Quantcast

Employer Asked Woman to Wear Mini-Skirts on Mondays: Should She Win Damages?

SodaHead Living 2011/08/10 17:27:08
You!
Add Photos & Videos
You'd think people would know better by now.

A Utah woman has sued her former employer for sexual harassment, claiming he asked her to wear a variety of sexy outfits on each day of the work week, The Salt Lake Tribune reports.

Trudy Nycole Anderson, 44, says she was told to follow the following wardrobe schedule, according to a civil complaint filed in U.S. District Court:

--"Mini-skirt Monday"
--"Tube-top Tuesday"
--"Wet T-shirt Wednesday"
--"No bra Thursday"
--"Bikini top Friday"

Our first question: Who wears a tube top to work?

Anderson worked as an office manager starting in September 2007, and Derek Wright, owner of Pleasant Grove-based Lone Peak Controls and D and L Electric Control Company, was her supervisor, according to the Tribune.

Wright "repeatedly asked Ms. Anderson about her breast size and talked about her breasts in front of other employees," the complaint states.

He also allegedly asked her to show him her breasts, slapped her on her buttocks and asked her for sex on several occasions, the complaint states.

Perhaps most serious, Wright brought Anderson a document in 2007 stating that she would agree to allow him to sexually harass her, according to the complaint. If Anderson didn’t sign the document, Wright told her she would lose her job.

Anderson claims she reported the sexual harassment and Wright retaliated by firing her in February 2011, and now she's seeking unknown damages. Should she win the case?
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Ben Brink 2011/08/10 17:36:28
    Yes
    Ben Brink
    +29
    I am always amazed that people are so stupid, rude, or oblivious to the responsibilities of position. When I was asked by (male) sailors in my various commands how to interact with their female counterparts without their actions being misinterpreted as sexual harassment, I gave them two simple rules--1) consider how they would like their sister or their mother to be treated and 2) always be professional. For leaders--always treat subordinates with respect and any social interaction, which might be considered coerced because of the supervisor's position of power is completely off limits. I really don't think this stuff need be all that difficult.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Fabrizzo Helkin 4 days ago
    No
    Fabrizzo Helkin
    How amusing.When women are asked to dress modestly,they protest and call the men all the ugly terms.When they are asked to do the opposite,they want to sue for damages.Do nothing please their kind?FYI,the men do NOT have any freedom to choose what they wear,they cannot wear shorts in the workplace on most occassions,and their shirt is usually a collar one,if not long sleeve too.Why do I not see men targeting the morality of women for questioning,ie why must the women be provoked by men in shorts and hence oppose the idea?
    If u are really for freedom and genuinely abhor those who dictate terms on others,sign this petition: http://www.petitionbuzz.com/p...
    Since the office workplace has mostly allowed women to wear tank tops and miniskirts to work,I dont see the need for women to have one(not to mention too many people are already fighting for women's freedom of dress but ignoring those of the men)
  • Joseph Arrington 2012/01/13 02:31:11
    Yes
    Joseph Arrington
    +1
    The mini-skirt is generally only acceptable business attire for prostitutes, escorts, strippers, and mini-skirt models. For everyone else it is a questionable choice for the workplace, and is certainly not something someone should be put on a schedule, let alone asked, to wear to work.
  • Liberals Are Brain Dead 2011/11/23 15:28:15
    Yes
    Liberals Are Brain Dead
    +1
    Damages for what?
  • Grammar Freak 2011/10/01 10:27:11
    Yes
    Grammar Freak
    +1
    Without question.
  • aaron 2011/09/04 01:26:25
    No
    aaron
    +1
    Women should be allowed to wear whatever
    They like as long as they look acceptable
    In the work place no they should not be
    Obligated other wise
  • Art 2011/08/28 04:26:20
    Yes
    Art
    +3
    How did that individual ever get a managerial position in the first place. He's obviously one of those individuals who has kept they're brain in a box in the closet so it wouldn't get worn out. His actions are reprehensible to say the least and when he brought a document to work for her to sign giving him permission to sexually harass her that action alone gave her all the material she needs to win the case. Not to mention the commenting on the size of her breasts in front of other employees, patting her on the bottom, or the list of required clothing. Having been a manager, both in the military and in civilian life before retiring and having attended a number of required Sexual Harassment Seminars this woman has an open and shut case. Not only against the manager, but, quite possibly against her employer as well since she reported the harassment to HR with no results.
  • Judge Peter Hill 2011/08/25 22:18:34
    Yes
    Judge Peter Hill
    +1
    Win damages for being asked to wear a mini skirt, no. For being asked to wear a tube top, a wet t-shirt, no bra, or a bikini top, yes. If she can win damages only for being asked to wear a skirt, then men should be allowed to wear skirts at work without being asked to wear pants. Your question is somewhat misleading in that it implies that the miniskirt was the only issue.
  • mivic 2011/08/24 22:51:57
    Yes
    mivic
    +1
    Yeah, she should. But is there a picture?.... :P
  • Ms. Macabre 2011/08/24 22:00:40
    Yes
    Ms. Macabre
    +3
    Just mini-skirt Monday? No.
    Read description? Yes, she should sue. And she should get all the damages.
  • Intelic KA 2011/08/22 19:17:39
    Yes
    Intelic KA
    +1
    but I guess the THOUGHT to quit such a slum spot had no Right as well, what do you do?!!
    America could be to blame if the Nation is that great, or Life just /is/ as we are use to understanding by now...
    I would of sat down with the guy and thoroughly discussed this thing, even again and over again
  • Illusions 2011/08/22 16:21:31
    No
    Illusions
    +1
    Now, im just going against the grain here cuz we dont know the whole story, (or I dont anyway) but what if the employer was a porn producer and it was his way of attracting his clients? (I'm just saying but any other situation where the request doesnt make sense, yeah, give it all to her! Punish the b@stard!)
  • Grammar... Illusions 2011/10/01 10:32:33
    Grammar Freak
    "owner of Pleasant Grove-based Lone Peak Controls and D and L Electric Control Company"
    The article says where she worked, who her supervisor was & what the situation was. It's all spelled out quite clearly. If you have any misgivings about it, you can always do 30 seconds of research to find more information.
  • Illusions Grammar... 2011/10/10 13:33:13
    Illusions
    I don't bother wasting my time with useless things. Hence why I'm not going to bother replying to you after this!
    Take care!
    Love, don't hate!
  • TheWhiteWolf 2011/08/20 11:17:00
    Yes
    TheWhiteWolf
    ........
  • LewisCrise 2011/08/19 20:07:45
    Yes
    LewisCrise
    +2
    That sicko ought to be fired, sued and then some.
  • sammy 2011/08/18 16:04:19
    Yes
    sammy
    +2
    This is damn too rude for a subordinate staff...Not fair at all......
  • Surya 2011/08/18 15:24:40
    Yes
    Surya
  • La 2011/08/18 13:19:22
    Yes
    La
    +2
    This is one of the most clear-cut cases I've ever seen :/
  • Ebony Flo 2011/08/17 23:34:40
    Yes
    Ebony Flo
    +2
    And yet, I can say that if there is a blue jeans Friday it's not so bad. I demand a Shirtless Wednesday: All ripped, healthy or exercise-everyday Men must be at work without a shirt and only a tie and dress pants . . . so I can drool. I mean hey you get to drool over my legs so why not I over your pecs? ;)
  • ☆stillthe12c☆ 2011/08/16 23:04:15
    Yes
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +3
    This is totally wrong to do, I am not saying that this is some million dollar suit, but is worthy of some kind of some kind of compensation. And it should be mandatory from the person who committed the transgression. Unless the Company can be shown to be negligent in training the employee.
  • Christi... ☆stillt... 2011/09/16 02:17:54
    Christine Leo
    +1
    Negligent in training the employees? Well, that's any easy out! Some things are just common sense---NO EXCUSES.
  • ☆stillt... Christi... 2011/09/16 02:26:16 (edited)
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    Yes I agree, but Lawyers win cases all the time blaming the company for their lack of training. It is just like handling chips from a lathe or a mill. You have to instruct the employee that he is to use a brush and and dust pan and never their hands. I still have to tell a new person even when he has 30 years at the same job and I know that he has been told before and it is common sense. I would be liable if I did not do it and I leave the company exposed as well.
  • Mr. Bean 2011/08/16 14:37:14
    Yes
    Mr. Bean
    +3
    All though I have the same dress code for my wife.
  • mimi 2011/08/15 21:31:43
    Yes
    mimi
    +2
    Oh yes she should.
  • Genise 2011/08/15 17:49:18
    Yes
    Genise
    +2
    Has he lost his mind or what????
  • mavriqk 2011/08/15 13:55:26
    Yes
    mavriqk
    +1
    yes if ture. but i wouldnt put past the idea thats some of it could be BS either
    .
  • Locke 2011/08/15 13:05:30
    Yes
    Locke
    +2
    If its true...hard to believe though.
  • rph636 2011/08/15 06:00:55
    Yes
    rph636
    +3
    By all means she should receive damages and he should be fired if there is someone above him at that company. And if he is the top dog then the state should also go after him and his company.
  • Harry 2011/08/15 02:42:07
    Yes
    Harry
    +3
    How stupid, crass, and oblivious can this employer be? Where has he been for the last twenty years?
  • Raphael Braga 2011/08/15 01:02:31
    No
    Raphael Braga
    +1
    It is laughable. I just cant believe.
  • Gina 2011/08/14 15:16:58
    Yes
    Gina
    +2
    Her boss is the biggest jerk! What planet does he live on. The only explanation to his behavior is that he is a out and out pervert! Perverts don't care about their behaviors...they're sick. He most definitely needs to go...and she should receive damages. However...the question initially presented is not the same as the question here. I also do not think that women should dress in a 'sexy' fashion at work. Be professional...that is, unless you're looking for men to look at you as a sex object...and if you're out there trying to bed your boss or coworkers. In today's world...there are plenty of women out there like that...and they should be held responsible as well! Everyone should maintain professional behavior/dress in the workplace.
  • splodge 2011/08/14 10:02:44
    No
    splodge
    +1
    Yes...she could always quit her job if it all gets too much, and especially if the employee is too old to wear flashy skirts/accessaries; purely made and designed for young employees.
  • La splodge 2011/08/18 13:21:27
    La
    +4
    Why should she have to quit her job? Then he would go on treating his female employees like that. He should have to stop, so a law suit is appropriate.
  • Aardfay splodge 2011/08/29 22:17:26
    Aardfay
    +1
    So if your neighbour harasses you, you'll move to another city?
  • antlerg... Aardfay 2011/09/18 20:56:32
    antlergirl21
    +2
    Also, people are already having enough trouble getting jobs. Why should she quit her job and possibly struggle with her bills and whatnot when he's the one who did something wrong?
  • Aardfay antlerg... 2011/09/21 19:16:53
    Aardfay
    +1
    Yeah. She doesn't have to quit. It wouldn't solve the problem and she would be the one in trouble instead of the abuser.
  • disclaimer 2011/08/14 05:32:26
    Yes
    disclaimer
    +3
    That is the most disgusting thing I have ever heard. That bastard should be forced to resign and register as a sex offender, which would (hopefully) ruin him.

    For all those people saying she's not entitled to money, she's entitled to lost wages because she was fired for reporting him. Most if not all states have laws stating that it's illegal to fire someone for filing a work-related police report.
  • Diane 2011/08/14 04:03:24
    Yes
    Diane
    +1
    If he is threatening her or else....then yes she should get everything she is asking for and then some. That is sexual harrassment!
  • Arielle 2011/08/14 03:16:50
    No
    Arielle
    I meant yes how you Change it.?!
  • Diane Arielle 2011/08/14 04:04:26
    Diane
    +1
    you just did. LOL I hear you and we all see your answer. have a good night.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 28 Next » Last »

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/05/25 21:12:47

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals