and have no comprehension skils. You are a diehard gulper of the liberal swill. And the bottom line you still do not acknowledge my original comment, but that's OK, you're a substandard figure in the world of intellectual pursuits. It takes a mental midget to wage the war of stupidity that you've adopted. You created your own argument where there really wasn't one. You're a smug, arrogant, self-centered waste of time, energy, and space.

ONCE AGAIN for your completely befuddled mind, YOU brought them up and misquoted, misrepresented, and identified the KKK as Republicans. YOU WERE WRONG. I gave you the truth of the matter which you totally ignored, but this is what I said in the beginning:

And the KKK members were all Democrats...How proud you must be of your ancestry since you brought them up and all. Any moron can see that I was speaking of the historical, but like all liberals, you don't let the FACTS get in your way.

You jumped in with both feet and made an ass of yourself. You argued incorrectly, as I said, a point you still haven't admitted, but you continue to call me names because in your totally warped mind you think I wil...

You don't get IT. I know a liberal is someone with a mental disorder. You are the poster child after all. You don't know your history. You can't read and have no comprehension skils. You are a diehard gulper of the liberal swill. And the bottom line you still do not acknowledge my original comment, but that's OK, you're a substandard figure in the world of intellectual pursuits. It takes a mental midget to wage the war of stupidity that you've adopted. You created your own argument where there really wasn't one. You're a smug, arrogant, self-centered waste of time, energy, and space.

ONCE AGAIN for your completely befuddled mind, YOU brought them up and misquoted, misrepresented, and identified the KKK as Republicans. YOU WERE WRONG. I gave you the truth of the matter which you totally ignored, but this is what I said in the beginning:

And the KKK members were all Democrats...How proud you must be of your ancestry since you brought them up and all. Any moron can see that I was speaking of the historical, but like all liberals, you don't let the FACTS get in your way.

You jumped in with both feet and made an ass of yourself. You argued incorrectly, as I said, a point you still haven't admitted, but you continue to call me names because in your totally warped mind you think I will admit that your comments were right if you call me enough names.

Let me say it again so that you might understand: YOU WERE WRONG. I corrected you, but you have had dysentary of the fingers long enough. Bug off.
(more)

reply
T J to Politic... 2012/08/24 02:29:22

You use Michael "The Weiner" Savages talking point and I have a mental disorder? You must have a had a lobotomy to think that. Especially since you're the misinterpreting what I'm saying. I have said over and over again that the KKK and racist Democrats of yesteryear are gone, they're now Republican. For example, David Duke. Checkmate, you lose, get a life.

reply
Politic... to T J 2012/08/24 02:52:35

Yeah, I thought I saw your icon on the inside cover. Yeah, yeah, you're so full of crap that I bet you ooze when someone hugs you. OMG, someone hug you? Well, maybe, there's no accounting for some people. AND I have said you are so lacking in comprehension and reading skills that you totally went off line and didn't understand what I said. Then you peed in your pants and went on a totally hilarious tirade. You obviously don't recognize sarcasm among other things. LOLOLOL, you are such a hoot. You don't have the intellect to play chess. Nice to throw a term here and there, but you still don't get it. I even repeated it for you and you blew right over it. I don't know whether to laugh at you, or console your family for the brain damage you have.

reply
T J to Politic... 2012/08/24 03:31:15

Right, so says the delusional bum who just lost. You bring up history, which I have acknowledged. You fail to realize that I have also given the change that occured in history. I got what you are saying, you just don't get what I am saying. That's your fault, not mine.

reply
Politic... to T J 2012/08/25 02:10:30

I win every time you respond. You are shallow, misinformed, under-educated, and historically incorrect. You acknowledged nothing, you argued incorrectly most of the time. When nailed, you ignore the comment and switch topics. The only fault I see is YOU, puppy.

reply
T J to Politic... 2012/08/25 04:01:43

Right, if that makes you feel better then fine. You don't win when I respond, I respond because I feel like it. Your delusions of grandeur are entertaining to me. It's really funny how you think you have me beaten when I have responded and countered every argument you've made, and you respond with "you're on drugs," "you're stupid" it's so cute. As I've said to before, you don't exist to me in the real world. So keep entertaining me, your turn.

reply
Politic... to T J 2012/08/25 14:04:40

I see your problem it's your ego. You have to "win" ... and there's no hope of that. I do win when you respond. That's one reason I get so amused when you post again. So, glad I entertain you, because you have brought loud bits of laughter to me. I'm not out to win or beat you, but it's pretty easy to see what trips your ticket., THAT is your own feeling of incompetence or low self-esteem coming out. You throw out a little bravado here and there, but the portrait you have painted is of someone who has totally missed historical perspectives and most likely hides under the bed at night.

reply
T J to Politic... 2012/08/26 04:46:56

Who's the one who brought up winning in the first place? Oh wait, that was you. Are you winning now? I just responded again. Keep projecting loser.

reply
Politic... to T J 2012/08/27 03:45:13

Yep, sure did ... because it became apparent that it's your gig. Sure am. You are a loser indeed, and your icon is ugly. LOLOLOLOLOL

reply
T J to Politic... 2012/08/27 14:15:37

Am I supposed to be sad because you don't like my avatar? Do you think you matter that much? Loser. Your turn.

reply
Politic... to T J 2012/08/28 01:45:04

I could care less how you feel. I matter enough to you that you can't stop answwering me. And you are one of my laughs for the day. You simply cannot help yourself. My bad too. I can't help watching you made an ass of yourself.

reply
T J to Politic... 2012/08/28 02:49:10

Gee, I'm glad I entertain you, but you are beginning to bore me. You haven't said anything of relevance since you said that the early version of the KKK were Democrats. I'm tired now, and I'm moving on to more important things. So go ahead and say what you want, but you will still be a nonsensical loser. Good-bye and your turn.

reply
Politic... to T J 2012/08/29 01:22:58

You do entertain me, but you are a basically boring person yourself. You NEVER said anything of relevance, just half truths and misinformation. Awwwwe, poor baby is tired. Important for you must mean a regular bowel movement. Maroom is still your favorite color. Good riddance to bad rubbish, I believe is the term best suited for you.

reply
BigFig#9 to Kenny T. 2012/08/20 19:00:29

and the Republican Party - the difference between the two becoming more and more difficult to discern

reply
les_gvt to BigFig#9 2012/08/18 01:29:44

actually, having 3 former governors currently in the hoosegow does not help their image either

reply
Politic... to T J 2012/08/19 02:39:02

Ever read a history book? Ever look at the career of the Daley family? Ever get clean of the drugs that have you confused?

reply
Soundstorm to T J 2012/08/17 08:53:09

+2
So are you one of those clowns who prefers partisan subjective BS in charge of our government and you'd crush any objective truth that stands in its way?

reply
D Hanes 2012/08/17 02:05:54

Yes

+2
He's a cutie alright!

reply
iHeartChopin 2012/08/17 00:47:32

No

+1

reply
D Hanes to iHeartC... 2012/08/17 02:07:54

+1
You got that wrong... It is Obama who is the Muslim in Christian clothing... check that out before you accuse anyone else!

reply
T J to D Hanes 2012/08/17 03:43:15

+1
And you are an uninformed poser in an uninformed poser's body. So you fit the description. Congratulations.

reply
william... to D Hanes 2012/08/17 04:50:59

+3
not JUST some muslim , a twisted one w/bad intentions . see my REAL father ,telling.capitalism about pow and eyes of sin set on the last enemy of the radical muslim ,OUR military.
sad, but watch my word . his objective 90% completed on capitalism its strengthened him for the cu de gra . his means to an end of us is to turn us against each other,thereby he only has to inflame ,sit back and laugh at the unknowing and the naive not to mention the ignorant . You see once he has turned us each against every socio-economic,racial,ethnic and gender groups isn't his job complete? who'll be able to reach us back ,far enough back to sept. 11 when we were ALL Americans UNITED !
well, wtf occured between then and today besides a build up of hatred supplied fiercely by the hate groups determined to have their sick ways. I have a hatred in my heart like never before for obama ,this traitor amongst us ...hope and change my ass!!

reply
Pamela ... to D Hanes 2012/08/17 11:17:18

+2
These Liberals just don't want to see the truth.

reply
tatilee(: 2012/08/17 00:13:08

Yes

+3
If we're going off of looks than yes, he is VERY attractive!

reply
Azrael-In GOD we trust 2012/08/16 23:16:42

Yes

+3
Hey-he's a cutie!

reply
Mike 2012/08/16 22:18:08

No

only gotta say one thing about this blood sucker

reply
betz to Mike 2012/08/17 00:21:41

+3
Bloodsucker??? NO a fiscal wizard and pretty darned easy on the eyes. So darned classy. I love class and I haven't seen it in almost 4 years. Actually we have two classy guys and I'm loving it.

reply
Mike to betz 2012/08/17 16:18:18

he is a sociopath and you are too naive to see it
http://www.newyorker.com/onli...

reply
betz to Mike 2012/08/17 16:21:23

+1
Wow! First s bloodsucker and now a sociopath? I won't dare type any of the words I feel describe Obama. Too much of a lady to do that. :)

reply