Does your family care about your sexual orientation?
Willow
2012/08/08 19:09:52
|
|
|||||
|
20 votes
|
|
27% | |||
|
5 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
29 votes
|
|
39% | |||
|
20 votes
|
|
27% | |||
My family supports me no matter what.
Top Opinion
-
☠ Live Free Or Die ☠ 2012/08/08 20:48:04None of the above+5No one in my family knows, except for my mom. And she's okay with it. (I'm bi) What she has a problem with is that I'm a libertarian and an atheist. She'd rather I'd be an Episcopal and a Democrat. Ugh.




















My family will always support me, even though they don't always condone my actions. Basically, it's the same as when I chose the military over college. They didn't like it, but they also didn't abandon me for it.
My parents say they're supposedly fine with it, but once I tried to tell them and both of them freaked out. So I said it was a joke and they smiled and let out a sigh of relief.
So... I don't know, honestly.
nor·mal
[nawr-muhl]
adjective
1.
conforming to the standard or the common type; usual; not abnormal; regular; natural.
2.
serving to establish a standard.
By this definition, homosexuals aren't normal. A 10-12% difference in the population's habits/activities does not constitute a standard or common type. Does that make them bad? No!
Technically, there never was -and never will be- a standard or common type of people. Everyone has differences and quirks and flaws that keep them from reaching that title.
Heterosexuality is only usual because it was the only thing accepted and seen for YEARS. If homosexuality were as accepted and seen years ago as heterosexuality was, this whole thing wouldn't be an issue.
Love is natural.
It's not bad to be abnormal!
You said: "Heterosexuality is only usual because it was the only thing accepted and seen for YEARS."
I say: So??? (though I disagree, seeing as how homosexual tendencies have existed for thousands of years in cultures that had no taboos against it and it still has not become a usual or normal set of habits anywhere)
Giving an excuse or reason for why something is a dominant trait doesn't change the fact that it is normal.
Do you really want to be normal anyway??
Are you familiar with Silver Back Gorillas? They are much larger and stronger than the average or "normal" gorillas, and also unlike normal gorillas, they have a silver streak down their backs. If they were "normal", there would be no Silver Back gorillas, because nothing would set them apart!
I don't find heterosexuals to be normal for their sexuality; therefore, I can't find homosexuals to be abnormal for their sexuality.
Excuse me, but how can you disagree with historical facts?
Homosexuality was rejected, discriminated and insulted. Homosexuals for YEARS got sent to jail and killed for being such. Therefore, heterosexuality could be only, and is, only usual because it was the only thing accepted and seen for YEARS.
Although I do admit that by leaving "seen" alone it could've led to a misunderstanding. When I put "seen" I meant "seen as correct."
Technically, normality doesn't really exist. Why want to be something nonexistent?
Now I get what you are saying. It's more of a classification than a statistic to you. That I understand, and I think that most of our disagreement is semantic.
Basically, my understanding of normal is that of the dictionary definition where it is simply a mathematical statistic, where your understanding of the word normal applies a morality or correctness to the meaning.
For your sake I will change my statement to this " Homosexuality is not a dominant trait among humans."
Now THAT I agree to.
I'm sorry for the whole misunderstanding.
When your down to such a small family, little things like sexual orientation just... don't matter in the long run.