Quantcast

Does Cannabis Smoking 'Permanently Lower IQ'?

Heisenberg 2012/08/28 19:00:00
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Don't say we didn't warn you! New research has found that regular pot smokers, who started smoking in school, had lower IQ scores as adults.

TELEGRAPH.CO.UK reports:
Teenagers who regularly smoke cannabis are putting themselves at risk of permanently damaging their intelligence, according to a landmark study.
teenagers regularly smoke cannabis risk permanently damaging intelligence landmark study

Read More: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/94262...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Chris 2012/08/28 00:03:12 (edited)
    No
    Chris
    +70
    And cigarettes kill millions of people annually worldwide... yet that's legal.

    cigarettes death annual

    Fast food and non-organic food makes people obese, the 2nd largest killer, yet its all legal
    fat woman

    Alcohol causes thousands of deaths via violence, approx. 10,839 car wrecks annually in US alone, etc yet thats legal
    car wreck

    Oh wait... because cannabis, despite it not causing any of these problems... it'll just make you a little slow with excessive use... that should be illegal?
    car wrecks legal wait cannabis causing problems slow excessive illegal

    deaths marijuana

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Resp PeterB 2012/09/04 13:49:15
    Resp
    +1
    Is there a synapse I can download with my other apps?
  • Adam 2012/08/31 23:01:12
    No
    Adam
    +2
    First of, I said no, but that is NOT the real answer. There is simply no evidence to suggest that Pot use adversely affects intelligence in this study. In fact, the only reason I know that this study is supposed to be a criticism of smoking pot is because of the leading headline. If we are going, as a public, to look at these studies, we need to at least have the most basic ability to understand them.

    I would like you, for just a moment, to imagine a world where very intelligent and driven people who have the spotlight shown on them constantly are a bit hesitant about doing pot. I would also like you to imagine that people who are ALREADY dumb as a sack of hammers might be a little more likely to break the law, and get high instead of, say, studying. I mean, this would COMPLETELY explain this 8 point drop in intelligence, all without pot affecting your intelligence by one whit. In this scenario, you could be smart or dumb, and pot smoking doesn't have to change your intelligence in any way, in much the same way that the physical act of wearing a, "Harvard" sweatshirt doesn't make you smarter, even though the people who wear Harvard sweatshirts are, on the whole, fairly intelligent. Is this world similar to the reality in which we live? Yeah, I think the answer to that is a re...



    First of, I said no, but that is NOT the real answer. There is simply no evidence to suggest that Pot use adversely affects intelligence in this study. In fact, the only reason I know that this study is supposed to be a criticism of smoking pot is because of the leading headline. If we are going, as a public, to look at these studies, we need to at least have the most basic ability to understand them.

    I would like you, for just a moment, to imagine a world where very intelligent and driven people who have the spotlight shown on them constantly are a bit hesitant about doing pot. I would also like you to imagine that people who are ALREADY dumb as a sack of hammers might be a little more likely to break the law, and get high instead of, say, studying. I mean, this would COMPLETELY explain this 8 point drop in intelligence, all without pot affecting your intelligence by one whit. In this scenario, you could be smart or dumb, and pot smoking doesn't have to change your intelligence in any way, in much the same way that the physical act of wearing a, "Harvard" sweatshirt doesn't make you smarter, even though the people who wear Harvard sweatshirts are, on the whole, fairly intelligent. Is this world similar to the reality in which we live? Yeah, I think the answer to that is a resounding, "YES!". They have established a correlation, but the evidence for a causal link is laughable at best.

    And as a kicker, one might expect that if pot had no effect on intelligence, then once a person got older and more responsible and more capable of making informed choices, then if they started smoking, it would not indicate a lower intelligence. If pot actually made you dumber, then choosing to smoke pot later would make you less intelligence, albiet at a perhaps decreased intensity. And lo and behold, this study shows that older smokers aren't effected by this decrease in intelligence, providing a solid argument that the effect is not causal.

    To answer most responses to this post, 1) Pot could lower intelligence. I strongly suspect that it does not, but there is no evidence one way or another in this study. 2) I do not smoke pot, I did not smoke pot when I was younger, and I do not plan on ever smoking pot.
    (more)
  • readmylips 2012/08/31 22:48:16
    Yes
    readmylips
    Experts who have studied its effect have concluded there is a correlation of deminished brain useage when smoking cannabis. Who is to say this is not detrimental in the long run.
  • Chris readmylips 2012/09/01 03:50:30
    Chris
    +1
    Not sure how detrimental 5 or 6 IQ points is. I think it's best to just keep cannabis away from kids, the best way to do that is to regulate it like alcohol, then you require an ID to buy it.
  • Maratho... readmylips 2012/09/14 06:51:59 (edited)
  • Dan 2012/08/31 22:05:11
    No
    Dan
    Temporarily probably but not when a person is clear headed.
  • Kozmo 2012/08/31 21:30:10
    No
    Kozmo
    +1
    The is Reefer Madness hysterical hype. The dude on "Super High Me" did a heck of a lot better than the one in "Super Size Me". Is there something in your water supply?
    Of course, keep those too IMMATURE from using ANY mind-modifier, be it chocolate to heroin.
  • Chris Kozmo 2012/08/31 21:55:20 (edited)
    Chris
    +1
    What irritates me is the article has the nerve to have this sentence with no rebuttal,

    " there was growing concern in the US that cannabis was increasingly being seen as a safe alternative to tobacco"

    Are they fu##ing kidding?

    You'll never have this problem from using cannabis, but you might from tobacco.
  • Kozmo Chris 2012/09/01 02:15:42 (edited)
    Kozmo
    +2
    I've quit tobacco 15 years ago, within a year of my Mother's passing from lung cancer (@ age 56). I've been on medical cannabis for about 5 years now & most folks who are familiar with Me say I'm better on it than going without it (did this Spring, not good).

    Tobacco works by stimulating DOPAMINE (Freud's Pleasure Center), what most Psych ("Tranquilizers") Drugs target, hence why 70 % of 'patient' smoke, to counter the prescribed Meds. SSRI (Anti·Depressants) target another neurotransmitter, serotonin, with similar unpredictable results (Columbine e.g.). Cannabis modulates its own particular analogue[s] (cannabinoids, 400+ known) within the brain which has been little-studied at present.

    The Inflamed Sigmoid Colon (likely spastic) who excreted this question is totally inept, Tobacco & Cannabis are absolutely different (self-administered) substances.
    Apples & Bananas.

    Who are you gonna Believe?? Mother Nature (on this planet 3.88 X 10^9 years), cf. Humanity (3.5 x 10^4 years)? There's a good 5 DECIMAL PLACES difference between the two, where'd you place your Faith/Trust?
  • Chris Kozmo 2012/09/01 04:57:10
    Chris
    +2
    Good to hear you quit. I quit smoking cigarettes about 3 years ago after smoking for about 15 years, just using cannabis for a week is how I quit, it really helped eliminate my cravings for tobacco. I tried everything, the gum, patches, etc... nothing worked but cannabis. It is fantastic for many uses.
  • Kozmo Chris 2012/09/02 07:08:22
    Kozmo
    Have a Medical license for arthritis & IBS, also has a mood-stabilizing effect, only need to toke one day (vary from two per to one per two) a week for effect. Did try to abstain for a season last but freaked out & got warded for a weekend. Soon as I was out, resumed (on Lent?) and within a month, family, friends, priests & quacks agreed I was much better than without.
  • nbarton2 2012/08/31 18:32:28
    Yes
    nbarton2
    +2
    most people start smoking weed in their teens and that damages them and their developing brain, proven fact by the Society of Neuroscience, while it may not impact older users not many people start using in their mid 20's
  • Chris nbarton2 2012/08/31 20:47:46
    Chris
    +2
    Right so we should not encourage children to smoke cannabis.
  • nbarton2 Chris 2012/08/31 21:09:00
    nbarton2
    Right we should encourage no one to smoke weed as is the law because studies already prove that telling kids no doesn't work.
  • Chris nbarton2 2012/08/31 21:25:04
    Chris
    +2
    Right so we should actually regulate cannabis like alcohol, because then it would make it more difficult for children to get cannabis because they would require a picture ID, something a drug dealer doesn't require.

    Right now according to a study minors can get herb easier than a beer.


    Study Says It’s Easier For Teens To Buy Marijuana Than Beer
    by Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director
    August 28, 2009
    It’s that time of year — time for one of America’s leading prohibitionist organizations, the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University (aka CASA), to once again report that seven-plus decades of criminal pot prohibition have resulted in making cannabis more readily available to teens than alcohol!

    Read more:
    http://blog.norml.org/2009/08...
  • nbarton2 Chris 2012/09/01 00:19:11
    nbarton2
    It would still be just as easy because it would just as easy to grow and sell that argument is null
  • Chris nbarton2 2012/09/01 00:28:57
    Chris
    +1
    How would it be just as easy if you require a photo ID vs. not requiring one with a drug dealer? And any adult who supplies it could face criminal charges for distribution to minors. I'm not following your logic.
  • nbarton2 Chris 2012/09/01 01:02:42
    nbarton2
    They face criminal charges now for dealing drugs and it doesn't prevent them from dealing how does legalizing it make that change anything.
  • Chris nbarton2 2012/09/01 01:06:47
    Chris
    +1
    It would be regulated requiring a photo ID to buy it, drug dealers don't require a photo ID. When you create more obstacles it makes it more difficult to obtain something.
  • nbarton2 Chris 2012/09/01 01:25:49
    nbarton2
    Are you high now?
  • Chris nbarton2 2012/09/01 02:39:36 (edited)
    Chris
    +1
    Are you drunk? Which is totally immaterial to the topic.
  • Maratho... nbarton2 2012/09/01 05:00:33
    Marathonracer
    This is precisely what I meant, you moron. You're only displaying your own ignorance and proving my point which I just posted, by asking Chris such a stupid, irrelevant, biased, and insulting question, If that's all you've got, to back up your seriously flawed argument, then you've already proved we're right.
  • nbarton2 Maratho... 2012/09/01 05:05:29
    nbarton2
    Troll right?
  • Maratho... nbarton2 2012/09/01 05:30:14 (edited)
    Marathonracer
    Thanks for backing up what I said about you. Just one thing, I never comment to people who think like you because I think it's going to be an intelligent discussion or that I in any way am delusional enough to think that I could teach you anything at all. No, I answer people like you sometimes when I think it's important for OTHER PEOPLE to learn the real facts and to call you out for them to see what an idiot you really are. You just did exactly that, but you're obviously too stupid to understand that. By the way, I do have a scientific background, and, unlike you, I do know what I'm talking about.

    Oh, yes, just one more thing. That American flag in your photo. It's obviously there to show the world that you're a true American. Educated people who really understand what this country and our Constitution really stands for, don't need the flag to prove it. It's a sure sign where you're coming from politically and how you think.
  • nbarton2 Maratho... 2012/09/01 05:48:36
    nbarton2
    No you believe that you could teach people that you know more than you actually do, you have an agenda to prove to people that you are smart but truthfully smart people do not need to do that at all. Your need to come to the aid and defense of others is proof of my point, I did not seek you out to comment on, you sought me out.

    My points are factual, valid and based more in truth than your thuggish and trollish behavior disguised in intellectualism. Having served America and the People of this Country for 12 years in the United States Army until being disabled, so please do not try to disparage me or my though process because you are intellectually stunted. That photo is Abraham Lincoln a great American President of our Country.

    Most people here will not learn anything from someone who chooses to be arrogant and ignorant and l sure do not care to interact with someone who has not answered any questions but has only chosen to troll on a page about marijuana.
  • Just.ca... nbarton2 2012/09/02 01:47:19
    Just.call.me.Lucifer
    +3
    A great American President of your country?? Really? I though Lincoln was a great AMERICAN president of Zimbabwe.
    haha sorry, but that was funny.

    Anyway..
    Your opinions are very illogical. Lets talk about your argument with Chris. First of all, making some drug legal will most certainly make it harder to obtain without ID. Think about it. If the Government of ,lets say, US takes control over weed then the worlds biggest cannabis manufacturing facilities will ship all their products to the us government, because politicians have most money. Drug lords would perish very soon, or they'll start selling other illegal drugs because they simply wouldn't get enough money from selling weed.
    Then, in order to buy weed you would need to be at least 18 (or 21 in some countries) like with alcohol, thus IDs would be required. Also, doing something legally isn't as fun as doing it illegally so even though there would probably be more smokers, people would probably smoke less overall. Everyone would be happy (except the drug lords). There would be no drug wars and in that aspect the world would definitely be a better place.
  • Geenie ... nbarton2 2012/09/01 02:29:46
    Geenie Nabottle
    +1
    How many hustlers are out there on corners slinging cigarettes and alcohol to kids?

    None.

    You knw why? Because these items are legal and regulated. What benefit is there to a drug dealer to sell weed if people can go to a store instead to purchase their product?
  • nbarton2 Geenie ... 2012/09/01 04:38:56
    nbarton2
    No it isn't immaterial to the subject because you aren't thinking clearly, do kids still smoke cigarettes and drink? yes (Rhetorical question) but After the legalization of the marijuana it will make it all the much easier to obtain the drug (not less difficult) ...for both legal age users and the underage users...as there will be all the more marijuana available to be consumed by anyone and everyone. Just like alcohol and cigarettes.
  • Geenie ... nbarton2 2012/09/01 06:12:48
    Geenie Nabottle
    It is easier for a kid to get marijuana than it is for them to get cigarettes and alcohol currently. Most kids get the alcohol & cigarettes they consume from their parents or adults living in their home environment. These are statistical realities.

    That is not a failure in the system designed to regulate and prevent kids from obtaining cigarettes & alcohol. It is a failure in parenting. The system is working as designed.

    Why would you expect the situation would be any different if marijuana were legalized and regulated in the same manner as alcohol & tobacco products?
  • Drug Free Chris 2012/09/01 04:53:44
    Drug Free
    He is pointing out that when it comes to the supply and consumption of cannabis the future laws and regulations and rules will still be broken by the drug suppliers and drug consumers.

    You said: "And any adult who supplies it could face criminal charges for distribution to minors."

    Exactly, as there within lies the "conundrum."
    Any rules or laws or regulations have been repeatedly violated and or ignored by the suppliers and consumers of marijuana for the last 60 years while the quantities have steadily increased as the laws are more or less meaningless to the drug suppliers and drug consumers.
    The laws have meaning...but the drug suppliers and drug consumers believe them to be meaningless to their purpose and self serving drug induced, drug consuming agenda

    "Any adult who does supply it to minors and facing criminal charges for distribution to minors will be feigning innocence while trying to absolve themselves of any culpability and or wrong doing supplying "harmless" marijuana to minors! The future law breaking supplier and the law breaking minor consumers will be no different than now while using the same repeatitive arguments that are used to argue on behalf of the drug and its consumption at present.
    There will still be plenty of people arguing that the minors a...


    He is pointing out that when it comes to the supply and consumption of cannabis the future laws and regulations and rules will still be broken by the drug suppliers and drug consumers.

    You said: "And any adult who supplies it could face criminal charges for distribution to minors."

    Exactly, as there within lies the "conundrum."
    Any rules or laws or regulations have been repeatedly violated and or ignored by the suppliers and consumers of marijuana for the last 60 years while the quantities have steadily increased as the laws are more or less meaningless to the drug suppliers and drug consumers.
    The laws have meaning...but the drug suppliers and drug consumers believe them to be meaningless to their purpose and self serving drug induced, drug consuming agenda

    "Any adult who does supply it to minors and facing criminal charges for distribution to minors will be feigning innocence while trying to absolve themselves of any culpability and or wrong doing supplying "harmless" marijuana to minors! The future law breaking supplier and the law breaking minor consumers will be no different than now while using the same repeatitive arguments that are used to argue on behalf of the drug and its consumption at present.
    There will still be plenty of people arguing that the minors and or the suppliers to minors should not have to face any legal penalties for supply and or consumption of the said to be and adamantly argued "harmless" intoxicant known as cannabis

    That aspect and the mentality of the drug users and drug suppliers will never change.
    The laws will still be broken and some people will still be held accountable and those being held accountable will always argue that the laws or rules or regulations are "stupid" and "meaningless" or "not effective at all" and should be abolsihed or changed in favour of their drug consuming mentality and drug supplying agendas and drug consumption practices.
    (more)
  • Chris Drug Free 2012/09/01 05:02:30
    Chris
    Well, it creates an additional barrier to help protect children. Right now a drug dealer doesn't make you show an ID, however a shop that could lose their business license selling to minors would be more careful to only sell to adults.

    So at least there would be a new barrier to keep it from kids... also the herb would be clean, right now a kid could get black market cannabis laced with Anthrax... who knows what they are smoking. On a legal market, even if by chance they got access to it, at least we know it's clean, pure, organic cannabis and nothing else that could kill them.
  • Drug Free Chris 2012/09/01 07:33:29
    Drug Free
    Agreed as to some aspects of what you say..and dont get the wrong impression about what I have to say about the POTHEADS of the world and their consumption practices relative to their particular beloved intoxicant known as cannabis...as I like to discuss what will "actually evolve" verses what people believe or hope will evolve concerning the various ramifications that will occur when marijuana is fully legalised for supply and consumption.
    I am certain much of what evolves will not really be like the POT HEADS tell us and or assure us..other than they can legally consume their non essential, recreational intoxicant of choice while being mindfull that they are politley requested to conduct themselves within the parameters of the regulations and laws pertaining to the "mindfull" drug consuming "social decorum" to be practised.
  • Maratho... nbarton2 2012/09/01 04:51:41 (edited)
    Marathonracer
    No, your argument is "null". When you start with false premises, as you do, that everything for you has been "proven"when it certainly has not, then any conclusion resulting that false premise must be logically wrong. You and the damn government want to legislate morality here and prohibition, prostitution laws, gambling laws ALL prove that can't be done. It is none of your goddamn business who smokes pot. Young people with developing brains need to be EDUCATED about the risks of REGULAR, FREQUENT use and NO STUDY UNDER THE SUN HAS PROVEN THAT OCCASIONAL USE, EVEN FOR ADOLESCENTS, IS HARMFUL.

    Holier than thou people like you will never accept that because of you inherent flawed biases. You do not outlaw sex for 18 year olds because of the risk of getting syphilis. You EDUCATE people. Alcohol is a completely different story and needs to be age regulated because even 1 serious abuse can and does kill people on the highways. That does NOT happen with pot.

    Why don't you stop shooting off your mouth and learn some more actual facts first before you offer an opinion, since you don't obviously don't have a clue about any of this.
  • nbarton2 Maratho... 2012/09/01 05:04:49
    nbarton2
    I like how you say that nothing bad happens with pot, because no one has ever had unprotected sex while high? or done anything illegal while being high on marijuana? because that argument is stale.

    Why the need to push an agenda on the population of the public is it so you can justify your habit? I have no problem with you getting high it doesn't affect me one iota, but when someone makes a stupid comment that making it legal would make it harder for someone underage to get it is asinine. The facts do not add up.

    Since you think you have all the answers I can't be bothered with you.
  • Maratho... nbarton2 2012/09/01 05:42:19 (edited)
    Marathonracer
    Again, every thing you just said is incorrect and everyone is seeing that, but apparently you enjoy embarrassing yourself by publicly displaying your own ignorance. I could refute every single one of your statements in great detail but it would be a complete waste of time. And if you read what I just commented to you, you will know that I can't be bothered with YOU. But this is always the famous last word from ignorant, unintelligent people. after misquoting me and displaying a complete misstating and misunderstanding of the facts....."I can't be bothered with you"
  • watusiw... Maratho... 2012/09/01 17:35:57
    watusiwaldo
    geeze you're boring....get a life. I repeat, you are one weird dude.
  • Maratho... watusiw... 2012/09/04 03:10:51 (edited)
    Marathonracer
    That's it? That's all you've got big shot - that you think I'm boring??? And boring equates with being weird? That apparently is your favorite retort to try to demean someone - calling them "weird" for absolutely no explained reason except, in this case I'm "boring". That's really funny.You're quite obviously not open to new ideas, so, of course you would find me boring, but we both know why you jumped in here with these cute remarks, don't we?
    But thanks for the compliment! If I were really boring to you I wouldn't have attracted your attention enough to tell me that. . you keep referring to me as "one weird dude" - again, that's certainly not the way you describe someone whom you find boring. Maybe you need to take your own advice and get a life instead of answering boring, weird people, dude! I'm going out for 12 mile run, so I won't "bore" you anymore LOL!!!
    By the way, I just noticed your other brilliant comment to Drug Free about me. You're obviously so damn stupid that you don't even realize he's against cannabis!!!! His nickname didn't give you a clue??? He's also incredibly pretentious, ignorant and stupid and can't even put words together correctly, nor can he spell. You proved yourself to be as stupid as he is, because you told him "if he doesn't want to smoke pot, f...
    That's it? That's all you've got big shot - that you think I'm boring??? And boring equates with being weird? That apparently is your favorite retort to try to demean someone - calling them "weird" for absolutely no explained reason except, in this case I'm "boring". That's really funny.You're quite obviously not open to new ideas, so, of course you would find me boring, but we both know why you jumped in here with these cute remarks, don't we?
    But thanks for the compliment! If I were really boring to you I wouldn't have attracted your attention enough to tell me that. . you keep referring to me as "one weird dude" - again, that's certainly not the way you describe someone whom you find boring. Maybe you need to take your own advice and get a life instead of answering boring, weird people, dude! I'm going out for 12 mile run, so I won't "bore" you anymore LOL!!!
    By the way, I just noticed your other brilliant comment to Drug Free about me. You're obviously so damn stupid that you don't even realize he's against cannabis!!!! His nickname didn't give you a clue??? He's also incredibly pretentious, ignorant and stupid and can't even put words together correctly, nor can he spell. You proved yourself to be as stupid as he is, because you told him "if he doesn't want to smoke pot, far be it from me to convince him otherwise." ??? Do you realize who you're saying that too???Hahahaa!!! How the hell do you know I don't smoke, jerk??!! I'm defending the legalization of cannabis, and defend it's use and you say something that stupid?!? You're really a blithering idiot!!! I don't know how the hell you ever made it through college to become an accountant, but apparently all you know how to do is count, you schmuck!!!
    (more)
  • Drug Free Chris 2012/09/01 04:17:57 (edited)
    Drug Free
    I am not prohibisionist at all...I want to see the drug ( intoxicant ) legalised....but I do not support or argue on behalf of the drug and the drug users....or make any excuses for their indiscreations.
    When Marijauna is legalised the under age users will still obtain their marijuana illegally....you can be assured of that.
    It should be obvious to everyone that the rules or regulations and or laws mean nothing to the drug consumers as we have witnessed the drug consumers ignore and or challenge the laws for the last 60 years.
    When the rules and regulations and the laws that enforce those rules and regulatons are finally in place I have no illusions at all about the drug users, over all, continually challenging and or breaking and or ignoring those regulations. They wil continually be fighting the laws that hold them responsible for any and all of their violations of the rules and regulations and or laws pertaining to the supply of marijuana and or the consumption of marijuana.

    Tell Us Chris...where to you think all the many, many under age users will continue to get their marijuana from.??

    "I know" where they will be obtaining their illegal marijauna from....but I would like to hear "your version" of just how the many millions of North American youth ( under 19 ) will ...





















    I am not prohibisionist at all...I want to see the drug ( intoxicant ) legalised....but I do not support or argue on behalf of the drug and the drug users....or make any excuses for their indiscreations.
    When Marijauna is legalised the under age users will still obtain their marijuana illegally....you can be assured of that.
    It should be obvious to everyone that the rules or regulations and or laws mean nothing to the drug consumers as we have witnessed the drug consumers ignore and or challenge the laws for the last 60 years.
    When the rules and regulations and the laws that enforce those rules and regulatons are finally in place I have no illusions at all about the drug users, over all, continually challenging and or breaking and or ignoring those regulations. They wil continually be fighting the laws that hold them responsible for any and all of their violations of the rules and regulations and or laws pertaining to the supply of marijuana and or the consumption of marijuana.

    Tell Us Chris...where to you think all the many, many under age users will continue to get their marijuana from.??

    "I know" where they will be obtaining their illegal marijauna from....but I would like to hear "your version" of just how the many millions of North American youth ( under 19 ) will "continue" to obtain their marijuana???

    You do realise that although alcohol is legal for those of legal age their still exists a notable percent of the alcohol consumption by way of the many, many underage drinkers..who obtain their alcohol illegally....by any number of means.
    You do realise that those that bootleg the alcohol to the youth and or the youth that consumes the alcohol can and often enough are held accountable by law!
    There are several forms of penalties for those that are caught boot legging alcohol to minors and or the minors caught consuming the alcohol.
    The majority of citizens agree that bootleggers and bootlegging and those that are underage should be held accountable.

    The question is: In the future legal marijuana consumption world should the underage consumers and or the suppliers to the under age consumers be held accountable ...and to what degree if and when they are caught violating the laws of legal consumpton and supply...especially if they are multiple repeat offenders.

    Will you and many others support the law breakers and argue on their behalf when the law breakers are caught breaking the laws or ignoring the rules and regulations that are enforced by the laws???...based on the old arguments that marijuana is harmless and people should be able to consume the drug and do what they want to do anyhow concerning recreational drug consumption and the resultant intoxication.

    I surmise that when cannabis users are being "held accountable" for violating the "legal" rules and regulations and laws they will still be arguing the same or similar "pro use" arguments on behalf of themselves and or the supply and consumption aspects.
    In effect they will still be wanting any and all restrictions concerning consumption and supply to be removed so they are free of any liabilities or accountablity.

    When they are being held accountable for their legal indiscretions will you and the others be rallying to their cause saying: "The existing laws and rules and regulations are the problem while the people being held accountable are innocent victims of government control and other people and out of control entities trying to tell people what they can or can not do."??? ...based on a drug consuming, intoxicated mentality??

    For those that are caught out and being held accountable will that platform "still" be the rallying platform for arguing on behalf of those that "are caught" breaking the rules and regulations and laws of "legal" marijuana consumption and supply???

    After the legalisation, legalisation of the intoxicant known as cannabis will make it all the easier to obtain the drug (not less difficult) ...for both legal age users and the underage users...as there will be all the more marijuana available to be consumed by anyone and everyone.

    There will still be plenty of law breaking going on ...but the drug consuming law breakers will still be trying hard to "absolve" themeslves of any wrong doing while trying to avoid being held accountable...as do all law breakers when they are caught breaking the laws.

    It seems that the pro marijuana advocates are not really concerned about the negatives aspects or ramifications of consumption of the intoxicant rather they are focused on liberalising the supply and consumption of the intoxicant while removing any restrictions to the supply and consumption.
    (more)
  • Chris Drug Free 2012/09/01 04:21:56
    Chris
    I'm not reading all that, make your comments more pithy.
  • nbarton2 Chris 2012/09/01 04:33:56
    nbarton2
    thus my comment are you stoned?

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Living

2013/05/23 07:32:00

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals