Evolution is a faud? Evidence of flood hydroplate theory (similar to the lunar bukake hypothosis)
By Michael Haverluck
For decades, science books in America’s schools have taught that
the earth is billions of years old, with the Big Bang bursting through
the universe some 14.3 billion years ago. They teach children that
bacteria has been around a billion years or so and that the “Precambrian
Explosion” some 500 million years ago launched some of the earliest
forms of life.
But what if the evidence doesn’t support that? What if scientific
observation suggests that the Bible’s literal account of thousands of
years is right.
That is the position of Walt Brown, director of the Center for Scientific Creation in Phoenix.
His own scientific credentials are impressive. He holds a Ph.D.
from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Mechanical
Engineering, is a West Point graduate and a National Science Foundation
fellow, served as a tenured associate professor at the U.S. Air Force
Academy and was chief of Science and Technology Studies at the Air War
College.
His blunt assessment is that some evolutionary explanations would
be more relevant at a Star Wars convention than in a science classroom.
Pangaea, plate tectonics and asteroids wiping out the dinosaurs might
work in state-issued textbooks, but they do not pass the scrutiny of
Brown’s scientific research.
In the Eighth edition of his book “In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood,” Brown
presents his hydroplate theory, which unfolds scientific evidence that
the earth’s present geologic features and fossils were formed around
5,000 years ago — not untold millions or billions of years ago. He
asserts that the global flood recorded in Genesis 7 is the mechanism
that created the geologic, astronomical and biological phenomena
witnesseed today.
A major motivation that has propelled Brown’s decades of research
has been his quest to give Christian students answers that will
withstand scrutiny when challenged by Darwinist theories within the
classroom. He notes that he does not rely on faith, miracles or sped-up
evolutionary processes to buttress his theory – only observable and
calculable data.
More Water
According to Brown, the earth was an extremely different place
before Noah’s flood. Oceans were much shallower and mountains much
lower. He notes that it is no coincidence that more than 230 flood legends –
with many common elements such as a sole surviving family in a boat –
exist from every corner of the earth. In fact, the flood of Noah is the
very device that sets Brown’s hydroplate theory in motion.
Many skeptics ponder how the entire earth could have been covered
in water, especially with many mountain ranges extending miles into the
sky. Brown argues that pre-flood oceans contained half their present
volume of water and that the Earth’s massive mountain ranges were not
yet pushed up.
Brown contends that “water depth would be 9,000 feet everywhere”
if the earth’s surface was completely smooth, easily covering the
low-lying mountains that existed at the time of the flood.
Tapping into the scientific validity of the Bible, Brown lets the
book of Genesis uncork the source of the floodwaters that reshaped the
earth to its present appearance.
“In the 600th year of Noah’s life, on the 17th day of the second
month – on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and
the floodgates of the heavens were opened,” reads Genesis 7:11-12. “And
rain fell on the Earth 40 days and 40 nights.”
For those wondering where such torrents of water would originate,
Brown also has students examine the beginning of the Bible’s first
book, which specifies that underground waters were set in place on the
second day of Creation.
“And God said, ‘Let there be an expanse between the waters to
separate water from water,’” states Genesis 1:6-7. “So God made the
expanse and separated the water under the expanse from the water above
it.”
This expanse, says Brown, is the earth’s crust separating the
shallow oceans and seas above from the water trapped underneath, before
much of it jettisoned during the flood two millennia later.
“About half the water now in the oceans was once in
interconnected chambers about 10 miles below the entire earth’s
surface,” explains Brown. “The average thickness of the subterranean
water was at least three-quarters of a mile. Above the subterranean
water was a granite crust; beneath the water was earth’s mantle.”
Brown gives a visual of what he calculates the earth looked like
before catastrophic forces pushed mountains tens of thousands of feet
higher.
“Asia, Europe, Africa, and the Americas were … joined across what
is now the Atlantic Ocean,” Brown asserts. “On the pre-flood crust were
deep and shallow seas, and mountains – generally smaller than those of
today, but some perhaps 5,000 feet high.”
Yet not all subterranean water escaped during the flood, asserts
Brown. He argues that earthquakes provide evidence that oceans of water
still exist underneath the crust, noting that only underground channels
of water could rapidly transmit shockwaves thousands of miles from the
epicenter.
See the “Incredible Creatures that Defy Evoluation III” and “Something Transhuman This Way Comes.”
Effects of this transmission are evidenced around lakes, where
the crust is thinner. If the shockwaves were going through solid rock,
instead of water, the earthquake’s effects would never extend great
distances, as it did after an Alaskan earthquake, when transmitted
shockwaves broke boat moorings in Louisiana’s Lake Pontchartrain ─ more
than 4,000 miles away.
Dishing out the hydroplate theory
Because of tidal pumping forces increasing the water pressure
beneath the miles of rock over the centuries, the crust stretched like
an inflating balloon, says Brown. This pressure triggered a crack that
ended up rupturing the earth’s crust – a process that Brown calculates
took about two hours to wrap around the globe.
“As
the crack raced around the earth, the 10-mile-thick crust opened like a
rip in a tightly stretched cloth,” Brown explained. “Pressure in the
subterranean chamber directly beneath the rupture suddenly dropped [and]
caused supercritical water to explode with great violence out of the
10-mile-deep ‘slit’ that wrapped around the earth like the seam of a
baseball.”
To relate the magnitude of this release, Brown equates it to the
impact of 1,800 trillion hydrogen bombs, ripping a tear down the middle
of the Atlantic, veering beneath Africa and Australia, running north a
couple thousand miles off South America’s west coast, dipping under
North America off Mexico’s west coast to Alaska, resurfacing in the
Arctic Circle and continuing down through Iceland.
To see a video presentation of the theory, Click here.
“All along this globe-circling rupture, whose path approximates
today’s Mid-Oceanic Ridge, a fountain of water jetted supersonically
into and far above the atmosphere,” posits Brown. “Some of the water
fragmented into an ‘ocean’ of droplets that fell as rain such as the
earth has never experienced – before or after.”
According to Brown, this cataclysmic event had more than geologic effects.
“Other jetting water rose above the atmosphere, where it froze
and then fell on various regions of earth as huge masses of extreme
cold, muddy ‘hail,’” Brown stated. “That hail buried, suffocated and
froze many animals, including some mammoths.”
Brown notes that this explains how mammoths froze in minutes
while still chewing vegetation, which requires temperatures of -150
degrees Fahrenheit – colder than any natural temperatures ever recorded
on earth.
The effects were of astronomical proportions, as well, says Brown.
“The most powerful jetting water and rock debris escaped earth’s
gravity and became the solar system’s comets, asteroids and meteoroids,”
Brown claims.
To buttress this assertion, Brown adds that numerous cosmic
bodies in the solar system possess scientifically documented
characteristics that support the earth’s supersonic expulsion – such as
spin, density, composition, size, number, texture and orbital
measurements. He credits this event with creating craters on the moon
and terrestrial planets, many containing craters on their outer-facing
sides with ice still inside of them.
The earth itself is also replete with many topological features
formed during the flood. Ocean trenches are one of these phenomena.
“Deep folds, up to thousands of miles long and several miles
deep, lie at the floor of the western Pacific Ocean in an area centered
directly opposite of the Atlantic Ocean,” Brown explains. “As the flood
increasingly altered the earth’s balanced, spherical shape, growing
gravitational forces tended to squeeze the earth back toward a more
spherical shape.”
Brown argues there are 15 reasons why
the massive plates on the earth’s surface cannot dive into the earth
and drag down the folds – one being his scientific explanation and
diagram demonstrating why such pressure would crush the plate, not pull
it down.
“Once a ‘tipping point’ was reached, the portion of the
subterranean chamber floor – with the most overlying rock removed – rose
at least eight miles to become today’s Atlantic floor,” Brown added.
“This caused the Pacific floor ─ the region inside the Ring of Fire ─ to
sink and buckle inward, producing folds called ocean trenches.”
In other words, the outburst and pressure release on the Atlantic
side caused suction on the opposite side of the globe, pulling down the
area where the world’s deepest ocean trenches (around the Pacific Rim)
are concentrated today.
Brown points to the tens of thousands of volcanoes formed inside
the “Ring of Fire” ─ where 90 percent of earthquakes originate ─ as
modern evidence of the massive pressure release and drop of the Pacific
Rim that formed this volcanic zone during the flood.
Let it roll
Even with the plummet of the Pacific floor, the most
earth-changing event was yet to occur, as Brown contends that once the
fountains of the great deep came to a halt after 40 days, other
mechanisms were set into motion. He notes that these fountains that
pushed up the crust on both sides to form the 46,000-mile Mid-Oceanic
Ridge not only flooded the world; they produced massive amounts of
sediment from the eroded rock that buried plants and animals to form the
stratified fossil record.
“Then the hydroplates slid down and away from the inclining
Mid-Atlantic Ridge,” Brown describes, illustrating how this separated
the east coast of North and South America from Europe and Africa. “Once
the gradually advancing plates reached speeds of about 45 miles per
hour, they would collide, compress and buckle.”
Brown credits the process with fashioning today’s topography,
comparing the event to a train falling down railroad tracks after being
lifted in the middle. He notes that once the railway cars (hydroplates)
run out of track (subterranean water), they lose momentum, crumple and
jackknife. The 46,000-mile earth-encircling rupture quickly grew to an
average width of 800 miles, says Brown, and when the subterranean water
ceased escaping, the remaining water acted as a lubricant to propel the
hydroplates.
“The plates that buckled downward became ocean trenches, and
those that buckled upward became mountains,” Brown clarified. “This
explains why large mountain ranges are in correlation to their oceanic
ridges. Naturally, the long axis of each buckled mountain was generally
perpendicular to its hydroplate’s motion or parallel to the portion of
the Mid-Oceanic Ridge from which it slid. So the Rocky Mountains,
Appalachians and Andes have a north-south orientation.”
Besides
spurring the formation of mountain ranges, plateaus and the jigsaw fit
of the continents, this compression event caused a catastrophic
imbalance in the earth’s sphericity, caused by the upthrust of the
Himalayan Plateau. The massive thickening of the crust containing the 10
highest peaks on earth produced a net centrifugal force that rolled the
Himalayas 35 to 45 degrees toward today’s equator. Brown says this axis
tilt explains why plants and animals from warm climates are buried in
today’s Polar Regions.
Debunking the evolutionary model
Brown argues that the evolutionists’ account of a comet, asteroid
or volcanic activity triggering the extinction of the dinosaurs is
flawed. He contends that only a global flood could have generated a mass
rapid burial and fossilization of animals, as all remains would have
rotted away if they had died without being submerged in water to
preserve them. Brown also explains that fossils’ similar density and
mass discovered on the same levels of the geologic column prove that
dinosaur remains were sorted and buried just thousands of years ago in a
flood, not merely interred hundreds of millions of years ago in a
series of mass extinctions.
Another chink in evolutionists’ armor, says Brown, is that the
soft bone tissue and DNA found in dinosaur remains could not exist for
more than thousands of years. On top of this, he points out that
intentionally inflated and incorrect readings of fossils and rocks
measured using various dating techniques further put evolutionists’
millions- and billions-of-years-old origins account into disrepute.
Evolutionary stories describing gradual erosion taking place over
millions of years to form various natural wonders have also been shot
down by Brown’s geological observations in and around the Grand Canyon,
the Strait of Gibraltar and the channel under the Golden Gate Bridge. He
presents evidence that these were carved by rapid erosion from nearby
breaches of large bodies of water, which carved out these marvels of
nature in a matter of weeks or months, not millions of years.
In addition to the aforementioned arguments for a young earth,
Brown also turns to the Bible to dispel dozens of theistic evolution
claims. One fundamental teaching from the Bible, that sin preceded death
(Genesis 2:17, 3:1-24; Romans 5:12, 6:23), demonstrates that evolution
is not compatible with Scripture, as naturalistic doctrine claims that
animals and “primitive” humans died for untold millions of years before
Adam and Eve’s original sin approximately 7,000 years ago, conversely
stating that death preceded sin.
Brown examines other phenomena and topics that provide further
evidence for the Bible’s accuracy and a young earth, including Noah’s
Ark; symbiotic relationships; strange planets; the moon’s dust, origin
and recession; planetary rings; a faint, young sun; the first and second
laws of thermodynamics; the devolving of languages; biblical
genealogies; mutations; mitochondrial Eve; and many more in his book.
As a former evolutionist and atheist, Brown is quite familiar
with all the arguments from the other side. But does his flood account
hold water to competing theories?
For decades, evolutionists and creationists alike have refused to
debate Brown’s scientific findings. He has a few stipulations – that
the debate is published in a major scientific journal, that his opponent
supporting evolution hold a doctorate and that religion is not
discussed in the debate, only scientific data.
Brown reports some 50 of the circumstances he would expect to see develop under his theory have been documented and concludes that it is the Bible’s description of origins that are, simply, scientific.
note: not a parody this time, sadly. I honestly wish it was.
Read More: http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/does-science-prove-noah...























*LMAO
There is a massive, gargantuan difference between "just a theory" and a "scientific theory". A scientific theory will never, ever be anything else. There is nothing for a "scientific theory" to graduate to.
It is the pinnacle of understanding regarding a phenomenon. If you choose to ignore them, you do so at your own peril. FYI.
I was merely attempting to explain the difference between "just a theory", and a "scientific theory", like evolution. They are not the same. Not even close.
One is something between a guess and a hypothesis, the other is one of the most evidenced understandings in human history.
The term "theory" literally has a different meaning in science than what you presented.
http://www.evolution.mbdojo.c...
This shows a misunderstanding, as a scientific theory will never be anything else. The pinnacle of understanding of ANYthing will always have the "theory" moniker. Therefore, using this as a reason not to believe it is completely unreasonable.
Yes, the entire rant is a litany of preconceived assumptions to fit a non-evidenced occurrence simply to shore up "faith" in the book it came from. Meh.
"Brown lets the book of Genesis uncork the source of.."
“And God said, ‘Let there be an expanse between the waters to
separate water from water,’”
Letting a bronze aged book of mythology "guide" you was merely his first mistake. This is an absolute mess of scientific ignorance. I honestly would not even know where to begin.
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
http://www.sodahead.com/livin...
10-43 seconds (that's 10 to the negative 43 power. A decimal point, 43 zeros and a 1)
The universe begins with a cataclysm that generates space and time, as well as all the matter and energy the universe will ever hold. For an incomprehensibly small fraction of a second, the universe is an infinitely dense, hot fireball. The prevailing theory describes a peculiar form of energy that can suddenly push out the fabric of space. At 10-35 to 10-33 seconds a runaway process called "Inflation" causes a vast expansion of space filled with this energy. The inflationary period is stopped only when this energy is transformed into matter and energy as we know it.
The Universe Takes Shape
10-6 seconds
After inflation, one millionth of a second after the Big Bang, the universe continues to expand but not nearly so quickly. As it expands, it becomes less dense and cools. The most basic forces in nature become distinct: first gravity, then the strong force, which holds nuclei of atoms together, followed by the weak and electromagnetic forces. By the first second, the universe is made up of fundamental particles and energy: quarks, electrons, photons, neutrinos and less familiar types. These particles smash together to form protons and neutrons.
Formation of Basic Elements
3 se...
10-43 seconds (that's 10 to the negative 43 power. A decimal point, 43 zeros and a 1)
The universe begins with a cataclysm that generates space and time, as well as all the matter and energy the universe will ever hold. For an incomprehensibly small fraction of a second, the universe is an infinitely dense, hot fireball. The prevailing theory describes a peculiar form of energy that can suddenly push out the fabric of space. At 10-35 to 10-33 seconds a runaway process called "Inflation" causes a vast expansion of space filled with this energy. The inflationary period is stopped only when this energy is transformed into matter and energy as we know it.
The Universe Takes Shape
10-6 seconds
After inflation, one millionth of a second after the Big Bang, the universe continues to expand but not nearly so quickly. As it expands, it becomes less dense and cools. The most basic forces in nature become distinct: first gravity, then the strong force, which holds nuclei of atoms together, followed by the weak and electromagnetic forces. By the first second, the universe is made up of fundamental particles and energy: quarks, electrons, photons, neutrinos and less familiar types. These particles smash together to form protons and neutrons.
Formation of Basic Elements
3 seconds
Protons and neutrons come together to form the nuclei of simple elements: hydrogen, helium and lithium. It will take another 300,000 years for electrons to be captured into orbits around these nuclei to form stable atoms.
Big Bang Confirmed
1990 A.D.
Astronomers use the new Cosmic Background Explorer satellite (COBE) to take a detailed spectrum of the microwave background radiation. These studies showed that the radiation is in nearly perfect agreement with the Big Bang theory. Two years later, scientists used the same instrument to discover minute variations in the background radiation: the earliest known evidence of structure in the universe.
I LOVE that people (be they scientists, doctors, students or anyone) continue to question what we hold as truths. No sarcasm! If not for ppl asking and probing for answers, we would still think the world flat and that the sun revolves around the earth.
So keep asking! As science and technology improve, maybe we will find a new answer that was unavailable to us before.
But this idea is not proven, while the Big Bang has been proven.
What year is this? Carlin was right: F*ck hope. People are too stupid to live.